Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the blog or about the author.

Friday February 16, 2007
16 Comments

Resolved Conference

I began my day in the subzero temperatures of a frozen Canadian winter and ended it in balmy, eighty degree California. It has been almost twenty four hours since I woke up and my eyes are starting to do some weird twitchy thing that happens when I get over tired. I need to get to bed. But first a few reflections on the opening session of the Resolved Conference.

First off, I am sitting at the front of the room at this conference. This is a new experience for me as I typically find myself in the bleachers. This time, though, I am way at the front and can actually see the speakers and the musicians. I kind of like it. I can actually get some good photographs from this vantage point but, sadly, forgot the cable that would allow me to extract the photos from my camera. I'll try to post some when I get back home (or when I find another way of getting them onto my computer and then onto the internet).

The evening began with almost 3,000 people filing into the conference venue. Unfortunately quite a few people were missing as many flights from exotic locales such as New York and Chicago were canceled due to inclement weather. This is hardly unusual for this time of year but must still be disappointing for those who got left behind. Hopefully they'll be able to make their way here before the weekend is through. When the crowd had finally filed in, filling the entire downstairs, the entire first balcony and exactly half of the upper balcony, the conference began with a time of worship. Songs included Be Thou My Vision, Let the Kingdom Come, The Glories of Calvary, How Great is Our God, Son of God and The Power of the Cross. This was followed by a short video biography of Edwards narrated by Rick Holland and shot at the campus of Princeton University. He discussed the vision of Resolved in connection with the life and teachings of Jonathan Edwards, his historical hero. He made it clear that what we do this weekend is not the local church and is not a replacement for it. Everything done and taught this weekend is to launch people back to faithfulness in their local assemblies.

He then encourages us to turn our attention to the most important topic (the gospel itself) and the person (Jesus Christ). As his text for the evening, he took Romans 5:6-11.

He began by discussing the historical context of Jonathan Edwards' most famous sermon (and, indeed, the most famous sermon since the closing of the canon), "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God. It was preached in 1741 in New England. God had moved cities and counties and people were coming to the Lord in droves. Whitefield was preaching, people were being converted, and people were filling the churches. But this revival somehow passed over an entire town. Edwards and his friends decided to gather a group of men to preach at this town and they preached a series of revival meetings. Edwards' turn came and he went to preach this revival sermon. On July 8, 1741, on a Wednesday evening, he took the pulpit and began to preach this sermon. Though it takes only forty minutes to read this sermon, it took him ninety. He had to constantly beg for silence and demand that people return to their seats. Throughout portions of the sermon there was a great moaning and crying. Why was there such a reaction? Edwards was preaching about sinners in the hands of an angry God. His point was that life was full of uncertainties and that God is justifiably angry at those who reject His gift of salvation. The sermon was full of imagery to describe the sinful and horrific condition of the sinful human soul.

Holland posed the questions: What do we make of this kind of preaching? This kind of preacher? This kind of God? Is this really true? Is God really this way? Is God really and truly and passionately angry at me?

The theme of Resolved this year is the gospel itself. We are going back to the basics, to the gospel truth. All of the speakers are organizing their thoughts around the gospel itself. This passage, Romans 5, and indeed the whole book, answers one question: what's so great about the gospel? How can someone stand righteous before a holy God? For six verses Paul stops and enjoys the view. And that's what we're doing this week - taking a deep breath of gospel fresh air.

So what's so great about the gospel?

The gospel satisfies the greatest need (verse 6). This verse doesn't make any human sense. Everything about the gospel is counter-intuitive, going against the wisdom of all we would think. No one would think of such things. If you think you deserve God's love, you will never be secure in this love because there will always exist the constant threat of trying or doing something to earn God's favor. The truth is, the only thing we contribute is our sin. God does the rest. He does it all. Only those who have settled their confidence in God, that He loves them despite their sin, these are the only people who can live in light of His favor. The key issue of assurance is that it is all of God. Your greatest need is defined by your sin, by your sinful soul. Our greatest need is to be righteous in the hands of an angry God.

The gospel demonstrates the greatest love (verses 7-8). Lloyd-Jones calls these verses the commentary on the whole Bible and these small words "but God" are so critically important to the Christian faith. Paul now discusses the vast difference between men and God. God loves differently than us. He demonstrates his special, saving love. There is a universal difference between the way God loves and the way men love.

The gospel extinguishes the greatest threat. Paul wants us to see that the cross is amazing and then to be amazed by it. The wrath of God is simply this: it means that sinners are sentenced to eternal hell. God's judgment is hell and this is no myth but a real place. There can be no salvation, no grace, no glory, no mercy, unless it is set against the dark side of God's vengeance in hell. There is no Christianity without absolving God's righteous wrath. Warning people of the wrath of God was at the center of Edwards' famous sermon.

The gospel mediates the greatest conflict. If God reconciles us as enemies, He will surely save us as His friends. This is an argument from the greater to the lesser. If He can do this, then surely He can do the other. Of all the terms used to describe our salvation, reconciliation is one of the greatest. The only person who reconciled was God because we desired no reconciliation.

