Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the blog or about the author.

Tuesday September 30, 2008

Book Review - Death by Love

Death by Love by Mark DriscollDeath by Love is Mark Driscoll’s fourth book (or eighth if you count the “A Book You’ll Actually Read” series of booklets released earlier this year by Crossway) and the second to be released in the 2008 calendar year. It follows Vintage Jesus, Confessions of a Reformission Rev. and The Radical Reformission. Along with Vintage Jesus it is the second to be co-written with Gerry Breshears. Death by Love is unique among Driscoll’s books in that it is serious in tone from the first page to the last; gone is the sometimes-irreverent humor and gone is the biographical theme. In place comes a deadly-serious look at deadly-serious theology.

The book is written in quite a unique format. Following the model of the biblical epistles, Driscoll writes letters to his congregation—individuals who have come to him for pastoral counsel through the years of his ministry. He writes letters to address their issues in light of the gospel. “Our approach is an effort to show that there is no such thing as Christian community or Christian ministry apart from a rigorous theology of the cross that is practically applied to the lives of real people.” By perusing the table of contents the reader can quickly see the themes of the book and the contexts in which Driscoll writes about them:

Introduction
We Killed God: Jesus Is Our Substitutionary Atonement

“Demons Are Tormenting Me”
Jesus Is Katie’s Christus Victor

“Lust Is My God”
Jesus Is Thomas’s Redemption

“My Wife Slept with My Friend”
Jesus Is Luke’s New Covenant Sacrifice

“I Am a ‘Good’ Christian”
Jesus Is David’s Gift Righteousness

“I Molested a Child”
Jesus Is John’s Justification

“My Dad Used to Beat Me”
Jesus Is Bill’s Propitiation

“He Raped Me”
Jesus Is Mary’s Expiation

“My Daddy Is a Pastor”
Jesus Is Gideon’s Unlimited Limited Atonement

“I Am Going to Hell”
Jesus Is Hank’s Ransom

“My Wife Has a Brain Tumor”
Jesus Is Caleb’s Christus Exemplar

“I Hate My Brother”
Jesus Is Kurt’s Reconciliation

“I Want to Know God”
Jesus Is Susan’s Revelation

Appendix:
Recommended Reading on the Cross

Similar to Vintage Jesus (and the forthcoming Vintage Church), Mark Driscoll writes the bulk of the text while Gerry Breshears offers questions and answers relevant to the topic at the close of each chapter.

The book is targeted at a general audience and is intended to share with these people a biblical theology of the cross. “We write this book not with the intention of pleasing all of the scholars who may find here various points about which to quibble. Rather, our hope is to make otherwise complicated truths understandable to regular folks so that their love for and worship of Jesus would increase as they pick up their cross to follow him. Additionally, we write in hopes of serving fellow pastors and other Christian leaders who bear the responsibility of teaching and leading people. We are heartbroken that the cross of Jesus Christ is under attack by some and dismissed by others. This book is our attempt to respond in a way that helps to ensure that the cross remains at the crux of all that it means to think and live like Jesus.”

In most cases, Driscoll covers the topics well. He writes with a true pastor’s heart and shares deep and important theology with the reader. He grounds all help, whether it is to overcome lust or doubt or marital infidelity, in the cross. He constantly turns the reader’s gaze to the cross and to the gospel of Jesus Christ. The great strength of Death by Love is the “realness” of the book. This is no abstract theology torn from any genuine context. Instead, it is theology from the battlefield of pastoral ministry. It is a pastor’s attempt to offer comfort or demand repentance from the people God has called him to lead.

Those, like me, who have expressed disappointment with the occasional moment of irreverence in Driscoll’s former books will find little to complain about here. The writing is serious and carries a gravitas appropriate to the subject matter. While there are moments of heart-rending pain and depravity in these letters, they represent real-life situations and a pastor’s reaction to them. While the book’s theology is largely sound, there are a couple of exceptions. Many readers will object to what Driscoll teaches in Chapter 8, “My Daddy is a Pastor.” This chapter is written to Gideon Driscoll, Mark’s youngest son. Here he encourages his son not to take faith for granted but does so in the context of a doctrine known as “unlimited limited atonement.” This is guaranteed to alienate most of his audience since so few people hold to it (Bruce Ware being one notable exception). While I’ll grant that Driscoll does a good job in explaining the doctrine (or doing so as well as it can be explained), it was not convincing. Some may also struggle with the chapter on being tormented by demons and on Driscoll’s teaching on that subject.

