"The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment is a truly important work-one that should be required reading not only for church leaders, but for all sober-minded laypeople as well."

John MacArthur (From the Foreword)

"If you were more discerning you’d probably buy this book. If you do read this book, you will be! This book on discernment is simple, clear, well-written and well-illustrated...

Mark Dever

Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the book, about the blog or about the author.

04/30/07
Comments (20)

Quote: Presbyterian Healing Service

This morning I finished reading Daniel Doriani’s commentary on James and, in his discussion of the final portion of James 5, found an interesting quote. As I read it, I though of my continuationist (charismatic) friends. It is my experience that these people often typify cessationists like myself as those who do not believe in supernatural or miraculous healings but this is really not the case. The disagreement really arises over whether or not the spiritual gift of healing is operative in the church today. This quote describes something that happened in a conservative, Reformed, Presbyterian context and something that I think is consistent with cessationist theology (even though cessationists may have some disagreement about what James refers to by anointing a person with oil). Doriani is not the only Reformed Presbyterian who has experienced this kind of blessing.

During the autumn when I first studied James in earnest, a friend suffered a viral infection of the heart. While it was not a heart attack, it mimicked many of the symptoms of one. My friend felt listless; he looked gray and lifeless. One day at church, I told him that James 5 instructs elders to lay hands on the sick and to pray for their healing; I suggested that he call the elders for that very purpose. Two weeks later, he told me he wanted to proceed. No one in our church had done this before, so we did something very Presbyterian: we studied the matter another six weeks and hoped he didn’t die in the meantime.

At last, we appointed a night for prayer and the elders gathered. Our church’s pastor (I was a college professor at the time) summoned the elders. Before we prayed, he told us not to expect a dramatic physical healing, since God heals in many ways. I appreciated his motive, but there was no need to restrain my enthusiasm; my doubting heart was already skeptical enough…

…My friend knelt down in the middle of a circle of elders. We anointed him with oil, laid lands on him, and began to pray. Since I had started the process, I was appointed to offer the closing prayer.

As soon as we began to pray, I had an overwhelming sense that God was, at the moment, healing my friend. My arms felt what I can only describe as bolts of fire pushing through them. As I grasped my friend’s shoulder, heat and energy burned my hand. I felt that my one hand could lift all of his 230 pounds to the ceiling or push him through the floor if I wished.

I knew God was healing him. I wanted to shout, “We must stop praying that God will heal John and start praising God that he has healed him.” But I was too astonished, too ensure of my sensations, to say a word to anyone that night. For four days, I kept my experience to myself.

Four days later, after church, my friend beckoned me with a wild grin, “Dan, watch this.” At once, he dashed up a flight of steps. I dashed after him and met him at the top. He smiled, “And I’m not even breathing hard.”

“I knew it,” I exclaimed, and told him what I had felt a few nights earlier. And he told me, “I knew it too.”

Since that day, I have joined elders to lay hands on the sick and pray for them. I have never again felt the fire. And while I occasionally feel a flood of warmth and emotion, I have learned that my feelings and God’s healings have no connections. A small number have experienced immediately healing from serious illness. More have recovered gradually and under the care of physicians. Many have found spiritual healing—great peace and spiritual renewal in times of crisis and suffering, whether they recovered physically or not. And some have apparently gained no physical or spiritual benefit at all.

A page later he provides an interesting and important clarification about what James says about healing and something that is consistent with cessationist beliefs.

Sick men and women call the elders as a group. They do not call those with a gift for healing; rather they call all to pray for healing. James says the prayers of a righteous man are effective. Since the first qualification for an elder is holiness—not social standing or theological acumen—the prayers of elders are effective. The elders pray for healing, not for miracles. It doesn’t matter if a healing is quiet or splashy, True healings garner all the attention they need.

Quote: Presbyterian Healing Service

Comments (20) »


1. mh
April 30, 2007
7:01 PM

Good, thought-provoking post, Tim. Thanks.


2. donsands
April 30, 2007
8:32 PM

When I was an elder I was always available for anyone who wanted prayer and anoiting. I never saw a healing like this, and I would never claim God is healing for sure, but i would pray in faith that God surely could heal right on the spot if He so desired. And no matter the outcome, God is to be honored and glorified in His sovereignty and goodness.

I enjoyed reading this post. Thanks for sharing it.

I did have a sister in Christ who was very ill, and was to have a very difficult operation on her brain and eye, who I informed that we would pray for her according to James 5 if she desired us to as elders. She basically said no thanks., and if she did she would call us.

A week later I went to see her at Johns Hopkins Hospital, and the doctors said she was healed. And they had no idea what happened. She didn’t need the operation, although that was the plan. I thought that was interesting.


