Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the blog or about the author.

Friday May 11, 2007

Challenging The Blasphemy Challenge

Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is all the rage these days. I first bumped into this strange fad when watching Brian Flemming’s documentary The God Who Wasn’t There. At the end of this film, at its very climax, Flemming, while standing at the front of an empty chapel, slowly turns the camera and speaks right at it, saying that He denies the Holy Spirit and acknowledging that this will guarantee him an eternity in hell (if, of course, Christianity proves true). It is meant to be a shocking, profound moment. Recently, inspired, I suppose, by Flemming, a group called The Rational Response Squad created The Blasphemy Challenge. They claim that they will give a copy of Flemming’s DVD to anyone who will first follow his example and damn themselves to hell. The instructions are simple:

You may damn yourself to Hell however you would like, but somewhere in your video you must say this phrase: “I deny the Holy Spirit.”

Why? Because, according to Mark 3:29 in the Holy Bible, “Whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven; he is guilty of an eternal sin.” Jesus will forgive you for just about anything, but he won’t forgive you for denying the existence of the Holy Spirit. Ever. This is a one-way road you’re taking here.

So they encourage their readers to shoot such a video, to upload it to YouTube and to send them the link. To this point is seems that 830 people have played along. There is something more than a little inflammatory about this site and the challenge it provides. Yet it is in no way shocking to me or to most other Christians.

The irony of this site is that it is based on a lie at worst, or a significant misunderstanding at best. It is based on a false understanding of the sin or the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. The members of the Rational Response Squad say “Some liberal Christians may throw out the parts of the Bible that they don’t like, but Christians who believe in the Bible as the word of God do believe that blaspheming the Holy Spirit is the single unforgivable sin.” And this is true. The Bible speaks twice of an unpardonable sin (Mark 3:29 and Matthew 12:31). Matthew 12:31 reads “Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven people, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven” and Mark 3:29 echoes it, saying “but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin.” This unpardonable sin has perplexed both Christians and non-Christians. Many Christians have wrestled with the meaning of these verses and have wondered if they have, perhaps unwittingly even, committed this sin. And now there are many atheists who are trying to deliberately commit this sin.

Atheists such as Brian Flemming and the members of this Squad teach that the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is, very simply, denying His existence. Hence they instruct people to utter these words: “I deny the Holy Spirit.” This, they teach, will be a one-way road to perdition. The trouble with this view is that it is, quite frankly, wrong. It removes the verse from its context and, conspicuously, always focuses on the verse as given in Mark 3:29 not as we read it in Matthew 12:31. And not only is this interpretation wrong, but it is unsupported, as far as I can see, by credible teachers of the Bible (and, of course, by the Bible itself). Speaking personally, I have been a Christian for at least fifteen years now and have been listening to the Bible taught since infancy. I have never heard anyone teach that the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is as simple as denying Him. Of course what I have been taught represents only a narrow slice of what Christians teach, so I dug deeper, searching for what other Christians teach on this subject. I searched all the Bible commentaries I could find and searched other resources written by highly-regarded teachers and scholars. I once more came up with nothing that would support this view.

Admittedly there is some level of disagreement about what exactly constitutes this sin. But the vast consensus is this: that the blasphemy against the Spirit involves ascribing the work of the Holy Spirit, accomplished through Jesus Christ, to Satan. To commit this sin you must know that Jesus Christ is God and, despite that knowledge, ascribe the Spirit’s work through Him to the devil. Reverend Richard Phillips, pastor at First Presbyterian Church Coral Springs, Margate, Florida, says “There is no sin so great that the precious blood of the Son of God — of infinite value before God — is not sufficient to pay for it. The issue is that forgiveness comes only to those who believe on the Lord Jesus. And someone who knows who Jesus is — who realizes that his work is by the Holy Spirit — and yet so refuses to believe that he actually ascribes the Spirit’s work to the devil, cannot possibly be saved. Why? Because that person is not just ignorant, but they willfully, knowingly, reject Jesus as Messiah, as proved by the Holy Spirit. So this passage describes not someone who in a fit of anger or temptation commits blasphemy, but someone who refuses to believe on Jesus as the Messiah, even when he recognizes the Holy Spirit at work.” So the great irony, based on what the Bible teaches, is that this sin cannot be committed by one who considers himself an atheist! This sin presupposes seeing and acknowledging the work of God, but then attributing it to Satan.

