Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the blog or about the author.

Tuesday November 25, 2008

Book Review - Twilight

TwilightTwilight is a phenomenon; or that is what I hear. I began to receive emails about it a short time ago and the requests for a review have increased as the release of the Twilight movie has approached. Strangely, I get more requests to review teenage fiction than any other genre. I usually reply with an apologetic email saying that I do not review such titles. But because of the popularity of this series I decided to make an exception. With great trepidation and with eyes fixed firmly on the floor, I went to a local store and purchased the whole series—four books. I read the first volume, which I will review today, and left it to Aileen (the fiction expert in our home) to read the rest of the series.

Admittedly, this is my first foray into fiction written for teen girls. Actually, it is one of my first ventures into teen literature at all. When I was young I read books for children, but largely skipped over teen fiction, opting instead to dive straight into the history books. So I admit to being largely ignorant when it comes to this kind of book.

I found Twilight surprisingly well-written, at least for the genre. This is not to say it will be supplanting Jane Austen in the university lecture hall, but merely that it is readable and reasonably good as fiction. The dialog, the characters, the pacing, the prose—all of it, at the very least, is good enough that it does not detract from the story. This is more than I can say for many novels.

The book begins with seventeen year-old Bella Swan moving from Phoenix, Arizona to Forks, Washington, so she can live with her father, Charlie. Her mother, meanwhile, is traveling with her boyfriend Phil, a minor league baseball player. A too-typical teenage girl, Bella is convinced she is an ugly duckling when in reality she is a swan (the inspiration for her last name, perhaps?). Where in Phoenix she had been a social outcast, in Forks she is immediately popular and she catches the eye of several boys.

I’ll continue this plot summary by (lazily) quoting from Wikipedia: “When Bella sits next to Edward Cullen in class on her first day of school, Edward seems utterly repulsed by her. He even attempts to change his schedule to avoid her, leaving Bella completely puzzled about his attitude towards her. After tricking a family friend, Jacob Black, into telling her the local tribal legends, Bella concludes that Edward and his family are vampires. Although she was inexplicably attracted to him even when she thought Edward drank human blood, she is much relieved to learn that the Cullens choose to abstain from drinking human blood, and drink animal blood instead. Edward reveals that he initially avoided Bella because the scent of her blood was so desirable. Over time, Edward and Bella fall in love.” Without spoiling the plot, the book concludes with some page-turning action involving a vampire tracker (which, for those who are as ignorant as myself, is a vampire who tracks humans, not a human who tracks vampires) who seeks to hunt Bella as a sick kind of sport.

I am sure that the subject matter will immediately convince some parents that the book is unsuitable for their girls. This was my initial reaction—why would I allow my daughter to read a book about vampires? But I know there are some, perhaps myself included, who may allow an older teenager to read it. It is primarily to assist such parents that I write this review.

The book is relatively clean. That is to say that there is little explicit violence and no overt sexual activity. However, I think this bears some further discussion. While there is no sexual activity portrayed in the book, it really does ooze with a kind of teen or tween sexuality. The book is, at its heart, the story of a young girl’s sexual awakening. It may be that the tween reader will be sufficiently young and innocent that this is lost on her, but I’m convinced the older teenage girl will find it in the story. The most explicit sexuality is found in a brief discussion between Edward and Bella where they talk about whether they desire one another in that way and whether Bella has ever been with another boy. Edward declares that he may be a vampire, but he is still a man. The quiet sensuality is far more pervasive and, I would suggest, far more powerful. There is scene after scene where Edward and Bella gently stroke one another, softly and slowly running their hands over each other’s bodies, exploring, pressing their heads against each other’s chests to hear their hearts pounding, feeling electric shocks as their fingers touch flesh, twisting and cavorting with their lips on one another’s faces and necks. Bella is inflamed by Edward and, while there may be no explicit mention of sexuality, it is clear that she desires Edward—all of Edward.

Edward, meanwhile, has a creepy kind of love for Bella. As a vampire he cannot sleep, so he spends his nights sneaking into Bella’s room to watch her sleep (as if this is sweet, not perverse) and often follows her unnoticed as she goes about her business. He reveals that her scent—the scent of her blood—drives him wild. His overwhelming love for her is sometimes nearly indistinguishable from revulsion or hatred. There is part of him that wishes to hold her, to make love to her, and another part that wants to attack her and to drink her blood. In one scene she has been bitten and Edward needs to suck some poison from her if he is to save her life. After he does so he discusses both her taste and her smell and how enchanting it is to him. Is this love or is this perverse obsession?

While the love between the two of them is meant to be real, it also has a strange, unearthly quality to it. It also has an obsessive, idolatrous quality. Perhaps this is true of any love story, but I wonder whether girls are well-served by reading of a young woman who is so utterly consumed with her boyfriend that she seeks and desires and thinks of nothing else. She lies, she disobeys her parents, she does whatever is necessary to be with him. She is convinced that in this boy she will find her all-in-all. All she desires—to the point of wanting him to drink her blood so she, too, can be a vampire—is to be with him forever. She would rather be undead eternally than live without him.

