Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the blog or about the author.

Monday September 29, 2008

Calvinism and Evangelism

One of the joyful challenges I face in maintaining this blog is answering the questions of Christians who are wrestling with issues related to Reformed theology. I receive many questions from people who are new to the doctrines of grace or who are fighting through them for the first time. I try to answer as many of these questions as I can, though admittedly, a few do get away. Some time ago a reader asked about Calvinism and evangelism. He wrote this: “Given the tenets of total depravity (the spiritually dead are unable to choose God), unconditional election (saved through God’s sovereign choice) and irresistible grace (once God chooses you and regenerates you, you can’t NOT embrace Him)… what does a Calvinist see as the purpose of proclaiming the Gospel? Does a gospel presentation simply provide the context in which God ‘pulls the trigger’ of regeneration and faith for those He has already chosen? (cf Acts 13:48.)”

I understand the confusion many Christians feel when they consider evangelism in a Calvinist context. After all, if God is entirely sovereign, and if His grace is irresistible, what possible use can God have for us? Why would He bother using us in evangelism? This question introduces an apparent antinomy—an appearance of contradiction between conclusions which seem equally logical, reasonable or necessary. The antinomy we face is what we perceive as tension between God’s sovereignty and human responsibility. In short, how does our responsibility to evangelize interact with God’s absolute sovereignty in the salvation of souls?

I went about answering the question by first looking at several things that, according to Scripture, God has not called us to do in our evangelism.

We cannot help others realize the desperation of their situation or convince them that God exists It is the Holy Spirit who must do these things. Men are willfully ignorant of them. 2 Peter 3:5 says “For they deliberately overlook this fact, that the heavens existed long ago, and the earth was formed out of water and through water by the word of God.” The hearts of men are hard and only God can soften them.

We cannot convince unbelievers of their sinfulness. It is the Spirit who convicts men of sin. Before He died Jesus foretold the coming of the Holy Spirit and said “When he comes, he will convict the world concerning sin and righteousness and judgment” (John 16:8). I believe this is one area we tend to get wrong. We often feel it is our job to convict others of their sin. But while we can tell people that they are sinful, it is only the Spirit who can actually convict them.

We cannot convince them of the necessity and wonder of Christ. A man needs the grace of the Spirit in his heart before he can see this. Isaiah 53:2 prophecies about Christ saying “For he grew up before him like a young plant, and like a root out of dry ground; he had no form or majesty that we should look at him, and no beauty that we should desire him.” Sinful humans can neither appreciate nor desire Christ without the Spirit first working in them.

We cannot produce repentance or faith. Once again, those are God’s works and His alone. We can speak of the reality and importance of them, but cannot bring them about in others.

The Bible also teaches us several things things that we must do in regards to evangelism. These are things God tells us we must do if we are to obey Him and faithfully represent Him.

We must pray for the lost. God delights in using our prayers to accomplish His purposes. We should pray for salvation and pray that God would grant the person a heart of flesh; pray that God would use circumstances, either specific or general, to bring people to a realization of their desperation; pray that God would confirm what we are saying through other people or circumstances; pray that God would remove the peace they have in their unrepentance; and pray that God would put people in our lives that we can share our faith with.

We must show our faith in our lives. We need not only to speak about God and what He has done, but we also need to show in our lives that we have changed. Our day-to-day lives are a great testimony to unbelievers.

We must share our faith. When opportunities present themselves we are to act as the messenger to deliver the message, free from our prejudices and opinions. We are to present the purity of the gospel, not our spin on it. This, of course, requires knowledge of the Bible and of God’s character. A prerequisite to sharing our faith is strengthening our faith by learning about God and growing closer to Him.

We must invite others to hear the message. We are to invite people to church and other evangelistic occasions. I Corinthians 14:25 speaks of the potential of church services where it speaks of an unbeliever hearing the “secrets of his heart [being] disclosed, and so, falling on his face, he will worship God and declare that God is really among you.” The Bible asks how a person can believe unless he hears the message. It is our job to share that message.

