Not too long ago my youngest sister began dating a guy who seems to have made her all twitterpated. Shortly after she started seeing him, she drove up to Canada to spend a few days with my family. I took the opportunity to try to impart some big-brotherly wisdom to her. I told her that I have known a great many couples who began dating as Christians and who set strict limits about how far they wanted the physical limits of their relationship to progress before marriage. These couples all wanted to remain pure until their wedding night, avoiding intimate physical contact. And yet, almost unanimously, they failed. Speak to Christian couples today and I’m sure you’ll find that the majority of them will admit regret that they went “too far.” Whatever limits they set for their relationship fell by the wayside at one time or another. This is not to suggest that all Christian couples engage in premarital sex. However, I think most Christian couples begin marriage with some regret, some guilt, that they have exceeded limits they felt would be easy to maintain.
The problem, I explained to my sister, is that, while Christian couples are generally well-intentioned and truly do desire to remain pure, they do not place the proper safeguards in their relationships. They are committed to a noble end, but do not have the same level of commitment to the means that will allow them to achieve that end. They are committed to the end, but not the means. What I told my sister was that she has little hope of avoiding sin if she and her new boyfriend do not take the proper measures now. They must ensure that they are never alone in a home; they must ensure that they do not park their car in some dark and isolated place just to sit and talk; they must have some sort of accountability to their peers and parents. And so on. Without certain safeguards the result is inevitable. They will sin and, if the relationship lasts and they decide to marry, they will enter their marriage with guilt that could so easily have been avoided. If the relationship does not last, they will eventually enter marriage with another person carrying baggage they have no right to carry. Either way, committing to the means and the end will save them from both the actual sin and from its consequences. Committing to the end by committing to the means will safeguard their relationship.
After I spoke with my sister I continued to dwell on this theme of means and ends. I have recently been struck by Proverbs 24:30-34, a passage that hints at how Solomon wrote his famous proverbs.
I passed by the field of a sluggard, by the vineyard of a man lacking sense, and behold, it was all overgrown with thorns; the ground was covered with nettles, and its stone wall was broken down. Then I saw and considered it; I looked and received instruction. A little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands to rest, and poverty will come upon you like a robber, and want like an armed man.
As Solomon looked at the sluggard’s field and received instruction, I looked at relationships I have seen, relationships that have led to sin, guilt and sin’s consequences. “Then I saw and considered it; I looked and received instruction.” I received instruction about my own life.
What I came to see is that there are many areas of my life where I am more wholly committed to an end than to the means of achieving that end. I can think of my desire to pursue holiness. It is an end I desire with desperation, and yet one that, when I honestly assess myself, I have to admit that I pursue with only half-hearted determination. I know this because I can look at the means I have put in place to reach the end and see that, without some serious realignment, they will never lead me to the end I desire. The same is true of my desire to be a good husband and a good father. I know what the end is that I desire to achieve, and yet know that I have not dedicated the appropriate attention to the means of reaching that end. I will never be the husband, father or Christian I want to be without giving more attention to the means.
It seems to me that the primary means of achieving all three of these goals - being a better husband, father and Christian (to name just three emphases) - is to begin with a great emphasis on reading the Bible, meditating upon the Scriptures, and spending time with God in prayer. Only by committing myself to pursuing a relationship with God can I be who I want to be and who God created me to be. There are changes I’ve made to my life after talking to my sister and learning something about myself. There are changes that remain. I trust that God will continue to guide me and to challenge me.
It just so happens that a new year is approaching. The start of a new year is a perfect time to examine my efforts in living this life a day at a time, emphasizing the means even more than the end. Perhaps you feel like I do, that you need to focus on the means of attaining godliness. Here are a few resources that may help us as we pursue the end we know God desires of us.
Crossway recently released two great devotional books from D.A. Carson entitled For the Love of God: A Daily Companion for Discovering the Riches of God’s Word. Here are links to Volume 1 and Volume 2
. A new devotional by John Stott called Through the Bible, Through the Year
also looks well worth reading, though I have not yet had time to read through it.
