Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the blog or about the author.

Monday October 8, 2007
15 Comments

Bringing Life to the Living

Taking God at His Word.

Do you remember that amazing miracle of Jesus where he brought life to Lazarus? I'm sure you must remember it. Lazarus was sitting in his home along with his sisters Mary and Martha. He was chewing on some bread and cheese as an afternoon snack when, from outside the door of the house he heard a bit of a commotion as if a crowd was quickly approaching. There was mourning and weeping. And suddenly a voice boomed "Lazarus, come forth!" He licked his fingers clean and walked out the door where he saw that his good friend Jesus was standing there along with His disciples. Everyone gasped in amazement as Lazarus walked out into the bright sunshine.

That's absurd, I know. It didn't go like that at all. In the biblical narrative Lazarus wasn't sitting in his house but was dead in a tomb. He wasn't eating a snack but was rotting and decaying. Lazarus was dead and was brought to life. If it was any other way it would not have been much of a miracle. It doesn't take any special power to bring life to the living. Jesus would not have been a great miracle worker if He simply gave life to those who already had it.

But this is a claim I see far too often--that people can bring life to the living.

One of the dubious perks of being a reviewer is that I receive all kinds of marketing material for various products. Just recently I received a copy of the marketing package for the new Word of Promise New Testament audio Bible produced by Thomas Nelson. It is a recording of the New King James translation of the Bible that is performed by a talented and well-known cast of characters. It boasts Jim Caviezel as Jesus, Richard Dreyfuss as the voice of Moses (in New Testament quotes), Stacy Keach as Paul, Marisa Tomei as Mary Magdalene, Luke Perry as Judas and Stephen, and so on. Slightly dramatized and complete with a soundtrack and various sound effects, it is something of a throwback to the days before television--the days when radio dramas were all the rage. All-in-all it seems like a decent enough production, though I listened only to the few sample clips that were provided.

But there's one thing about it that really bothers me.

Hear the Word Come Alive

The cover page for the brochure says this, and only this: "The Word Comes to Life." On the inside of the CD case are these words: "Hear the Bible Come Alive!" Interestingly, a similar product and one I reviewed a short time ago, The Bible Experience, makes a similar claim: "Hear the words of the Bible brought to life like never before. Inspired By…The Bible Experience: New Testament Audio CD is a fully-dramatized reading of the Bible performed by an unprecedented ensemble of distinguished African-American actors, musicians, and personalities." And as I pause to think about it, I realize I've lost track of the number of products that claim to bring the Bible to life or to make its words alive.

I object. Every Christian ought to familiarize himself with the incredible words of Hebrew 4:12 which read, "For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart." The Word, it seems, is already alive. And like the living Lazarus, it has no need for us to breathe life into it. That is no cause for boasting; no cause for acclaim; no headline for marketing materials. The Bible is alive. We can't make it more so.

Now I'm no dummy and will admit that I know what the marketing people mean when they say they will bring the Bible to life. I make no objection to people trying to inject some emphasis and drama into the biblical text. Just yesterday our pastor's assistant preached about Jesus' crucifixion and clearly invested a lot of effort in reading the biblical text in a dramatic way. A drab, monotone, unenthusiastic reading can certainly seem to rob the text of its life or vitality. I believe it is right and good when the text is read in a way that emphasizes what ought to be emphasized. But we need to be careful how we speak of such things. We need to show a little bit of theological precision lest we inadvertently cause people to doubt that the Bible has life of its own and that we somehow need to inject it with excitement in order to give it vitality.

If we claim that a dramatization of the Bible brings life to it, we tacitly suggest that Joe Christian, reading the Bible in the morning before heading to work, is somehow reading it in a way that is less living, less powerful than when Marisa Tomei and Jim Caviezel read it superimposed over a professionally-produced soundtrack. By emphasizing the life-giving nature of dramatization, we necessarily de-emphasize the Bible's own qualities; we de-emphasize the Bible's power of having and giving life.

After all, the Word does not gain its power or efficacy from the way it is read or through dramatization. Rather, the Bible has innate power--power given it simply by virtue of its authorship. Because the living God has given us the Word, it has power and life of its own. In that way it is absolutely unique; there is nothing else like it. We can bring other words to life; we can bring the plays of William Shakespeare to life; we can bring history to life; we can bring other cultures to life; but we cannot bring the Bible to life. Nor should we even attempt to do so. The Bible is already alive. It is living and active and powerful. It is sharper than any two-edged sword. It has life of its own.

So don't try to make the Bible come to life. You don't need to do that anymore than you need to perform CPR on a living, breathing, healthy individual. It's already alive. Dramatize it if you wish; there is value in doing that, I am sure. But be careful how you speak of such things. Be careful how you understand such things. God hasn't told us to bring the Word to life. He has told us simply to bring the Word. If we bring the Word, He will bring the life.

