Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the blog or about the author.

Wednesday January 24, 2007

Self-Centered Sex (Part 1)

Twelve or eighteen months ago I wrote a couple of articles about the always difficult subject of autoeroticism (i.e. masturbation). This is a subject I hesitate to write about and yet one that I feel is both important and relevant. It is a subject that takes us outside of our comfort zones but hiding our heads in the sand and pretending it is not a real problem is almost unfair. I have had opportunity in recent days to speak to young men and to hear about the struggles they face. And I know that this is a near-universal struggle. I was recently convicted that if the church won’t speak out about this issue, no one will.

This is the type of issue that I suspect only Christians really wrestle with. It is an issue that our culture regards as irrelevant. To question the morality of masturbation is folly to those who accept and seek to honor no higher authority. “If it feels good, do it!” is the wisdom of our age. But this is no wisdom at all. I know that many Christians have questions about this issue and are troubled by it. And hence I will write about it again in the hope that it can help Christians understand God’s design for sexuality.

In what I anticipate will be a two-part article I would like to bring a biblical perspective to autoeroticism, or the act of providing sexual pleasure to oneself. The Bible is silent on explicit discussion of the subject of autoeroticism. There is no place in Scripture where we will find a clear statement allowing or condemning the practice. Thus we have to begin our study by attempting to come to a biblical understanding of sexuality - God’s purpose and design in human sexuality. Once we understand this we will have a foundation upon which we can build an understanding of autoeroticism.

God’s Design for Sex

We will begin by providing the groundwork for a theology of sex. This is a topic that could consume as much time and space as we chose to give it, so we will discuss it only briefly. Consider this nothing more than a framework. Much of the following was drawn from Sex, Romance and the Glory of God by C.J. and Carolyn Mahaney. Much of that book is available as a chapter in Sex and the Supremacy of Christ, edited by John Piper and Justin Taylor. Both books are well worth reading.

A Gift From God

Andy Warhol said, “Sex is the biggest nothing of all time.” Andy Warhol was dead wrong. Sex is a gift of God and it is inherently good because the God who gave us sex is good. God created us in such a way that sex is a natural part of what it means to be human. We glorify God when we use this gift in the way God intends and when we use it to His glory. In Genesis 2 we read about the creation of a woman. After God gave Eve to Adam the Bible tells us, “Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24). It is God who designed sex and who gave it to us. It is a good gift and one that must be used as the Creator intends.

For Marriage

When God gave sex to humans, He provided a restriction. He decreed that sex is to be enjoyed only within marriage. “Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous” (Hebrews 13:4). God gave us this restriction not to be burdensome, but to increase the pleasure and intimacy found in God-glorifying sex. As the creator of sexuality, He was free to place any restrictions He felt necessary. And thus, so that we could benefit from sexuality in the way He intended, He placed this simple restriction on it.

For Our Pleasure

God created sex to be pleasurable. What more evidence do we need than the clitoris, a part of the body that has only one function - to receive and transmit sexual pleasure. And not only is sex pleasurable, but it is mutually pleasurable, allowing the husband and wife to give and receive pleasure at the same time. This leads to mutual sexual fulfillment. A servant’s mindset is crucial in the marriage bed so each partner primarily seeks after the interests of the other. “The husband should give to his wife her conjugal rights, and likewise the wife to her husband. For the wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. Likewise the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does” (1 Corinthians 7:3-4). Sex is pleasurable because God made it to be pleasurable. We are not to feel guilty or burdened by sexual desire or by sexual pleasure.

For Intimacy

Humans are not entirely capable of comprehending the depth of intimacy brought about by sexual union. The word “know” is often used in Scripture to speak of the deep, intimate knowledge brought about by sex. God also speaks of the husband and wife being of “one flesh” through this act. Carolyn Mahaney writes, “Marital sex is the pinnacle of human bonding. It is the highest form of the communication of love - a language that expresses love without words. It calls forth the deepest, most powerful emotions. It creates intimacy within marriage like nothing else. In fact, as we give and receive the gift of lovemaking, this intimacy will grow stronger and more precious as the years go by. Each encounter will lead us to a deeper ‘knowing’ of the one we love” (Sex, Romance and the Glory of God, page 107). One of God’s deepest purposes in creating sex was to use it to bond husband to wife and wife to husband. It is something they are to share only with each other and something that will bring a deep and intimate knowledge reserved only for a spouse.

For Procreation

Sex is a means of pleasure and intimacy, but also has the purpose of procreation. Through the joyful act of sex God works through us to create new life.

These five points provide a framework for a biblical understanding of sex.

Culture and Sex

Our culture promotes a view of sex diametrically opposed to what Scripture teaches. This is a view that makes sex appear as little more than a biological function like breathing or urinating. In this view men have a sexual appetite they must fulfill and hence they hunt around much like a male dog seeks out a female who is in heat. Like a dog, a man can barely even help himself from fulfilling his craving. Television and movies now portray women in a similar light - as sexual creatures who are able to separate love and marriage from the act of sex. Yet biblical sexuality is far different.