If you’d prefer to simply study the Bible without another person’s comments, perhaps an ESV journaling Bible would come in handy. They are available in leather and hardcover
. The ESV offers several daily read plans which can be read on the site. Each also has a link to the audio if you prefer to listen to the Bible. They also offers RSS feeds of each of the plans and even offer a daily podcast that for only $19.95 will provide three one year Bible plans over the course of three years. Each day the daily reading will be delivered to your iPod or computer.
And, of course, there are nearly unlimited numbers of resources from days past. Spurgeon’s Morning and Evening devotions are never disappointing. J.C. Ryle’s daily devotions are exceptional. And on and on. As Christians are certainly not lacking in resources to promote godliness.
As 2007 approaches why not spend some time examining whether you have committed not just to ends, but also to the means that will help carry you to those ends. You may just find, as I have, that you are looking too far towards the horizon while ignoring the day-to-day graces that will carry you to the future you desire.




Comments (30) »
1. Brian
December 20, 2006
10:41 AM
Tim,
Thanks for the insightful post. You have put your finger on an issue that has bothered me for quite some time. In today’s world, a little resting and a little folding of the hands with respect to our Christian walk is often a result of an all too-busy schedule in other secular activities… With much to do and not enough time, I can easily fill my schedule until I don’t have time for daily discipline in God’s Word and prayer. Since I have a good ‘end’ in mind, I rationalize my behavior, and don’t recognize it as lethargy even though my spiritual life seems empty. I see now that I am at risk of sin - failing to acknowledge God and give Him rightful place in my daily walk - when I do not give attention and priority to the means. Thank you for the recommendations - but it is the perspective that I value most - an ‘ah ha’ moment for me.
May you and your family have a Blessed Christmas!
2. SolShine7
December 20, 2006
10:46 AM
Challies, thanks SO much for posting this. It’s exactly what I needed to hear, what God has been trying to point out to me: commiting to the means. Your blog has been a real blessing to me. I thank God for you and your salty words of wisdom. I’m going to add this post to my blog under the section of articles that stirred my soul. Thanks again and keep on writing!
3. Derek Simmons
December 20, 2006
11:10 AM
MERRY CHRISTMAS, Tim. Your thought filled post is a wonderful reminder that “ends” are generally just the natural God-intended consequences of the means we choose. Focusing on God-pleasing means results in God-given Blessings. Thanks for all the thoughts and “means” you provoke in your posts throughout the year. HAPPY NEW YEAR.
4. Brian at voiceofthesheep
December 20, 2006
11:18 AM
Good thoughts, Tim.
I fear this is a much bigger problem for the church than we might realize…focusing on the ends without considering the means. The means - contained within Scripture and biblical commentary from the resources such as the ones you cited - is the very gospel itself. And trying to produce end results without it becomes nothing more than pagan ritual…gospel-less morality, which will fail every time.
Merry Christmas!
ps. If your sister is here in Atlanta I’d be happy to put the fear of God (and Tim Challies) into her new boyfriend for you. ;)
5. David McCrory
December 20, 2006
11:24 AM
I’m afriad the situation you describe regarding Christian “dating” is all too common. If, by the time our children are old enough to be considering marriage, they don’t not already understand these fundamental principles of purity, we have already failed them in many ways.
Individualistic Christians disregard the implications of their sin in light of the rest of their family. Marriage involves more than two people “living together”. They are bringing two families into covenant with one another. Both parities should be taught their actions have much broader implications than that which two individuals do.
6. BeerHallRevival
December 20, 2006
11:39 AM
Nice one Tim. Guess you Canadians do more than just hang out at Tim Horton’s and practice your curling…;) Good thoughts! I’m going to bring this article with me to my discussion group tonight. Its got a much broader application than sexual purity (as you pointed out). Thanks again…
7. Paul
December 20, 2006
12:05 PM
Excellent post! Truly we do often live with lofty ideals but do not consider and commit to what it will take to live them out. As Thoreau wrote in the Conclusion of Walden, “If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that is where they should be. Now put the foundations under them.” (emphasis mine)
8. lisa4given
December 20, 2006
1:23 PM
When I think of the means by which I must depnd on to achieve the end I realize that to avoid “good intentions” that never see the end, I pesonally must also prayerfully pursue accountability to ensure that I am progressing… Even if there are times when steps back are taken, such accountability transforms an intention into a reality. What kind of accountability I employ depends on the goal. For example, it could be a peson like my husband for one thing, a godly woman friend for another, or just something as simple as maintaining a family calendar to ensure effective communication of upcoming activities to accomplish the end goal of dependability. So pehaps when one considers the means to an end, prayefully factoring in accountability could make all the difference. Just a thought.
