“Freedom Go To Hell,” reads the sign. “Europe You Will Pay. Your 9/11 Is On Its Way,” and “Be Prepared For The Real Holocaust” read others. Other signs list verbs prescribing the punishment for one who blasphemes the prophet of Islam: behead, slay, butcher, exterminate, massacre, annihilate. All this from the hearts and hands of those who claim to follow the religion of peace. And all of this over a series of cartoons.
James White writes, “I see the State Department of the United States has also condemned the cartoons…could someone link me to where they condemn the blasting of Christianity, the Bible, Jesus Christ, etc., that takes place daily in almost all of our newspapers? I can’t find that link. I must just be missing it. It has to be there, right?” But we all know it is not there. Jesus Christ is blasphemed and reviled every day. In fact, there may be no greater object of scorn in the world today than Jesus Christ. His very name is, for multitudes of people, little more than a blasphemous swear word. The name of Jesus is slandered and blasphemed not only in cartoons, but in poetry, prose, song and film. The symbols of Christianity are swear words and the Savior of the world is despised and rejected.
John Piper comments, “To me this cries out for the observation that when artists put the crucifix in a flask of urine, Christians were grieved and angered, but not one threatened to kill anyone. Our longing is to convert the blasphemers with the Good News of Christ’s death and resurrection, not kill them. Our faith is based on One who was reviled not just in cartoons but in reality and received it patiently for the salvation of the cartoonists. These riots are filled with intimations about the glorious difference between Christ and Mohammed, and between the way of Christ and the way of Islam. And the cowing of the press around the world and the US government is ominous for the fear we are under of Islam—not just extremist Islam. I do not respect the teachings of Islam which when followed devoutly lead to destruction.”
My friend Paul Martin says that this is bottom line: “Our God is sovereign and will meet out a perfect justice in the great and final judgement. He doesn’t need me to burn your house down just because you blaspheme Him. In fact, He calls on me to warn you of your sin and (wonder of all wonders) to urge you to embrace the One you have mocked and disgraced as your own Saviour from sin and its punishment.”
Islam is, in many ways, a terrifying religion. As much as Muslims insist that they embrace a religion of peace, it would so often seem to be anything but. The great irony in many of the protests around Europe and the protest expressed in North America is that the Muslims are using the freedom of speech provided to them by the Christian framework of the constitutions of their lands to protest another freedom of expression. They are using freedom that would be denied to them were their laws to rule the land.
Christians look at these people burning, shouting and inciting violence and we feel some outrage, but mostly we feel pity. These people are merely acting out a naturally sinful human tendency.
Christianity is a rational set of beliefs that can be proven in many different ways. We can turn to historical evidences for the existence of Jesus and there are many available to us. We can look at the complexity of the universe and declare correctly that it must have been created by an intelligent Designer. And it was. But when I seek evidence of the truths of the claims of Scripture, I need look no further than Scripture itself. There is simply no way that a mere human could have created such a religion. It is impossible.
Every religion in the world acknowledges that there is a problem with humanity. Every religion knows that man is not in the state for which he was created. This is obvious to us. Every person knows, even if only deep in his heart, that death is unnatural. Men were made to live forever, not to be torn away from friends and family. Men were made to live in fellowship with God, not seperated from Him temporally and eternally. Every religion in the world offers some type of solution to this problem. But for one, every religion offers a solution that ultimately depends on the efforts of man. Only Christianity looks outside of man to the work of God Himself. Jesus Christ is our hope. Without Him and without His work we are nothing, we have nothing and we can look forward to nothing. He is our only hope.
Jesus Christ, through the Spirit, empowers us to live lives that are pleasing to Him. He calls us to live lives marked by peace, patience, kindness, goodness, gentleness and self-control. He tells us that, if our enemy persecutes us, we are to love our enemy. If a person strikes us we are to turn the other cheek. If a person blasphemes the Lord God, we are not to exact vengeance but are to lovingly, patiently, passionately challenge that person to turn from his sin and to turn towards the Lord, the very one who has been offended. We serve a Lord who is infinitely more willing to forgive than we are to sin. And we all love to sin.
Christianity proves itself to be true simply by its other-worldliness. No human being could conceive of such grace - grace that compels us to forgive rather than avenge. Grace that demands obedience rather than sacrifice. Grace that forgives all of our sin.
So when I look to the news and see followers of Mohammed burning embassies, rioting in the streets and demanding blood, I see my own humanity. I see men acting as men will act. But then I turn to Scripture and see the change God has wrought in my heart, and the change he can bring to the hearts of those who seek blood. Blood has already been shed, and Christ’s precious blood is sufficient to cover a multitude of sins.
When I see the Muslim riots I see myself. Looking past myself I see Jesus Christ and in Him, clear evidence for the truths of Christianity.