I just don’t know that young girls will derive any benefit from spending hours reading and thinking about such an unrealistic, unobtainable, perverse kind of love. It glories in love that is forbidden, dangerous and just plain weird. The fact that the story involves vampires may be beside the point. My primary concern with Twilight, as I consider handing it to a girl of thirteen or fifteen or seventeen, is its sensuous quality. The lack of overt sexuality means that it is not an erotic book, but it is very nearly so. It oozes sensuality even without an act of consummation.

It is not insignificant that on the cover of Twilight is the simple image of hands—female hands—holding out an apple. This clearly evokes the forbidden fruit of Genesis 2:17, verses that are quoted at the beginning of the book. This represents not only the forbidden love between a human and a vampire, but Edward himself as Bella considers partaking of him. My suggestion to parents would be to leave this book on the shelf instead of handing it to your teenage girl (and especially your young teenage girl). At the very least, read it yourself and see if your conscience is clear before you hand it to her.


Postscript: Aileen read this book and promptly read the other three volumes in the series. Her assessment of the sensuality and the violence in Twilight: “that’s nothing compared to the other three books.” It should be noted, however, that Edward and Bella marry in book four and that they do so as virgins.

Comments (52) »


1. Eric S. Mueller
November 25, 2008
7:25 AM

Thanks for the review, Tim. My wife’s youngest sister got hooked on this series and in turn my wife started reading it. I have no intention of reading it myself, so I appreciate you sacrificing the time to do it. Now I need a good history book to take the edge off that write-up of teen romance fiction.


2. Stephanie
November 25, 2008
7:58 AM

Hmm. I hadn’t heard of this series before but after reading this review, I’m suprised that it’s even being reviewed on this site. If I had daughters, they would NOT be reading this book.


3. Jody Gates
November 25, 2008
8:28 AM

Thank you Tim for this review. I had seen the previews for the movie, my pastor/husband and I wondered about it and the books. I’m thankful you did the leg work of the review because I’m sure there will be parents and teens that will ask us about this. Well done.


4. Brance
November 25, 2008
9:01 AM

Several of the teens at our church have read, or are reading, this series. I’ve told them all along that there are better things they could be reading, and that reading such things only fills their mind with ungodly values. They didn’t listen.

The same with the book The Shack. Despite the warnings, despite sending people to your review, we still had people in our church that thought it was a good book that they were learning from.

How can a pastor/elder actually warn people and get them to pay attention to the warning? Any advice out there?


5. johnMark
November 25, 2008
9:22 AM

Tim,

I appreciate this review. We would not let our teen daughter read this book. The problem is that the sensuality is too smoothly written in so that is almost slips by. Just as some TV sitcoms have become unwatchable. The stuff I see on the commercials is enough for me not to watch. However, it’s on regular TV so it must be safe, right? This fits right into Lewis’ quote about the devil’s biggest trick is convincing the world he doesn’t exist.

There is also the issue of pornography. For men, it’s normally pretty easy to catch because of the visual nature of the material. For women, it’s not so easy because their stimulus is a bit different i.e. romance novels and such. I think we’re seeing a similar thing here in this books approach to teens. It’s teenage girls that were said to prop up this movie. It’s a clever artistic slight of hand.

Every little step closer to the edge of the cliff are only little steps, but still closer to falling off.

Mark


6. Melissa
November 25, 2008
9:26 AM

Two of your points really nail what made “Twilight” so intoxicating and disquieting when I read it: “The quiet sensuality is far more pervasive and, I would suggest, far more powerful” than it would be if it were overtly sexual, and the relationship the book portrays is “unrealistic, unobtainable.”

I read the book following the rave reviews of a friend. I am single and in my early 30s, and my friends who’ve read it are mostly single Christian adults. The intense sensuality you mention is largely why I did not read the final three books, though I was curious to know what happened with the characters. (I did read recaps online, so I’d know the plot points stripped of their sensual tone.)

When I read “Twilight,” I thought of how most, if not every, young female (and many older ones) would be drawn to it. It indulges our fantasies about what a romance can be, and when I finished reading it I struggled with strong disappointment with my real life and longing for a relationship. It really brings alive the idea of an intense physical relationship that is void of sex but overwhelmed by desire. I doubt that many single people of any age could read it and not long for some of what it portrays.

A lot of fiction and romantic stories in general can have that effect — encouraging the longing for more, and discouraging the contentment that you had before reading the book. Sometimes it’s good to be woken up. But immediately after reading “Twilight,” I found it quite difficult to keep my thoughts submitted to God, or to even want to. I didn’t think reading the other books was worth the conflict.


7. Dan Hagan
November 25, 2008
9:56 AM

Tim,

I echo the earlier comments in thanking you for the review. I have great faith in your discernment skills and I really appreciate your clarity on this subject.

As a father of a very driven and precocious 16 year old daughter, I strongly believe that there is no need to amplify the yearnings already present in a healthy young girl. I realize that the target audience of the series and your review is heavily weighted toward the female reader’s side of the teen equation. However, based on your review I don’t see anything healthy in this material for the young male either. Frankly, I see quite the opposite.