Comments (15) »


1. Stephen Altrogge
October 8, 2007
10:46 AM

This reminds me of a story by R.C. Sproul. He was asked to teach a group of people in such a way so that “the Bible would come alive” to them. R.C. recalls thinking at that moment, “It’s the Bible that makes me come alive.” Scripture is alive, we’re the ones who are cold to it…


2. diane
October 8, 2007
12:16 PM

AMEN!


3. rosemary
October 8, 2007
12:21 PM

“The Bible is alive. We can’t make it more so.”

Great, timely post. Unfortunately, a lot of us treat the Word of God as though it is stagnant, dull and ineffective. Perhaps if we brought ourselves to it with an openness to the Spirit’s work in our hearts rather than with our own agenda, we’d receive first-hand acquaintance with its liveliness and sharpness and absolute effectiveness.


4. Tim
October 8, 2007
12:50 PM

I’ve heard that when Edwards delivered his sermon, “Sinners in the hands of an angry God”, he read it from a manuscript, never made eye contact with the congregation and avoided adding anything emotional or entertaining to his reading. Yet, it was used in a mighty way.

I’ve also often wondered how the original languages lacked punctuation, for the most part. How can we be certain that we are emphasizing the right word of phrase.

I preached a sermon, once, on the text “My God, My God, Why hast thou forsaken me.”

Before the sermon I asked the question: “Which word or words should be emphasized the strongest when reading this text?” I then built my sermon around what might be understood by emphasizing the different words. One time I would emphasize “MY”, the next time I would emphasize “GOD”, etc. Changing the emphasis seems to change the point of understanding.

Good post.


5. Ben
October 8, 2007
12:51 PM

A fair and true assessment, Tim.

My two cents: A for-sale product aimed at a consumer base is one thing. But how many churches use the same language in their, erm, marketing tactics?

I often see churches advertising how their pastor or some visiting speaker will make God’s word (or, even less specifically, “church”) “come alive” or be more “relevant” or “exciting”. The reason to come to church is seemingly to hear a dynamic message of hope / love / peace / wealth / blessing, etc. powerfully delivered. Is this some conjurer or magician who can pull rabbits out of his leather bound, Bible-shaped hat?

I hear people talk about their experience on Sundays at a local church. It sometimes sounds like a sales pitch. “Such and such pastor is such a great speaker — he knows how to make the Bible so interesting! I never knew that was in there…” etc.

As you point out Tim, this approach may not come from a desire to detract from the power of the Scriptures themselves. But still, I wonder if people / churches who speak this way believe that God’s divine attributes are inherent in His Word? If not they have a flawed view of the Bible. If so, what do they finally believe about God?

Thanks for the great post. For the reformed it may be as much about the way we speak and think as it is about true belief. I’ll try to speak carefully so as not to give others the impression that the Bible needs our help to become more than just a dusty old book full of ancient stories and peculiar rules.


6. donsands
October 8, 2007
2:51 PM

Good thoughts. You truly give the Scriptures the honor they deserve.
To market God’s truth is wrong. To try and make the Gospel so it becomes exciting and intreating is simply leaning on our own understanding.

The Gospel is the power [dunamis] unto salvation.


7. David at free Christian resources
October 8, 2007
3:13 PM

Amen! Great post.

The bible is God’s word. It is the truth! If I am finding the bible “dry” I know the only way to get my mind and heart working is to bring it before God and get Him to help me.


8. Matt
October 8, 2007
3:28 PM

I’m tracking with you. You reminded me of a 9Marks interview I heard with Grudem. He challenged preachers to repeatedly use exact phrases of Scripture even as they balance their words of commentary that are not Scripture. Encouraging a repeated use of exact bibilical words and phrases throughout a sermon.
Therein is the power. In the living word. Spoken. “Come alive” indeed…


9. Larry Geiger
October 8, 2007
4:01 PM

I think that some passages feel better and some people feel that they understand them better if they are well read. I think that this works particularly well with dialog. A flat reading of dialog by a single individual may be more difficult for some people to understand than if it’s well read by two people.

I think that this is similar to when the pastor expands our understanding of the text by explaining how shepherding worked during bible times. I know nothing about sheep but it seems that people in Israel 2000 years probably knew shepherding terminology very well.


10. Robert M. Warren
October 8, 2007
9:11 PM

To expand on Stephen’s R.C. Sproul story, Dr. Sproul also thought to himself, “I didn’t know the Bible had died…I didn’t even know it was ill.”


11. Jennifer Churchill
October 8, 2007
11:35 PM

First off let me say thank you for a very thought provoking blog. I’m a fairly new regular but before that, every time I would google a topic I was interested in, up would pop your blog…so I thought…I better start reading this guy! As a homeschooling mom with four kiddos under eleven it’s really easy to become absorbed in my own little homeschooling world…listening to homeschool speakers, reading homeschool books, blogs etc. The Lord has really used your blog to get me out of my homeschooling world for a little while each day and thinking on other things.

