Any time I write a review of a book dealing with prayer I feel the need to point out that bookstore shelves are already groaning under the weight of such books. There are hundreds, thousands probably, of books on prayer. A new one is going to need to be good—very good—to supplant the excellent resources already available. Paul Miller, perhaps a bit reluctantly, takes on this challenge in his new book A Praying Life: Connecting with God in a Distracting World. I was drawn to this book by David Powlison’s Foreword in which he gives it his highest recommendation and says, “A Praying Life will bring a living, vibrant reality to your prayers. Take it to heart.” And what Christian does not want to learn to pray better? What Christian would claim that his prayers are as powerful as ever he would want them to be? The vast number of books on this subject testifies to the Christians’ desire to pray more and to pray better.
A Praying Life is the fruit of the prayer seminars that Miller has led scores of times over the years. And in the structure, in what it teaches, it has the practical, real-life feel of a seminar. The meat of the book is family stories—not dramatic tales, but just small vignettes of daily life and survival. These stories do not only offer that personal touch that takes the book out of the abstract, but they also provide a measure of cohesion, tying chapter-to-chapter and part-to-part.
The book begins with a brief reflection on why Christians struggle so much with prayer. Miller says rightly, I’m sure, that many people fail to pray properly because they are pursuing prayer rather than God. Ironically, they make prayer their focus instead of focusing on the one to whom they are praying. Prayer becomes an end in itself rather than the means to relationship with God. No wonder, then, that we struggle! “Consequently, prayer is not the center of this book. Getting to know a person, God, is the center.” Another source of the frustration that many people feel when they reflect on their prayer lives comes from working on this discipline in the abstract, separated from the rest of life. This is why Miller advocates a praying life, a life of prayer and not just small moments of prayer. This is something that needs to be learned over time and that needs to be nurtured. “A praying life isn’t something you accomplish in a year. It is a journey of a lifetime.”
Miller teaches prayer in thirty-two (!) chapters divided into five parts. In the first part, he writes about praying like a child, writing about the childlike trust and wonder that so moved Jesus and caused him to use children as an example to his disciples. Miller wants readers to learn to talk with their Father, to learn to love spending time with their Father, to learn to be helpless as children are before their father and to learn to cry “Abba” continually just as Jesus did. In Part 2 he encourages readers to “trust again,” to put aside the cynicism that is endemic to our culture. This cynicism is a large part of what keeps us from enjoying God and trusting him in prayer. Part 3 is dedicated to learning how to petition God, to ask for things in prayer and to do so with confidence. He shows why we find it so hard to ask and teaches the grounds by which we can ask. He then looks at God’s promises regarding daily bread and “your kingdom come” along with Jesus’ extravagant promises that “whatever you ask in my name, I will do.” The fourth part is about living in the Father’s story, about seeing prayer as part of the grand story God is weaving into the lives of his people. The fifth and final part, “Praying in Real Life,” is the most practical part of the book, teaching real-life praying through journaling, using prayer cards, and so on. This is the small bit of practical application that follows a lot of good teaching.
A Praying Life is a very quotable book that offers many excellent lines, sentences, reflections. Here is just a single example of one that caught my attention. Miller asks, “How would you love someone without prayer? I mean, what would it look like if you loved someone but couldn’t pray for that person? It was a puzzle to me. I couldn’t figure out what it would look like. Love without being able to pray feels depressing and frustrating, like trying to tie a knot with gloves on. I would be powerless to do the other person any real good. People are far too complicated; the world is far too evil; and my own heart is too off center to be able to love adequately without praying. I need Jesus.”
From the earliest chapters to the last, the book is full of good teaching. Miller says very little that is not immediately supported by Scripture and, even in a book that is full of stories of his family, is able to keep himself out of the limelight. This is a book foremost about God—the God who asks his people to come to him and to come with him in confidence that he hears and answers prayer. He offers constant challenges to first understand prayer properly and then to pray, knowing that God desires that his people pray.
I do want to point out what I consider a weakness in the book, and it has to do with some of the people Miller quotes. Those who have read other books on prayer may well see that Miller is indebted to the mystics; he has clearly derived at least a portion of his theology and practice of prayer from them. At times there is a certainly mystical quality in what he teaches. We can begin to see the source of this in the several times he quotes Thomas Merton. Now I do know that many people quote Merton as an authority on prayer; I have not read his books on prayer so cannot comment. However, necessarily, as a Roman Catholic Trappist monk, Merton’s theology will get worse the closer he gets to the cross. Hence I think an author would wish to quote him only with the utmost care. My concern with Miller’s book is that he may lead people to investigate Merton and read there not only what Merton wrote on prayer but also what he wrote on other subjects. Thus there is good reason to be just a little bit cautious here. This mystical emphasis on prayer runs as an undercurrent through the book, not destroying it but at times, I feel, detracting from it.
