Reformed: A Definition
A reader posed the question this morning of what it means to be a Reformed Christian. His (or her) question made me realize that though I am Reformed in theology and have been for many years, I do not have a definition of Reformed to answer the question. So I thought today I would post a definition of what it means to be Reformed.
First, it is important to note that because the Reformed tradition arose from the Protestant Reformation, the term “Reformed” is usually defined in comparison to something else. By affirming Reformed theology you are implicitly denying other theologies, such as Catholic theology (which Reformed theology rose in opposition to) and Arminian theology (which later rose in opposition to Reformed theology). I doubt any sentence in the history of the English language has used the word “theology” as much as my previous sentence. My English professors must be shedding a tear on my behalf.
Let’s start with some definitions. Christendom refers to all religions that are based at least partially on the teachings of Jesus Christ and the Bible. Christendom is separated into four main divisions: Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Protestant and Cults. Protestantism is generally divided into two camps: Arminian and Reformed. The vast majority of Protestants hold to Arminian doctrine. We will concern ourselves today with minority who consider themselves Reformed.
A good starting place for any research these days is the Web and a quick search for “reformed” turned up the following definitions that pertain to theology:
- A term used to refer to a tradition of theology which draws inspiration from the writings of John Calvin (1510-64) and his successors (see pp. 68-72). The term is generally used in preference to “Calvinist.”
- Referring to the Reformation, it’s theology, and/or those subscribing to it. Also used to differentiate a,) Calvinism from Lutheranism, or b.) Continental European Calvinism from Scottish Calvinism, aka Presbyterianism.
Those are both concise definitions but ones that do not capture the full sense of the word.
A far better and more complete definition is found at Five Solas. There Professor Byron Curtis, a professor at Geneva College breaks the definition into four parts. To be Reformed is:
- To confess the consensus of the five first centuries of the church:
- Classic theism: One omnipotent, benevolent God, distinct from creation.
- Nicene and Chalcedonian Trinitarianism: one God in three eternally existent persons, equal in power and glory.
- Christ, the God-Man, the one mediator between God & the human race, incarnate, crucified, resurrected, ascended, & coming again.
- Humanity created in the image of God, yet tragically fallen & profoundly in need of restoration to God through Christ.
- The Visible Church: the community of the redeemed, indwelt y the Holy Spirit; the mystical body of Christ on earth.
- The one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
- The Sacraments: visible signs and seals of the grace of God, ministering Christ’s love to us in our deep need.
- The Christian life: characterized by the prime theological virtues of faith, hope, and love.
It would be correct to say that this is a statement of the Protestant faith more than it is a statement of the Reformed faith. From this list we see that Reformed Christians adhere to all the foundational beliefs taught in the Bible. These beliefs were the foundation of the early church and are based on the teachings of the Bible as interpreted by the apostles and early church fathers. Many of these beliefs were changed or lost as the Catholic Church grew in power and authority from the fifth century onwards. Throughout history there were pockets of non-Catholic believers who held to many or all of these points of doctrine, but they were largely lost until the time of the Reformation.
- To confess the four solas:
- The authority of Scripture: sola scriptura (Scripture alone)
- the basis of salvation: Sola Gratia (Grace alone)
- the means of salvation: Sola Fide (Faith alone)
- the merit of salvation: Solus Christus (Christ alone)
Again, these form the basis for Protestantism as much as they do for the Reformed tradition. These are the principles that drove the Protestant Reformation of the 16th century and separated it from the Roman Catholic Church. These four points of doctrine are based entirely on the Bible and were the theological driving force behind the newly formed Protestant movement.
- To confess the distinctives of the Reformed faith:
- In salvation: monergism not synergism. God alone saves. Such monergism implies T.U.L.I.P., the Five Points of Calvinism from the Synod of Dordt:
T = Total Depravity U = Unconditional Election L = Limited Atonement, or, better, Particular Redemption I = Irresistible Grace P = Perseverence and Preservation of the Saints
These five distinct points of doctrine are also known as the five points of Calvinism as they were first articulated by John Calvin after the Reformation was in full-swing. They are based entirely on the Bible. When people speak of being Reformed these five points of doctrine are most often what they are referring to. Most evangelical (non-Reformed) churches do not hold to all of these points. Some hold to two or three (and occasionally even four), but most reject them in favor of Arminian theology. For a more in-depth look at what constitutes Reformed vs Arminian theology, see my four part article which begins here.
- In salvation: monergism not synergism. God alone saves. Such monergism implies T.U.L.I.P., the Five Points of Calvinism from the Synod of Dordt:
- Other Reformed Distinctives:
Professor Curtis goes on to list other points of doctrine he believes are Reformed distinctives. They include: The Regulative Principle of Worship (which I have written about here), Covenant theology (The Church is the New Israel - this generally means infants are baptized rather than believers) and Life is religion (Christians have neither jobs nor careers; they have vocations (callings)). I would not consider adherence to these principles necessary to consider oneself Reformed and I suspect the majority of Reformed Christians would agree with me.