Comments (19) »
1. Ryan Wentzel
February 6, 2006
10:44 AM
Amen!
2. Larry
February 6, 2006
11:20 AM
We certainly do see the outpouring of fallen man in acts like this. Acts of which we are all capable apart from Christ. Therefore we should actively share the Gospel with such people, as that is the ultimate solution.
However, we must remember too that God has ordained government to deal with the lawless and it is not contrary to scripture to insist that such folks be dealt with firmly and decisively (by government, not individuals), even to the point of execution if they’ve taken human life (Genesis 9:6, Romans 13:4)
3. Ian Hugh Clary
February 6, 2006
12:55 PM
Very well put Tim.
4. JD Wetterling
February 6, 2006
2:03 PM
This is the best post by you I’ve ever read, brother! Great truth! Great writing!
5. Julian
February 6, 2006
2:21 PM
Thanks for the thoughts, Tim.
I can’t help but wonder if one of the reasons God—in his unsearchable wisdom—has allowed Islam to grow, as he has: So that the glorious truth of the gospel (changed hearts and lives) will be displayed all the more brilliantly against the backdrop of man-made religion.
If it is, we would be remiss (at best!) to refrain from pointing it out. Let’s boast in Christ, just as you’ve done! He is for true peace, true love, true religion. How “un-man-centred”!
6. Amy
February 6, 2006
3:17 PM
Excellent thoughts. Thanks for this.
7. Susanna
February 6, 2006
3:54 PM
Our pastor mentioned yesterday that because of these cartoons, not only has the Islamic community been aroused to much anger, but the persecution of Christians in many countries where Islam is followed will become even more heated because of this event. That is something I hadn’t thought about.
8. Sam
February 6, 2006
4:41 PM
Tim,
Great article!!! Well written, well thought out.
Here is one point many people can understand about the followers of Islam compared to Christians.
Look, as Christians, we are forgiven and have been given the ability to forgive. Our hearts have been pierced and know forgiveness. We can more easily look at persecuters and forgive them for their actions. We know that all our merit rests in Jesus and we should not think we forgive on our own.
The followers of Islam have not been forgiven in their religion. They do not know the freeing feeling of being forgiven and everything they know and do rests on their own actions. Their hearts have not been pierced by forgiveness. THEY do not know how to forgive. Why should they?
Isn’t it easier for us to act that way too. In our humanity, we act the same way. Driving down the road, someone cuts you off. Everyone has been there. Then the hair on your necks stands up and that sneaking feeling of “HOW DARE THEY” creeps into your thoughts. It’s much easier on your heart to train yourself to think “They must have an emergency, better back off a little so they get there safe.”
It’s all about forgiveness. I didn’t say forget, but forgive, just like each one of us has been forgiven.
Good post.
His,
Sam
9. Sam
February 6, 2006
5:01 PM
First line should be “Can’t understand”. Sorry, proofer was sleeping.
10. Renee
February 6, 2006
5:42 PM
Very well said Tim. You have said it all.
Thank You
11. Lindsey
February 6, 2006
9:26 PM
I’ve been pondering this in my head for days and could not get my thoughts down so nicely like you have done. Thank you for this post…….
12. Mike Perrigoue
February 6, 2006
11:14 PM
Boom, baby!
13. Leslie
February 7, 2006
12:06 AM
A few disjointed thoughts on this post.
Firstly, it seems illogical that the extremists protesting would be upset that a non-Muslim would publish an image of Muhammad. Surely the edict against that is directed only to Muslims. Applying the same “true for you but not for me” mantra used so often against Christianity, why even acknowledge the protestors let alone apologize to them?
Secondly, when trying to understand how Jihad continues to exist in today’s world one must look to its modus operandi: fear. Jihad exists partly because of antiblasphemy laws in Muslim countries and partly because the moderate Muslim voice cannot speak up against the violence threatened upon anyone, anywhere in the world. As Ravi Zacharias states in his book, “Light in the Shadow of Jihad”, ‘Moderate voices need to speak up now, so that every man, woman and child may be free to believe without the threat of the sword.’
Finally, when you say Tim that you see yourself in the protestors, I don’t understand that. You are a free and moral Christian who abhores violent behaviour and has nothing to do with religious discrimination and oppression. How could you possibly see in these extremists, a likeness of yourself? Sinful and in need of a Saviour, yes. Out of control, murderous, evil, hateful terrorists bent on destroying Christian nations? No.
14. étrangère
February 7, 2006
8:40 AM
Just to pick up on something Leslie - “destroying Christian nations”: this is perhaps the Islamic perception, but the European nations involved are not Christian. Neither is the US, or Canada. Secular or religious, they’re not Christian nations and we shouldn’t reinforce that impression.
