Sin Does Not Provoke Our Own Wrath
As I mentioned last week, I’ve decided to read John Stott’s The Cross of Christ before Easter this year. I’ve been reading it a bit slower than I might like, but have been enjoying it immensely. To this point the chapter entitled “The Problem of Forgiveness” has been my favorite. This is a quote that stood out to me. This is Stott’s exhortation to hold fast to the biblical revelation “of the living God who hates evil, is disgusted and angered by it, and refuses ever to come to terms with it.” Here is what Stott says:
“The kind of God that appeals to most people today would be easy-going in his tolerance of our offenses. He would be gentle, kind, accommodating. He would have no violent reactions. Unhappily, even in the church we seemed to have lost the vision of the majesty of God. There is much shallowness and levity among us. Prophets and psalmists would probably say of us, “There is no fear of God before their eyes.” In public worship our habit is to slouch or squat; we do not kneel nowadays, let alone prostrate ourselves in humility before God. It is more characteristic of us to clap our hands with joy than to blush with shame or tears. We saunter up to God to claim his patronage and friendship; it does not occur to us that he might send us away. We need to hear again the Apostle Peter’s sobering words, “Since you call on a father who judges each man’s work impartially, live your lives. . in reverent fear.” (I Peter 1:17) In other words, if we dare to call our judge our Father, we must beware of presuming on him. It must even be said that our evangelical emphasis on the atonement is dangerous if we come to it too quickly. We learn to appreciate the access to God which Christ has won only after we have first cried, “Woe is me for I am lost.” In Dale’s words, “It is partly because sin does not provoke our own wrath that we do not believe that sin provokes the wrath of God.”




Comments (19) »
1. Chris
March 9, 2008
2:50 PM
This is what is concerning in much of the current teaching on forgiveness. When people falsely insist that God forgives unconditionally, they presume upon God.
A tremendous number of Christians today don’t view forgiveness is a Cross-centered way. Rather, they see forgiveness as kind of self-help therapy for getting over negative feelings, e.g. “I must forgive or I will be bitter.”
2. Wyeth Duncan
March 9, 2008
4:59 PM
I needed this; thank you for posting.
3. Flora
March 9, 2008
5:16 PM
What is sin? It is rare to hear preaching today that defines it as the Shorter Catechism does, “Sin is any want of conformity unto or trangression of the law of God” Q.14 and “.the Moral Law is summarily comprehended in the ten commandments” Q41.
The first four commandments are especially neglected. When I was convicted of sin and saw that I had made no place for God in my life, had taken his Holy Name “in vain” and had used His Day for my own amusements, I was afraid to sleep because I thought I would waken in Hell. I envied animals who have no soul and are not accountable to God. How precious Christ’s atonement and imputed righteousness are when you have truly experienced the ‘terrors’ of the law.
I pray that God would restore to many pulpits the kind of preaching that brings conviction of sin and true repentance.
4. Zach Nielsen
March 9, 2008
6:07 PM
Tim,
Thanks so much for posting that. Very powerful and illuminating.
5. Reg Schofield
March 9, 2008
7:22 PM
This has always ,to my mind been a delicate balance. In todays church , yes it is true that often forgiveness of sin is passed over like a minor cut , Jesus being our band aid. However in the past you had such a hell fire and legalistic yoke placed upon many ,they never could experience the love and grace of God because they failed to ever live up to their own standards of pleasing God , driving many to despair. This is why I think we need to see our sin for what it truly is ,an affront and attack on a holy God that warrants His wrath and that should make us tremble and bow our heads in tears and contrition but then the gospel of Christ comes into play and the sweetness of the cross and what Jesus did lifts our souls . Unless both the law and gospel is preached properly, as Dr. Micheal Horton, on the White Horse Inn has been talking about for years, we will either fall into the trap God is happy as long as we do our best or fall into despair because we can never live in perfect obedience . The law leads to repentance and the gospel , the sweet song of grace to our humble and repentant souls. The one thing many Christians forget , and I used to be one, is that the gospel is still for Christians . May we, as we reflect on the cross and the completed work of Christ , strive to put to death sin in our lives but never forget it is in Christ that we are declared righteous. Should that not motivate us !!