As we begin to understand this sin we see that it is not so much that a particular sin cannot be forgiven as that there comes a point at which the Holy Spirit will no longer convict a person of sin and thus drive him to repentance. The Scripture is clear that any sin for which we ask forgiveness will be forgiven. But we only seek true forgiveness and only express true repentance when the Holy Spirit works in us. John Piper, a popular author, pastor and scholar writes “The unforgivable sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is an act of resistance which belittles the Holy Spirit so grievously that he withdraws for ever with his convicting power so that we are never able to repent and be forgiven.”

If the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit was as simple as denying Him we would all be guilty of this sin. The Bible teaches that, as human beings, we all hate God and that we are all firmly and deliberately opposed to Him. Genesis 6:5 says “The Lord saw that…that every intention of the thoughts of [man’s] heart was only evil continually.” In Ephesians 5:8 we read the Apostle Paul saying “for at one time you were darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Walk as children of light” and in 2:1-2 says “And you were dead in the trespasses and sins in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience.” We all sin and we all hate God. We all hate Him, that is, until He changes our hearts so we see Him and know Him and love Him. I used to hate God. I was no different from Brian Flemming in my denial of God and my hatred towards Him. To continue this passage from Ephesians 2, I carried out the desires of my body and mind, and was by nature a child of wrath, like the rest of mankind. The next two words are among the most simple but the most glorious in all of Scripture. “But God.” The passage goes on to say (and I’ve taken the liberty of personalizing it) “But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved me, even when I was dead in my trespasses, made me alive together with Christ. For by grace I have been saved through faith” (Read it here). I was the blasphemer, the sinner, but Christ intervened and stooped to save me despite who I was and what I had done.

Brian Flemming and the Rational Response Squad and others who use these passages about the sin against the Holy Spirit deliberately neglect the first portion of Matthew 12:31. It reads “Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven people.” Forgiveness remains for those who blaspheme. If you have made a video and have denied the existence of God, of His Son or of His Spirit you have blasphemed. You have sinned. Sin is a serious matter and one that God will deal with. But you have not committed an unpardonable sin. Do not be too secure in what you have done for Christ offers forgiveness, even for this. The Bible tells us that Jesus has come to seek and to save the lost. Christians are often prone to speak of “seekers” as those who go looking for God. But the Bible tells us that Jesus Christ is the one who seeks and if Christ seeks after you, He will find you whether or not you’ve denied Him. He will graciously change your heart and allow you to see the beauty and glory of God. Being rich in mercy He will love you, even while you are dead in your sin, and will make you alive with Christ. You, too, can be saved by grace through faith if only you will believe in Him. There is forgiveness for all. God desires that you, too, be saved and gave his only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life (John 3:16). Look to Him.

If the issue of the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit continues to perplex, consider reading this excellent treatment of the subject. This one, written specifically for Christians, is also excellent.

Comments (34) »


1. Josh
May 11, 2007
11:46 AM

Ironic isn’t it? That a bunch of Athiests will work so hard to prove they don’t believe God exists. If He doesn’t exist, it wouldn’t be such a big deal.

Josh
“…the word of God is not bound.”
—2 Timothy 2:9


2. drew@jonah
May 11, 2007
12:06 PM

Another popular error would be Benny Hinn’s definition. He and other Charismatic fringers say that blasphemy of the spirit is speaking against what the Spirit is doing. So if you’re a cessationist, you’re pretty close to reprobate.

I too found it ironic that one would have to look at the works of God and then ascribe them to the devil. Pretty hard if you can’t do step one. Tim, in your experience, does this tie in with apostasy? It sounds very similar.

-d


3. Rong
May 11, 2007
12:07 PM

Thanks Tim for taking the time to spell that fallacy of this out so plainly.


4. donsands
May 11, 2007
12:56 PM

I was a blaphemer. I believe in a religious god of what I was taught as a Catholic, and I grew to say things like, “I’d rather go to hell, than to go to heaven with you”.

God is incredibly gracious.

I agree: “So this passage describes not someone who in a fit of anger or temptation commits blasphemy, but someone who refuses to believe on Jesus as the Messiah, even when he recognizes the Holy Spirit at work.”