So here are the things we need to do—the things God invites and commands us to do so that He might reach His people.

To be consistent with Reformed theology we must say that if a person is one of the elect, he will come to faith and repentance. It is divinely predestined that this will happen and it is impossible for it not to happen. But God has not shared with us two vital pieces of information. He has not told us just who the elect are and how they will be brought to repentance. He has decreed that we are to share the message with everyone, in every way possible (within the bounds He sets in His Word). Charles Spurgeon once said “if all the elect had a white stripe on their backs I would quit preaching and begin lifting shirt tails” (or something to that effect). God has not put a visible mark on the elect, so we are to treat all men as if they are among the elect, and are to share the Gospel far and wide. We need to share it with a sense of urgency.

It is critical that we realize that we are not to measure success by the visible results. A convincing response to evangelism does not necessarily indicative of a biblical method of evangelism. Perhaps this was best proven by the Catholic Church during their “convert or die” campaigns among the native populations of South America. Allow me to post a length quote from J.I. Packer’s wonderful book Evangelism and the Sovereignty of God.

If we forget that it is God’s prerogative to give results when the gospel is preached, we shall start to think that it is our responsibility to secure them. And if we forget that only God can give faith, we shall start to think that the making of converts depends, in the last analysis, not on God, but on us, and that the decisive factor is the way in which we evangelize. And this line of thought, consistently followed through, will lead us far astray.

Let us work this out. If we regarded it as our job, not simply to present Christ, but actually to produce converts—to evangelize, not only faithfully, but also successfully —our approach to evangelism would become pragmatic and calculating. We should conclude that our basic equipment, both for personal dealing and for public preaching, must be twofold. We must have, not merely a clear grasp of the meaning and application of the gospel, but also an irresistible technique for inducing a response. We should, therefore, make it our business to try and develop such a technique. And we should evaluate all evangelism, our own and other people’s, by the criterion, not only of the message preached, but also the visible results. If our own efforts were not bearing fruit, we should conclude that our technique still needed improving. If they were bearing fruit, we should conclude that this justified the technique we had been using. We should regard evangelism as an activity involving a battle of wills between ourselves and those to whom we go, a battle in which victory depends on our firing off a heavy enough barrage of calculated effects. Thus our philosophy of evangelism would become terrifyingly similar to the philosophy of brainwashing. And we would not longer be able to argue, when such a similarity is asserted to be fact, that this is not a proper conception of evangelism…

…It is right to recognize our responsibility to engage in aggressive evangelism. It is our right to desire the conversion unbelievers. It is right to want one’s presentation of the gospel to be as clear and forcible as possible. If we preferred that converts should be few and far between, and did not care whether our proclaiming of Christ went home or not, there would be something wrong with us. But it is not right when we take it on us to do more than God has given us to do. It is not right when we regard ourselves as responsible for securing converts, and look to our own enterprise and techniques to accomplish what only God can accomplish…only by letting our knowledge of God’s sovereignty control the way in which we plan, and pray, and work in His service, can we avoid becoming guilty of this fault.

It is not difficult for a Christian to know if he has, indeed, evangelized. He has done so if he has proclaimed the message of sin, death, Savior and forgiveness. If he has done this he has evangelized successfully. He cannot and must not evaluate his efforts in the light of who responds to the message. Don Whitney likens the evangelist to the mailman. The mailman has fulfilled the obligation of his job when he has delivered the mail to me. The measure of success in his job is to carefully and accurately deliver the message. How I respond to the letters I receive is none of his concern. And the same is true of the evangelist. He faithfully delivers the message and leaves the results to God.

Ultimately we need to understand that God has not seen fit to share with us exactly how human responsibility and Divine sovereignty interact in evangelism. While we need to always remember that God is the only one who can bring about salvation, He has decreed that we will be the instruments He uses to take the Good News to the world. And that is what we must do, all the while asking God to equip us to be worthy ambassadors for Him.