6. Jim Vellenga
March 9, 2008
8:31 PM
Reg, not to disagree with you, but I always wonder when this past was when most churches preached hell and judgment and legalism to the point people could not experience the love and grace of God. I ask this because if that was the case, those churches would not be ‘Christian’ as all. Would that not be what Paul was saying when he said that anyone preached another gospel they are anathema? A legalistic gospel is not the gospel. A hell-fire and damnation gospel with no grace and forgiveness until a person earns it, is not the gospel. If there was a time when that was the case, it certainly would not have been all the churches. I sometimes wonder if it is a caricature of churches in the past because they actually preached the whole counsel of God and people today don’t like that. I can say in the congregation I serve I preach on sin but also on the great grace of God in Jesus Christ, but all some people hear is the part on sin, and they say I don’t preach uplifting sermons, simply because I mention sin and judgment.
Having said that, thank-you for the wonderful quote. Sounds like a book I will have to read.
7. Nick Hill
March 9, 2008
8:55 PM
Thank you for the quote by Stott. I need to read this book,
Nick
8. donsands
March 9, 2008
9:45 PM
Excellent quote. There are many in the Church who are not the Church.
If one has truly been born again, and he is a new creation in Christ, and his heart is no longer stone, and self-absorbed, then this heart will fear God. It will also love God, or at least for the new convert, begin to love God.
Can the true believer not fear God? I don’t think so, not completely. We can go through seasons of rebellion, but our Father will discipline us. And He will cause us to come to understand who is on the throne.
When our hearts condemn us, the genuine believer, then we can be sure that God is greater than our heart. And that all our sins are nailed to the Cross, “The Cross of Christ”.
9. Gordon Cheng
March 10, 2008
12:32 AM
It’s a terrific passage, Tim, and shows Stott at his best. It is a pity that Stott in his later years has given a nod to the doctrine of annihilationism, a doctrine which to my mind tends to damp down rather than increase a biblically grounded fear of God.
This passage, however, is a good reminder of the strength of his doctrine of the cross; it’s one of his most useful books too.
10. Fusion!@letmypeopleread
March 10, 2008
1:52 AM
Thanks. I remember this was one of the first real theology books we had to read at my Pentecostal school. Too bad it may not be used anymore. While I wish he focused on predestination, this book truly gave me a lot to mull over. I think I’ll be joining you in your reading.
11. Reg Schofield
March 10, 2008
9:07 AM
Jim , I don’t know what your background is but in my area you either had fluff preaching , or a hyper-free will view of salvation that was always depended on what you are doing. In this style sin and hell were used as a hammer to guilt you into doing more acts , not to bring you to repentance and faith . In many ways it resembled the style of Charles Finney , who I consider a heretic and did not preach the gospel . You are right in saying that in many ways , some that was presented was not the gospel and that many of these churches in fact , illegitimate . But I do hold that its a delicate balance that can easily be swayed to one side or the other, but if you preach the whole counsel ,like you recommend and let the word of God speak, I think that will do the job. So many that fall into this trap of either gospel light or forgetting grace pick and choose a text that will fit their view and as James White has shown when exposing many cults today , force a thought out of the text .
12. Nick
March 10, 2008
9:43 AM
Gordon,
It is my understanding that annihalationism was his former belief. If I am not mistaken, he has come to a more orthodox understanding.
Tim,
Awesome quote! I am looking at Stott’s book as I type. I haven’t read it yet. It will make some good vacation reading!
13. Flora
March 10, 2008
10:47 AM
Tim,
Thank-you for this thought-provoking article on a neglected subject on a snow-bound Sunday! Having just returned home after worshipping in various Evangelical churches and being appalled by the shallowness of much preaching and Worship today, it was very refreshing.