What makes Death by Love so different from his other books is what makes it good. Driscoll holds his tongue, refusing to bring his trademark humor to this book. In this case it is a very good thing as the subject demands a serious tone. Driscoll looks at real-life crises and offers biblical wisdom and hope. While I have struggled in the past to recommend Driscoll’s books, I have little hesitation in recommending this one.

Comments (20) »


1. Nick Mitchell
September 30, 2008
8:41 AM

I loved the chapter, “My Daddy is a Pastor”. I’ve always thought that Limited Atonement was biblical in that Christ died for his sheep. Yet, whether we like the difficulty it brings to our theology, the apostle John meant world when he said ‘world’. Go Driscoll!


2. Tim Irvin
September 30, 2008
8:54 AM

Good Review.

Personally, I wouldn’t read the book if it was given to me. I don’t care for the Macho who try to be understanding and relative.

I’m certain that I have benefited more by “Mommy bacuum” and “99 balloons” than I would by reading this.


3. Nick Mitchell
September 30, 2008
9:06 AM

“Good Review.

Personally, I wouldn’t read the book if it was given to me. I don’t care for the Macho who try to be understanding and relative.

I’m certain that I have benefited more by “Mommy bacuum” and “99 balloons” than I would by reading this.”

I don’t get it.


4. Evan
September 30, 2008
10:37 AM

I am interested in this book, mainly because of the format and pastoral approach. I don’t know exactly what Driscoll means by “unlimited limited atonement” because I never heard his views specifically on this subject, but I think I know what he is getting at. And if I am right in my assumption, I would agree with him and would challenge your assertion that Ware is the only notable exception. Again if I am right in my assumption, then you could add a good deal of the early reformers (including Calvin) 19th century Calvinists (including Charles Hodge) and a lot of the Puritans as well. Today most people assume that Owen’s “Double Jeopardy” view is the only view consistent with Calvinism but if that is the case then Calvin wasn’t a Calvinist. Here are some sources that show this:
Calvin on the Atonement
Various Reformers on the Topic “For Whom did Christ Die?”
Various Reformers on the Topic of Double Payment


5. Kyle
September 30, 2008
11:10 AM

Tim,

I benefit greatly from your book reviews. It’s a significant ministry to the church of God, and I’m grateful for your efforts in it.

Can I make two simple little requests regarding your book-review posts?

1) If a book has a subtitle, you often don’t state it in the review or in the title of the post. This is an example. “Death by Love” has a subtitle (which I discovered from amazon.com is “Letters from the Cross”), but you don’t include it in your review.

2) This is not true in this case, but sometimes you don’t even include the author of the book in question when you write a review. The post title will say (for example) “Book Review - Death by Love;’ and sometimes you don’t mention the author of the book in the first several lines of the review itself.

So all I’m asking is, when you post a review, could you be sure to include the name of the author and the book’s subtitle (if it has one)? That’s nit-picky. I hope it doesn’t come across as negative. Again, I love reading your reviews.

Thanks!


6. Mrs. J.D. Darr
September 30, 2008
11:20 AM

Tim,
Love your review…I also benefited from “Mommy baccum”. It is so very sweet.


7. Jessica Watson
September 30, 2008
12:37 PM

I also appreciate the review. I have never been a big fan of Driscoll because of some of the reasons you stated, but I am pleased to hear he withheld some of the elements potential readers, like myself, might find irreverent. I don’t know how our book budget is holding up, but I might purchase this one. The title and theme are certainly arresting.