I wonder if you’d agree that books of this genre are following the worldly scheme of advocating and supporting the sexualization of our young people? And that they are doing so at a progressively younger age? This is what I see happening here. By applying a lengthy and continuous tease, it appears that the series of four books is attempting to maximize the exposure time of the young reader to everything but the final consummation. It also appears that even the final act of marriage (in book #4) does little to justify the rather sorted and unhealthy journey to that end. In fact, my cynical analysis would be that the marital conclusion may have been designed to allow less discerning reviewers the ability to excuse the sensual story line because of the final outcome.

Come on Mom! It’s not that bad! They get married in the end!

Am I being cynical here or realistic?

Besides the sexual nature of this series, can the subject of vampires and blood lust be a healthy source of entertainment for any Christian regardless of age level?

Thanks again for your and Aileen’s timely review of this poison!


In Christ,

Dan…


8. Melissa
November 25, 2008
10:07 AM

Thank you so much for your objective review of this book. It has been difficult, as a parent of a 14-yr-old, to hold to the point that she may not read these books. I finally compromised and went to the theatre and watched the movie with her & her friends & another mom. The movie was not near as sensual as it appears the book is, because in order to get through everything in the book, they had to move fast. For me, you put my thoughts and objections in to plain English that I can help explain to my daughter.

Thank you so much.
Blessings,
Melissa


9. Mike
November 25, 2008
10:53 AM

What’s so wrong about sensuality again? This isn’t sexuality we’re talking about. Are we not supposed to let teens read anything where a girl has a crush on a guy? Is desiring someone “in that way” (as more than friends) really so wrong? The review seems a bit nit-picky, making a big deal out of something that isn’t really a problem at all, just so he can have some reservations about recommending a popular book for teens.


10. Kyle
November 25, 2008
10:59 AM

I appreciate your willingness to read and review this book. Your thoughts are clear and helpful.

One question though. You say that you might permit an older teenage girl to read the book, and urge against allowing a young teenage girl to read it. However, your primary concern about the book (its sensuality and sexual overtones) is one you say may be lost on younger teens but easily grasped by older ones. Wouldn’t this be an argument for the opposite conclusion? If the most dangerous aspect of the book is one that would be grasped only by older teenagers, wouldn’t it be less appropriate for an older, rather than a younger, teen?


11. Jessica Watson
November 25, 2008
11:13 AM

Hmmm. Interesting review and comments. I have also seen these books being read by teenage girls in the music class I teach.. I was curious as to its’ contents, but didn’t want to take the time to read it myself. This gives me a way to start a conversation with them about it. So thanks.


12. Laura
November 25, 2008
11:16 AM

This weekend past, my husband and his friend stumbled into the theatre for this movie, not knowing what it was. He said, excepting his friend, himself, and two women, the seats were packed with teenage girls. The two lone women were moms screening the movie for their own teenage daughters. At the end of it, my husband asked the moms if the movie passed the muster, and she decried, “No way!”

The things which impressed the heart of a father (my husband) were the not-so-subtle foolish representation of Bella’s father and the multitude of giggles his idiocy provoked among the viewing girls. He was made sad over the reflection and direction of culture this literature/film represents and thankful that our own daughters are not yet old enough to be tempted. Myself, I prefer Austen.


13. Michele
November 25, 2008
11:21 AM

Excellent review, Tim. Some might enjoy my son’s review of this book at his blog, “Fiction Snobs”, under the post: “Paolini is fading, Meyer is gaining…”


14. Carrie, Reading to Know
November 25, 2008
11:46 AM

(My first comment here as a regular blog stalker! Woo hoo!)

I TOTALLY enjoyed your review. I slapped the desk and laughed out loud. I haven’t picked up these books because I really don’t like modern teen fiction and vampires aren’t the sort of characters that attract me. Still, everyone said, “you’ve gotta read them!” Now I feel like, at the very least, I’m hearing the REAL story for the Twilight series and while my opinion on whether or not I want to read them hasn’t changed, I feel like there’s a better my personally doing so.

Thanks.


15. carrie
November 25, 2008
11:49 AM

Better argument, that is


16. Tim Challies
November 25, 2008
11:54 AM

One question though. You say that you might permit an older teenage girl to read the book, and urge against allowing a young teenage girl to read it. However, your primary concern about the book (its sensuality and sexual overtones) is one you say may be lost on younger teens but easily grasped by older ones. Wouldn’t this be an argument for the opposite conclusion? If the most dangerous aspect of the book is one that would be grasped only by older teenagers, wouldn’t it be less appropriate for an older, rather than a younger, teen?

That’s a fair question. I guess I wanted to be sure not to sound like I was binding anyone’s conscience. An older teen, even if this book is directed right at her, is better equipped, I think, to deal with it. She may be mature enough to see it for what it is—an impossible standard based on an impossible romance. As one commenter said earlier, this really is the female form of pornography (or close to it, anyways).


17. Jennifer, Snapshot
November 25, 2008
2:42 PM

Interesting that you get so many teen fiction requests. On 5 Minutes for Books we cover all sorts of stuff, and don’t get many requests for popular fiction or for teen and tween stuff (which I would read and review).