Comments (21) »


1. Tim Irvin
September 29, 2008
10:13 AM

I think that some confusion is added to the subject by the misconceived idea that the purpose of evangelism is Decisional Regeneration. How can we lead someone to a decision if we have no way of knowing that they are elect?
The error and difficulty lies in this faulty premise.
Also, see Pulpit Magazines article - Evangelism: Event or Lifestyle
Good Article.


2. Timothy Ha
September 29, 2008
11:01 AM

Calvinistic worldview does take away many things a religious-thinking Christian would like to boast about, including the number of conversions and his/her evangelistic efforts.


3. Mike Batley
September 29, 2008
11:17 AM

Tim,

You make three points up top that include the word “convince.” And while I agree with you on principle is it possible this leads us to a style of evangelism that may be too passive and therefore not fully faithful? Specifically, I look at Paul’s passion and strength of words used in both 2 Cor 5:11 and 20. Here he clearly speaks of “persuading” based on the fear of the Lord. (Most likely knowing the judgment that awaits those who are lost vs. being judged for not sharing with enough passion, though both may be true-Romans 8;1 seems to make the later less plausible though.)

And in v. 20 the ESV reads, “We implore on behalf of Christ. Be reconciled to God.” Other translations render “implore” as, “beg” and “entreat.” This sounds like someone trying to convince someone—especially when Paul adds, “on behalf of.”

And I feel like that this is what faithfulness looks like in evangelism. Not merely going, not merely speaking, but speaking with acute care, emotion and persuasion, bring fully the need for them to repent and what is at stake.

Thoughts?


4. Nick Coller
September 29, 2008
11:26 AM

I was reading Philemon a few days ago, and verse 6 stuck out at me which I’d never really meditated on before: “I pray that you may be active in sharing your faith, so that you will have a full understanding of every good thing we have in Christ. “

When we look at it that way, evangelism is equally as much (if not more) for our benefit than of the person we’re talking to!


5. John Strehmel
September 29, 2008
11:42 AM

Thank you for this post. Your list of things God has not called us to do is spot-on. We must be careful not to assume any responsibilities which are God’s or shirk any responsibilities which He has given to us.
I wonder (and my desire is not to nit-pick or find fault - just talk things out) if my invitations to hear the message have replaced my duty to share my faith. It’s much easier to invite my neighbor to church and pray that the LORD will use the preacher to bring him to Christ, than it is to allow the LORD to help me build a relationship over time and provide opportunities to personally share the gospel, not only with words, but with my attitudes and example. Discipleship takes time and allows others to see evidence of sincere faith — sin, confession, humility, repentance, obedience, perseverance, etc. That can be painful and uncomfortable to say the least.
Do you have any other Scriptures which support your statement that we must invite others to hear the message?
thanks, and keep up the good work!


6. Timothy Ha
September 29, 2008
12:09 PM

“Calvinistic worldview does take away many things a religious-thinking Christian would like to boast about, including the number of conversions and his/her evangelistic efforts.”

I wrote that above, but that doesn’t justify my lack of love or compassion to the unbelieving people at all. It’s still a duty to proclaim the Gospel, and without compassion I would sound very much like Jonah, who preached in Nineveh at the command of God, but had not love…

How do you grow in compassion to others?


7. R.A.Servin
September 29, 2008
12:12 PM

Great post Tim, well written.
I think the fundamental problem that people have with Calvinism is the fact that God chooses us rather than us choosing Him. Men want the ability to be in control, including Christians sadly.

Grace to you,
Roger


8. Laurie
September 29, 2008
12:15 PM

A very clear and helpful post. Thanks.

I would like to add something in regard to what is necessary for our evangelism to be effective. It is something Christ thought important enough to include in His high priestly prayer:

“I do not pray for these only, but also for those are to believe in me through their word; that they all may be one, even as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be in us; so that the world may believe that thou hast sent me. The glory which thou hast given me I have given to them, that they may be one even as we are one. I in them, and thou in me, that they may become perfectly one, so that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them even as thou hast loved me.” John 17:20-23

Our love for, and oneness with, our brethren has a direct bearing on our evangelism - and would appear from the verses above to be a sort of embodiment of evangelism.