The gospel provokes the greatest response. We now exult (overflow with gladness, to jump up and down with happiness, to spew forth joy) in God. We can only truly exult when we know what we have been saved from. Can you, will you, do you exult in God? The focus of our joy is in God.

Holland led us to the basics of the gospel and led us to stand amazed, to be amazed anew, at the beauty and wonder of God's wisdom. It was an opportunity for Christians to marvel at the gospel and for those in the audience who are not saved, to see and know that they are sinners in the hands of an angry God and to turn to Him and be reconciled to Him. This message set the stage for what is sure to be a challenging weekend focused on the gospel in all its beauty and all its simplicity.

Favorite quote: "We're all born with a stiff-arm in God's face."

I do hope these ramblings made sense. I'll be back tomorrow with updates from the morning session which will feature Steve Lawson. Hopefully I'll get some good sleep between now and then!

Comments (16) »


1. Bethany
February 17, 2007
3:02 AM

Hi Tim! After the first session, I went to the back of the theater (the sound booth!) only to be surprised to not see you and your laptop there. At first, I wondered if you had made it safely, but praise God that you did.

Thank you for your “ramblings” and insights… looking forward to the next three days!


2. ThinkTank
February 17, 2007
3:10 AM

Thanks for a great report, Tim.

I have a related question - and I’d be interested in hearing anyone’s response.

A colleague and I have been in correspondence on the subject of the atonement. Our debate is about exactly how Jesus “takes away sin”.

I argue that Jesus bears God the Father’s punishment for sin. He insists that the Bible says no such thing. (My appeal to Isaiah 53 didn’t convince him - he said that only the non-punitive parts of the chapter are quoted in the NT, and therefore the NT writers stop short of saying that Jesus was actually punished on our behalf by God).

I also appealed to Romans 8:3, but he insists: “The NT writers (Paul, John, Luke, Mark, Peter, Matthew) who write about this speak of sacrifice and ransom/purchase (and other things, too) but never of punishment. Why? Because that sets the Father against the Son (as well as being neither mercy nor justice).”

I would like to get a better understanding of this. Any Edwards homeboys out there who can help me get clear?


3. Bryan
February 17, 2007
3:22 AM

hey tim,

could we take a picture with you? ill be with bethany tomorrow looking for you! do you plan on being in the front during the whole conference?


4. Dan H.
February 17, 2007
3:50 AM

Regarding the last point in Rick Holland’s sermon that the gospel provokes the greatest response, it was interesting that he mentioned his son summarized his thoughts on joy in one statement: “It’s good to be joyful, because we’re not in trouble with God anymore.”

The fact that Christ paid for our sins and God imputed His righteousness to us undeserving sinners (cf. 2 Corinthians 5:21) would be one reason for the cause of joy in our hearts, but I think John Piper will address the issue of joy in more detail on Sunday evening in his sermon on God Is the Gospel: Meditations on the Love of God as the Gift of Himself.

It was nice meeting you in person. Although, I least expected that it would be crossing the street to your hotel in eighty degree evening weather. Enjoy the conference.

Dan (Truth and Zeal)


5. Jabbok
February 17, 2007
8:05 AM

Tim, I really enjoyed reading this summary of the conference. I hope the remaining sessions prove as profitable and edifying.


6. Tim Challies
February 17, 2007
9:55 AM

“do you plan on being in the front during the whole conference?”

Yes, I think I’ll be up there at the front right. I’m probably the only guy in the first couple of rows with a laptop so you shouldn’t have trouble finding me!


7. diane
February 17, 2007
10:01 AM

Thank you Tim for your hard work in live blogging this conference! I look forward to your summaries today! I was inspired to look up Jonathan Edwards resolutions.. printed them and plan to try and read them several times a week!
After reading last night’s summary all I could think of was:
Romans 11:33
Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways!
blessings! Enjoy the conference!


8. Steve Camp
February 17, 2007
10:26 AM

ThinkTank:

The key word the N.T. writers use to demonstrate the question you posed is propitiation (Rom. 3:25; 1 John 2:2, 4:10, Heb. 2:17). This word carries two ideas: 1. to satisfy; 2. to quench, to assuage. Taken in context, Jesus Christ on the cross took not only the guilt and penalty of our sin, but the full wrath of God for His elect. That is what the Apostles Creed means when it says, “…He descended into hell.” Jesus didn’t go literally to hell after He died (the false teachings of the Word/Faith movement), but He did so on the cross. “He descended” by taking fully God’s wrath in our place. Hell is not the absence of God, but it is His wrathful presence being poured out upon all the ungodly, Satan and his demons forever. Hell would be “Club Med” if it were not for the presence of God’s wrath.