9. Richard
December 20, 2006
1:47 PM
“Twitterpated”? Is that a noun or a verb?
10. Tim Challies
December 20, 2006
2:46 PM
“”Twitterpated”? Is that a noun or a verb?”
That is a verb. Watch the movie Bambi for context.
11. Caleb B
December 20, 2006
3:29 PM
hahaha
Tim, I love your response in comment #10.
But about more serious matters, your post is a very good reminder of how we do not do what we need to do. I feel like most Christians, myself included, have good goals in mind but probably don’t have anything set up to help them reach their goals. Maybe they want to be sexually pure, but they don’t set up any accountability and so they fail again and again. Maybe they want to be a better father, but they don’t search the Scriptures for guidance or go talk to older fathers or listen to sermons about parenting to accomplish that goal. Thank you for this reminder that to reach our wee-intentioned ends, we need to have proper means which will always be biblically-informed means.
12. Jack
December 20, 2006
3:52 PM
Tim,
I appreciate your comments very much and I think there’s much to learn from what you write. However, I do think you miss something here that many Christians fail to see in our individualistic, “me and my Bible” North American Christianity, and that is this: The importance of corporate worship. As a Reformed Christian, I believe that God has ordained “the means of grace” (preaching and the sacraments) as the primary means to strengthen and nourish His people spiritually. I have no problem with personal Bible reading and time in prayer, but frankly, those are secondary to gathering corporately with God’s people on the Lord’s Day. All of that to say…excellent post, but as one who claims spiritual ties with the 16th Century Reformation, don’t miss “the means of grace” that God has ordained.
13. Mark
December 20, 2006
4:24 PM
Jack:
I have never, in my entire life, ever heard anything like: “I have no problem with personal Bible reading and time in prayer, but frankly, those are secondary to gathering corporately with God’s people on the Lord’s Day.”
I’m not criticizing, but could you unpack that a little?
14. Rick
December 20, 2006
4:26 PM
Tim, Thanks for stirring our thoughts. I have been thinking much lately along a similar vein. Through listening to numerous messages and reading many books and articles over the past couple of years (Keller, Bridges, Mahaney and others have been helpful), I find myself utterly convinced of the importance of the centrality of the gospel and in the words of Mike Bullmore not just the centrality of the gospel but a functional centrality of the gospel (you can find this message on the sovereign grace ministries website and I highly recommend it - title: The Functional Centrality of the Gospel). Then I began pondering the idea: how do I move from having an understanding or conviction of the importance of the centrality of the gospel to having that conviction function in my heart and life? And I began to see that Faith is the means to having the gospel function in my life (I began seeing this as I was reading William Romaine’s book The Life, Walk, and Triumph of Faith - highly recommend it - gospel saturated and gospel connections everywhere). Of course the end of Faith, as in everything, has to be God (Piper’s book God is the Gospel and mp3’s from a DGM conference in Phoenix this year on the topic God is the Gospel is helpful here). If faith is the means or the connection or link between doctrine and life, or the understanding of the centrality of the gospel and a functional centrality of the gospel, then the next question became how is faith cultivated? Rom 10:17 ‘So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ.’ As you have pointed out -Scripture is a means. And it is a means to another mean - Faith; which is a means to another mean - a functional centrality of the Gospel - which is a means to the end - the Glory of God - the ultimate end of all (Edwards). So let us be encouraged to pursue God (and be pursued by God) through His Word as we venture into 2007. RCH
15. Luke
December 20, 2006
4:34 PM
Jack,
I couldn’t agree with you more about the egocentric view of Christianity today. However, as Martin Luther said it, Orthodoxy is like a slippery saddle. You realize your not on the saddle, thus in order to get on the saddle you jump up and slip off on the other side. I have found this in my own, and in others, reaction such as your own.
It is a travesty that the “Jesus and me” ideal has relagated the Church to minimal, if not unnecessary, significance. This is sad, unbiblical, and quite simply anti-Biblical. The means of Grace God has appointed in the Church through corporate worship, fellowship, prayer, reading of the scripture, preaching, and the sacraments are, as you stated, “primary” means of grace. But, it is easy to see the egocentric error and over-simplify the primary at the exclusion of the NECESSARY secondary.