Eugene Peterson, in his paraphrase of 1 Corinthians 6:16-18 brings wisdom that reads more like a commentary on this passage than a translation of it. “There’s more to sex than mere skin on skin. Sex is as much spiritual mystery as physical fact. As written in Scripture, ‘The two become one.’ Since we want to become spiritually one with the Master, we must not pursue the kind of sex that avoids commitment and intimacy, leaving us more lonely than ever—the kind of sex that can never ‘become one.’ There is a sense in which sexual sins are different from all others. In sexual sin we violate the sacredness of our own bodies, these bodies that were made for God-given and God-modeled love, for ‘becoming one’ with another.” And not only do we violate our own bodies, but the bodies of those with whom we have sex. Sex outside of marriage is a perversion of God’s intent.

Perhaps the clearest biblical teaching on sexuality is found in the Song of Solomon. This book portrays a man and woman who are desperately in love with each other. “These two desperately desire to be together, but not simply so they can experience sexual gratification. They want to be together because they are in love, and the sex they enjoy with one another is an expression of that love. Their mutual attraction is not primarily hormonal. It is primarily relational” (Sex, Romance and the Glory of God, page 85). The sex that is so beautifully depicted in Song of Solomon, (the great sex!), is founded primarily on relationship, not technique or the mere fulfillment of animal urges. The consummation of the sexual act is only one place on a long continuum filled with relationship, loving words, expressions of desire and finally physical intimacy. If we were to read Song of Solomon as a textbook on how to have sex we would misread Solomon’s intent. The book is a guide on how to build a loving, intimate relationship. It shows a view of sexuality that is far different from what we see on television or the movies. It is love that leads to sex rather than sex that leads to love.

God’s purpose in sexuality, then, is to provide ultimate intimacy between a husband and wife. There is no greater expression of vulnerable intimacy between human beings, and this is a large part of what makes marriage so unique.

Consequences

God’s plan for sex is clear and so is God’s expectation for how we will use this gift. If we recklessly violate this gift we ought to expect to suffer consequences. The book of Proverbs makes this clear: “Can a man carry fire next to his chest and his clothes not be burned? Or can one walk on hot coals and his feet not be scorched? So is he who goes in to his neighbor’s wife; none who touches her will go unpunished. People do not despise a thief if he steals to satisfy his appetite when he is hungry, but if he is caught, he will pay sevenfold; he will give all the goods of his house. He who commits adultery lacks sense; he who does it destroys himself” (Proverbs 6:27-32). There are always consequences to sin. If we want to be people who honor God and if we want to avoid the consequences of sin by avoiding sin, we must be people who think deeply about issues, and even issues as difficult as this one.

In our next article we will build upon this theology of sex and discuss autoeroticism.

Comments (21) »


1. John Lee
January 24, 2007
11:08 AM

I want to applaud you for writing on this issue. I was somewhat disappointed, however, in part 1 of this series since you seemed to deal almost exclusively with sexual relations and not with masturbation. I understand that you need to lay down a certain foundation first, and I look forward to a more incisive look at masturbation in part 2, with a hope that you’ll pull no punches.

However, I do have this contention. A happily married man’s advice to lonely, sex-starved, Christian singles may be theologically right on the money but nevertheless leaves the reader cold, unmoved, even resentful.

It’s easy to dispense advice on how to diet while stuffing your face at the buffet table, after all.


2. Tim Challies
January 24, 2007
11:13 AM

“A happily married man’s advice to lonely, sex-starved, Christian singles may be theologically right on the money but nevertheless leaves the reader cold, unmoved, even resentful.”

To some extent. But I don’t necessarily believe that sex and masturbation are equals. Plenty of men masturbate through their youth, get married, and are shocked to find that they still want to masturbate. So while sex and masturbation fall under the same broad category, I don’t think sex is necessarily an easy replacement for masturbation. Married men (and women) deal with this issue too.


3. Brian @ voiceofthesheep
January 24, 2007
11:14 AM

Wow, Tim…you have created ‘contention’ from something you haven’t even posted yet. Now that’s real influence and power. Kudos.


4. Josh
January 24, 2007
1:53 PM

It’s easy to dispense advice on how to diet while stuffing your face at the buffet table, after all.

Just how long have YOU been married John?

Tim this is a great article. I particularly liked this line:

The consummation of the sexual act is only one place on a long continuum filled with relationship, loving words, expressions of desire and finally physical intimacy.

Right on the money.

Josh
“…the word of God is not bound.”
—2 Timothy 2:9


5. connie
January 24, 2007
2:21 PM

Josh Harris’ book, “Not Even A Hint”, helped open this topic up for discussion—-we separated the boys and girls into two groups during the whole study when we lead our youth group through it a year ago.

Make no mistake, it is a topic that Xians need to address—straight on, humbly, and honestly.


6. Chris Hillcoat
January 24, 2007
5:10 PM

Great start. Looking forward to part 2.