Leave aside that concern, I still do not hesitate to recommend A Praying Life. Perhaps the greatest strength of this book is Miller’s unrelenting emphasis that prayer cannot be an add-on to the Christian life; it cannot be supplemental but must always be instrumental. This book will equip you to understand prayer properly and, on that firm foundation, to commit yourself to it, with confidence that God is willing and able to hear and answer your prayers.







Comments (11) »
1. Don Gale
June 1, 2009
9:09 AM
I agree 100% with this review. I just finished the book yesterday. About half way in I noticed that I was praying more and about a wider range of things. I also had the same problem with some of the quotes. Many of them just seemed unnecessary.
The “God put (his daughter’s) speaking over his Son’s own honor” quote (Miller’s own) on pg 200-201 was confusing. I know what he’s saying, but there may have been a better way to say it.
It was a great book and something I really needed to read.
2. Mark | hereiblog
June 1, 2009
9:59 AM
Tim,
Thanks for this review. I have the book, but have only read parts due to time constraints.
What you said here
is exactly right and why it can be hard to recommend certain books/articles from time to time.Thanks,
Mark
3. Angus
June 1, 2009
11:41 AM
I’m looking forward to reading this (loaned it out as soon as I bought it), and expect to get a lot of good from it, but I resonate with comment 2 and your concern. It is a shame so many good writes (as I consider them) seem to need to quote the mystics or other modern writers greatly affected by them today (like Henry Nouwen, Richard Foster etc.). Perhaps the greatest formative influence on my early Christian life was Tozer, and that almost entierly for the good (I still go back and read The Pursuit of God), but I did read a little Guyon, Julian of Norwich, etc and others due entirely to his quoting of them. Those are a few months I wish I had back and an avenue I wish I hadn’t followed…
4. Renee
June 1, 2009
11:50 AM
Hi Tim,
I heard a story once where a very new Christian joined others in a group for prayer. When it was his turn to pray, he started with “Hi God, I’m John. I live at 432 Westminster Drive…” The story was meant to be funny, as it appeared that John was green in his manner of prayer and felt a need to introduce himself to his Maker.
I may be very wrong but I can’t help but think that God might prefer this type of prayer to the prayer of a well-seasoned Christian who knows all the theological terminology and the right formulae to petition Him. Prayer is a heartcry, it is a plea for help from a person who recognizes his or her inabilities and fallibilities. (Psalms 51:17) Perhaps the only real prerequisite to a good prayer life is understanding who God is and how much He loves us - and that is perhaps what the author has done by reminding the reader to come to Him like children.
While the book generally may have good advice, I would find it hard to imbibe the “good” while trying to sort out the “bad”. Thomas Merton was an interfaith proponent. My God, as scriptures tell me, is a jealous God; the Alpha and the Omega - He doesn’t share His glory, not even between the covers of a very good book on prayer, with false gods. The mysticism that you mention found in this book is not unlike the little yeast in a batch of dough. (Galations 5:9)
5. Paul Miller
June 1, 2009
4:26 PM
Tim, thank you for such a warm and thoughtful review! You have really blessed me and the book.
I thought I would briefly respond to some of the concerns about the Thomas Merton quote. One reason I included several quotes like Merton because they expressed in some way a Biblical truth and using their name would increase the comfort level for a broader audience similar to the way Paul quoted from two Greek philosophers at Athens. Before I decided to use the Merton quote I asked a Westminster prof what he thought. He said, “You’re not endorsing Merton; you are just highlighting one thing he said that was true.” I also quote N. T. Wright, although I don’t agree with Wright’s view of justification. Yet, Wright is a thoughtful scholar. One of my profs at seminary said, “If you only have evangelicals in your reading list, you will have a narrow list.”
David Powlison and I have often reflected that the two poles or bad tendencies in prayer are legalism which is more typical of more fundamentalist evangelical circles and mysticism which is increasingly dominate in the broader evangelical world. Both poles grate on me.
Whole sections of the book are written to counter the mystical tendencies in the world of prayer. Part III “Learning to Ask Your Father” is largely focused on fighting the mystical tendency in much of prayer writing (in the broader evangelical market). I’m particularly gunning against the “floatyness” of mysticism in the first three chapters of this section (12-14). Without mentioning their names, I take a number of pot shots at authors who I think have mystical tendencies.
Three quick thoughts on mysticism. Mystics tend to get stuck in the darkness. To put it another way, they have the cross without the resurrection. In Part 4, I deal partly with that problem by encouraging all of us to see the story that God is weaving in our lives. The theme of hope that permeates the book comes from incarnate God who answers prayer.
