Facing Down the Hurricane
The sovereignty of God in the storm.
Thabiti Anyabwile, his family and his church are facing down a hurricane. A recent post at his blog is titled What Do You Think About God When Calamity Strikes? and in this post he makes reference to another recent tragedy and two different responses to it.
When the 35W bridge in Minneapolis collapsed a few weeks ago, it raised questions of ultimate meaning. When times of tragedy strike people are always left wondering, “Why did this happen?” and “What does it all mean?” John Piper wrote on the Desiring God blog that “the meaning of the collapse of this bridge is that John Piper is a sinner and should repent or forfeit his life forever.” “That is his most merciful message: there is still time to turn from sin and unbelief and destruction for those of us who live. If we could see the eternal calamity from which he is offering escape we would hear this as the most precious message in the world.” In other words, God uses tragedy to point us to the truth that we all deserve to die but that God extends His mercy, at least for time. This tragic event is proof that we all deserved to die. Just a couple of days ago I posted a quote by John Blanchard that seems relevant. He says this: “The judgments of God fall often enough in this world to let us know that God judges, but seldom enough to let us know that there must be a judgment to come.”
Another Minneapolis pastor has contested Piper’s understanding of the event. Greg Boyd, a prominent Open Theist, takes issue with almost everything Piper says. Though he agrees that this event offers an opportunity for theological reflection, he arrives at completely different conclusions. Denny Burk summarizes the differences. “Boyd’s ‘concern’ is not surprising, however, given that the theological differences between Piper and Boyd could not be more pronounced. Piper is a Calvinist. Boyd is an Arminian. Piper is a determinist. Boyd is an open theist. Piper believes that penal substitution is the central meaning of Christ’s atoning work. Boyd maintains that the Christus Victor view is the central meaning of Christ’s work.” Because of their vastly different theology, it is no great surprise that they disagree. But as Burk points out, only Piper’s view can be faithfully reconciled with the testimony of Scripture.
And now Thabiti is looking at the possibility of a tragedy as well. “Right now, the Cayman Islands are preparing for what could be a category-5 hurricane, Dean. Men are at my house boarding up windows and securing the place.” In 2004 a similar storm essentially destroyed the island. “Understandably, people here are filled with fear and questions.” It is worth pausing to consider which understanding of God offers the most hope not just after a tragedy, but in preparation for the possibility of one.
It’s clear to me that when moments like the Minneapolis bridge collapse happen, or category 5 hurricanes come your way, you need to have a rock-ribbed theology featuring the massive and awesome God of the Bible, the God who created the worlds with a word and His Son who rebuked the winds with a word. The same God who rules even over the evil causes of Satan and his minions, and the feeble efforts of men to thwart Him. The Bible’s picture of God is that nothing is beyond his control, not even the places where we live (Acts 17:24-26). And “God did this so that men would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us” (Acts 17:27).
The storm is expected to hit Grand Cayman late on Sunday night. But before then, on Sunday morning, Thabiti has the task and “the privilege really, of telling people … how they should think about their lives right now. And it won’t be much of a stretch, by God’s grace, because we’ll be meditating on what we’ve been meditating on for the entire year of my service here.” He will teach them nothing less than the beautiful truth of the gospel.
God still rules. I can tell the people that the way men messed the world up through sin provoked God to wrath; the disasters of the world are really only one aspect of the outworking of His holy judgment, and not even the infinite outworking. Though God is not in the hurricane, listen for His voice. Listen for His call to repent. And that’s the good news to the lost among us tomorrow.The even better news to the found is God has not purchased your life with the precious blood of His Son in order to waste it! Whether we perish or survive in this hurricane, God will eternally be glorified. Christ has conquered death and the grave, and He will raise us up victorious. Now let goods and kindred go, this moral life also. There is a far superior one awaiting.
I thank God for men like Thabiti Anyabwile who preach the gospel in the face of tragedy. Looking at the possibility of meeting with the worst of what nature can send their way, they stand firm on God’s promises, knowing there is ultimate meaning even in pain and suffering and tragedy. What a tragic thing it would be to see the storm but to miss the message.
Let’s pray for Thabiti, his family, his church and the whole island, that God would preserve and protect them. Let’s pray that if the hurricane does continue to bear down on that island, that God would use even that tragedy for His glory.




Comments (12) »
1. Mike Reynolds
August 18, 2007
2:29 PM
Thabiti’s words are so God-filled. Two minutes before I read your post, Tim, I finished reading Thabiti’s, and thought, “Tim Challies has to say something about this today and get the word out that we need to pray.” Then I read your thoughts.
Let’s pray that when the power of the dark storm arrives, the light of the gospel will pierce through that other darkness, the darkness of our own making, that many will be eternally saved and God will be exalted.
2. Jeri
August 18, 2007
4:22 PM
Amen.
3. Peter Smythe
August 18, 2007
4:43 PM
“But as Burk points out, only Piper’s view can be faithfully reconciled with the testimony of Scripture.”
I read Piper’s blog and Greg Boyd’s blog/response. While both blogs deal with the same proof text of scripture, it is more than apparent that Piper reads a large amount of his own theological gloss into the meaning behind it and its specific application to the Minnesota bridge. Boyd, on the other hand, does a much better job of exegesis. To say that Burk’s reference to some isolated scriptures in Job demonstrates that “only Piper’s view can be faithfully reconciled with the testimony of Scripture” speaks more of backroom politics than good hard thinking.