It is not true that all the Muslim protestors are out of control, murderous, evil, hateful terrorists. I don’t buy the ‘Islam is a religion of peace’ line at all, but neither do I write off as terrorists all Muslims who protest against the breaking of one of what they see as universal fundamental laws. They are more consitant that we are in this. They see the laws and principles of Islam as universally true. They have NOT sold out/bought into the ‘true for me but not for you’ myth. So they object when someone flouts this law.
I don’t think that we should necessarily universally enforce what is universally true - though as stewards of creation we should work towards this as we have godly means. I do believe in the freedom of the media to a limited extent - I would see no problem with a government censoring porn in newspapers though, so to be consistent I should have no problem with a government censoring blasphemy. Immorality is what God defines is to be, and blasphemy is bad. What’s the difference, in view of Genesis 3?
Much of our objection is on the grounds of ‘their beliefs are wrong’. Fair enough. Some of our objections are on the grounds of ‘they shouldn’t use violence’ which is consistent with our view, yes. Some of our objection has been on the basis of ‘look how stupid they are’ which is a non-argument and doesn’t forward anything. What I raise is that it also seems that much of our objections are not on the basis of ‘we wouldn’t enforce universal truth violently’ but more like ‘our truth isn’t universal’. The fact that we don’t take offence has less to do with peacefullness and more to do with swallowing the worldview which happily puts ‘what you believe and do’ into another little world while I’m happy in my own. So when someone swears by Jesus’ name, we might object - but most likely on the basis that we’re offended personally, not that Jesus is Lord and it’s wrong to treat his name lightly. We’re shocked at Islam partly because it claims to be universally applicable. Since when did Christianity cease from being universally and objectively true?
15. Sam
February 7, 2006
9:20 AM
What is their primary objective with this rioting?
Is it to get their faces on the TV so that in turn, they become legitamate in their stance that their truth is the only real truth? That is one of the devil’s main lies. This group of people are clueless to the deception they live under.
Do they honestly believe they have merit in rioting? IF they prove they have merit in rioting, will this set precedent in courts of law? Is this what they are really pushing towards?
His,
Sam
16. Shelley
February 7, 2006
11:15 AM
Here are some sobering stats posted by Jim Bublitz at Slice of Laodicea: http://www.sliceoflaodicea.com/archives/2006/02/some_insight_on.php#comments
Peter Hammond is a missionary in Africa who has a great deal of contact with Muslims, and has authored books on Islam. He gives this insight relating to why some populations seem to have more violent confrontation with this religion:
As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. … Between 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. [Europe, Australia, USA and Japan]
From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. You will find not only the introduction of halaal food (giving food prep jobs to Muslims), but growing pressure on the super-market chains to feature it on their shelves (along with threats for failure to comply). South Africa’s Muslim population is 2%, but they control 35% of the businesses, a large percentage of the banks and have five Cabinet seats while Christians (77% of the population) have none.
From 10% you will notice growing belligerence in no-go lawless suburbs (ghettos), with car-burnings (a la France last October). After 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihadi militia formations, sporadic killings and terror bombings of Churches. [India, Mindanao (Philippines)]
At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare. [Indonesia] From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Shari Law as a weapon and Jizya confiscatory tax. [Sudan, Kosovo, Lebanon and Egypt]
After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide. [Western Papua New Guinea, Iran, Biafra, Turkey and N. Nigeria]
100% will usher in the peace of “Dar-es-Salaam”- House of Peace - as in Saudi Arabia, Libya and Yemen.
—Statistic source: Slavery, Terrorism & Islam by Dr. Peter Hammond
…..
Since one can’t morally kick a people-group out wholesale, the only recourse is prayer and a faithful, loving witness of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
17. TheBlueRaja
February 7, 2006
7:10 PM
Beautiful post, Tim. Thanks.
18. tim
February 10, 2006
12:29 PM
Another thoughtful blog you might want to check out comes from the Far East but isn’t far wrong on the Christian reaction.
It’s here:
click
19. Dana R. Spencer
March 9, 2006
5:24 PM
Interesting article, and I encouraged my local newspaper to run the cartoons. What has happened is that our freedom of speech was denied by outside interests. When I investigated more fully I found that many Moslem artists over the centuries have pictured Mohammed in various art forms. In fact after looking at the cartoons (from another cultural standpoint), I am unsure why anyone would be upset over a man leading sheep—there is no sign stating this in Mohammed and it could be Christ for that matter. They cartoon Christians and Jews in poor light, behead an American and others on their TV station, and continually fan the flames of discrimination and hatred around the world. This is just another excuse to take their anger out instead of obtaining a good dose of anti-depressants.
Dana R. Spencer