C.J. Mahaney: "The Pastor's Priorities"
Those who had the privilege of attending the Together for the Gospel Conference, or who listened to the audio recordings (available here in MP3 or CD format), no doubt remember C.J. Mahaney’s plenary session which was entitled “Watch Your Life and Doctrine.” He took as his text 1 Timothy 4:16 which reads: “Keep a close watch on yourself and on the teaching. Persist in this, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers.” He taught that, through God-appointed means, the preservation of a pastor and his congregation is at stake in his obedience to this verse. Faithful, pastoral ministry could not be more important and the implications could not be more important, for they are eternal. I know of a great many pastors who were both challenged and encouraged by this session.
As you may know, the sessions from the conference are being compiled into Preaching the Cross, a book that will be published by Crossway in 2007. In the days following the scandal involving Ted Haggard, it seemed appropriate to provide this chapter to others. Though the book has not yet been edited and published, Crossway was kind enough to provide special permission to Justin Taylor and myself to post this chapter. It is Copyright © 2006 by Crossway (used by permission; all rights reserved) and will be available here for only a limited time. While you are free to link to this post from your web site or to download the document for personal use or, we ask that no one else upload the file to their own web server.
So here is your first glance at the forthcoming title Preaching the Cross. The chapter written by C.J. Mahaney is entitled “The Pastor’s Priorities: Watch Your Life and Doctrine.” We strongly urge you to consider making this chapter available to your pastor and leaders, either by forwarding the link or printing a copy. The wisdom of Paul, relayed through C.J., is timeless, but seems especially timely today.
The chapter headings include:
- Our Two-Fold Task
- Watch Your Life
- Sound Doctrine Is Not Enough
- The Consequences of Neglect
- The War Within Never Ends
- We Can’t Fight the War Alone
- A Model for Your Consideration
- Watch Your Doctrine
- Watch the Savior Work
Here is a brief excerpt from the document:
The Consequences of NeglectSound doctrine is not enough, because according to Scripture, the fundamental qualification for pastoral ministry is godly character. Neither skill, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, nor reputation, nor personality, nor apparent fruitfulness of public ministry will suffice. Scan 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1, and you will encounter a profile of personal piety.
Yes, the pastor must be able to teach. Certainly, he must handle the Word of truth accurately and skillfully. But the foundational assumption of Scripture—both for appointment to or continuation in ministry—is that the pastor provide a godly example. Not a perfect example, but an authentic example. As Spurgeon exhorted his students in “The Minister’s Self-Watch,” “Our characters must be more persuasive than our speech.”
If we neglect the command of 1 Timothy 4:16—if we fail to watch our life closely, carefully, and uncompromisingly—negative consequences are inevitable, for ourselves, our family, our pastoral team, and our church. A marked or prolonged inattention to personal holiness in a pastor is a grave matter that must be addressed.
In Sovereign Grace Ministries, here is how we have sought to apply this passage in relation to the pastors of our local churches.
We believe that the biblical requirement for a pastor is not flawless character but mature character. We are all progressively growing in godliness. A pastor who recognizes an area of immaturity, and takes specific action towards change, demonstrates close attention to his life and doctrine. Likewise, if a particular instance of non-disqualifying sin occurs in a pastor’s life, but he genuinely repents before God and the appropriate individuals, this also honors the passage we are examining.
There are, of course, some sins that are particularly serious, both in the effect they have upon others and what they reveal about the condition of the heart. Even a single instance of such sins—sexual immorality, financial impropriety, violent behavior, etc.—would automatically disqualify a man from pastoral ministry. Beyond such grave instances of sin, however, a serious ongoing pattern of disobedient deviation from biblical requirements in the life of a pastor can also be disqualifying.
For example, a single lustful look, quickly confessed and repented of is part of growing maturity. However, a pattern of pornography could be disqualifying. Similarly, an isolated instance of lying speech, promptly brought into the light, is evidence of ongoing sanctification. Repeated examples of deceptive behavior, on the other hand, call into question a pastor’s trustworthiness. Likewise, an outburst of irritation, immediately regretted and repented of is proof the Holy Spirit is at work. But a reputation for anger is not consistent with the biblical requirements for a pastor.
