"The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment is a truly important work-one that should be required reading not only for church leaders, but for all sober-minded laypeople as well."

John MacArthur (From the Foreword)

"If you were more discerning you’d probably buy this book. If you do read this book, you will be! This book on discernment is simple, clear, well-written and well-illustrated...

Mark Dever

Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the book, about the blog or about the author.

07/02/06
Comments (13)

Book Review - On Being Presbyterian

1596380195.jpgDespite being Baptist, I love and admire Presbyterianism. My parents are Presbyterians and raised me in that environment. Though I may not necessarily believe in them, I am at least sympathetic to many of the tenets of Presbyterianism, such as covenant theology, infant baptism and the Presbyterian system of church government. It was with some interest, then, that I began to read On Being Presbyterian by Sean Michael Lucas. This book, recently published by P&R Publishing, is intended to serve as a primer on all things Presbyterian. Lucas wants to show “how a particular type of identity is formed, as the confluence of beliefs, practices and stories.” He seeks to introduce the beliefs, practices and stories that have converged to create Presbyterianism as it exists today.

These three divisions form the structure for the book. In the section dealing with beliefs, Lucas looks at God’s sovereignty, the priority of grace, covenant and kingdom, the nature and purpose of the church and the signs and seals of God’s grace. When dealing with practices, he examines piety, worship and church government. The final section looks at the genesis of Presbyterianism through the leadership of Calvin and Knox, and then turns to an examination of Presbyterianism in America. The book wraps up with an epilogue entitled “On Becoming Presbyterian” where he suggests what would be expected of a person who wished to adopt this system of beliefs and how a person might set about finding such a church body.

This book often recalled memories from my youth, many of which were very good memories. It helped me realize that in many ways I continue to be Presbyterian at heart, for it was necessity rather than desire that drove us out of these churches (there are far more solid Baptist churches in Canada than Presbyterian ones). While I do love Baptist churches, there is a part of me that will probably always be Presbyterian.

Ultimately, as a Baptist, I suppose that my view of this book only counts for so much. Eventually we’ll need to ask other Presbyterians for their views on the book. They are, after all, more qualified to pass judgment on it. So let’s look at some of the men who have endorsed this book. Ligon Duncan endorsed it saying it is a “popular introduction to Presbyterianism that I can put in the hands of Bible-believing, gospel-loved Presbyterians and other evangelicals interested in this part of the Christian family.” Bryan Chapell, President of Covenant Seminary, says “The people who fill Bible-believing Presbyterian churches increasingly have little Presbyterian background. Lucas provides a terrific resource to get everyone up speed.” John Muether of Reformed Theological Seminary says it is “A compelling and coherent account of the distinctive features of Presbyterian identity that draws the vital connection between Reformed faith and practice. Pastors, elders, and Presbyterian laypeople will want to study this book and pass it on to their children.”

I enjoyed On Being Presbyterian and would recommend it either to those who are interested in learning about the distinctives of Presbyterianism, or those who are Presbyterian and would like to learn and understand more about their beliefs, practices and history. It is well-written and quite easy to understand and absorb.

Book Review - On Being Presbyterian

Comments (13) »


1. The Aspiring Theologian
July 2, 2006
3:09 PM

I saw this book on the Reformation Theology Blog. Looks like very good read. I am Presbyterian, have been for awhile… I understand the majority of what we believe, therefore, but it is always good to step back and look at it again every now and then.

If Ligon Duncan endorses the book, I’m sure that it is a great work on Presbyterianism.


God bless,

A. Shepherd
The Aspiring Theologian

Knight of the Living God: Reformed Theology & Apologetics


2. Andrew Cairns
July 2, 2006
6:18 PM

Hi Tim,

Believe it or not, I too have a Presbyterian upbringing. Despite many years in a Pentecostal/Charismatic denomination, we’re now worshipping in a “Pressy” church in our new city and thoroughly enjoying the experience.

You may recall our earlier ‘conversations’ on the merits of Calvinism … interesting that, like you, something within me was drawing me back to the blessing of those formative years.

I do hope many people will gain a deeper insight and understanding through reading this book (I’m off to find a copy myself).