I haven’t read these yet, but I would like to as an adult. I’ve heard that they are oozing with heavy romance, and as you said, for that reason, I don’t know if I’d want my teen to read it either.

FYI, if you like sci-fi at all, her first adult novel that published this year is The Host, and it was excellent. I don’t particularly like sci-fi, but it was great imaginative fantasy type of stuff.


18. JUSTIN BRUCE
November 25, 2008
2:45 PM

Tim,

Thanks for the book review, haven’t read it, never will, but I did take my 16 year-old sister-in-law, and 14 year-old cousin to see the movie over the weekend. They would have seen it without me, and as their youth leader, I figured I should see the biggest teen-pop culture film so that I could speak into their world with wisdom. My wife and I noticed the sensuality permeating the entire movie; Bella and Edward constantly close, you can see the desire to rush together in passionate embrace, but they restrain.

The biggest thing that I found in the movie was what you had touched upon in your review. The fact that to be with Edward would mean that Bella is eternally condemned; she knows the price for having her desires, she doesn’t care, everything in her lusts to have what is forbidden and she will spend an eternity in Hell to get it, as Romans 1:32 says, they know the penalty for pursuing such things, yet they not only pursue, but give approval of all that pursue them as well (my paraphrase). The other thing is no matter how “good” the Cullen’s are in not killing humans, their nature is wicked; no matter how hard they try, as Edward says, “I am a killer, I am designed to kill”. Two huge points for the depravity of man in both thirsting for sin at all costs, and trying to restrain from sin and be “good” when by nature they are wicked. Both sides, both Bella and Edward, reveal humanities rebellion against God.


19. Lorissa Haveman
November 25, 2008
3:00 PM

I am a 15 year old girl. I have never read the series, and never plan to. I first heard of them about a year ago at a youth retreat. A teenage girl a bit older than me was reading the 1st, Twilight. When asked by a youth leader about the books, the young woman became embarrased and defensive, which was my first warning signs about them.

Based on your review and what I have already heard about these books, they are not the type of literature that would help me “set my mind on things above” (Colossians 3:2) or “flee the evil desires of youth, and pursue righteousness, faith, love and peace (2 Timothy 2:22).

I also realize I am probably the exception.


20. Curtis
November 25, 2008
4:26 PM

Tim, “this really is the female form of pornography “

if this is true then how can you say this book could or should be read by anyone? Isn’t sin sin anymore, or is this an acceptable sin? Can we as Christians take a stand on this issue of sexual content in books and films and say, no more. This sin, if kept down to a minimum, has become the worlds forbidden darling sin. Tim this isn”t a conscience issue, this is an overt sin issue. To know that a book contains this sort of material, meant to induce sexual thoughts, and read it out of curiosity or a love of fiction, is sin. I know people will call me a legalist because I call sin what it is, and perhaps because people hate to have there sin exposed.
Hard truth, yes, but true no the less.


21. Tim Challies
November 25, 2008
4:34 PM

Curtis - I probably overstated that a little bit. I guess I’d say that, at some level, this kind of thing is a female equivalent to pornography (or this is what I hear from Aileen and from other women). So at some point this can become a form of escapism that draws the heart away from what is good and pure and true.


22. Curtis
November 25, 2008
4:36 PM

Lorissa Haveman
Way to go! Unfortunately more adults don’t think the way you do.


23. Curtis
November 25, 2008
4:48 PM

Thank Tim for responding, I know where you are coming from, and I think the reason I take such a firm stand on these issues is because I know what a temptation this can be. I suppose it comes down to how Godly we wish to become. Just enough as to look holy in the eyes of the world and the church. 99% pure, 1% sewer, I’m not drinking.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Db9OVpqCMGE&feature=related

Before people say I shouldn’t judge or that I don’t know the heart, please listen to the above audio.


24. Jeri
November 25, 2008
4:51 PM

Thanks, Tim. Just last night it occurred to me to ask you if you’d heard of or planned to comment on these books. Like so many others, I know several young Christian ladies who have been reading them (with great gusto.)

The article and comments have all been helpful and enlightening. I hope the word will get out to churches; I wish we’d been a little more ahead of the curve on this one!


25. Chris Borah
November 25, 2008
5:06 PM

@JUSTIN BRUCE - I think for the very reasons you mentioned above, namely:

Two huge points for the depravity of man in both thirsting for sin at all costs, and trying to restrain from sin and be “good” when by nature they are wicked.

This is why, as Tim suggests, that more discerning persons should (or should have liberty to) read this book. Especially those of us in ministry.

I have seen the movie (twice… don’t ask) and I’ve only begun reading the book, but I must confess I am very engaged in the story. Grant it, the prose is not the best and when you’re used to reading Waltke and Horton it seems like a kid’s book (yep), but the story is engaging and compelling nonetheless.

I suppose the head in the sand mentality gets to me. I totally understand that we must draw the line somewhere, especially concerning our children. For example, I won’t watch R-rated movies with nudity/sexuality any more because I just don’t think it’s worth it for me, however good the writing and production values are. Should our high schoolers not read and discuss Shakespeare because Romeo and Juliet deals with lust (and rather poorly)?