Thanks for sharing this. It’s a deep subject in Scripture, and we need to discuss it more, so that we understand it better.


5. Don Fields
May 11, 2007
1:07 PM

Excellent job! Right on point. Thanks for your ministry of writing.


6. janelle
May 11, 2007
1:11 PM

Phenomonally well done, Tim.


7. carissa
May 11, 2007
1:56 PM

i watched a couple of those youtube videos until i felt too sick to continue. these people are conscious of the irony that they are denying a God whom they claim isn’t there - and they use it to their advantage, to mock religion. they are daring God to damn them. one really young girl ended her video with, “see you in hell.” i nearly cried. clearly, she doesn’t really believe that she’ll experience actual hell. the irony, however, is not to her advantage. it may feel good to get out anger toward God (the one who isn’t there, right?), but in reality she has no idea what she’s doing - though she should - and that is tragic.

i know many of us feel disgust and even anger toward these people. many of us also feel intense sorrow and compassion for these lost people. i think we should rightly feel both… i believe God does.


8. Josh Rives
May 11, 2007
2:30 PM

Thanks for clarifying who John Piper is.

Just joking, I know that this article would hopefully get to others who are not frequent readers, but as a frequent reader (who obviously would know who Piper is) that line made me laugh.


9. Allen Mickle
May 11, 2007
2:34 PM

Tim,

For a detailed scholarly look at the issue of blasphemy against the Spirit see:

William W. Combs, “The Blasphemy Against the Holy Spirit” Detroit Baptist Seminary Journal 9 (Fall 2004).

Allen Mickle


10. Frank Walton
May 11, 2007
3:01 PM

I have a blog against the blasphemy challenge here.


11. Sojourner
May 11, 2007
3:39 PM

Let me understand: you are saying that in order to effectively blaspheme, or rather to blaspheme effectively, with the end of inviting permanent residence in hell, if such exists, then one has to a)believe in Jesus b)believe in Satan and c)believe in Hell.
This means that no atheist, anywhere, can ever blaspheme, no matter how hard they try.
In fact, it seems that only Christians can blaspheme, and, if this is indeed the only unforgivable sin, and liable to send one to hell, well then, there’s a lot of Christians there. The rest of us, I presume, have a free pass?

If so, this is great news, because then I can go on my merry way without fear of ever again being waylaid by (no doubt hellbound) Christians, who wish to save me from hell. I take it I have your permission to explain to them that whilst I cannot go to hell for blasphemy, they surely can, and indeed, the only way to avoid going to hell (for this sin at least) is to themselves become atheists as soon as possible, since they, like me, would then be excused.

Thank you for this.


12. Joe
May 11, 2007
3:59 PM

Dear Sojourner,

I feel incredibly sorry for you. Your post is so terribly misinformed, I felt I should send you my condolences before you are reduced to absurdity. However, when it happens, it will serve to promote more informed discussion, as many will see the embarrassing consequences that spring forth when a cocky-poster lacks the basic information concerning the issue. Without further delay, I will let the others have the pleasure of this demonstration.


13. Matthew Lipscomb
May 11, 2007
4:11 PM

I have on rare occasions heard it preached that “The Unforgiveable Sin” was in fact attributing the work of the Holy Ghost to the devil; and I have always felt that there was perhaps a dimension of truth in it; but that there were larger issues at play with the soteriologic dynamic that prevented a genuine believer from actually ‘throwing that switch’ as it were in the spirit. Only someone who never was and died unsaved could do such a thing, and that if you become a Christian and genuinely profess Christ it precluded the possibility that you ever did.

I do not - however - think that that gives a blank check to an adamant cessationst to run around and accuse everything of a Pentecostal/Charismatic nature of being Luciferian. I have a copy of Merrill F. Unger’s What Demons’s Can Do To Saints in which he basically says that Speaking in Toungues is a more or less a gateway to demonic possession. I am sure Unger entered into Glory - but I would urge anybody regardless of your propensity for vitrol and your polemic drive in such matters to absolutely aproach such a question with the greatest of prayer and care lest you call a soverign act of God some allocation of demonic sway. My parents grew up with freinds from Baptist churches where the pastors openly said that speaking in toungues was a demonic manifestion. That is a fearful assertion. I beleive that BB Warfield was reacting to the abuse that he had seen in the early 1900 to the outpouring of the spirit that he had seen. We have to take care that we do not formulate docrtinal assertions based on an isogetic outworking of our cultural/theological anxieties; such practice invariably deevolves into spiritual neurosis. You do not see abuse and then go to the scripture to approve your remedy. Abuse does not consitute disuse - it is not an understatement that you don’t have to defend a lie from a lie; it is the truth that the lie most assuridly seeks to attend itself to.