3. Tim H.
July 2, 2006
6:51 PM

Thanks. I’m a presby myself, so I’m going to check it out.


4. Diane R
July 2, 2006
7:59 PM

Here in America there are two types of Presbyterian churches - the PCA type and the PCUSA more liberal type although many PCUSA’s are desparatey trying to keep their evangelical focus. I am curious as to whether this book talks about both?


5. Dave Theobald
July 2, 2006
8:40 PM

Tim,

I thought his discussion/defense of paedobaptism was about the weakest I have ever seen. What do you think?


6. Denny Burk
July 2, 2006
9:51 PM

Well, one thing is for sure. Presbyterians (at least the ones on the cover of the book) are a handsome bunch. That ought to count for something! :)


7. Alan Davey
July 3, 2006
4:22 AM

I’m almost the opposite of you, Tim. I was raised Anglican, became a Christian late teens, and convinced of believers’ baptism not long afterwards. I’ve been part of reformed baptist and presbyterian congregations, a pastor in a church that was kinda in the middle, and now I work alongside a presbyterian church in France. Lots of our folk don’t have a presby, or even an rb background. Books like this are really useful for churches like ours in France to give an introduction to what it means to be reformed. But in French, of course.


8. Alex Chediak
July 3, 2006
2:55 PM

Tim,

what do you think of open membership? Baptist churches allowing peadobaptized believers to be members. I have a recent post on this.

A question for Presbyterians: Would a Presbyterian church discipline a member for not baptizing their infants if the practice was contrary to their understanding of Scripture? My understanding is that such could nevertheless be grounds for discipline, but I’ve heard mixed answers from different Presbyterians. If someone could point me to an authoritative answer (perhaps for a particular Presby. denomination), I’d be most grateful!

Currently, my understanding is that PCA (for example) would not mandate discipline in such a case, but leave it at the discretion of a particular set of Elders at a particular local church.


9. Tim Challies
July 3, 2006
8:40 PM

“Would a Presbyterian church discipline a member for not baptizing their infants if the practice was contrary to their understanding of Scripture?”

Personal experience says “yes.”

“I thought his discussion/defense of paedobaptism was about the weakest I have ever seen. What do you think?”

I wouldn’t say that. I think he did a good job of distancing Presbyterian infant baptism from those that assume it makes a person a Christian. His argument, as I remember it (I read the book a couple of weeks ago!) is that it makes a child a part of the visible church but that it certainly does not begin or prove salvation. It wasn’t a great defense, but it also wasn’t the purpose of the book to defend paedo-baptism. Having said that, if he does hope for the book to “convert” Baptists, I’m not sure that his explanation of baptism will do that…


10. Kyle
July 4, 2006
3:48 AM

Alex,

I can’t give you an “authoritative” answer, but the PCA congregation of which I am a member would not, as far as I’m aware, discipline a member who had a conscientious objection to paedobaptism and so did not have his children baptized. In fact, one couple with young children were members, although their children were unbaptized. (They subsequently became convinced that infant baptism was biblical, and their children were baptized.)

Whether other sessions in the PCA would discipline credobaptist members for not having their children baptized, I couldn’t say.


11. Roger
July 4, 2006
4:19 PM

Hey all, I am a PCA Pastor.

For what it’s worth, I have never heard of a PCA church “disciplining” a member for simply not baptizing his/her children (as church discipline is normally understood). I suppose it could have happened (I have a friend who had a cousin…) but it seems rather strange to me and by no means a common practice.

Peace,
Roger


12. Alex Chediak
July 6, 2006
1:24 AM

Roger and Kyle,

Thank you for your comments!

Alex


13. Sean Lucas
July 7, 2006
4:53 PM

Thanks, Tim, for your generous words; I’ve linked them at my own blog.

Just one little word on the sacraments chapter, if I may: since I wrote the book imagining myself sitting across from someone at Starbucks, explaining what Presbyterianism is, it wasn’t meant to be a full-fledged defense of paedobaptism. That being said, I’ve had a number of Baptists who are/have been wrestling with these issues tell me that it was one of the most helpful explanations that they have read on the Reformed position. For what it’s worth.

Thanks again for your kind notice of my book.