We must keep a Christ-centered perspective with romance. Namely, that it is within the confines of marriage, that it is a picture of Christ and the Church, and that it is in our nature to trade the truth of that setup for a lie (i.e. lie = the vision of romance in Twilight).

Conclusion:

I’m enjoying the book right now, I enjoyed the movie, and I like using cheesy, teenage pickup lines (from the book/movie) on my wife. Do I see the danger in much of the perspective in this book/movie? Certainly. However, I think our response should be to build a solid foundation for kids to be able to acknowledge these feelings (lust & romance), and then (possibly after they’ve read the book) direct them to Christ and his perfect vision for romance. Don’t just write it off.

Thanks Tim, for not just writing it off.

Yours ever,
Chris


26. Mary Ellen Hunt
November 25, 2008
5:52 PM

As usual, an insightful review. I would like to add one thing more to it—both Edward and Bella have a choice in the matter. Edward shows enough moral fiber not to drink the blood of humans. He starts out adamantly against the idea of making Bella a vampire. He even says something to the effect of “Isn’t a whole lifetime of happiness with me enough?” to Bella as a way to try to convince her she doesn’t really want to be a vampire.

Bella doesn’t have to become a vampire unless she chooses to. Edward doesn’t have to make her a vampire unless he chooses to. They have a clean way forward……..but I guess that would not make a dramatic, intense, sensual series of books designed to hook into teenage desires and rebellion issues. As Edward is written and played in the movie, he would’ve made that difficult choice to watch her move closer to death every second. What a true sacrifice of love that would have been.

God doesn’t give us more than we can bear…….if we have the will to bear up under the burden.


27. Colibri
November 25, 2008
7:50 PM

Thanks for the review and the comments. It’s very helpful to get the reasonings of other Christians when one is considering a liberty. As a Believer and an English teacher, I find several points in favor of these novels.

Since these books are fantasy, try not to get distracted by the word “vampire” in the story. Would you reject a book just because it had the word “adultery” in it, or because it had characters who committed adultery? No, you wouldn’t reject it on that one point because you understand that it is the treatment of the idea that is important. You would reject a book that glamorizes or promotes adultery, but you would embrace a book that portrayed the painful consequences of it. This is the reason that you don’t mind your teenaged daughters reading “The Scarlet Letter.”

The fact that Edward is a vampire is just a representation of other common flaws in humanity. In fantasy, it’s easy to see our foibles and their resultant consequences. This is a reason that we love The Chronicles of Narnia! The fantasy shows us pictures of truth in a different light or from a different angle, and we understand it better and see it clearer. I believe the vampire trait is singularly representative of our sin nature! We hunger and thirst for what is wrong, but there is a way to turn our appetites toward more wholesome fare. Edward and his family have chosen to fight their natural thirst in order to preserve life, believing that every life is precious. No, they aren’t turning to Christ, but the point is that they are seeking the better way.

Another important point to these books is that the characters change! They grow better! By the end of the third book, Bella and Edward continue to abstain in an attempt to preserve their souls. Their growth is in the right direction. They understand sacrifice and that their decisions -and mistakes- affect the happiness of others.

The books teach many worthy concepts: that one doesn’t have to surrender to his lust, that abstinence until marriage is desirable, that physical attraction is potently dangerous and needs to be restrained. It is also interesting that Carlisle, the character with the most restraint and the most concern for others, is the character with the most “religion.”

With such strong, positive messages, these books are an immense improvement in the genre of young adult literature. They are definitely not the quality of Jane Austen or C. S. Lewis, but certainly aim higher than Harry Potter. I suggest that we allow our older teens to read them.

And regarding sensuality, I’m curious— when your teens read-through-the-Bible-in-a-year, do you tell them to skip the Song of Songs?


28. Kim K.
November 25, 2008
9:54 PM

I had never even heard of this series until a few weeks ago when I was made aware that several moms in our Christian school were completely enthralled with them. One of the moms had decided to pre-read the book for her daughter and was so taken in by the story that she was recommending the books to everyone. From just the little I heard of the story line they didn’t sound like books that I would normally pick up. When I got home I asked my 17 year old daughter (voracious reader) if she had ever heard of the series. Her answer, with eye-rolling - “Mom, those books are so lame.” (She had read them.)

Also, I don’t think I’ve heard anyone mention it in the comments, but the author is a Mormon, which probably doesn’t make a big difference, but some of the moms at school were thinking the books were okay because they were written by a Christian. Aaaargh!


29. yaozhaoshu.com
November 26, 2008
12:16 AM

Net price book to find books: Book Shop to provide more than the price comparison to find the lowest price to ensure that, from worry out of stock.


30. Mary Eady
November 26, 2008
1:03 AM

Tim — I was so interested to read your review. I first heard of these books at a baby shower where one Christian friend was raving about them and another was relating how all of the teachers at her school read them almost obsessively. The teacher friend was saying she was actually considering reading them because of all the raves, but I think I’ll point her to this review. Especially to the comment from Melissa. Thank you, Melissa, for your honesty about the effects this book had on you. I think that your response to them is one that many women could identify with because we do, indeed, fall prey to a different type of temptation than men do (generally) and I can see where these books would speak specifically to that weakness and draw us in.