Where such patterns of sin exist, we believe that genuine care for a pastor and church involves a corrective process. Of course, this must be administered with all humility, gentleness, and patience. Occasions requiring the loving confrontation of a pastor in sin have been among the most difficult and painful of my ministry experience. But in the end, the corrective process has normally produced God-glorifying and fruitful outcomes in a pastor’s life, family, and church.
The document is available is PDF (Adobe Acrobat) format. You can download it here.




Comments (15) »
1. donsands
November 8, 2006
9:52 AM
Excellent words from C.J. Thanks for the tasty tidbit.
2. Jabbok
November 8, 2006
10:48 AM
“We believe that the biblical requirement for a pastor is not flawless character but mature character.”
That’s an interesting statement. I’m assuming he means “mature” as in “mature for his age”.
How should we define “mature”? I’m asking because I know many young men in their early 20’s who are pastoring churches. I’ve even known of teenagers as young as 16 who pastored churches. Certainly they are not as mature as someone whom we would classify as an “elder”.
Does the prohibition, “not a novice” exclude younger men from pastoring? It has always seemed to me that the term “elder” and “not a novice” indicate that a pastor should be an older man. However, I’ve heard speculation that Timothy was perhaps in his 20’s.
Even if Joel O’steen were reformed in his doctrine I’m not sure I could sit under someone that young.
It seems that most folks today want to equate pastoring with preaching only. Wouldn’t it be wonderful to have a private study with lots of books and nothing else to do but read, study and prepare to teach and preach the Word of God. But, a pastor’s time is filled with hospitals, nursing homes, shut-ins, sudden illnesses and personal or family catastrophes. Maturity, to me, is being able to relate and minister to these folks as effectively as you would to the youth at a Switchfoot concert.
W.A. Criswell, in his book on Pastoral Ministry, advised pastors to take care of the elderly in their churches and the youth would take care of themselves. This requires a maturity that very few younger pastors have.
3. Janie Harbaugh
November 8, 2006
1:00 PM
That’s an interesting statement. I’m assuming he means “mature” as in “mature for his age”.
I won’t presume to answer for C.J., but I’ve set under his God honoring teaching for over 12 years, and from my reading of his excerpt, my understanding is from Hebrews 5 and 6, as someone who is skilled in the word of righteousness, trained by constant practice to distinguish good from evil…solid food for the “mature.”
4. Tim Challies
November 8, 2006
2:17 PM
I’m with Janie on this one.
5. Lisa
November 8, 2006
2:46 PM
Tim,
It’s very odd that the exact same post as above is also found at Between Two Worlds, but there is no mention of you as the author. That’s a bit confusing. Did you write the above or did Justin Taylor? I’m assuming you did because I don’t think I’ve ever seen you post someone else’s work. Maybe Justin can give you some credit… :)
6. Tim Challies
November 8, 2006
2:57 PM
Lisa - J.T. and I coordinated on this one. C.J. wrote the chapter, I wrote the intro on my site and J.T.’s, and J.T. got the file ready for publication (since it came from a fairly rough manuscript).
7. Jabbok
November 8, 2006
3:23 PM
I’m not sure that Janie understood my intent or that I fully understand hers.
I’m not attacking C.J. or anything that he said in his article. I just wanted some points of view on what is meant by “mature”.
I agree whole-heartedly with what Janie said. I think maturity can be recognized as “skilled in the word of righteousness” and “trained by constant practice to distinguish good from evil.”
I don’t believe a 16 year old or most 20 something year olds possess either of these characteristics simply because they haven’t lived long enough to develop them. For this reason I don’t believe they meet the “biblical requirement for a pastor”.
8. Michael Garner
November 8, 2006
4:00 PM
I don’t believe a 16 year old or most 20 something year olds possess either of these characteristics simply because they haven’t lived long enough to develop them. For this reason I don’t believe they meet the “biblical requirement for a pastor”.
