Any book on worldliness faces a difficult challenge. The author who takes too firm a stand on issues may slip into legalism while the author who takes too lax a stand may slip into the worldliness he seeks to avoid. The discerning author will need to tread the line, being careful to say no more than Scripture does while still dealing effectively with issues of contemporary importance. Because such a book is long overdue I was pleased to see that Worldliness would be coming from C.J. Mahaney and those whom John Piper affectionately refers to as “his gang.”
Mahaney handles the introductions in this book, beginning with a reflection called “Is This Verse in Your Bible?” He biblically defines worldliness saying that this world we’re not supposed to love is “the organized system of human civilization that is actively hostile to God and alienated from God.” Worldliness is a love for this fallen world and, specifically, “to gratify and exalt oneself to the exclusion of God.” Mahaney is careful to point out that worldliness is not extrinsic to us but intrinsic, inhabiting our fallen hearts. Worldliness does not consist of outward actions (though such actions can certainly be evidence of worldliness) but instead is a heart attitude that rebels against God. The antidote to worldliness is the cross of Christ. “Only through the power of the cross of Christ can we successfully resist the seduction of the fallen world.” Worldliness dulls our affections for Christ and distracts our hearts from him. Hence it is so serious “because Christ is so glorious.” While resisting worldliness is the theme of the book, its aim is to exalt Christ.
Each of the subsequent chapters is meant to build on this foundation. In “God, My Heart, and Media,” Craig Cabaniss discusses issues related to the pervasiveness of media in our society. Cabaniss grounds the discussion in grace, saying “any discussion of biblical obedience, including entertainment guidelines, must spring from a robust understanding of grace.” He offers the fair warning that we must guard our hearts as the conscience is prone to become dull over time. As we relax our standards and as we engage in ungodly media habits, our hearts may slowly become dulled to the things of Christ. He warns against the temptation to see anyone with stricter standards as us as legalistic while seeing anyone with more lenient standards as worldly. He encourages us to view proactively, to view accountably and to view gratefully.
In “God, My Heart, and Music,” Bob Kauflin takes on the subject of music, beginning with the fact that music was God’s idea long before it crossed the mind of any human. He states that “listening to music without discernment and godly intent reveals a heart willing to flirt with the world.” Saying that music itself is amoral (there are no holy or unholy harmonies or melodies) he warns that music does convey three things: content, context and culture. The Christian will need to discern what is being communicated through the music he listens to in order to ensure that he is not, perhaps inadvertently, absorbing messages that would conflict with his Christian faith. Kauflin closes with some good thoughts on using music for the glory of God.
To this point I felt the book was excellent. Though in a work of this nature each of the chapters could be little more than a cursory introduction to what might have been a book-length project, I felt the authors did a great job of teaching, exhorting and illustrating while avoiding those perilous extremes of worldliness and legalism. Unfortunately I felt that Worldliness soon stalled out. And this is where the job of a book reviewer gets tough. What do you do when you have great respect for an author (or a group of authors) but just don’t like the book they’ve produced?
The fourth chapter, entitled “God, My Heart, and Stuff” was authored by Dave Harvey. While I haven’t ever met Dave (at least to my recollection) I have benefited from reading his book When Sinners Say ‘I Do’. From my experience in reading that book I had high hopes for his contribution to this one. I was disappointed. While he addressed the heart so well in his book on marriage, in this case I found little of real depth. The next chapter, from the pen of C.J. Mahaney is titled “God, My Heart, and Clothes” and discusses the issue of modesty. It had very little application to men beyond stating that this is an issue for pastors and fathers to consider. Ultimately he provided a lot of quotes and a few good thoughts on modesty and encouraged women to dress properly. Both of the book’s appendices carried on the theme, with “A Modesty Heart Check” and “Considering Modesty on Your Wedding Day.” But this was quite a superficial look at modesty and one that offered little that we haven’t heard C.J. and others say before. It did not take the issue of modesty to men (where modesty of heart and intention comes into play) but instead serves as just another encouragement to girls to check their neckline and test their hemline (see Josh Harris’ Sex is Not the Problem, Lust Is for a more thorough look at it). Jeff Purswell concludes with a chapter titled “How to Love the World” in which he reminds the reader “To impart biblical discernment in areas that increasingly escape the scrutiny of the evangelical world so intent on ‘relating to the culture.’” He offers a summary of redemptive history in the grid of Creation, Fall, Redemption and Consummation and gives the reader a three-part charge: to enjoy the world, to engage the world and to evangelize the world. These last three chapters and the appendices were uniformly disappointing to me. Missing was the depth and intensity I’d expect from a book authored (or edited) by Mahaney.