The first review of these books I read were from a female reviewer who read through the entire series. Though I would not be prone to read these books given your review here, I wanted to address something that rang as a death knell even more clearly in regard to thinking it would be a good idea for any girls or young women these books.

Beth Felker Jones over at the Gospel and Culture Project said, “Models are scarce for the young woman who wants to imagine love, sexuality, vocation, and parenting as directed towards God’s glory. It doesn’t surprise me that girls identify with Bella, a character that cannot imagine she is lovable. She trips and falls through Meyer’s four novels. Her clumsiness and willingness to erase herself form an apt portrayal of the self-understanding of many young women today. Dark romance, a love that erases the awkward heroine, is an answer to desire and self-loathing that draws on the worst cultural assumptions about what it means to be female.”

I do not know if you would be interested in reading her review, nor did I know if it would be appropriate to post about it here. I hope that I’m not being disrespectful in doing so. But her insights as a woman into the dangers of the book series for young ladies really touched a note for me. It sounds as though your wife was relaying some of the same types of thoughts to you in reading these books.

If it would not be inappropriate for me to provide a link to the rest of her review and if you’d like to see it, just let me know and I’d be happy to give it to you.


31. Jesse
November 26, 2008
1:19 AM

Here is the link to the review mentioned above. It’s really excellent.

http://www.gospelandculture.org/2008/11/vampires-and-young-female-desire/


32. Curtis
November 26, 2008
7:25 AM

There seems to be much apathy towards sin in general regarding this book and its content. I think Christian liberty is being confused with liberalism. Our liberty as a Christian is not a liberty to flirt with sin. Playing around in temptation and sin is dangerous and I am merely giving a warning, take it or leave it.

Colibri
“And regarding sensuality, I’m curious— when your teens read-through-the-Bible-in-a-year, do you tell them to skip the Song of Songs? “

Really? You’re compairing what is being taught in the Song of Songs(God breathed) to Mormon(Satanically influenced) fiction, really? What is happening in the professing church that it’s come to this way of thinking…nevermind, it just grieves me that it’s become so rampant, and I sometimes forget Christ warned us this would happen.

Let me ask an open question, if I may. Is this book God honoring,or does it contradict the charater and nature of God? Because really thats all anything should really come down to. This isn’t about something being, “not THAT bad”, or “it’s just a good story”, it’s about holiness and glorifying God, isn’t it? Am I missing something when I read the bible?


33. TL Boehm
November 26, 2008
9:25 AM

Thank you for posting this review. I am a “newly published” writer but have been interested in the mechanics of solid teen/tween fiction for years. There is a “black hole” it seems, when it comes to the literature for this age group. A lot of what I have seen my teens pick up is either violent, sexually charged, or it is of the graphic novel genre. I really tried to steer clear of these things in my first book and will continue to do so. Peace
TL Boehm


34. Chris Borah
November 26, 2008
10:26 AM

@Curtis - Have you read the book(s)?

I think Colibri’s point was not to put SoS and Twilight on the same level. He is merely saying that just the presence of sensuality should not be grounds enough to discount something.

I wholeheartedly agree that we need to be careful not slide into license when we’re talking about liberty. We need to continue to be vigilant to guard our hearts and minds from unrighteousness.

@Colibri - I’m actually really glad you brought up the struggle of Edward’s vampire “nature”. I’m actually surprised Tim did not make mention of this in his review. It seems very much apparent to me from reading the book as well as seeing the movie that this theme is (whether purposefully or not) a picture of our sin nature. Very fascinating discussion topic at the very least.


35. connie
November 26, 2008
12:24 PM

“Curtis - I probably overstated that a little bit. I guess I’d say that, at some level, this kind of thing is a female equivalent to pornography (or this is what I hear from Aileen and from other women). So at some point this can become a form of escapism that draws the heart away from what is good and pure and true.”

You didn’t overstate it at all. Being a man, it would be hard for you to have the perspective on the female reaction to a book like this: Female pornography is EXACTLY what it is.

By the way, for those that don’t know, the author is Mormon; my husband is a former Mormon-and there is something about that perspective-of course there would be no blatant sex in the book, but the things that are portrayed in the book would be just as damaging if not more so to a young girl-or any female, for that matter. I’m almost fifty, and I would NOT feel it safe to read such a book.


36. carissa
November 26, 2008
1:50 PM

they get married at the end?! you didn’t even give a spoiler warning!!

just kidding. i’ve never read any of the books (wasn’t interested), but i know plenty of people who have. i didn’t really know much beyond the basic vampire premise. now i want to ask people who read it what they thought.


37. Curtis
November 26, 2008
5:06 PM

Chris Borah
@Curtis - Have you read the book(s)?

No, nor will I. Something being sensual isn’t in and of itself sinful, but when that sensuality, in this case, is written for the reader sake, to promote emotional and sexual desire, which leads to lust and sin.