4. bryce
August 18, 2007
7:39 PM
you know, i’m not a bible scholar by any means, but after reading both articles, my thought is that the GOD that piper talks about at least has the ability to do things in the world. the god that i see boyd describing seems impotent and out of control.
5. kletois
August 19, 2007
5:11 AM
I pray that my brothers and sisters will be safe and that their faith be increased during this time. As for the question ‘What do you think about God when calamity strikes?’, I have to say this: I remember His promises, I remember that He is with me, and I love Him all the more.
6. James Martin
August 19, 2007
8:09 AM
Peter Smythe is correct.
7. SteveE
August 19, 2007
6:34 PM
While I agree that tragedy is a sad and constant companion of man, while he is in this world, its does not necessarily fall that God is behind them.
I know, I know, everyone will leap to say that God is ultimately in charge of everything. I don’t disagree with this statement…at least not in spirit. Basically you’d have to be presupposing that God had some intention involved in calamity, great or small. Since He has never deigned to lower Himself with the need to explain all the in’s and out’s of His operation of this world any statement we made in regard to such things could only be supposition and guess work. Things I believe He would say are not things we need to be worrying about.
As Jesus Himself stated in Luke 13 concerning the Galileans and the tower of Siloam. Here He basically made the point that things in life happen. Does this mean God is not in charge? Nope. It simply means that God placed the parameters and laws of how life works in motion. His involvement, and the extent thereof, are never explained…but He does make the point here, and elsewhere in scripture that life happens, and it doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with some lesson from God or a punishment for sin.
But as Jesus tried to stress so hard…we do need to repent, because life can be taken away at any moment. Well, repent if your not Reformed…cause otherwise God will do it for you. HA! Sorry guys…just had to poke that dig in at you….:)
Peace Bro’s and Bro’ets.
8. Ben
August 20, 2007
8:00 PM
“Piper is a determinist. Boyd is an open theist.”
Why are people spreading the false antithesis in this debate that you must be either a determinist or hold to a strictly libertarian view of free will? If we only have a choice between a strictly robotic universe or a strictly free universe, I know I’d want to go with a strictly free universe everytime.
The best of reformed scholarship has always emphasised both the absolute sovereignty of God and the responsibility of mankind for its actions together, simply because scripture clearly emphasises that both hold together (compatibilism, in other words). I’m not sure why anyone would want to be proud of and aspire to the label “determinist”… I certainly don’t.
9. Ben
August 20, 2007
8:09 PM
@Peter Smythe:
So while Piper is reading his own “theological gloss” into the meaning of the text here, Boyd is sitting on a high, lofty ground whereby he magically doesn’t impute any of his own perspective (aka “theological gloss”) into his analysis? Give me a break. Both views depend massively on underlying structures which both sides would claimed to have developed from their exegesis of scripture. I agree with you that simply pulling out a proof-text from Job (or anywhere else for that matter) is not going to settle anything, precisely because at the heart, this whole debate is a “massive worldview clash” (to use DA Carson’s language), not simply a quibble over some obscure points of theology.
10. BJ
August 21, 2007
11:21 AM
all- Now there were some present at that time who told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices. Jesus answered, “Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way? I tell you no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish. Or those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them- do you think they were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem? I tell you no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish.” Luke 13:1-5 If you were standing there listening to Jesus, would you have understood him to have said: a) “In a fallen oppressed world, tragedies happen. I should focus my mental and physical energy turning away from my self-centered ways to carry out God’s will on earth as it is in heaven” (Boyd) or b) “There is still time to turn from sin and unbelief and destruction for those of us who live.” (Piper)
Given (a) or (b) (I hope a fair summary of Boyd and Piper’s positions) which choice seems to best reflect the response Jesus was trying to evoke from his listeners?
Verse 6 begins “Then he told this parable …” Does Jesus’ parable shed any additional light on what he meant in vs. 1-5?
11. Carl
August 21, 2007
7:58 PM
For whatever it’s worth, I have many family and friends all along the I-10 corridor from Tallahassee, Florida to New Orleans, Louisiana. When Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast, many close family and friends were directly affected. Every one of them suffered various levels of damage and/or injury but fortunately no deaths. Some years before that, Hurricane Ivan struck the Florida Gulf Coast and once again many close family and friends were directly affected. I’ve also gone through my share of hurricanes with the most damaging was Hurricane Frederick in 1979 when I was a kid in south Mississippi. The small town I lived in received a direct hit (first and only hurricane I’ve ever been in the eye of) and had to endure the results of hurricane damage for several days before outside help arrived. My wife was a little kid when she went through Hurricane Camille in the 60’s when she lived in Gulfport, Mississippi. Her parents, her sister and she had to stay on the top of their car for a couple of days before flood waters subsided. Their house was about a mile away from the beach. My inlaws’ home was saved and repaired but it was destroyed during Hurricane Katrina.
In all of those, churches all over were damaged or destroyed yet the church members rallied together in Christian fellowship to help each other spiritually, emotionally, physically, and every other way possible. It seems to me that in the darkest times, we Christians turn to God and turn to Christian fellowship as well. It’s automatic. We don’t even think about it. We just do it. I firmly believe it’s the Holy Spirit at work in our lives at these times. He is our comforter according to the scriptures, right?
And don’t get me started with tornadoes.
Pardon my rambling.
12. Balendu Sharma Dadhich
August 22, 2007
2:15 PM
Why is is so that most of the calamities affect the have-nots the most? Why is it so that people who are already oppressed and agonised are put to test over and again?