You might notice that in the Pastoral Epistles Paul does not put “youth” and “maturity” together. For example, Paul exhorts Timothy to “Command and Teach these things” to much older people. He then says, “Do not let anyone despise your for your youth, but set the believers an example in speech, in conduct, in love, in faith, in purity.” The clear implication is that one can be a youth and also be spiritually mature.
Now, the objection may come that Timothy was surely in his mid-thirties and you are talking about men who are 16 to early twenties. Fair enough, but I would suggest to you that God has used men of this age countless times to lead his people.
Consider the age of Joseph when he was first sold into slavery and the ensuing years where he saves not only Egypt but the people of God. Consider David’s age as he first attacks Goliath and later ascends to lead the nation. Consider Jeremiah who was called to be a prophet to the people but worried about his age.
My point is, it seems clear that at times God raises up people who are mature beyond their years. In cases like this, it seems wrong to have an a priori conviction that young people could not have the maturity that God requires to lead his church.
I should note, that the vast majority of the time age and maturity move together (clearly we should gain wisdom as we age). However, we can have old people who very little maturity and we certainly may have young people with a high degree of maturity. Consequently, the discussion should revolve solely around their maturity level and not their age.
All of that being said, you might be able to remove most if not all youth on account of “must not be a recent convert.” I would say that is a more convincing argument than the maturity route.
Just my thoughts, mike
9. Jabbok
November 8, 2006
4:23 PM
Michael,
Good point. I don’t believe age is a determining factor for God preparing a man for the ministry. Joseph is a good example. Sold into slavery at a young age and then thrown into prison but he came into leadership once he had matured in years and experience. David, too, was used of God to destroy an enemy but spent years on the run and living in caves before he was prepared for leadership.
If Timothy was in his 30’s when Paul exhorted him to not let others despise his youth then it should give us pause as to what age one can serve as a pastor. Apparently some in the church of his day had concerns as well but Paul had confidence in Timothy because of his upbringing and experience.
Some might think my motives for approaching this topic are to scorn young people but that’s not it at all. I pastored my first church when I was 22 and I wasn’t ready. The pastorate is a difficult calling and I believe we, as the body of Christ, have a responsibility to help these young men prepare for a life-time of service and not just throw them out there to stumble along, get discouraged and burn out. For example: I attended my grand-mothers funeral when I was 14 and the next funeral service I attended was one I was conducting. I was scared to death and blundered my way through it. As I said above, it’s not all books, study and preaching.
10. Michael Garner
November 8, 2006
6:11 PM
As I said above, it’s not all books, study and preaching.
Agreed.
I figured you might suggest that about Moses/David and that is why I added Jeremiah. In either case, I think we agree far more than we disagree.
Maturity is a key component for leadership and it is severely lacking in the church today, both my young and old pastors alike. Let us strive towards spiritual maturity.
Just as a quick comment, Timothy started serving with Paul about 15 or so years before these words are penned to Timothy in Ephesus.
-mike
11. Luke
November 8, 2006
7:49 PM
I am a 28 y.o. pastor and have been pastoring now for 3 years. While I am fully convinced that God would have me persevere in the Church I am presently serving, I thank God he uses the sometimes foolish decisions of his people to work out the goodness of his grace to the Church. In retrospect, I would have not entered upon the ministry, especially Church planting ministry, had I understood the full implications of Church leadership. It is one of those things that you can’t quite understand until you’ve been there…just as jabbok indicated with his first funeral experience.
It makes sense why my previous pastor was quick to send me out to plant a Church. He was living in gross sexual sin that came out a year later and, though older, was intimidated my degree of doctrinal understanding in comparison with his (this didn’t come out till I was pastoring for over a year!). Somehow God has worked through these circumstances, but I felt compelled to write my experience here due to the situation I am presently in.
I should have been led by my pastor to serve as an associate, at most, for a few years prior to sending me out. God has a way of ‘makin a straight lick with a crooked stick’…for this I praise His sovereign hand over the immaturity of my own soul. But, from the perspective any Biblically mature observer I was not ready, and now need much grace to simply carry out the most menial of pastoral duties. While the experience has been beneficial, I lie awake each night wonderring if with my abilities and lack of wisdom whether or not I am adequately leading the flock I am now overseeing!