For example, if I take advantage of corporate worship and attend those means that are of primary importance, but do not engage in daily Bible reading, daily personal prayer, and other “Jesus and me” activities, my engagement and preparedness in corporate means of grace will be severely, if not entirely, imparied and ineffective. We must not, in any way, allow ourselves to think that we can rely solely on corporate means of grace any more than we can rely solely on personal time with God. God has given them both as means that compliment one another and serve us most effectively when simultaneously pursued.
Note: Psalm 1 is not talking about corporate but personal meditation on God’s word. But, Psalm 1 apart from Psalm 4, a Psalm to the “choirmaster” in public worship, is incomplete and lop-sided.
Thankyou for your insight…it was needed as I am sure Tim left it out inadvertantly (I have read enough of him to know where he stands on this). But, let us not overreact to the error of today, but respond to the revealed counsel of God in this matter: both personal and corpoarte means of worship are wholly necessary for our fight against the flesh!
16. Jack
December 20, 2006
4:41 PM
Sure Mark…
If you look at the Westminster Standards, you will find that they teach that the principle way that God nourishes His people in the faith is through the “means of grace”—namely, the preaching of the gospel and the administration of the sacraments. Those are the primary means through which the Spirit works in us. Now that doesn’t mean that personal devotions aren’t good. They are good…but they are secondary means of grace. Now maybe this sounds like a foreign concept to you…and it used to sound like that to me, too. But when you look at what the church of the Reformation taught (Luther, Calvin, Knox, the Westminster Divines, etc.), this is exactly what you find. You will find the same thing in a 16th Century Protestant Confession, such as the Heidelberg Catechism (Q & A 65). Again, I hope no one thinks that I’m saying we shouldn’t read our Bibles and pray during the week. But if that’s the primary way that we think we grow spiritually, then we are missing those key elements that God has ordained—preaching and the sacraments. Sadly, I think this is happening in much of the church today, because there are more and more churches that don’t even have church membership and there are more and more professing Christians who don’t think the local church is all that important. As long as I have my Bible and my personal relationship with Jesus…that’s all I need.
I would encourage you to pick up a couple of books by Michael Horton: “Putting Amazing Back into Grace” (read especially chapter 12, “Two Keys to Spiritual Growth”) and “A Better Way” (read especially chapters 4 through 7).
17. Jack
December 20, 2006
4:45 PM
Luke…
Excellent, excellent point. I put my last post on before I could read yours, so now I’ll add some more :)
You are right…we have to avoid the 2 extremes—either thinking that all that matters is that we go to church on Sunday OR all that matters is that I have my daily quiet time. There is both an individual and a corporate aspect to our faith. And there are some branches of Christianity that emphasize the corporate aspect to the neglect of personal piety (which usually ends up resulting in what I call “orthodusty”…dead, lifeless orthodoxy)…while there are other branches that emphasize the individual aspect to the neglect of gathering with God’s people on the Lord’s Day and being committed to a local church (which usually ends up resulting in “Me and My Jesus”ism).
18. Chris Roberts
December 20, 2006
5:22 PM
Without certain safeguards the result is inevitable. They will sin
Not quite that universal. My wife and I set the limits on how far we would go and we somehow managed to remain within those limits. Granted, our limits on physical behavior would be called extreme by some, but it worked. We had moments alone in houses, parked on dark roads, etc etc. And yet we never did go past the point we said would be too far. For us, we didn’t kiss or anything beyond. Holding hands and hugs were it. Our first kiss was on the wedding day. Anything more came on the wedding night.
That wasn’t quite the point of your whole post, and you had some good thoughts, but I thought I’d throw this out. :)
19. Brian at voiceofthesheep
December 20, 2006
5:40 PM
Our first kiss was on the wedding day.
YEOWZUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No kissing until the day of the wedding? I feel so ashamed…my wife and I kissed on the second date.
20. Tim Challies
December 20, 2006
5:54 PM
“That wasn’t quite the point of your whole post, and you had some good thoughts, but I thought I’d throw this out. :)”
You’re the exception that proves the rule!