9. Mike Batley
September 29, 2008
12:34 PM

Timothy,

I love your question! That really gets to the heart of it. And of course your use of the word “compassion” immediately reminds me of Matthew 9:36.

I spent 11 years on staff with Campus Crusade. As you probably know, CCC is an organization that finds its distinctive in intentionally sharing its faith. We were expected to share our faith, one-to-one, about 300 times a year.

For me it often was a challenge to find compassion for college students. Especially when they were so blatant in their sins, and so proud in their opinion about who God is, and what He cares about.

And yet that was the very source of my compassion—they were so blind. They had been so led astray. They had so laid down to culture and appetite that they just didn’t know the gift of God in their next breath.

To the degree I could remember that. And to the degree that I could remember what I had been saved from as a college student!!!!! That is what helped my compassion.

Mike


10. Rick
September 29, 2008
1:24 PM

Tim - Growing in Compassion

As I understand sanctification or growing in godliness (compassion etc.) it is the Gospel affecting us and changing us from the inside out. And what I’ve found helpful is looking for gospel connections in scripture and understanding why and where I am disconnected from the affects of the Gospel. And I think faith is a key factor in that faith comes from hearing and hearing the word of God. Faith receives what Christ has done and the benefits of our salvation. It receives the truths of scripture realized in Christ. The Gospel Mystery of Sanctification by Walter Marshall is great resource and a message by Mike Bullmore - The Functional Centrality of the Gospel is outstanding.

Fruit of the Spirit (gosple implication), Gal. 5:22-26 .. now those who belong to Christ Jesus (gospel)…

1 John 4:7-9 .. love is from God (gospel implication) …by this the love of God was manifested in us , that God has sent His only begottend Son into the world so that we might live through Him (gospel).

Eph 5:2 and walk in love (gospel imperative/implication), just as Christ also loved you, and gave Himself up for us (gospel), an offering and a sacifice to God as a fragrant aroma.


11. Curtis
September 29, 2008
3:14 PM

Mike Batley
“And I feel like that this is what faithfulness looks like in evangelism. Not merely going, not merely speaking, but speaking with acute care, emotion and persuasion, bring fully the need for them to repent and what is at stake.”

———-

I totally agree, have you ever heard Martyn L Jones preach, it is awesome. You can hear it at http://www.sermonindex.net/ . We must warn the lost not just “tell”, we must preach to them not just, “speak” to them.


12. Ian Hall
September 29, 2008
10:05 PM

Thanks for that post. I have been in full-time Christian service for coming up on three years and I have noticed this is an issue which consistently crops up.
Many like myself whom the world at large would describe as Calvinists but who are in reality simply Bible believers struggle at different times with this issue . It is good to read a balanced post on this which sets forth both what we might call the God-ward and the man-ward side of evangelism.


13. Chelsey
September 29, 2008
10:07 PM

I think that posts like this demonstrate a mature, sanctified understanding of the Reformed faith. For so long when God first revealed to me the doctrines of grace, I was like a rabid dog, never finding any sort of balance between man’s responsibility and God’s sovereignty. I believe God is supremely sovereign, but because I have so many friends that don’t, I have to be wise in how I discuss that with them.

One of my greatest comforts is that, even though I am not by nature very extroverted or outgoing, God has chosen to use broken vessels to proclaim His name. That is my prayer, and I think He answers it by giving opportunities that may not turn me into a street preacher. Sometimes evangelism is small, faithful decisions that we do where others can see.


14. Jugulum
September 29, 2008
11:08 PM

Hmm… Tim, there was one comment that I would have liked to have seen expanded upon: “We need to share it with a sense of urgency.”

You dropped that in at the end of a paragraph, but I didn’t see where you discussed the nature of the urgency, or the reason/cause.