14. Ann Addison
May 11, 2007
4:42 PM

Tim, an excellent post.

btw, the link I quote below from your post did not work. It is a memory scripture for me, but I was curious to know where you were linking.

For by grace I have been saved through faith” (Read it here


15. donsands
May 11, 2007
6:52 PM

“I do not - however - think that that gives a blank check to an adamant cessationst to run around and accuse everything of a Pentecostal/Charismatic nature of being Luciferian.”

I agree. As I expect most everyone who visits this blog.

However, there may be some demonic working going on in some of this speaking in tongues as well. But for the most part, I believe it is the flesh, when it isn’t God, and it serves no purpose, except for the person doing it to feel good about themselves.

The real gift is from God, and I would glady acknowledge the genuine gift if i ever saw it.


16. Elizabeth at A Biblical Home
May 11, 2007
6:57 PM

I have watched a short TV clip on this and it seemed to me that the participants were trying very hard to convince themselves that God does not exist.


17. Nath @ Reformed Geek
May 11, 2007
7:51 PM

Great post Tim. Having been in a Hyper Pentecostal church, I can testify that the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit was something that was used to keep the people from questioning their teaching. To question any of their special ‘revelations’ - even when they were contrary to scripture, would be to blaspheme the move of the Spirit. And it was considered almost the same thing to dare question the teaching of a modern day ‘apostle’.

Oh, their other favorite line was “touch not mine anointed and do my prophets no harm!”. Problem is, they’re not anointed by the Holy Spirit, and a prophet of God ONLY speaks God’s once revealed Word, not false ‘revelations’.

Thanks again for this post Tim, I think a correct understanding of this doctrine would help set a lot of people free from Charis-mania.


18. Jeremy
May 12, 2007
12:30 AM

Anyone who would do that is obviously not saved, so I don’t see why it would matter, except to disturb Christians, and we should be above being provoked by such trash-talk.

They are already bound for infinite and eternal torment….foolish words will make no difference. You can’t make infinite torture worse, so let them babble.
Nothing they can do can change their fate….it was written before the stars shone.


19. KathleenM
May 12, 2007
1:51 AM

Carissa writes: “These people are conscious of the irony that they are denying a God whom they claim isn’t there - and they use it to their advantage, to mock religion. they are daring God to damn them.”

You seem to be missing the point. Atheism is simply lack of a god-belief — there’s nothing there that warrants an active denial. (In other words, an atheist feels no more need to deny the Christian god than to deny Thor, Zeus, Satan, Voldemort, Xetlzcoatl, Shiva, Allah or any other of the other thousands of gods, deities, devils, demons, fairies, werewolves, etc.).

What they ARE doing — via the Blasphemy* Challenge — is showing other people there is nothing to be afraid of. It’s simply the equivalent of stepping on a sidewalk crack or walking under a ladder, except for a different superstition.

*Isn’t blasphemy a quaint word? It’s got that funny medieval schtick going, like drinking mead, minstrel troupes, and other stuff from the Renaissance Faire.


20. Joe
May 12, 2007
7:36 AM

Before one can be saved, the Holy Spirit must convict of sin and point one’s heart to Jesus as the way of salvation.

Once having had this taste of salvation, to then reject it is attributing to some other source than the Holy Spirit the conviction and the pointing.

That is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.

One in whose heart the Holy Spirit has never worked cannot blaspheme against Him.

Therefore, he has always the potential to be saved.

To reject the offer of salvation tendered by the Holy Spirit is the blasphemy. It is not a moment in time, but a spiritual response of rejection.

Does that make sense?


21. KathleenM
May 12, 2007
12:56 PM

Tim writes: “But the vast consensus is this: that the blasphemy against the Spirit involves ascribing the work of the Holy Spirit, accomplished through Jesus Christ, to Satan.”