8. Andrew Randazzo
September 30, 2008
1:54 PM

I saw the promo video for this book and it was pretty intense. I’m really interested to read the book now. Once again, Mark Driscoll pushes line of our comfort zones…..but in a good way.


9. Adam
September 30, 2008
4:19 PM

But what I want to know is if the book is serious or not. You did not adequately explain the seriousness of the book in my serious opinion. Seriously.


10. donsands
October 1, 2008
6:58 AM

Thanks for the review. Nice to have some one run the gauntlet of reading Driscoll.

“disappointment with the occasional moment of irreverence in Driscoll’s former books will find little to complain about here.”

That’s good to hear.


11. Avid Book Reader
October 1, 2008
9:22 AM

Great review, the book looks fairly interesting. I’m glad to know there are a few irreverent spots, I like an author who tells it like it is. Thanks.


12. Scott E
October 1, 2008
9:25 AM

Evan:
Tim doesn’t say that Ware is the “only” notable exception, he says that Ware is “one” notable exception.

I too haven’t read Driscoll’s new book, nor have I heard Driscoll expound on this subject, but I wonder if it is similar to James P. Boyce’s view, or is it different all together?


13. Kara
October 1, 2008
4:20 PM

“Some may also struggle with the chapter on being tormented by demons and on Driscoll’s teaching on that subject.”

I’d love to see if you can flesh that sentence out a little. What is (are) the issue(s) with Driscoll’s teachings on that subject?


14. Dluxe
October 2, 2008
10:24 AM


15. Gage Browning
October 2, 2008
12:05 PM

Being a reader and listener of Driscoll, and admittedly a critic, I caught myself wondering about Tim’s review.

Have we come to the place in the evangelical world where we actually admit that one of the reasons we can recommend a book is because it is void of coarse language and irreverance from a Pastor? Not too much irreverance…not too much coarse language in this one…give it a try? It seems terribly sad that we have to have a discussion about reverance and language in the same discussion of a book written by a Pastor.



16. Jeremiah Lawson
October 2, 2008
9:31 PM

Re: Kara
In the past Driscoll has commended a book by Dr. Ed Murphey called The Handbook for Spiritual Warfare. He has cautiously commended some Neil Anderson works, and in recent presentations has referred to the lengthy writing of William Gurnall. Since those are books he has suggested in a recent set of lectures on spiritual warfare they might be a useful point of reference for where he’s coming from. Should Tim not have time to address that more fully that’s a direction you can look into. Gurnall’s work has stayed in print for literally centuries so my hunch is that people might take issue with anything Driscoll says about demons it would be more likely to derive from experiences that can’t be contested or investigated, or possibly the use of the other two authors as authorities on the topic.


17. Phil
October 3, 2008
11:26 AM

Tim,and interested folks. I’m not sure what Driscoll’s view on the atonement is specifically,having not read him. But there are plenty of ‘calvinists’who hold to an ‘unlimited atonement/particular application view of the atonement,like me. We maintain Christ paid a price for all men,such that only their lack of consent keeps them from being subjectively reconciled to a God who has made such possible. There is not just infinite merit in the atonement,which is large enough to comprehend ‘whosoever will’,but there is an actual ordaining of the sacrifice for all as the grounds of a bona fide general call. At the same time,God grants the particular gift of faith to those he has designated it for-who would,just like others-reject the gospel invitation,were it not for this effectual grace…people think this doesn’t force a resolution that scripture doesn’t supply. You might be interested in Reid Ferguson’s blog on the subject…check out his notes for a recent lecture he gave at the Bunyan Conference. His blog address is responsivereiding.com


18. Brendt Waters
October 4, 2008
11:04 PM

Yes, Gage, let’s not rejoice in the fact that good solid teaching is devoid of what (for some) would be a distraction or stumbling block. Let’s beat the dead horse instead.


19. Gage Browning
October 6, 2008
11:57 AM

Brendt,
Huh?


20. Jackson Jones
October 6, 2008
12:00 PM

I am amazed at the level folks go to to defend MD. When he finally writes a book that has no slang words, we are suppose to celebrate? Brendt? Really?