I, after this experience, would be hard pressed, very hard pressed, to put anyone under the age of 30 in the position of a senior pastor of a Church plant or established Church. Knowing my own weaknesses and lack of wisdom, despite my passion for good and rigorous doctrine, I don’t know that it is the best for the Church…God can use it and I believe he presently is with me and countless others, but I do not believe it to be ideal.
Pastors should not be getting the feet wet alone!
12. Steve
November 8, 2006
7:50 PM
Just as a note of interest, Jewish culture of the time did not allow a man, or a woman, to speak for themselves until they were 30. This is much akin to children of our own age who are not considered adults until 18.
One train of thought for this was that it was a left over tradition, (for which the Jews are famous) from long ago, when men were living far longer; and simply was never changed. The fact of Jesus ministry, begining at this same age, and a few other examples found in the New Testament, would seem to support this.
Maturity and youth may not be opposite ends of the poles, but it is equally not the hard and fast rules that define the ‘qualifications’ of whether a man is capeable of preaching. Some of the things stated in the article would, you would think, be pretty obvious. But I think I would go with maturity being a combination of numerous factors. Admittedly most of the time those factors are to be found in a person of mature age, but I have seen numerous instances of well matured young men.
13. carissa
November 8, 2006
8:07 PM
i love c.j.’s wise preaching. good post, tim. :]
“Just as a quick comment, Timothy started serving with Paul about 15 or so years before these words are penned to Timothy in Ephesus.”
mike, i think i’m still not getting you. does that mean timonty just served alongside in general, or did he already lead the church at ephesus? i don’t think it’s the latter…
younger people can minister, to be sure, but should young men lead a whole church? not often, it seems, as these other commenters have convinced me. not as a legalistic thing, but as a general principle. sure there are young people beyond their years in spiritual maturity, but at the same time, i agree that just because one can exegete and apply scripture doesn’t necessarily mean they’re ready for a full-time pastorate replete with all pressures of shepherding a flock. not to mention that younger people tend to be a bit more impetuous, however sincere. :] just a thought.
14. John S
November 8, 2006
10:26 PM
‘General principle’ sounds like wisdom to me.
Genuine character, fruit, and faithfulness witnessed and faith tried and found persevering through trial. Normally these traits of maturity come with time. However, making a rule beyond what Scripture requires for pastors seems quite unwise and dangerous.
Man looks on the outward appearance but God on the heart. (David?) Balaam’s steed? What mortal in all of eternity would have chosen a donkey to bring Almighty’s message? But He did. Who’s to say he won’t use a 22 year old man if He so chooses? There is wisdom and there is faith, don’t toss faith because without it all the wisdom you can muster won’t please God. If his Spirit is on a man, who would say he couldn’t shepherd a church? (Spurgeon?)
BTW, Sovereign Grace churches raise up pastors from among their local churches, providing opportunity for the church to witness their character before they are positioned for leadership. This seems much wiser to me than the common ‘interviewing’ method of today. Who knows of a man’s character, whether 20 or 60, if you have only a few hours with him?
Oh, how sweet, as per Rev Tevia, twould be to be a rich man and thusly spend my days discussing the scriptures as here. However ‘real life’ beckons and time flees. I was browsing the site on a recommendation from a friend. This will probably be my only post ever but I thought I’d put in my 2 cents of pure genius anyway :>)
15. Michael Garner
November 9, 2006
12:41 AM
Carissa,
I agree that typically younger men should not lead churches. I’m just suggesting that this really doesn’t have much to do with age. Whether a Church is considering a 25 or a 65 year old man to shepherd the congregation, they should examine the man with respect to what Paul lays out in the Pastoral Epistles (This refers to spiritual maturity and time since conversion among other things, but not age).
I should mention, the way that I think the NT describes church leadership, one person would never be solely responsible for shepherding an entire congregation. I believe that a church lead, pastored, shepherded (or any other of the words that are used) by a group of elders tends to reduce the damage caused by the flaws of one man in particular.
-mike