Had I been hoping that this book might be another Humility or The Cross Centered Life, Worldliness would have been quite a disappointment. This is not to say the book is without value—there is a good bit of biblical wisdom to gain from it. But where it got off to a strong start, it quickly tapered out. In the end it just seemed a mite shallow—a work of far less depth and offering far less application than I’m accustomed to seeing from a book with Mahaney’s name on the cover. It came across as an uneven collection of essays of unequal value. I almost feel I should apologize when I say, it just isn’t that good of a book.
It is available at Westminster Books or Amazon:





Comments (16) »
1. Aaron
November 10, 2008
8:38 AM
Hi Tim,
Wow, I didn’t expect to read that! This is the first book I have read on the subject and I thought the authors did a really great job at giving gospel-centered advice on these different topics. Many of these are areas that I have often wondered not only how to walk out myself, but especially how to counsel others in. So I found it very helpful towards that end.
I wonder if you would have a recommendation on another book that you would recommend more on this topic(s)?
2. Tim Challies
November 10, 2008
9:04 AM
Aaron - Not really, actually. I haven’t read a whole lot on the subject of worldliness.
3. Alistair
November 10, 2008
9:10 AM
Tim,
Thank you for having “discernment” and being willing to give an honest personal review of this book that included some critical comments.
Our evangelical refored sub-culture can have it’s own political correctness/party line at times. Rare to see anyone criticize anything that CJ, Moher, Dever or Sproul write or do. So well done for having integrity.
I am not trying to encourage negativity, just avoid our own groupthink. Thanks again for allowing iron to sharpen iron.
4. gary Boaly
November 10, 2008
9:27 AM
Thanks for the review Tim, i’ve been looking forward to this book for a while, just haven’t got around to it yet. Though i’ll still get it & am still looking forward to it, i’m glad you wrote this so it pulls back my expectations from it being another ‘cross centered life’ book!
5. JLS
November 10, 2008
10:23 AM
I have posted on my blog about a conviction that arose in my heart because of this book.
While on vacation I read a book edited by C.J. Mahaney: Worldliness.
This book was very convicting even though I’m a pastor. One chapter was about covetousness. That chapter was particularly convicting.
What!?!?!?!!!!!!! A pastor confessing covetousness?!?!?!!!!!
Yep. I’m afraid so.
Now get this. I’m not desiring the 10,000 square ft. house, or the Lexus, or the SUV, or the multi-million dollar income.
Neither am I after fame, prestige, and a nationally known pulpit.
I have a library.
I enjoy my library.
I enjoy my books.
I enjoy reading and studying using my books.
I enjoy buying books.
You see, I have more books than I can read in the next three years. I have over 27 feet (That’s nine shelves, each shelf three feet long) of books that I have yet to read.
That’s a lot of books……….
The rest is here
http://pastoralmusings.wordpress.com/2008/11/01/covetousness-and-the-pastors-library/
6. JLS
November 10, 2008
12:07 PM
Tim,
By the way, I enjoy your site, though I don’t comment much. In fact, today may be a first for me.
In the vein of the above, if you are interested in what I want for Christmas…………..well, just take a guess :-)
Jason
7. Mark
November 10, 2008
1:25 PM
There was a suspicion that among Reformed Calvinists that there was this uncritical adulation afforded to the likes of Mohler, Piper, Mahaney, Dever and the likes…in much of the same way that the media and people have had of Obama. After reading this review, I feel more confident that I’ll be reading critically, unbiased reviews of books. Tim, you’ve earned my vote of confidence. Keep up the good work.
8. Bart
November 10, 2008
1:56 PM
Thanks for your review, Tim. I’m a happy member of a Sovereign Grace church and am thankful we have leaders who humbly seek and receive criticism.