If charlatans were looking for an insurance policy against charges of fraud, they could hardly find a better one than this Blasphemy clause, could they?
It goes like this. Some Benny Hinn character makes a big public show of his magical faith-healing powers — under his laying-on of hands, cripples arise from their wheelchairs, the deaf hear, the blind see. Of course, the whole spectacle is a choreographed fraud using able-bodied plants paid to fabricate their maladies and miracle cures. So how does ole Benny protect himself from exposure? He invokes the Blasphemy Clause, of course. If anyone dares to whisper “fraud” (fraud being a sin, thus the work of Satan) about his spectacles, he can simply accuse them of The Unforgivable Sin: attributing the work of the Holy Spirit to that of Satan. That oughta keep the yokels quiet.

Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel … and the Holy Spirit is the last refuge of the charlatan.


22. Jesse Phillips
May 12, 2007
5:37 PM

I’m not exactly an ardent supporter of Benny Hinn, but I hardly expected that a very well written article on the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit and critique of atheist misunderstanding (good job, Tim) would end up with comments slamming Hinn. Talk about unexpected. Don’t everybody praise him at once ;P

No, on a serious note, I agree with you and your exegesis of those passages. It’s amazing what a few atheists can accomplish, especially with the internet: having people purposefully trying to be forever condemned to hell. Staggering.

(On a light note: how many of you think Hinn himself has committed the unpardonable sin and will be in hell?)

Of course Hinn also believed there were 9 Holy Spirits at some point I think, so maybe he thinks his critics blasphemed the 4th and 7th one :)


23. kathleen
May 12, 2007
6:11 PM

It’s amazing what a few atheists can accomplish, especially with the internet: having people purposefully trying to be forever condemned to hell.

It’s kinda hard to seek condemnation to an imaginary place by an imaginary entity for an imaginary violation, isn’t it?
I think that’s the whole point. The atheists are saying “Hello. There’s nothing to be afraid of.” Saying ‘I deny the Holy Spirit’ is every bit as inconsequential as saying ‘I sing mice greenly’ or ‘Twas brillig and the slithy toves.’ It’s just a sequence of syllables; it has no supernatural power or agency, there’s no god waiting to torture the dead.


24. Blake
May 12, 2007
11:32 PM

I don’t consider myself an expert on the subject, but I’ve been sitting here trying to imagine what must be taking place in the heart of the blasphemer described in Matthew 12:31, the one who knows Jesus is God but attributes his doing to the devil. We’ve talked about atheists and how they are not the ones described by the verse, but we have not talked about the person who is.

I picture a person who is within the context of a covenant community—they are born the child of Christian parents and/or attend the visible church their whole lives, but of course they are not among the elect…
I might say other things that I picture this person believing or doing, but I wonder if anyone else has thought of this and might be able to respond with their own thoughts about what such a person would be like? I am really curious, would this person be like an Esau? Judas? who?


25. Ellie
May 13, 2007
5:27 PM

I’m a Christian. I found the end of the video very moving. Christianity in its most distorted arrogant, smug and self righteous forms has done untold damage to many people. It seems that by arguing over the finer points of blasphemy, or impugning peoples’ motives, we don’t have to hear the stories and the grief that lies behind them.

it’s a beautifully written post, Tim, but it does nothing to offer hope and grace to damaged group of people.


26. Brad
May 13, 2007
7:01 PM

Great writing, Tim.
I sure am glad that I’m not smart enough to believe in atheism.
Brad


27. SteveE
May 13, 2007
8:20 PM

I find an odd irony in the whole thing. I doubt that these people would need to really need to blaspheme the Holy Spirit to accomplish their trip to hell, since the very fact that they were atheists would have done that already.

I’m not sure that I agree with some of the interpretations of blasphemy against the Spirit. Having been stated but unexplained leaves us with a wide variety of possible meanings; yet for christians I figure its mostly a non-issue anyway. I find the need to challenge God in this manner highly sad.


28. Thomas Twitchell
May 13, 2007
11:08 PM

I am glad that someone finally is saying this. The blasphemy challenge folk are self defeating. It takes the acknowledgement that a spirit exists before it can be blasphemed.

Good work Tim, thanks.