I remember watching Basic Instinct when I was younger(16-17ish) and I suppose it would be ok to show my children as long as I edit out the cursing, I mean just because sensuality, and violence is present doesn’t mean I should discount it. Do you see how foolish this level of justifying is? Just because it’s not “as sinful” doesn’t make it ok. As I said before 99%pure 1%sewer, would you drink it, what makes this book any different.

Just curious, would you let your 8 years old listen to you read this book? If it’s not ok for them to hear, why is it ok for you, because they are too pure?, well what about God, He is holy, and you read this book to Him.
It portrays sensual behaviour between teens, and God hates it.
I don’t know how this is even a conversation or subject of dispute, sickening whats happening in the professing church..


38. Ashley
November 27, 2008
1:31 AM

Another thanks from me for this review, Tim.

I think the idea of this being pornography for women should be more fully pondered - some seem to be dancing around this because it seems so harsh, but I think it’s important to consider because of the devastating effect of porn on our ability to enjoy the real pleasures and passionate joys that God has made us for. This completely unreal, exaggerated portrayal of romance and sensuality will only lead to dissatisfaction and constant unhappiness when reality does not conform. And while it is noteworthy that the main characters in ‘Twilight’ do not actually have sex until they get married, to me this is another unreal fantasy that will lead to real world pain and tragedy - no young girl (or woman of any age) can expect to be able to indulge in sensuality of this order without it leading to sexual activity.

I will not be reading this book, not because I’m prudish or that I think it will necessarily lead to sin (I think people can read this story without sinning, and I am willing to give them that liberty), but because I know that as a single woman it will only add to the immensely difficult struggle I already have to fight against dissatisfaction and longing for what I don’t have. And because I would never want to burden a real man with such an emotionally immature fantasy of how romance and love should be. And most of all because for me, indulging in this kind of unreal, sensual fantasy would dishonor my God and the true, passionate glory of His reality and His creation.


39. Sam Eliza
November 27, 2008
1:32 AM

I was a bit shocked, to say the least, when a Christian, homeschooled (I am also) friend told me that she had seen the movie. She tried to justify her seeing the movie, and the movie itself. I am just amazed that this could be accepted as purely entertainment. What one reads and views for pleasure affects one’s outlook on life, despite what one claims.
Lorissa- I’m 16, and I stand with you on this one!


40. Curtis
November 27, 2008
8:04 AM

Sam Eliza, Lorissa, way to go!


41. Leslie
November 27, 2008
11:37 AM

Tim,
Since the author is a Mormon, how much Mormon theology did you notice written into the story and its themes? I bet there’s a lot more there than you may realize at first, especially if one doesn’t know the meatier teachings of mormonism. Perhaps warnings should be sounded over the book’s spiritual sensuality as well.


42. M. Jones
November 28, 2008
2:30 AM

Thanks. Many of my friends were highly interested in this book, but what I found on Wikipedia and elsewhere caused me to skip the movie—just too much of the wrong thing to feed my mind. Like most good books, it has the quality of causing characters to come alive, but they are not the type of characters I want alive in my life.


43. sophie
November 29, 2008
10:52 AM

i dont think people should be put off the twilight series because of the review. i understand coming from one point of view it may seem a bit to sensual to give to your teenage daughter, however i am 16 and love these books. many of my friends read them and they are very good. dont just rely on mine or the reviewers opinion, buy them yourselves and then judge whether or not you let your daughter read them. i may be slightly biased due to the fact i love stephenie meyers books, but so is the reviewer as he doesnt normally go for this type of genre.


44. beatrice81
November 30, 2008
9:56 PM

So escapism is pornography? Really?
By that logic, all science fiction, fantasy, and adventure books are “pornography”. Right?


45. Rob
November 30, 2008
10:02 PM

Thanks for the review. I’ve seen this on the shelf and heard the hype about this, so I’m glad to read a review about this to get the general idea of what this is about, which is, a book to skip and forget.


46. Curtis
December 1, 2008
4:32 AM

beatrice81, I think you msiunderstood what was said, escapism does NOT equal pornography, however sexual desire as portayed in this book is sinful, also many forms of escapism can also be sinful in and of itself. The sin involved can be considered “equal” because of the One to Whom they’re against, though distinct from one another.

Let me ask you this, if this book had been on store shelves only 50 years ago, and would have been labeled as pronography, what has changed? Is it that which is sinful that has changed or is it our low view of God and His holiness,which has lead to our acceptance of this form sin? You see, as our willingness to conform to our culture takes hold of our hearts, we go places that we ought not to be. When we let our desires and apathy govern our acceptance of such things, we loose sight of what really matters,and that is just how holy our God really is, and how unholy and wicked we really are.

I don’t mean to beat the horse any more than I have, but what are you or teens really missing if you don’t read these books? If you read them, it could lead to sinful thoughts, no? If you don’t read them they can’t lead you to sinful thoughts, right? Why go somewhere when you could be tempted?

You want your kids to read more, get a book about God. And not the Shack, thats just outright heresy. If you want your kids to read fiction, get them into Pilgrims Progress, you could spend a lifetime in that book. Or how about Laura Ingrams, we can do better than Twilight.

I think it was Tozer who said, “Ican tell how much of God you have by how much entertainment you need.”