I wanted to comment and add that I also see and have myself been lured into, this repackaging and making to “come alive” in the area of printed Bibles. I have had times in my walk when I thought that if I only had this Bible or that translation, or a certain edition, that would surely make me understand, make it “come alive” and have meaning. The Lord has been so loving to show me my sin in this. The Lord brought me the very Bible I wanted and you know what? It went unopened for nine months until I came in repentance and stopped expecting a quick fix. As someone posted earlier it was I who was cold to it not the other way around. As I read in Oswald Chambers just the other day, I wanted to go from mountain top to mountain top, forget the drudgery of living an everyday life of faith.

When I buy into the belief that the gospel is all about me and my experience then that is all it will be about and I will go from thing to thing looking for my next spiritual fix. It really won’t surprise me if I start hearing people I love say, “The Lord is really moving through these new dramatized Bibles! This new thing of listening to the Bible instead of reading it….it just makes it come alive man!”


12. SteveE
October 8, 2007
11:55 PM

I find it curious that AT LAST someone has finally indicated that God’s word has power! At least from a reformed perspective. Though I have always known that God’s word was the bridging factor in allowing us to make a decision and come to Him, most reformed/Calvinistic ideology has God doing it with no reason for our preaching or going into the world and spreading the gospel. Meanwhile scripture gives us the very reason for it!! That being that God’s word can pierce the hardened heart and blends perfectly with scripture and the myriad examples found through out the bible.

Sigh….what a relief. But I figure that it will be muted and down played so that it fits with reformed ideology…no mater how that contradicts scripture…but at least no one will be able to say to the Lord…”Ummmm, I thought you were doing it all, so I didn’t??”

Forgive my sarcasm…I just find this issue so obvious, and so ignored…..sigh.


13. RANDY HURST
October 9, 2007
9:30 AM

Hi Tim. Insightful post.

The Word “comes alive” when it is read or preached. Like peanut butter, it does little to satiate an appetite when it is in the jar. It betters no one in the bedside stand drawer or written in a language that one cannot understand (i.e., Greek). Taylor’s “Living Bible”, for all it’s flaws was an refreshingly understandable on the fly interpretation for a generation that was stymied by the foreign language of the KJV. I remember the first time I looked at a truly original KJV and found it, much like the original Shakespearian phrases,”Greek to me” (years before I took Koine Greek). Once in the human mind and heart it has to encounter the presence of the Holy Spirit in order to enjoy spiritual translation and comprehension.

I remember my orientation to the history of the old mountain schools of East Tennessee. The main goal of teaching how to read was so that the students could read and understand the scriptures.

That goal was the greatest contribution of the reformation; that the common person could appreciate reading the scripture. Until just a few decades ago, one of the core tools of teaching to read was the bible itself. As we have allowed that to be a peripheral aspect (if offered at all, even as literature) of general education, we have seen nothing but decay of character and morality throughout America.

That’s not from a lack of Bibles. It’s from a lack of reading and hearing the Word.


14. Jeri
October 9, 2007
1:00 PM

SteveE,

Your comment shows that you really don’t understand much about reformed theology. A high view of God’s word and the power of the preached Gospel to save is at the very center of reformation theology. My goodness, I hardly know what to say to your comment, because I know you’ve been reading this site…if you didn’t have such antipathy toward what you think are reformed views of God’s word, you might be able to see those views a little more clearly. Here’s hoping so!


15. SteveE
October 11, 2007
11:15 PM

Jeri,
Sorry if you viewed my comment as antipathy towards reformed teachings. Actually, it is specifically because I have a very clear understanding of Calvinistic/Reformed teachings that my comment was made.
A reformed teaching under Calvinistic tenets would have the Spirit of God, or grace; as the case may be, breaching the gap of our ‘total depravity’. Though scripture teaches that no one received the Spirit prior to their salvation, with the exception of Christ…who didn’t need to be saved, or the Apostles…for a very specific reason..and again a single group of gentiles…for another very specific and singular reason. Everyone else…us included, only gets the Spirit after our salvation.
Thus, the power of God’s word, as is told in scrioture over and over, begining in Acts the 2nd chapter, is the catalyst that enables us.
Though the ideas of reformed teachings have altered and changed since Calvin, I find the clumination of changing the tenets set forth by him, interesting and disturbing in many ways. Since the tenets of Calvin all depend upon one another in order to stand as a coherent unit; the change of one distorts or destroys the rest and renders them unsupportable. Though much of scripture would do this, regardless, I speak in concern…for my brothers and sisters who obviously love God, but still flounder in the changes and alterations of their basic understandings of scripture but who do not consider what these changes mean to their underlying beliefs.
I never comment simply to inflame or throw stones. I value this site and its contributers, even if I worry over their life past this one.


Post Your Comment Here »