29. Kathleen
May 13, 2007
11:46 PM

The blasphemy challenge folk are self defeating. It takes the acknowledgement that a spirit exists before it can be blasphemed.

I’m not following this logic.
If you believed in this spirit, then you’d also believe that denying it would condemn you — they’re both part of the same belief package.

By denying the spirit, you’re not only saying you don’t believe in it, you’re saying that neither the spirit nor its threats have any power over you.

In other words, it’s only those who believe in the whole thing who need to live in fear.


30. Randy Hurst
May 14, 2007
11:01 PM

After reading your post and Pipers study I have reaffirmed clarity through the haze of this little cloud of pompous foolery.
I started a short story in January titled A Gathering of Love found here:

http://togetheroneservant.blogspot.com/search/label/A%20Gathering%20of%20Love

…in which a depressed young man blasphemes God. [Warning: spoiler next (smile)] He will find the Love of God irresistible through the efforts of the young lady he seriously crippled in an automobile accident.

The story was inspired by real and recent events in the life of a man who was in my youth group several eons ago. If anyone has ever wanted to curse God and die for the consequences of his behaviors it is this man. He lost his whole world; reputation, job, wife, health. In real life a wonderful collegiate Christian girl was killed. But still, God is loving this man back to spiritual wholeness through his family and family of faith.

The most poignant insight of your post lies in how extraordinarily difficult it must be to get oneself into a position to commit this unforgivable sin. Also of note is recognizing the oxymoronic nature of an atheist vehemently and devoutly denying no one.


31. Phyllis
May 15, 2007
8:55 AM

Interesting… how does this passion to deny Christ measure up with John 17:2 “Since you have given him authority over all flesh, to give eternal life to all whom you have given him.”

Also, aren’t we already condemned? John 3:18 “Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.”

If it is true that Jesus has authority over all flesh, can a man condemn or save himself?

It seems God’s authority is the heart of their rebellion. Not much has changed since Adam huh?

As for me, I will cry out for mercy!!

Phyllis


32. Micky
May 18, 2007
6:10 AM

About 3 years ago I dropped into a black hole – four months of absolute terror. I wanted to end my life, but somehow [Holy Spirit], I reached out to a friend who took me to hospital. I had three visits [hospital] in four months – I actually thought I was in hell. I imagine I was going through some sort of metamorphosis [mental, physical & spiritual]. I had been seeing a therapist [1994] on a regular basis, up until this point in time. I actually thought I would be locked away – but the hospital staff was very supportive [I had no control over my process]. I was released from hospital 16th September 1994, but my fear, pain & shame had only subsided a little. I remember this particular morning waking up [home] & my process would start up again [fear, pain, & shame]. No one could help me, not even my therapist [I was terrified]. I asked Jesus Christ to have mercy on me & forgive me my sins. Slowly, all my fear has dissipated & I believe Jesus delivered me from my “psychological prison.” I am a practicing Catholic & the Holy Spirit is my friend & strength; every day since then has been a joy & blessing. I deserve to go to hell for the life I have led, but Jesus through His sacrifice on the cross, delivered me from my inequities. John 3: 8, John 15: 26, are verses I can relate to, organically. He’s a real person who is with me all the time. I have so much joy & peace in my life, today, after a childhood spent in orphanages [England & Australia]. God LOVES me so much. Fear, pain, & shame, are no longer my constant companions. I just wanted to share my experience with you [Luke 8: 16 – 17].

Peace Be With You
Micky


33. jb
May 18, 2007
7:28 AM

Micky, all I can say is WOW!
What a testimony


34. Randy Hurst
May 18, 2007
1:53 PM

Micky.

I wish everyone who’s taking pride in blaspheming to prove the nonexistence of our Lord (sic) could read your story of deliverance.

In my counseling experience I watched many an “incurable” psychological condition find its cure in the Love and Power of Christ.

God does love you and has proven His love is a proactive love in your life.

We all need love. Some of us have been wounded in uniquely difficult ways that require either medical or emotional intervention. But whatever your needs, the spiritual needs MUSt be met too. We all need lve, not man’s phony concoction, but the real agape of God. I hope you have found a family of faith to help you grow (you are a new born babe) and that will share more tangible proofs of that love that found you.

You are in my prayers.

Randy