3. Blake
April 30, 2007
8:44 PM

Wow, this post is invaluable to me as someone who is a cessacionist and has the hardest time explaining how I do believe God miraculously heals all the time. I remember sitting in a course on religion at a public university night after night where a girl confined to a wheelchair would bitterly mock Christianity. Apparently her father had tried to heal her many times when she was young through group prayers. The professor smugly joined in the mockery of the faith of her father and was apologetic of the distasteful impression it must have left on the girl to be subjected to such false hope. I harbored all these thoughts of getting up in front of everyone, marching over to the girl and praying that the Lord would heal her and she would get up and walk… but of course I knew that is not the standard the Bible details for healing in this age. The scenario in the story above, however, is very much in line with the Bible. In fact, just this past week a small boy in our church contracted Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever and the church was alerted to pray for his healing from this disease that was a great danger to his life—yet he recovered very rapidly and was running around at worship just like always. Praise God!


4. robert tewart
April 30, 2007
9:24 PM

Great article Tim. Pithy and to the point. It’s encouraging when leaders simply research the matter instead of going on past tradition alone.

Please come check out my evangelism audioblog at StreetFishing

Rob


5. Tim Challies
April 30, 2007
9:56 PM

“Wow, this post is invaluable to me as someone who is a cessacionist and has the hardest time explaining how I do believe God miraculously heals all the time.”

It was valuable to me, too, in understanding how God uses the ordinary means of grace (prayer of the local church through the duly appointed elders) to bring about even the extraordinary. Those who head for healing services or run to a person who supposedly has the gift of healing are missing out on God’s great gift of the ordinary.


6. Phil Awtry
April 30, 2007
10:18 PM

Tim, thanks for this post. James is a letter that I have studied in depth and written (and re-written) a series of lessons on, and I have to say that this last portion of the book is a challenge for both us cessationists as well as contiunationists. There are so many that have taken it as a formula for getting God to heal, and there are as many that dismiss it as being indicative of the Roman rite of extreme unction. As an elder, I have too had the privilege of taking part in a number of anointing with oil and praying for healing occasions - although with none having the kind of effects or results described by Doriani. I always struggled with this practice a bit, seeing the abuses of this kind of thing by the likes of Benny Hinn. But as noted here, James describes seeking prayer and laying on of hands not by a faith healer or even a pastor, but the elders, leaders of the local body. The focus is not on the person needing healed, or on the ones praying, but rather on The Healer.


7. afrikaner
April 30, 2007
11:17 PM

  1. The elders here have taken a thoroughly biblical approach and as God wills so He acts - with and besides means.
  2. To Blake - yes I grew up in a church which more or less taught ‘don’t expect the miraculous’, as if God just doesn;t work like that these days. Well thankfully I have ministered in Asia and Africa and have met many many people who have come to Christ through miraculous signs, visions, healings etc and who continue to see God act through these means. Many of these people have never even seen let alone read about Christ before. Also I have friends who know what is happening wrt God’s mighty acts in places like Egypt - again visions, signs etc. (Ask some of our Presbyterian brethren from Egypt about these things).
  3. As far as cessationism - who says the sign gifts are closed? (Maybe we have fakes and abusers and mistaken people ……)

8. Nath @ Reformed Geek
April 30, 2007
11:23 PM

Great post Tim. It is encouraging to read a testimony of God actually healing someone, and receiving all the glory from it. Not a man, not a ministry, but a sovereign God operating as He wills.

I especially liked:

Sick men and women call the elders as a group. They do not call those with a gift for healing; rather they call all to pray for healing.

9. Samantha
May 1, 2007
8:24 AM

I agree with Nath, it is joyful to read that the LORD glorified Himself in this healing.


10. NJC
May 1, 2007
9:05 AM

Tim, I would be very interested to hear your definition of “cessationalism” - it is not a term I’ve heard used all that often, and my initial reading led me to believe it meant that the supernatural gifts were not used at all anymore… But to read it in the context of a healing makes me ponder no end! Another blog topic perhaps?


11. Josh
May 1, 2007
9:11 AM

Thanks Tim for helping clear this one up.

Presbyterian healing service. Who knew?

Josh “…the word of God is not bound.” —2 Timothy 2:9


12. Tim Challies
May 1, 2007
9:52 AM

“I would be very interested to hear your definition of “cessationalism” - it is not a term I’ve heard used all that often, and my initial reading led me to believe it meant that the supernatural gifts were not used at all anymore”

The term is “cessationism” since there’s nothing sensational about it!

Cessationists, quite simply, believe that the miraculous gifts of the Spirit were given for a specific purpose and thus a specific time. These gifts have since ceased. Miracles still happen, but do not depend on the spiritual gifts.

So while we believe that the gift of tongues is no longer operative, we still believe that God can miraculously give someone the ability to speak in a language he does not rightly know. It’s just that this person does not have the gift of tongues. We believe that God can still heal miraculously but do not believe that there are people with the spiritual gift of healing. We believe that people can still prophecy (think of John Huss, who before he died, prophecied something like “You are now going to burn a goose, but in a century you will have a swan which you can neither roast nor boil.” This prophecy came true in the Reformation, but did not rely on the spiritual gift of prophecy.