I’m not sure but this may be part of the issue. I know it has been in my own life.

So now that the horse is sufficiently dead and I’ve said all that I think can be said, I’ll leave you with those thoughts.


47. Chris Borah
December 1, 2008
10:21 AM

I heed your counsel Curtis, and I still agree with you, but you have no idea what you’re talking about… because, *drum roll, you’ve never read the book(s). This is not like watching a racy rated R movie to approve for your kids. It’s much more like pre-viewing Snow White before allowing your kids to watch it. You know, with the witches, and spells, and love and romance, that would be devastating to them. They would be living in a fantasy world that has romance, oh no.

Trust me, I 100% agree that the view of romance in this book is not fully sufficient and that it does not take perfect counsel from the Scriptures, but (and I’m in book 3 now) they do not have actions (or thoughts) of sexual activity, and at the very least it shows a great depiction of John Owen’s the mortification of sin with Edward’s constant struggle and growth.

Again, I’m 100% okay with you not reading these book(s) and also making the decision to not allow your kids to read these books, but you’re gone off the reservation on this one.


48. Carrie
December 3, 2008
12:38 AM

After seeing the previews for this movie, I was considering going to see it. I decided to read the book first, and I’m glad I did — so that I could warn others. It was horrible. From a purely literary standpoint, it was so bad! The character development is non-existent, and the plot moves at an uneven pace. But most importantly, Stephenie Meyer makes the cardinal mistake of telling the reader rather than showing us what is going on. By the end of the book, Bella expresses her desire to become a vampire - but what on earth would possess a normal girl with a normal life to want to die an extraordinarily painful death and become a vampire? The fact that Edward is SO attractive and smells SO good… Really, that’s about all the explanation we get; and that is just one example of many. If you’ve been thinking about reading this book, trust me: your time would be better spent doing almost anything else.


49. Michele Harvey
December 3, 2008
9:28 PM

I am coming out of lurking to comment because one of the posters above asked how much Mormon theology is present in the book. I have thought about this a lot. I read the series, was rather addicted to it and felt glad when I was done. Twilight can be read pretty much as a straightforward romance novel without the “bodice ripping.” In that, I think it’s brilliant, perfect wish fulfillment for young women. It could be very dangerous for some to read because of this, and perhaps not such a problem for others. But for me the real problem with the series, aside from the sensuality, is the outworking of a very Mormon world view in the final three books. The Cullens become better and better as the series progresses. They essentially triumph more and more over their own nature through their own efforts. Spoiler Alert: Edward and Bella bear a child together, who, it turns out, will live a very, very long life, even if she’s not immortal. They exemplify the Mormon concept that “families are forever.” Edward and Bella make much of the fact that they will be together “forever.” Edward is darn near perfect, far beyond Mr. Darcy perfect, and Bella becomes nearly perfect when she becomes a vampire. She doesn’t go on a wild rampage of thirst for human blood like other newborn vampires; she quickly masters self-control. In the end, the Cullens are a race of superhumans, instead of being monsters. I may be reading too much into this, but it seems to me that this godlike man, and the family he creates, are an image of a Mormon family, eternally together in “heaven.”
One other note-I adore Jane Austen(so does Stephanie Meyer) and her heros are quite appealing because of Christian virtues, but her portrayal of fathers not a great deal better than that of Charlie in Twilight. See, for instance, both Elizabeth Bennet’s and Emma’s father.


50. Emma Green
December 7, 2008
4:25 AM

I am a fifteen year old girl and I disagree. Maybe you see it in a different way because you are an adult, but I know that neither me or my friends read this book and only focussed on the sexuality of it. It’s told really well compared with other teenage books and it isn’t too heavy like classical books. The style of writing isn’t challenging and the story is exciting. This book is aimed at teenagers and your looking further in to what the sexuality stuff means than the actual sotry itself. Almost all of my friends have read this series and the author is a morman christian, and from other points of view the relationship of Edward and Bella is actually veyr stiff and proper rather than sexual. If you think this book is sexual, read others- read the other boleyn girl by philla gregory, which we were told to read in my english class or slam by nick hornby. Those books are read by teenagers, and they are so much more sexual than Twilight and I should know since I’m a teenager and have read all three. You’re look at this from an adult point of view, but it’s not an adult book, it’s for teenagers.


51. mike
December 7, 2008
8:52 AM

in many ways we are like edward — not perhaps vampires who have to control our urges to kill, but sinners who have to control our urges to sin. every day and in every situation we face, we make a choice: will i give in to the sinful body i inhabit (romans 7:24) or will i live as if i am dead to that sin (romans 6:2-3)? edward can be a model for us of this daily struggle we face.


52. Manfred
December 9, 2008
9:39 AM

You said, “I found Twilight surprisingly well-written, at least for the genre. This is not to say it will be supplanting Jane Austen in the university lecture hall, but merely that it is readable and reasonably good as fiction.”

Made me smile. My 20 year old college senior daughter asked her mom and me for a set of Jane Austin books for Christmas (I’m trying to move away from giving one another gifts in the name of honoring the Lord; it’s a slow go).