True Forgiveness
I’ve been working my way through Lou Priolo’s new book Pleasing People and it has given me a lot to think about. I don’t know that any of us are readily willing to admit that we are eager to be people pleasers but Priolo shows in this book just how prone we are all to slipping into the sin of esteeming the opinion of others higher than the opinion of God. Like so many other transgressions, at its root the sin of being a people pleaser is a sin of pride.
In a chapter dealing with clothing ourselves in humility, Priolo had some excellent things to say on the subject of forgiveness. As the father of three young children, and as the owner of a proud and sinful heart, I have endless opportunities to teach about forgiveness and to practice both forgiveness and repentance in my own life. I’ve had to tell my children that true repentance doesn’t involve the word “but” (I’m sorry but you shouldn’t have…). But then I’ve seen that I can fall into the same sin. I’ve had to tell my children that true repentance doesn’t drag up the past and use forgiven sin against others. But then I’ve seen that I can do the same thing. I am sure that I’ve got almost as much to learn as my children.
In Pleasing People Priolo helpfully portrays the heart of forgiveness as being a promise. “Forgiveness is fundamentally a promise. As God promises to not hold our sins against us, so we also must promise not to hold the sins of those we’ve forgiven against them.” This is, of course, the foundation of the forgiveness God promises to us: that He will never hold our sins against us. On the day of judgment we know that He will not suddenly charge us with sins that have been forgiven us through the blood of Jesus. We have faith in God and trust in this promise. Without this promise our faith is hopeless.
The promise of forgiveness, says Priolo, can be broken into three parts. First, you promise not to bring up the offense to the forgiven person so as to use it against him. Second, you promise not to discuss with others the sin you have forgiven. Third, you promise not to dwell on the forgiven offense but to remind yourself that you have forgiven the offender in the same way that God has forgiven you for a multitude of far greater sins. Thus when you ask forgiveness you secure these promises for yourself.
Seeking forgiveness cannot be confused with apologizing. An apology is not the means to reconciliation. If I apologize to a person I’ve offended and he subsequently apologizes to me, we still have not taken responsibility and truly humbled ourselves. We haven’t tied up loose ends and, to use Priolo’s term, the ball is still up in the air. Apologies are not enough. We must seek forgiveness and its fruit—reconciliation.
True forgiveness looks something like this:
- Acknowledge that you have sinned. Let the party you’ve offended know that you acknowledge wrongdoing. This is humbling but necessary. Acknowledge not only that you sin but that you have sinned against this person.
- Identify your sin by its specific biblical name. Do not simply acknowledge generic sin but acknowledge specific sin and call it by its biblical name (which keeps you from acknowledging something society may label as sin but the Bible does not). This ensures that you have thought deeply about your sin and have seen how it fits into what the Bible calls sin.
- Acknowledge the harm your offense caused. This is also humbling. You must acknowledge that your sin has had consequences and that you are owning up not only to the sin but also to the harmful consequences your sin brought about.
- Demonstrate repentance by identifying an alternative biblical behavior. Show that you have truly considered your sin by explaining what you should have done instead. Show what the appropriate alternative behavior would have been.
- Ask for forgiveness. This puts the onus on the offended party to accept your repentance and to extend forgiveness to you. It completes the reconciliation between the offender and the one who has been offended.
Simple steps, to be sure, but steps that show true humility and true repentance and can thus bring about true and lasting reconciliation.




Comments (16) »
1. Jennifer
June 21, 2007
10:45 AM
I am a new reader of your blog…not even sure how I stumbled upon it but grateful that I did. This post convicted me today…as there are some things I have forgiven in my mind and thought my heart too but when I look closely - I HAVE been, “bringing up ” past hurts in my dealing with particular people. Not outright or out loud but deep in my heart. Sort of ‘forgiven but not forgotten’ type of thing. I know at this very moment that I need to leave those things at the Cross for good. Recalling past hurts, even if only in my mind - is detrimental to myself and unpleasing to the Lord. Thank you for this post…as a “people pleaser” myself - I’ll be looking for that book. God Bless you in your service to Him.
2. David Reimer
June 21, 2007
11:55 AM
Not to nitpick or anything, but … I will anyway! Tim writes: “True forgiveness looks something like this…” by way of introducing the closing five enumerated points.
The “five step plan” is predominantly one of repentance, not forgiveness as such.
Further, I suppose, what this really is aiming at is reconciliation. Christians, in my experience, tend to use “forgiveness” as a shorthand for “reconciliation”. I know I have been caught out on this myself.