15. Rachael
September 30, 2008
12:08 AM

Are there specific Scriptural examples of prayers asking for the salvation of others?


16. Steve
September 30, 2008
2:08 PM

Thanks for your post. I enjoyed reading it.

There are scores of people who are Calvinistic in their soteriology but not Reformed in their overall systematic theology. I am not certain that we can always equate the two. For example, I have met many Calvinistic Dispensationalists and sat in their classes in seminary. Bottom line…Calvinism does not always equal Reformed.


17. Mitch
September 30, 2008
8:25 PM

In your comment:
“We cannot convince unbelievers of their sinfulness.” and “I believe this is one area we tend to get wrong. We often feel it is our job to convict others of their sin. But while we can tell people that they are sinful, it is only the Spirit who can actually convict them.”
Would this be criticism of the “Way of the Master” style of Evangelism? Although we cannot convince a person of their sinfulness and although it is the work of the Spirit to do so…The Holy Spirit does not do so in a vacuum. It seems that the Law needs to be applied to a person’s heart for the Spirit to do that work of conviction. Maybe I am misunderstanding your point.


18. Nina
October 1, 2008
8:32 AM

When my husband and I were preparing to become missionaries 10 years ago, he preached a sermon on election to the churches we visited while raising support. His main point was that it is only because of the doctrine of election that we would ever endeavor to evangelize in this world. God’s sovereignty in salvation guarantees that people will be saved and it’s not dependent upon us. It is all God’s work. If salvation is people’s choice, then we have an impossible task before us as missionaries. If you’ve been to our mission field, you would know what I’m talking about - people are so cold to the Gospel. It’s discouraging sometimes, but it’s the promise that God has His elect from every tribe, tongue and nation that keeps us going and motivated. Whether we see the fruit in this life or not, it doesn’t matter. We are grateful to have the opportunity to be used by Him in reaching out to the lost.


19. Phil
October 3, 2008
12:15 PM

Tim,Mitch…I find that the NT doesn’t support ‘law-preaching’ to prepare the way for saving faith. Jn16v8,9 tells us that-this side of the cross-the Spirit convicts the world of their sin in convicting them of their unbelief. The same thing which he uses to witness to the believer of his righteousness in Christ. All people naturally have consciences that condemn them when they’re infracted-they have knowledge of right and wrong even if they’ve steam-rollered it for a season. I think preaching moral law to conversion,in and of itself,will encourage them to continue in the fundamental sin-from which all else stems-that of unbelief-which manifests itself in a ‘going about to establish one’s own righteousness’in one form or another,by way of one’s conscience, then putting strength into the expression of sin from an unbelieving heart,by way of their ‘law’. Thus law can’t touch the root sin of gospel unbelief. But God can,with a gospel that both convicts and heals. The gospel which brings a gospel repentance from ‘dead works’ with which men would seek to garner,or assume, God’s favour.


20. Phil
October 3, 2008
12:41 PM

When I said ‘the same thing’above,I meant the same gospel is conviction of sin in the unbeliever, in conviction of unbelief-and a savour of life to the believer,with the witness of the Spirit.


21. a helmet
October 11, 2008
6:18 AM

Phil:

What is “saving faith” as opposed to “simple faith”? As far as I know there is only one kind of faith in the Lord Jesus Christ taught in the bible. Faith in Christ is faith in Christ. What exactly is saving faith and how can it be identified? “Show me your faith” James challenges (2:18). Now this holds true for “saving faith” as well, it must be revealed what exactly that is, if not normal faith in Jesus Christ.


Mitch wrote: “But while we can tell people that they are sinful, it is only the Spirit who can actually convict them.”

If you are a Christian, you have the Logos (=word, reason, clarity) in you and can express any truth you have reaped. The Logos is Christ (Jn 1:1). Whatever fruit you have in yourself can be expressed by the Logos, hence you’re appointed a co-savior of God. Draw and save your fellows as you were once drawn and saved. You’re right the spirit does not operate in a vacuum, but in man.