Mystics can also get stuck in their depravity and not move out in love. I discipled a brilliant, educated couple once because the wife wanted to “experience Jesus” more. As I got into their lives, I told her that Jesus was at the bottom on the laundry basket. That sounds harsh on my part but it fit her beautifully. Her husband had a full time job and cooked all the meals and did all the cleaning and laundry. She dabbled at some hobbies, but did no real work around the house except critiquing his work. She was particularly concerned about his occasional angry outbursts! She wanted to have a deeper experience of Christ without knowing love. I told her that you’ll start getting to know Jesus better when you start doing the laundry. Jesus was at the bottom of the laundry basket. That is just a simple exposition of John 14:21,23.
Mystics get stuck in darkness and depravity because they search for experience. They are truly modern (in the Oprah sense) in that they’ve idolized feelings about God. You’ll see in the book how much I react to the idea of hunting for God as an experience. In Chapter 2, I stress that if you make prayer the center then it becomes a search for an experience with God, which is idolatry. This theme runs all through the book. For instance, in chapter 23, Praying Without a Story, I gently critique a woman who has made experience with God her goal in life. Experience has left her disappointed…as it always does.
6. Angus
June 1, 2009
5:55 PM
Paul,
Thanks for your comments. As I mentioned, I have not read your book yet, but the person I have loaned it to caught me the other day and said it has helped him get through a 2 month or so period of deadness in prayer – he was gushing in his praise! I really am looking forward to getting to read it, and I’ve heard almost nothing but good regarding it.
I appreciate the clarifications. I confess I still feel a little discomfort with quotes from writers such as Merton and others, while I understand the Acts 17 argument, and going to sources outside our own small community. As I have not read the book I don’t know whether Merton is quoted as an authority, contrast, or something else, but if quoting writers whose spiritual experience may not even be one based upon a true salvation experience, and certainly a very distorted one at best, does that not leave the danger of giving those writers a legitimacy among the readers of your book? As I wrote above, that was what happened with myself and Tozer…I was reading Tozer in my late teens, and have at least a couple of dozen books of his that I devoured in that period, but from there I was looking (in a young and pretty uninformed way) for more of the same - so naturally I looked to Tozer for advice, and found he loved the mystics. I think it is pretty natural that this is where my desire to know God more deeply took me based on my great appreciation for Tozer who had helped to fire my passion. Is that not a possible danger for those who read your book, and are thrilled in the same way as my friend genuinely is? I guess my tendency would be to limit myself to those who are sure sources on the fundamentals and risk losing some more ecumenically minded readers than opening the door for some genuine truth seekers to be knocked of course by following guides they really shouldn’t. Does that make sense?
I’m very glad that the book emphasizes steering readers away from the primarily experiential, and I had assumed it would from the endorsements and brief excerpts I had read. I appreciate that the book would appear to be having a significant impact on the prayer life of many people for the good, like my friend, and I hope myself once I read it. I just worry about apparent endorsements of ‘iffy’ people by good people (like yourself), and the effect they can have based on my own experience).
Thanks so much for the interaction, and I pray God uses your book in a powerful way to make us a more prayerful people (and sorry if this is waffly – I’m having to write quickly)…
Angus
7. Renee
June 2, 2009
12:00 PM
Hi Paul,
I have been learning just recently that my whole approach on sharing God with unbelievers is all wrong. I always felt that if I could show people that God was not all that rigid in His demands, not all that demanding in His holiness, that I could more easily entreat them to come see about Him. But God didn’t change with time and God will never change. He is holy, He demands holiness, He is all-inclusive in His salvation and all-exclusive in the means to that salvation.
The point I am trying to make is that, for any author to cite mystics who express a form of “truth” to increase the comfort level for a broader audience, is in fact the wrong approach on sharing God. The gist of the gospel is to save the lost from a life of deceit and ultimately, perdition. Making a broader audience, the saved and the lost, comfortable now by employing quotes from a variety of faiths, may do little to build up the saved and do much to make sure the lost remain lost.
8. David Powlison
June 2, 2009
4:57 PM
I appreciate Tim Challies’ fair-minded review of Paul Miller’s A Praying Life. Along the way Tim rightly notes (and blog commenters, including Paul Miller himself, agree) that the heirs of medieval spirituality lead the unwary into the sloughs of interiority, mysticism, and quietism. By contrast, the Psalms are decidedly extraspective and outloud.
Let me offer another slant on the fact that Miller quotes Thomas Merton as a buttressing authority. Is it OK that Miller quotes Merton and many others – e.g., John of Landsburg, Augustine, Abraham Lincoln, Reinhold Niebuhr, N. T. Wright, C. S. Lewis, the Greek Orthodox Church, Charles Malik, Albert Einstein, etc. – with whom he’d have various points of theological difference? Is it OK that, like Paul in Acts 17, he quotes them “out of context” without offering a critical analysis of the strengths and weakesses of their overall thought-praxis systems? I think Yes.