- Finally: in everything, Soli Deo Gloria - to God alone be the glory in all things.
This is, once more, something all Christians would claim, either explicitly or implicitly. In all areas of life we are to give glory to God.
So what does this all mean? To be Reformed is to adhere to the purist teachings of the Bible - to affirm the doctrine taught by Jesus, Paul and the apostles. Scripture is considered the ultimate authority in matters of life and faith and all Reformed doctrine is founded on the Bible. I am convinced that Reformed doctrine is nothing more than Biblical Christianity. Were it not for human sin we would have to make no distinction between them.
If you are interested in learning more about the Reformed tradition, I would suggest the following resources:
- Christian Handbook by Peter Jeffery - an excellent little book I reviewed here that introduces Christian beliefs from a Reformed perspective.
- Desiring God by John Piper - not for the faint-of-heart but does a great job of explaining Reformed principles.
- The books, sermons, articles and Web sites of the following teachers: John MacArthur, R.C. Sproul, John Piper, James White. There are so many more I could list but I will keep the list brief.
If you have other Reformed resources you would like to suggest, please feel free to do so in the comments section of this site.




Comments (11) »
1. Randy Brandt
April 22, 2004
1:53 PM
Covenant theology (The Church is the New Israel - this generally means infants are baptized rather than believers
Interestingly enough, almost all of the Reformed people I know personally are not paedobaptists. Those who are paedobaptists tend to be of the somewhat dead Presbyterian camp with little interest in discussing theology.
I liked “feint-of-heart” as a phrase, but I think you meant “faint-of-heart.” :-)
For the Readers’ Digest condensed version of “Desiring God,” get the Jabez-sized “Dangerous Duty of Delight” by Piper.
2. Tim
April 22, 2004
2:07 PM
Faint! Yes, that is what I meant. :)
3. dawn
April 22, 2004
2:50 PM
“Dead” Presbyterians who have little interest in discussing theology? The vast majority of bloggers I link to are Presbyterians who discuss a lot of theology. I think you may be looking in the wrong denominations. The OPC and sectors of the PCA are growing and doctrine-discussing denominations. And we baptize babies :)
4. Tim
April 22, 2004
2:55 PM
I certainly have to agree with Dawn. I know many vibrant, growing, multiplying Presbyterian congregations. Overall I would say the PCA and OPC are probably two of the healthiest denominations you would be able to find.
5. Jeri
April 22, 2004
6:12 PM
I will always be very grateful for David R. Wells’ “No Place for Truth, or Whatever Happened to Evangelical Theology”. It’s not that easy a read, being written by a professor of theology, but life-changing in its implications.
6. matt h.
April 22, 2004
7:02 PM
While a hardline Covenantal hermeneutic may not be a prerequisite for defining “Reformed theology”, I am not sure you can be terribly Reformed and be a dispensationalist. I know many try (ie. “progressive dispen.”), but at the core, the Reformed tradition sees a unanimity and continuity in God’s sovereign saving purposes of the elect.
7. David
April 22, 2004
11:26 PM
Tim, This is one of the best short summaries of Reformed theology I have seen. You hit all the high points in a concise manner. Thanks for pointing out that Reformed theology is about more than the TULIP. As you can imagine, with me being a PCA pastor I also take exception to the “dead presbyterians” line and I appreciate the good word. My only addition would be to say that the implications of covenant theology go much further than infant baptism. It deals with your view of redemptive history, and it impacts your eschatology and hermeneutics.
Great post. God bless, David
8. John
April 23, 2004
7:56 AM
As someone relatively new to the Reformed perspective (I started attending a PCA about a year ago), I found this a helpful description. I just finished reading Desiring God, by the way, and I’d recommend it to anyone!
9. Messy Christian
April 23, 2004
12:46 PM
Coming from an Assemblies of God background, this is all very new to me. It took me quite a while to understand it all, and I’m really grateful that you took the time to explain it.
Oh dear, but another question - what is Arminian doctrine?
10. Tim
April 23, 2004
1:12 PM
Messy - By way of answer I will link you to the articles I wrote about this topic. The first of them is here. There are four more following that one…
11. Leah
August 27, 2004
3:54 PM
Interesting blog! But I need to disagree with your use of the word “Christendom,” since a more historically accurate definition of Christendom would describe it as the Church (worldwide ecumenical or any ecclesiastical expression) that acted in an imperial, acquisitive and colonizing way rather than in an evangelical, gospeled, Christocentric one. I hope the days of Christendom are over and done with! Anyway, blog on! I’ll be back.
Post Your Comment Here »