Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the blog or about the author.

Friday October 23, 2009

Great Truths

If you were one of the four million people to read the bestselling book Freakonomics, you will pretty well know what to expect from the long-awaited sequel SuperFreakonomics. It has five chapters, each of which stands on its own and each of which ties varied economic data into some kind of a cohesive whole. It is just as interesting as its predecessor and sticks very closely to the formula that made the first book such an unlikely hit.

The first chapter is titled “How Is a Street Prostitute Like a Department-Store Santa?” and this chapter is a lengthy look at the economics of prostitution. The authors draw out all kinds of interesting conclusions about prostitution and especially about how prostitution has changed over the years. For example, they show that the wages for prostitutes have fallen drastically over the past hundred years. The reason is pure economics and goes back to the law of competition. “Who poses the greatest competition to a prostitute? Simple: any woman who is willing to have sex with a man for free. It is no secret that sexual mores have evolved substantially in recent decades. The phrase ‘casual sex’ didn’t exist a century ago (to say nothing of ‘friends with benefits’). Sex outside of marriage was much harder to come by and carried significantly higher penalties than it does today.” In other words, in decades past women held closely to their virginity and were unlikely to give it away to anyone but their husbands. Today a man has, in the words of the authors, “a much greater supply of unpaid sex.” According to the laws of supply and demand, prices must then fall. In our generation only 5% of men lose their virginity to a prostitute; in days past it ran as high as 20%. Today more than 70% of men have sex before marriage; in days past it was just 33%. Premarital sex has proven a free substitute for prostitution. Once the domain of the professional (at one time one in every fifty American women in their twenties was a prostitute!) premarital sex is now the realm of any woman. This has driven down wages through a strange but sad kind of free market force. I guess this gives us something to think about the next time we hear about the falling levels of prostitution. Though we rejoice when prostitutes find another line of work, it does not necessarily mean that we have cured one of society’s ills. It may point to changing market forces based in turn on declining morality.

There was something else in this chapter that gave me a lot to think about. In their research the authors found that certain sexual acts have always commanded a premium; some are more costly than others. That is no surprise. Acts that are taboo in society are going to cost more than acts that are considered “normal.” What is interesting, though, is to see that this is a moving standard. As society has become increasingly sexualized, acts that were once taboo are now considered bland or boring. What once commanded a premium is now considered barely worth thinking about. This got me thinking about sin and about the very nature of sin. Have you ever had one of those moments where you found that sin was suddenly taking charge of you? If you think about it I’m sure you can come up with a moment when you realized that it was no longer you who was in charge, but sin. Sin had taken over; sin was taking the lead and you were just following along. It is a terrifying place to be! Sin always wants more, always demands more. It is progressive, beginning with something small but always demanding more and greater. Give it an inch and it will take a mile. The economics of prostitution shows the progressive nature of sin. Just in a brief look at rates and wages we can see how society has changed as women have become more willing to give their bodies away and as the vulgar and invasive and degrading has become mainstream.

This book illustrates why I love reading and why I always seek to read widely. I rarely regret reading Christian books and have benefited from such books immeasurably. But I would be impoverishing myself, I think, if I were to read only Christian books. Here in a book that is not in any way “Christian” I found all sorts of interesting facts, interesting ideas, that I can grapple with. They are issues that I can think about within my Christian worldview and use them to uncover great truths about people and about the God who created them.

Amazon

Comments (9) »


1. J.P.H.
October 23, 2009
9:53 AM

It may point to changing market forces based in turn on declining morality.
Can we really call “declining” morality when, in days past, four times as many men lost their virginity to a prostitute as do today? Would you agree there’s something more sordid about paying a professional stranger for sex compared to having consensual sex with a woman with whom one is in an ostensibly loving (though, not entirely committed) relationship?

2. Tim Challies
October 23, 2009
9:58 AM

Can we really call “declining” morality when, in days past, four times as many men lost their virginity to a prostitute as do today?

I guess you could see it either way. In days past a larger percentage of men had sex with a vastly smaller percentage of women (but the overall occurrence of men who had premarital sex was smaller). Today far more men have premarital sex with a far greater percentage of women.


3. Chris Roberts
October 23, 2009
11:07 AM

J.P.H.,

I’d say men in that day likely knew there was something wrong with hiring a prostitute. Today, society has no issue with casual sex. It was known that men ought not hire a prostitute but it is not known today that men and women ought not have sex outside of marriage. The overall moral sense of society has changed.

I would argue that this in itself is not altogether bad. Back then there were many lost people living moral lives. At least today lost people look like lost people, making the need for evangelization increasingly clear. It was easy to ignore the lostness of a person who acted like church folk, but lost people (and church folk!) no longer act like church folk.


4. K Menzel
October 23, 2009
11:32 AM

JPH - The only difference between sex with a prostitute and the “hook up” style of sex many people are currently engaged in is that there isn’t any direct/explicit monetary payment to the woman. So I think it can easily be said, and very reasonably be defended, that there is indeed a decline in morals.


5. Beth Badenhorst
October 23, 2009
12:38 PM

Hi Tim, I am from South Africa and am visiting my daugther in Vancouver. Through her I have come to know about your blog. Thank you I find it very interesting.
I would like to take part in your next book reading project. So please count me in.

God Bless. Beth


6. Eric Nygren
October 23, 2009
9:54 PM

Hey Tim,

With all the books that are out there how do you decide what to read in order to read ‘widely’? Just curious if you’ve figure out a system that works for you or if you just go with whatever catches your eye.

- Eric


7. GrammaMack
October 24, 2009
12:01 AM

Kathleen says, in regards to “The only difference between sex with a prostitute and the ‘hook up’ style of sex many people are currently engaged in is that there isn’t any direct/explicit monetary payment to the woman”: “You could say the same thing about marriage, no?”

No.


8. Marie
October 24, 2009
6:28 PM

No, Kathleen, in marriage, there is not an exchange of payment for sex.

Wives AND husbands are to have sex with each other pretty much when they or the other want to. We are instructed in Scripture not to deny one another, actually, except for a few good reasons.

A marriage continues even if we can’t have sex. For instance, if I were unable to have sex or in a coma or some such thing, my husband would still be married to me. He’d take care of me, too, for “nothing.”

And if my husband can’t have sex, I stay married to him and fulfill my role as best I can. I don’t get to go “get it somewhere else.” If he is disabled and unable to work, I’d have to step in and provide for everyone, actually.

This does not happen with prostitutes.

Marriage is a pleasure but it is also mutual sacrifice and living for another person.

The opposite of prostitution, come to think of it.


9. Tee-Jay
October 26, 2009
1:09 AM

Yes, there has been a definite decline in morals. The fact that casual sex is pretty much taken for granted in most college dorms is evidence of the fact.
While the situation with prostitution back in Victorian times was sinful, the people at the time would have readily admitted that the practice was sinful. True, writers such as Thomas Hardy, C.A. Swineburne, and Samuel Butler were anxious to throw off “outmoded” sexual mores of the past but most people would have been ashamed to admit that they frequented brothels.

Today, by contrast, people think that as long as there are two consenting adults, anything is permissable. This casual attitude towards sex makes it difficult to find wholesome but clever television to watch. Everyone at work would talk about the show “Friends”, but almost every time I’d tune in, the characters would be talking about who they were sleeping with. I couldn’t bring myself to watch an entire episode even once. The same can be said about the sitcom “Two and a Half Men”. Thank God I continue to be disturbed by these things. Woe to me when I cease being disturbed by them.