"The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment is a truly important work-one that should be required reading not only for church leaders, but for all sober-minded laypeople as well."

John MacArthur (From the Foreword)

"If you were more discerning you’d probably buy this book. If you do read this book, you will be! This book on discernment is simple, clear, well-written and well-illustrated...

Mark Dever

Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the book, about the blog or about the author.

05/12/07
Comments (9)

The Nature of News

I continue to make my way, rather slowly, really, through the 20th anniversary edition of Neil Postman’s Amusing Ourselves to Death. Though written some 22 years ago, it continues to stretch my mind and to help me think about this visual culture we live in. In a chapter dealing with “the peek-a-boo world” he discusses the changing concept and definition of news. Where news was once regarded as functional information, the telegraph (and, after it, other forms of far-reaching and instant communication) made relevance irrelevant. Suddenly people encountered news that had very little or nothing to do with those to whom it was addressed. Information became a form of entertainment and with it news became entertainment. Postman writes this about “context-free information:”

How often does it occur that information provided you on morning radio or television, or in the morning newspaper, causes you to alter your plans for the day, or to take some action you would not otherwise have taken, or provides some action you would not otherwise have taken, or provides insight into some problem you are required to solve? … Most of our daily news is inert, consisting of information that gives us something to talk about but cannot lead to any meaningful action. This fact is the principle legacy of the telegraph: By generating an abundance of irrelevant information, it dramatically altered what may be called the “information-action ratio.”

What is the problem with this? Postman answers, “In both oral and typographic cultures, information derives its importance from the possibilities of action.” Telegraphy, television and other forms of electronic media have made the relationship between information and action both abstract and remote. We hear more news than ever which elicits more opinions than ever, but which leave us increasingly impotent, unable to do anything more than offer opinions and bluster about what we might do if we could. And I am left asking, do I really need to read and to know so much of what passes as news today?

The Nature of News

Comments (9) »


1. SC
May 12, 2007
4:04 PM

I am reminded of this G. K. Chesterton quote:

“Journalism is popular, but it is popular mainly as fiction. Life is one world, and life seen in the newspapers is another.”


2. candyinsierras
May 12, 2007
6:00 PM

Amusing Ourselves to Death is an interesting book! A good companion book written by a Christian is The Vanishing Word by Arthur Hunt.


3. Elizabeth at A Biblical Home
May 12, 2007
6:29 PM

I quit watching network news after a feature story about a cat that was rescued after being trapped in its owner’s car engine. I’m sure it was very traumatic for the cat and the owner, but why exactly did it qualify as news?


4. C.H.H.
May 12, 2007
8:11 PM

B o o y a h ! for “Amusing Ourselves to Death.” One of the few books to which you can say to people, “You need to read this.”

Really, if you’re reading this, you need to read that book. You owe it to yourself and your children.

Chris


5. C.H.H.
May 12, 2007
8:12 PM

Really, I’m not joking. Go read it.


6. Steve
May 12, 2007
9:21 PM

Thanks for this post!


7. Julana
May 15, 2007
7:36 PM

“In both oral and typographic cultures, information derives its importance from the possibilities of action.”

That’s a fascinating statement.


8. mattzion
May 15, 2007
9:10 PM

This reminds me of a conversation I had years ago with a now-deceased staff photographer for the New York Times who quipped that the paper’s motto, “All The News That’s Fit To Print,” should long ago have been changed to reflect the paper’s apparent operating philosophy: “All The News That Fits.”


9. Alex Moore
May 16, 2007
4:49 PM

It’s hard to comment on news as it stands right now, because the system is completely broken.

It’s a really funny thing we’ve got going on here— our news is filled with infotainment, and for the “real” news we rely on commentary by folks like Dobson and O’Reilly…

I would suggest that there is a shortage of “real news” on the airwaves because there is no demand for it.