7. C.H.H.
January 24, 2007
6:38 PM

Tim,

Have you been following Steve Hay’s discussion on this over at Triablogue?

I’d also be interested to see you comment a bit on Lev. 15:16-17.


8. Jabbok
January 24, 2007
10:07 PM

Well, James Dobson says masturbation is OK so I thought this issue had been settled.


9. Tyler
January 24, 2007
11:41 PM

Douglas Wilson has a thought provoking chapter on this topic in his book “Fidelity”.


10. Kelly
January 25, 2007
4:38 AM

Lol to Jabbok’s comment. I read Dobson’s books as a teen, so I know what he’s referring to (and yes, Dobson does say it’s ok.)

So Tim, just out of curiousity, what prompted this series? Slow news day?


11. Rong
January 25, 2007
7:28 AM

Dobson really says that it’s OK? Would someone mind sharing with me the context in which the good Dr. believes that this is OK and is a healthy thing for anyone to perform let alone an adolescent?

I’m attempting to withhold judgment until I have some specifics.


12. rong
January 25, 2007
7:47 AM

I couldn’t leave it alone and found this quote from James Dobson:

“It is my opinion that masturbation is not much of an issue with God. It is a normal part of adolescence that involves no one else. It does not cause disease. It does not produce babies, and Jesus did not mention it in the Bible. I’m not telling you to masturbate, and I hope you won’t feel the need for it. But if you do, it is my opinion that you should not struggle with guilt over it. Why do I tell you this? Because I deal with so many Christian young people who are torn apart with guilt over masturbation; they want to stop and just can’t. I would like to help you avoid that agony.”


13. Kyle
January 25, 2007
9:39 AM

Holy crap. That is a reprehensible position represented by Dr. Dobson.

I’m seriously shocked.

….

Wow.

- Kyle


14. Tim Challies
January 25, 2007
10:02 AM

Rong - That’s a shockingly humanistic thing for Dobson to say, isn’t it? It causes guilt, therefore don’t worry about it.

“So Tim, just out of curiousity, what prompted this series? Slow news day?”

I think it’s a topic that needs to be addressed. It may also be the kind of topic that can be handled well on a blog.


15. Tim A.
January 25, 2007
4:20 PM

I think that 1 Cor 6.12 should give us part of an answer for the debate over Dobson’s statement. BECAUSE they can’t stop (slave to it)is part of the reason why they should. Besides, self gratification never was God’s intention for sexuality, not for a teen, not for an adult.
Thanks again Tim for writing on the subject.
Tim A.


16. A Friend
January 25, 2007
7:42 PM

Thank you for this article. But, I do hope that you will mention, that it is not only guys who struggle with this issue.


17. A Friend
January 25, 2007
7:43 PM

Thank you for this article. But, I do hope that you will mention, that it is not only guys who struggle with this issue.


18. Andrew
January 26, 2007
4:45 AM

Thank you for this mature, balanced, and courageous treatment of the ‘great unspoken’ issue among Christian teens, and men and women. You have a capacity with prose and a lucidity of thought that make your article on a difficult problem a pleasure to read.

I was wondering if you might be adding a postscript to these articles, in terms of practical advice? I think that’s the great strength of Josh Harris’ book. For instance I would be interested in your thoughts on what it means to pluck out our eyes, and cut off our hands in modern terms. As a Pastor I find that it is these kind of nitty gritty practical issues which can be the major stumbling block to those trapped by these behaviours - they want to change but don’t know how.

One tool which I have recommended to a good number of people is Covenant Eyes (www.covenanteyes.com) which is inexpensive, and provides valuable protection from online temptation, as well as establishing good lines of accountability.

Thank you for your blog, Tim. I read it often, but this is my first comment. I’m glad that in spite of the difficulties which you shared about having a popular blog that you continue to challenge and help us through your writings.


19. Kevin
January 26, 2007
9:05 PM

Under “Culture and Sex”:
“In this view men have a sexual appetite they must fulfill and hence they hunt around much like a male dog seeks out a female who is in heat. Like a dog, a man can barely even help himself from fulfilling his craving.”

I felt this was rather sexist not mentioning that some women share the same “appetites”. I’ve know many women who frequently masturbate and regularly patronize bars, clubs, etc. seeking sexual gratification…no strings attached.


20. Brian
January 26, 2007
10:23 PM

I think masturbation is ok if your married, and you are thinking about your wife when you do it. If the wife is gone or your on vacation, why is it wrong?

As Tim said, “The Bible is silent on explicit discussion of the subject of autoeroticism.”


21. david
January 27, 2007
12:24 AM

Tim went on to say in Part 2:

Yet, as we will see, the Bible is not silent and does not leave us guessing. While Scripture may not mention masturbation explicitly, I would suggest that this simply points to the fact that it speaks so much and so thoroughly about sexuality that there is no need to speak about masturbation (just as Scripture speaks so thoroughly about murder and the value of human life that there is no need to speak explicitly about abortion).

…and since his thoughts here have been completed there, I think it’s time to move on over there and end it here.