I need to be clear about what I am talking about, so I’m learning (slowly) that I need to use these terms with more precision than I am wont to do! This is precisely what Tim’s discussion is doing (following Priolo) in the preceding paragraphs, distinguishing “apologies” from “repentance”.
Thanks for the review!
3. Jeff
June 21, 2007
12:34 PM
So… would you say that the book is a “must-read” or just a “good read?” What’s your recommendation on this compared to other similar books (are you aware of any?). Cause it sounds like I might need to add it to my Amazon wishy.
4. Chris Brauns
June 21, 2007
1:41 PM
David… I appreciate your point that the five step process Tim put forth is a summary of repentance, which must be the foundation for forgiveness.
However, I think you imply too much distance between “forgiveness” and “reconciliation.” Reconciliation is more a component of forgiveness than an additional step or something distinct from it.
In the New Testament, the word forgiveness is used as an overarching term for salvation in the Gospels. The use of the word rarely appears in Paul’s writings. Vorlander explains that this is because Paul explains forgiveness systematically. He writes:
“In Paul the terms aphiemi and aphesis virtually disappear. This is because the proclamation of forgiveness appears in Paul’s writings as a thought-out and systematized doctrine. The fact that forgiveness is not merely a remission of past guilt, but includes total deliverance from the power of sin and restoration to fellowship with God, is expressed by Paul in his doctrine of justification … and of reconciliation… with God. This has taken [place in Christ and is the center of the gospel. Forgiveness takes place because God gives himself completely in the sacrifice of his So and so gives man a share in his own righteousness. Thus ‘in Christ’ man becomes a pardoned sinner and a ‘new creature’. This teaching represents a summary and theological consolidation of the early Christian preaching of forgiveness.” (Vorlander, H. “Forgiveness.” In The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, ed. Colin Brown, 1, 697-703. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1971, page 702.
Paul would not have accepted the notion that someone could be forgiven but not reconciled. Rather, he saw reconciliation as a component of forgiveness. This, of course, would extend to interpersonal relationships as well as salvation (Ephesians 4:32).
5. Tim Challies
June 21, 2007
1:53 PM
“So… would you say that the book is a “must-read” or just a “good read?”“
So far I’d say it’s a good read, not a must-read. But I guess that depends on how much you read and how much you need to read about this subject!
6. Jamie Butts
June 21, 2007
3:59 PM
I am reading this book right now. I have struggled with being a people pleaser for years, but I couldn’t really wrap my mind around how to break my thoughts or habits and it was easy to justify away. Hey, I love people. What’s so bad about that? It’s easier to mask the truth with phrases like, “I’m insecure” or “I am not a conflict person” or “It’s just hard for me to say no” rather than coming to grips with what the BIBLE says about inordinate people pleasing. This book is literally underlined at least once on every page and I want to highly recommend it to anyone who reads your post today. I just recently “reviewed” it over at www.somethingbooked.blogspot.com. I mainly just quoted from it. Thanks for the post, Challies.
7. The Misadventures of Captain Headknowledge
June 21, 2007
4:32 PM
Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you (Ephesians 4:32).
23 “Therefore the kingdom of heaven may be compared to a king who wished to settle accounts with his servants. 24 When he began to settle, one was brought to him who owed him ten thousand talents. 25 And since he could not pay, his master ordered him to be sold, with his wife and children and all that he had, and payment to be made. 26 So the servant fell on his knees, imploring him, ‘Have patience with me, and I will pay you everything.’ 27 And out of pity for him, the master of that servant released him and forgave him the debt. 28 But when that same servant went out, he found one of his fellow servants who owed him a hundred denarii, and seizing him, he began to choke him, saying, ‘Pay what you owe.’ 29 So his fellow servant fell down and pleaded with him, ‘Have patience with me, and I will pay you.’ 30 He refused and went and put him in prison until he should pay the debt. 31 When his fellow servants saw what had taken place, they were greatly distressed, and they went and reported to their master all that had taken place. 32 Then his master summoned him and said to him, ‘You wicked servant! I forgave you all that debt because you pleaded with me. 33 And should not you have had mercy on your fellow servant, as I had mercy on you?’ 34 And in anger his master delivered him to the jailers, until he should pay all his debt. 35 So also my heavenly Father will do to every one of you, if you do not forgive your brother from your heart” (Matthew 18:23-35).