I suspected this book would not be as good as the usual Mahaney/Sovereign Grace fare when I saw the table of contents. Defining worldliness in terms of modesty, music and media seems too pietistic and fails to explore what Paul had in mind when he spoke of the elementary principles of this world.
For a deeper and more provoking study of worldliness, I’d recommend “The Way of the (Modern) World: Or, Why It’s Tempting to Live As If God Doesn’t Exist” by Craig Gay of Regent College. It made me painfully feel the depth of my compromise with all that make sin seem normal.
9. Tom Hardy
November 10, 2008
8:58 PM
What I have noticed among Reformed believers a lot lately is a very critical attitude towards anything Piper writes.
This usually has something to do with Piper’s “Christian Hedonism” and his involvement with Mark Driscoll. Many are warning others not to have anything do with Piper at all.
They see this as proof that Piper is not truly Reformed, despite his claims to the contrary.
Like any writer, we should read with discernment and more times than not I usually agree with Piper.
Tim, I like how you can critique books based on the merit of the book itself, not on the authors themselves.
10. Tim Challies
November 10, 2008
9:49 PM
This usually has something to do with Piper’s “Christian Hedonism” and his involvement with Mark Driscoll. Many are warning others not to have anything do with Piper at all.
I’ve seen that too. It’s ridiculous. Even if you disagree with his view on Christian Hedonism and his affection for Mark Driscoll, you weigh the good with the bad and I don’t see how you can say not to have anything to do with him!
11. Rachael Starke
November 10, 2008
10:34 PM
“Tim, I like how you can critique books based on the merit of the book itself, not on the authors themselves.”
I do too! This must not have been easy for you to write, but I’m thankful you were willing. It’s not like Mahaney still isn’t a great preacher, or great servant of God. And I can’t wait to see what he writes next, perhaps (lest we forget) with more helpful editing and iron sharpening iron from others before it goes to press.
12. Paul Wilkinson
November 10, 2008
10:52 PM
This is always a much-needed topic in a genre that includes classics like Jerry Bridges’ Pursuit of Holiness and John White’s Flirting With the World.
…Piper has a ‘gang?’
13. carissa
November 11, 2008
2:04 AM
i am chastened. i was JUST thinking that i might skip this review because it would probably be just a positive summary rather than a real critique. as others have expressed, it’s not that i’m glad the book had some soft spots, but that you can address them and honestly review several facets of a book rather than automatically give it a gold star because it says good things. i appreciate that.
that said, i’m still interested in the book as maybe a good beginning point for someone newer or younger in the faith. would you recommend it for that, or would you say its foundation is less than firm?
14. Tim Challies
November 11, 2008
7:29 AM
that said, i’m still interested in the book as maybe a good beginning point for someone newer or younger in the faith. would you recommend it for that, or would you say its foundation is less than firm?
Absolutely. The book is certainly not without any merit.
15. Nick Carter
November 11, 2008
9:13 AM
Aaron asked early in the comment string for other books on this topic. I’d recommend “Too Christian. Too Pagan.” by Dick Staub. He’s not as conservative a theologian as I am (or as Challies is, judging by what I’ve read on his blog) and yet I can still appreciate the genuine cander with which Staub approaches life situations that real humans face. Worth the read if for no other reason than to ponder the predicaments he throws out. It also made a GREAT small group study.
16. mike
November 11, 2008
2:43 PM
I agreed entirely with the review. I found the first few chapters to be wonderful and was quite disappointed with the remainder of the book.
Thanks for the objective review and for letting me know that there are other people out there who see the same things that I do. It’s pretty easy to critique some of the Emergent books out there, but I imagine it is quite a different task to review this book critically.
For what it is worth, I haven’t seen the same overwhelming criticism towards Piper. In general, those seem like minority positions. On the other hand, I think some recent comments about male-female roles might turn into a bigger issue. It’s almost a sign of departure from current complementarianism to the more traditional/archaic (depending on how you look at it) male-hierarchy position. The whole Piper thing isn’t all that relevant to this thread, but several people had commented on it and so I figured I’d throw out my two cents.