Reg,
Dr .Martyn Lloyd Jones, who was greatly used of God, believed that modern preaching had gone fundamentally wrong. I quote from “D.Martyn Lloyd Jones - The Early Years” by Iain Murray- “He saw the main proof of that fact is the failure of the pulpit to recognise that the first work of the Holy Spirit is to convict of sin and to humble men in the presence of God.He knew that that any preaching which soothes,comforts and pleases those who have never been brought to fear God, nor seek his mercy, is not preaching which the Spirit of God will own. The truth is he was going back to a principle once regarded imperative for powerful evangelistic preaching, namely that before men are converted,they must be convicted of sin. In 1883 C.H Spurgeon declared: “In the beginning the preacher’s business is not to convert men, but the very reverse. It is idle to attempt to heal those who are not wounded, to attempt to clothe those who have never been stripped and to make those rich who have never realised their poverty. As long as the world stands, we shall need the Holy Ghost, not only as the comforter, but also as the convincer., “who will reprove the world of sin and of righteousness, and of judgement’” Page 206.
14. Reg Schofield
March 10, 2008
6:07 PM
Flora I agree totally with what you said and the men you referred to . Both of them hold a special place in my library . Both I think reflected the type of preaching that is needed . They preached hard concerning sin , God’s wrath etc… but they never forgot about the cross of Christ. If you read the puritans and such , they applied the law to bring about the realization of sin and the coming of a holy God’s wrath but they preached grace and called men to repent , look to Jesus and cling to the cross. Something lacking in many places today.
15. Gordon Cheng
March 10, 2008
7:00 PM
It is my understanding that annihalationism was his former belief. If I am not mistaken, he has come to a more orthodox understanding.
This would be significant (and great) news if it was true, Nick. However, I don’t know of any evidence for this. A friend of mine, concerned about just this issue, phoned him a few years ago and confirmed with him that he had not changed his mind on the subject (although he may have since, of course).
John Stott’s own website makes no reference to the question. The current Wikipedia article on John Stott states that John Stott has publicly considered the question (with references to external sources) but makes no mention of any subsequent change of mind.
16. Flora
March 11, 2008
9:48 AM
Reg, I don’t know what kind of churches you are referring to when you imply that some churches preach about the wrath of God and repentance without any emphasis on the Gospel. This was certainly not true of the Scottish Presbyterian churches that I have been affiliated with, for close to seventy years. I have heard this argument used, but only by those who have turned their back on the God of the Bible and found a god of their own imagination that suits them better.
17. Reg Schofield
March 11, 2008
6:44 PM
Flora, I do not disagree with any of the points you raised . I can only reflect what I have been exposed to , which is either Pentecostal and Baptist. Plus I never implied that the preaching of sin and the coming wrath wasn’t vitally important . Plus to be fair , the Churches in my area in Nova Scotia , Canada , the flip is now happening and its been almost devoid any preaching concerning the serious of sin . The emphasis has been on love that most people have little conviction of their sin !! Plus like I said before I have plenty of Spurgeon and Jones , plus I hope to do a bible study in the future at my church using R.C Sproul’s Holiness of God and then his new book The Truth of The Cross. Thanks for your well thought points and God bless you .
18. Flora
March 12, 2008
10:23 AM
Thanks, Reg. May the Lord bless your ministry. At my gym yesterday, there was discussion about the Pope defining new sins. Some-one mentioned that it was now a sin to take illegal drugs. I pointed out that this was already covered in the sixth commandment. The point I was trying to make and my husband a retired pastor constantly deplores, is that although many talk about ‘sin’, there is very little teaching about the moral law - the Ten Commandments, given not just as our ‘school-master’ to bring us to conviction of sin and repentance but also as our rule of life when we have come to faith in Christ.
19. Dan Rook
March 12, 2008
8:11 PM
An excellent quote. I have been reading a book by a retired PCA minister, Arnold L. Frank; The Fear of God; A Forgotten Doctrine. It studies the neglected doctrine from scripture and the puritans. He was recently interviewed on the Crosstalk radio program. This can be listened to at www.crosstalkamerica.com.
This topic is soooooo missing in the church, and soooooo needed. SDG,