21. Dallas Pymm
December 20, 2006
7:29 PM
“No kissing until the day of the wedding? I feel so ashamed…my wife and I kissed on the second date.”
Kissing WAS our first date. Ok a joke. Our first kiss was on our wedding day….well first kiss as husband and wife. Does that count for something?
22. ReformedMommy
December 20, 2006
7:40 PM
I wasn’t going to chip in on this one because I was sure someone else would, and say it far better -
I think there’s one critical element that has gone unmentioned, and that is the role of the Holy Spirit. He is the one who indwells us and enables us to pursue holiness. He is the one who illuminates the Scriptures, helps us in our prayers and in our actions,and above all, points us to Jesus, who lived for us the very life He now enables us to live. He is the one who bears the fruit of the means of grace in our lives.
Those that live in the power of His Spirit can have absolute confidence that He offers and gives us His strength to live purely, when we pursue it as has been already described. Coming from a pretty fundamentalist background, I heard a whole lot more about my part, my effort, the ten things I should do, and not nearly enough about the one thing, the most important thing, that had already been done for me. When I began to understand this, the more confident and hopeful I became in pursuing holiness, and change was the inevitable result.
23. pilgrim
December 20, 2006
7:44 PM
Avoiding situations where you are alone in private is important (sorry to come back around to being on topic)
While you need to time to discuss your marriage without interruption or distraction, there is danger in time alone.
I’m not saying I would put a zero tolerance on it—but don’t overestimate your abilities.
24. Tim Challies
December 20, 2006
9:17 PM
Reformedmommy - I agree entirely. But just as there are groups that underestimate the importance of the Spirit, there are groups that avoid speaking of the fact that we cannot simply rely on Him to do all the work. He empowers us, yes, but we are still responsible to work with Him. Where justification is an act that is all of Christ, sanctification is a process where we must act with the Holy Spirit.
25. Neil
December 21, 2006
8:29 AM
Thanks so much for writing this. Just yesterday I was thinking about blogging on this, but now I can just post your link!
It is crucial to set limits, especially regarding time alone. God wired us to feel romantic with the one love in that way, which is a good thing after you are married. But before marriage discipline and clarity is required.
Also, behaviors classified as “foreplay” are just that: precursors to sex. Planning on stopping with foreplay is unnatural, so people need to be honest with themselves.
26. Josh
December 21, 2006
9:20 AM
I’m not saying I would put a zero tolerance on it—but don’t overestimate your abilities.
This is nine-tenths of the problem right here. The overestimation of our own ability to say no. When you’ve drawn a line the easiest way to accidentally fall over it is when you’re trying to balance on the thing. You might be a good person but there are some things that can overcome your better judgement. Being “twitterpated” (I love that) is way up there on THAT list.
Josh
“…the word of God is notbound.”
—2 Timothy 2:9
27. beerhallrevival
December 21, 2006
10:01 AM
Jack,
THanks for explaining, I appreciate it. I’m going to take a look at some of the resources you posted about. I’ve never really considered church as the primary means of delivering grace to us…it seems so foreign to me. I’ll take a look at it though…thanks again.
28. Luke
December 21, 2006
4:17 PM
Beerhallrevival,
If you want a good resource, the first I would recommend is Joshua Harris’ “Stop Dating the Church.” From there I would read, if you like some technical reading, R.B. Kuiper’s book, “The Glorious Body of Christ.”
There may be some ecclesological places to part ways with either depending on your tradition…but both have been very helpful to me.
P.S. Like the url!
29. pilgrim
December 21, 2006
6:31 PM
Josh-
Well it worked for me—because it avoided the legalism that is an inherent danger in the other way.
But we always had an out—there was always somewhere to go, something else to do.
There were times it was tempting to skip a gathering to spend an evening alone—but we went to the gatherings.
Still for us that approach worked.
Zero tolerance can breed legalism and miss the point.
30. Melissa
December 24, 2006
12:27 PM
Excellent post! Just one little quibble. You said, “These couples all wanted to remain pure until their wedding night, avoiding intimate physical contact.” Purity is a goal even on the wedding night and thereafter. Married
couples are commanded to keep the marriage bed pure.
Maybe the word “until” in your sentence is throwing the meaning off of what you intended.