The wrath of God that you and I deserve to be poured out upon us in hell for ever and ever in unmitigated gall without relent, was poured out upon Jesus on the cross. That was the punishment. This is a profound truth and mystery. Whatever eternal wrath is, the miracle was that it was compressed into time and poured out on the Son for us as the Father faced Jesus (pros ton theon - face to face) and the fullness of His anger was consumed, quenched, satisfied by the Lord.

Listen, every sin, that would ever be committed, by everyone, who would ever believe was placed on Jesus. But also, the wrath of God that burns against us and our sin as well. THAT was the cup that only Jesus could drink; and the cup that He wrestled with in the garden. It was not the cup of dying; wicked men had gone the way of the cross before and were rightly punished for their crimes. Many went laughing, mocking, scornful of their insurrections. But only the Lord could drink the cup of God’s wrath; and He did it fully. He drained it! He drank it to the very dregs and redeemed us there.

Christ was punished in our place so that we may have peace with God (Rom. 5:1-2) forever. He became, what Paul says in Galatians, “a curse for us.”

On the cross, God through Christ saved us from Himself. The true Christian never has to face the fear of eternal judgment; why? Because Jesus faced it for us already on the cross. God treated Christ on the cross as if He lived our life, so that we by grace through faith in Him, can be treated as if we lived His life (2 Cor. 5:21). That is the great doctrine of imputation.

The culmination of the Lord being punished in our place and the satisfaction of God being accomplished was when Jesus cried out, “My God, My God, why has thou forsaken Me?” Christ was forsaken in that He bore our sin, its guilt and penalty. But also He bore the wrath of God against us. The Father faced the Son and the Son faced the Father on the cross and He “took it—all of it” for His own. Then Jesus cried, “IT IS FINISHED” He had fulfilled the Law; went beyond the veil; satisfied God’s wrath; fulfilled all righteousness; exalted grace; took away the guilt and penalty of our sin; destroyed Satan’s hold of death; abolished death and its sting; secured for us eternal life; brought us into intimacy with God; instituted a new covenant; and made for us peace with God forever! Amen?

The death of Christ was both a propitiation and an expiation of sin. Propitiation refers to the turning away of wrath by an offering. God’s wrath is satisfied, His justice is met by the sacrifice. Expiation refers to covering sins. By the atonement our sins are removed from us. The atonement satisfies both the demands of the Father and the needs of Christ’s people (1 Pet. 1:2). That such a double transaction can be achieved by one Person, in one event is a matter of eternal glory reserved for Christ alone.

I hope this helps a bit more in answering your question.

Grace and peace to you,
Steve Camp
2 Cor. 4:5-7


9. diane
February 17, 2007
10:45 AM

Steve,

AMEN! AMEN! and AMEN!


10. ThinkTank
February 17, 2007
1:45 PM

Steve,

I thank you - and thank God! - for your answer.


11. Ann Addison
February 17, 2007
3:58 PM

Tim, thanks for the live blogging post. I look forward to reading the rest of this series. If anyone is interested in the audio sermon of “Sinners in the Hand of an Angry God” I’ve posted the info on my new blog http://mousenaround.wordpress.com/


12. donsands
February 17, 2007
4:28 PM

“On the Cross, God through Christ saved us from Himself”. -Campi

Excellent quote.

This is the Ultimate of all ultimate loves! How can we compare anything to the love that is displayed here. A Father who loves His Son with perfect and divine love, crushes Him for rebellious sinners.

Amazing love. Amazing grace. And amazing Jesus, our Lord and Savior.


13. Ellen B.
February 17, 2007
5:51 PM

I’m a new reader of your blog. Funny connections you begin to have with other bloggers. My husband and I frequent the In and Out close to LAX on our many travels between LA and Seattle. Just found out my niece is singing at the Resolved Conference. You can probably see her from where you are seated. She’s the cute short one :) with shorter brown hair. I think her husband is running sound for the group. Enjoy, wish I was there.
Ellen B. from Seattle


14. Dan H.
February 18, 2007
3:17 AM

“Yes, I think I’ll be up there at the front right. I’m probably the only guy in the first couple of rows with a laptop so you shouldn’t have trouble finding me!”

Tim, actually there are quite a few people with their notebooks in the first few rows as I bear witness to two other people in my row (which was the fourth row) tonight with the same MacBook I have with me. Then you have the techies with their Dell notebooks and then the techies of all techies with their IBM ThinkPads.

If you came by yourself, you do know by the Resolved Conference tradition, your lunch is paid by us veterans.


15. Mark Helfrich
February 23, 2007
12:40 PM

I remember him saying your favorite quote. Mine was when his son said:

“Dad, it’s good to be joyful because I’m not in trouble with God anymore.”

That hit me because a 7 year old said that. It’s basic english, and it hits the point. Because of Christ, we are no longer in trouble with God.


16. Tim Challies
February 23, 2007
3:21 PM

“That hit me because a 7 year old said that. It’s basic english, and it hits the point. Because of Christ, we are no longer in trouble with God.”

I love that. As the father of an [almost] 7 year old, I have come to appreciate the wisdom of babes.


Post Your Comment Here »