So we do not believe that the miraculous has ceased. We believe that the gift has ceased. Most charismatics (or continuationists) do not understand this distinction.


13. Craig Ervin
May 1, 2007
9:53 AM

Great blog! Very balanced. I am from a Pentecostal background, but I did have a struggle with anointing with oil. It seemed a bit silly to me, because it is God that heals, not oil. But… after obeying the Scriptures and doing it and seeing results, who can argue? When we do anoint and pray, I teach that in the Old Testament, the only people who were actually anointed with oil were kings and priests. When we anoint a sick person with oil, it is a reminder that they are a royal priesthood, that God has made us all kings and priests unto Him. When you are sick, you feel God has left you sometimes. The oil as a symbol has both sacramental and pastoral function.

Thanks again for the post. Craig


14. Tim Emerson
May 1, 2007
10:25 AM

Tim:

I am fascinated by your description of cessationism. I, as a continuationist, would pray for healing exactly the same way. And I would not be disappointed if God didn’t heal “dramatically”.

How would you characterize the difference between our perspectives? I take it you would consider yourself a “Classical” cessasionist a la MacArthur?


15. Todd H.
May 1, 2007
10:36 AM

So cessationists would say someone CAN speak in tongues, heal, or prophesy, but they do not have the GIFT of tongues, healing or prophesy?

I can see why someone would not understand this distinction.


16. David Reimer
May 1, 2007
1:17 PM

Although this post is about “how God uses the ordinary means of grace … to bring about even the extraordinary” (as TC put it in a comment), it reminded me of this article, which narrates an out-of-the-ordinary event. Maybe those reading Tim’s piece and this comment thread will find it encouraging, too.

Personally, I am increasingly finding “cessationist” and “continuationist” labels inadequate, although I realize there are of course both theoretical and practical differences between them. But when I read Jonathan Edwards on “religious affections”, or Iain Murray on revival, or either Tim’s post or the article linked above relating to healing, I can’t help but think how unhelpful a “cessationist” tag is.

God heals. God heals! GOD heals! I reckon that trio of propositions is common to cessationist and continuationist alike!


17. Jesse Phillips
May 1, 2007
9:44 PM

I posted this question on my blog, in response to some comments on a review I did of your entry.

“So I think a fundamental difference is this: can non-pastors, who feel the Spirit stirring their hearts to pray for someone, expect those prayers to be answered?

Can a father, whose child is sick, legitimately pray for healing and expect by faith an answer, or must he wait until the elders have a chance to lay hands?”

Tim, thanks for your honesty. I would appreciate hearing your thoughts on this question. Thanks!

http://prophetically-speaking.blogspot.com


18. Jamie
May 2, 2007
12:49 AM

Tim, You state,”So while we believe that the gift of tongues is no longer operative, we still believe that God can miraculously give someone the ability to speak in a language he does not rightly know. It’s just that this person does not have the gift of tongues.” Well, if God has given this to someone who does not merit it, is it not then a gift? Thankfully, Doriani did not run off after this experience with the idea that he now has the gift of healing. Sadly, I see that those who claim to have this gift seem to say that if they pray for you, the healing will happen. The focus is more on theirself than on He who does the healing.


19. Chris Hutchinson
May 2, 2007
1:41 PM

Cessationists also point out that in the majority of Biblical history, Miracles were not a regular occurance. For instance, the (arguably) greatest man of the OT, King David, never experienced a supernatural Miracle. Rather, we see miracles largely contained in three periods: Moses-Joshua, Elijah-Elisha, Jesus-Apostles.

So, we should not be astonished if this age is more akin to the majority of Biblical history than to those exceptional periods.

Incidently, the oil in James 5 undoubtedly points to the oil of gladness in Isaiah 61, thus signifying the Gospel itself, rather than some kind of healing ointment. Too long to prove, but I am quite convinced of this by James’ argument as well as its use in Mark.

Blessings, Chris H.


20. julie
May 3, 2007
8:00 AM

Great testimony!

I believe that the dividing line between the cessastionist and the continuist lies in a fundamental understanding of our God. Is he like Jesus or not? Is he more or less compassionate, loving, and merciful? I’m a continuist (also reform) but until very recently I found it much easier to believe God wants most of us to be sick than to believe he wanted to heal very many people. I humbly suggest this is more of a problem with our understanding of God’s love and grace than anything else. We all believe he has the power to do anything he wants, but most of us have trouble believing he wants to heal anybody except on a very rare occasion. We have a difficult time believing that salvation is good for us in the here and now (persecution notwithstanding) and has drastic implications for us on earth. I think most ‘charismatics’ are in the same boat as the cessationists and we live generally the same. If all the reform charismatics out there lived what they preached, we might have more ‘converts’ as well as more converts hehe. Hopefully I’m not being offensive in any way, I realize this is a bit of a touchy subject.