It comes down to authorial purpose and intended audience. If Miller’s purposes had been scholarly – e.g., along the lines of “A critical analysis of the intuitionist-‘Buddhistic’ cast to medieval spirituality” or “The presence and/or absence of stoic-rationalistic elements in the history of Reformed piety” – he’d have written an entirely different sort of book.
The author’s purposes are practical. (Along the way, he does dispute both the subjectivizing tendency of mysticism and the objectivizing tendency of rationalism. Both are a-relational. They disconnect daily human experience from the gospel story.) Miller wants readers to take the gospel to heart and live out the verbal-relational implications. “The Father’s gift of his Son to die in our place” (p. 213) is the best Story ever told, omni-relevant into every person’s life story. The gospel is our Father’s standing invitation to honest, biblical prayer.
The author’s intended audience includes broad Christendom. So why not quote from Charles Malik (Eastern Orthodox), C. S. Lewis (Anglican), Thomas Merton (Roman Catholic), Reinhold Niebuhr (Mainline Protestant)? And in a book that notes the faith-numbing effects of secularized science, why not quote from Albert Einstein (God-haunted committed secularity)? Why not even quote Charles Hodge (childlike Reformed)? Of course. A Praying Life is not a scholarly exposition of Reformed-evangelical teaching and practice, compared and contrasted with other doctrine-praxis systems. It is an invitation for people to pray to the real God about things that matter. It’s along the lines of B. B. Warfield’s conviction that “all Christians are Calvinists on their knees.” Can Thomas Merton’s words cited on page 55 help readers realize the depth of their helplessness, need, and weakness? Can Merton’s words cited on page 138 help readers think critically about the things they most want? I think so.
Will some readers be moved to read Merton, taking his mysticism to heart, drifting away from Christian faith and towards Buddhism? If they take A Praying Life seriously, No. Paul Miller has “used” Merton for his own purposes. He has “proof-texted” and reframed Merton’s words (undermining Merton’s own system). This is similar to the way Paul proof-texted and reframed Greek poets and philosophers, creating a point of contact for the biblical gospel in calling Athenian intellectuals to repentance.
I hope this is a helpful contribution to the discussion. But even more, I hope that we’ll all pray with more candor, realism and faith!
9. Angus
June 2, 2009
10:33 PM
Dr Powlison,
Thank you so much for commenting. I wondered if you were the Westminster prof that Paul Miller referred to in his post, with your high recommendation of his book (your high praise being the things that moved me to purchase it [as well as his Love Walked Among Us]…I’m actually reading your “Seeing with New Eyes” just now with great profit, and I love the CCEF books and materials). Your quote of Warfield reminded me of one from Tozer that I liked a lot when I was younger, stating he was an Arminian when he preached and a Calvinist when he prayed (though I’ve since moved to where I’d rather be a Calvinist in both!)
I won’t say too much more, as I really need to read he book before I reveal my ignorance too much further. The one thing I would say, after reading the posts above, is that the Miller – Tozer comparison (and I still love Tozer’s books) is not that close, for Tozer never really spoke against the mystics he quoted so highly, and that was where the danger came in my experience. Perhaps I am reading too much into A Praying Life of my misgivings about some modern Christian Evangelical writers on spirituality and their apparent commendation of writers from the past who are more dangerous than helpful. I appreciate what Paul Miller is trying to achieve, that he is trying to reach as wide an audience as possible, drawing them into a real faith and authentic relationship with the true God. I have the highest regard for you both, am eagerly anticipating getting my copy back so I can get into it, and give a hearty Amen to your closing comment.
Angus
10. Mark
June 3, 2009
7:54 AM
Tim, thanks for the incisive review. I had already ordered the book and am looking forward to reading it.I have also read several of David Powlison’s books and been blessed, as well as challenged by his writings. The debate over who to quote and how to quote those who may be controversial is worth having. I have serious reservations about quoting those who hold to false views of salvation and the nature of God and who purport to be Christians. It would make sense to at least include a disclaimer in a footnote. If the book is as good as it is said to be, then I will recommend it, but with the appropriate warning.
11. Renee
June 3, 2009
12:10 PM
With all due respect to bloggers here, I need to question the ideas of fairness and practicality regarding book reviews and authorial purposes respectively, if the topic at hand is the Christian God. It’s not about fairness to the author and it’s not about practicality, at the end of the day. It’s about a true testimony of who God is. We as Christians ought to do anything we can to sweep the path clean of any obstacles that would hinder unbelievers from coming to Him.