Having never heard the point made in my entire life of listening to preaching, it came to my attention for the first time a couple of years ago that forgiveness is not something that may be extended except to an offender who is actually seeking to be offended. We know that it is not extended to us until we by the grace of God repent of our sins, asking for forgiveness on the basis of the work of Christ.
But what to do if one is the offended party whose offender does not seek forgiveness? Perhaps Romans 2:4 should be our model? “Or do you presume on the riches of his KINDNESS and FORBEARANCE and PATIENCE, not knowing that God’s kindness is meant to lead you to repentance?” From this I gather that in the face of the unrepentant offender we are can be kind, forbearing and patient with him in the hopes that our lack of “in-kind” response to his offence will motivate him to seek forgiveness.
8. yikesmom
June 21, 2007
7:58 PM
This sounds like a good book, Ed Welch’s book “When People are Big and God is Small” is another good book along the same vein. Welch writes about the fear of man instead of being a people pleaser.
9. JC
June 21, 2007
10:57 PM
To: YikesMom (poster #8) I think the phrases mean the same thing. (Unhealthy) People Pleasing is Fear of Man. Fear of Man is (Unhealthy) People Pleasing.
10. David Reimer
June 22, 2007
8:46 AM
@ Chris Brauns (#4) — so we meet again. :)
Thanks for your comments, and for probing my blog comment in this thread (#2). If my entry implied “too much distance between ‘forgiveness’ and ‘reconciliation’”, then I did a bad job! Of course they are not distant: they are closely related. In fact, one cannot find one without the other. But they are not the same thing, and should not be collapsed together, and that was the slippage that I sensed towards the end of Tim’s thoughtful review.
I do, however, disagree with Vorländer’s analysis (perhaps not a surprise!). It has been a long time since I read him closely. Looking again, I don’t find myself any more persuaded. I think his subordination of the gospels to Paul is both unwarranted and unnecessary: their language differs (as your quote makes plain), as do their interests, emphasis, and focus.
I agree wholeheartedly with your conclusion, though (“Paul would not have accepted the notion that someone could be forgiven but not reconciled.”). I’m a bit hesitant about the terms you frame this in (“… [Paul] saw reconciliation as a component of forgiveness”), but I’ll have to go away and think about that!
The terms “repentance”, “forgiveness”, “reconciliation”, along with “mercy”, “grace”, and others, form a pretty intricate, interconnected system. My own (synthetic) reading of biblical teaching is that reconciliation happens when the relationship between an injured party and the offender is made whole through the mutual movement of one towards the other: by the offender repenting, and the injured party forgiving. Since each element is required, I don’t see how any one can be subordinated to the other.
But perhaps you’ll tell me. :)
David (“The Happy Pedant”) Reimer
11. David Reimer
June 22, 2007
9:09 AM
P.s. Much appreciated Captain HK’s contribution to the proceedings!
12. Chris Brauns
June 22, 2007
9:13 AM
David, I have been trolling the blogging ocean hoping to spot you. I don’t find a lot in your thoughts that I disagree with - — apart from your ruthless assault on Vorlander …
13. Todd H.
June 22, 2007
9:37 AM
This grabbed my interest because I have a wife who struggles with the fact that she has not been able to forgive someone who shot and killed her sister 12+ years ago. Any additional thoughts/resouces on this would be greatly appreciated.
TH
14. Chris Brauns
June 22, 2007
10:57 AM
David, I agree that the Captain made a fine contribution. He is not a pedant.
Todd - - your wife’s situation is a focus of the book I am currently under contract to write - - she may find some helpful thinking in a column I wrote about Virginia Tech:
http://gotpreaching.wordpress.com/2007/05/05/forgiveness-and-virginia-tech/
You may also e-mail me at (chris at theredbrickchurch.org)
15. Ann Addison
June 25, 2007
10:56 AM
I’m almost back from vacation, so just catching up… I have not read this book of Lou’s, but know it must be good. He did the premarital counseling for my husband and I several years ago, and I cannot say enough good things about him. He is very wise, very Biblical. I remember well his teachings on forgiveness… very eye-opening to me.
16. GrammaMack
June 27, 2007
7:54 AM
These principles, promises, and steps sound very much like what has been taught for years (since at least 1991) by Ken Sande in his book The Peacemaker: A Biblical Guide to Resolving Personal Conflict, and in his ministry, Peacemaker Ministries. This would also be a great resource for Mrs. Todd H. See www.Peacemaker.net.