"The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment is a truly important work-one that should be required reading not only for church leaders, but for all sober-minded laypeople as well."

John MacArthur (From the Foreword)

"If you were more discerning you’d probably buy this book. If you do read this book, you will be! This book on discernment is simple, clear, well-written and well-illustrated...

Mark Dever

Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the book, about the blog or about the author.

02/22/07
Comments (9)

Book Review - Final Exam

Final Exam - Pauline ChenI assume that Pauline Chen’s experience is quite typical of doctors. She began medical school dreaming of being a hero and of saving lives but had little idea of just how big a role death would play in her chosen profession. It did not take long for her to learn that death would be a regular occurrence and one for which she was largely unprepared. She found that her vocation, which is premised on caring for those who are ill, also systematically depersonalizes dying. Final Exam: A Surgeon’s Reflections on Mortality, another book I found on the New York Times list of bestsellers, represents her attempt to come to terms with this brutal truth of the medical profession.

In a profession made attractive by the power to cure, it is rare to find the young medical student who dreams of caring for terminal patients. But in a society where more than 90 percent of us will die for a prolonged illness, physicians have become the final guardians of life, charged with shepherding the terminally ill and their families through the intricacies of the end. Most patients and their families fully expect physicians to be able to comfort and provide that support. For doctors, this care at the end of life is, as this book’s title implies, our final exam.

Chen’s next words are revealing. “Unfortunately, few doctors are up to the task.” The problem is that most doctors quickly learn to suspend or suppress any shared human feeling for dying patients, as if this is the key to being a successful physician. Chen found that these lessons in denial and depersonalization began as early as her first encounter with death in the gross anatomy dissection lab where she spent weeks dissecting a cadaver, and that they continued through her residency and practice.

The structure of the book is such that it is divided into three sections. The first, “Principles,” focuses on the early lessons she learned about death while a medical student. She discusses the early terrifying experiences of dissecting a corpse, of seeing death up close for the first time, and of emotionally distancing herself from what she was doing and seeing. The second part, “Practice,” goes to the heart of clinical work, revealing how “professional responses not only manifest but perpetuate themselves.” The final section, “Reappraisal,” briefly explores how change is possible and how there have been some hopeful transformations in end-of-life care.

The real heart of the book is the section dealing with “Practice.” It is here that the author wrestles with difficult issues and shows how most doctors are unable to cope with end-of-life care. She shows that they will often avoid being fully honest with their patients and their patients’ families. They will even do what seems inhumane and even cruel—avoiding difficult conversations with their patients or increasing treatment and providing hope even when the situation is hopeless. While fear of litigation certainly provides some impetus (more than a few doctors have been sued for suggesting there is no hope and then being proven wrong), the most common driving force is fear. Doctors are simply fearful and unequipped to help their patients face death with dignity. On one hand doctors need to distance themselves from their patients lest they become too emotionally involved and become paralyzed or traumatized. And yet when they distance themselves they are apt to view patients as something less than fully human and worthy of human dignity.

Because the book is written from a secular perspective it stops well short of a biblical position and solution. And yet the author’s reflections on mortality are fascinating and gave me much food for thought. In an age where medicine has the ability to prolong life far beyond what would sometimes seem natural, Christians have many issues to wrestle with when it comes to end-of-life or palliative care. We need to affirm the value and dignity of life and cannot stoop to arguments used by those who promote agendas of euthanasia. But in our fight to preserve life it seems we could also err in irrationally prolonging life when all hope is gone; we could err in telling less than the truth and in promoting difficult and painful treatments that are known to be useless. We must not be people who fear death, but instead we must be people who trust in God’s sovereignty.

Death has always been an important issue to Christians, but is likely to move to the forefront of critical issues in the coming years. Not only are medical abilities increasing so people can be kept alive for longer, but society’s morals are crumbling and more people believe in the right of patients to take their own lives. Issues surrounding how we allow people to die, when we allow people to die, and just what constitutes death are ones that Christians can no longer ignore. Final Exam gives a physician’s perspective and numerous examples of the intricacies involved in this discussion. Even if Chen does not wrestle with the ultimate issues, she does provide a valuable perspective and one that can lead into useful, biblical discussion.

Book Review - Final Exam

Comments (9) »


1. Steven
February 22, 2007
1:24 PM

Good to see that there are some thinking/feeling MDs out there. It’s this sort of thoughtfulness that would help us avoid the bioethical nightmares that are becoming more and more common in the news.

On another note, it seems like you just blaze through these books. How many books do you read at a time? And where do you find the time to read all of them? I’m always curious about people’s reading habbit/strategies. I like to read mulitple books simultaneously, but I’m finding that I need to slow down if I’m going to retain any substance from these books.


2. Tim Challies
February 22, 2007
3:06 PM

“On another note, it seems like you just blaze through these books. How many books do you read at a time? And where do you find the time to read all of them?”

I read a few at a time. I usually have one easy-reading kind of book as well as one tough-slogging book going at any given time. Typically there are another one or two bouncing around as well.

I read them whenever I have time. :)


3. Ann Addison
February 22, 2007
3:37 PM

Tim, your next to last paragraph brings up many important issues. There is not a definitive way to know when all hope is gone. At some point, it becomes obvious, but there is a long road before that time. I value the sanctity of human life, but I think that sometimes we are a poor witness when we cling to life on this earth at any cost. I see a big difference between euthanasia and withholding treatment. I can think of many situations for myself in which I would wish for treatment to be withheld. One thing I want to make clear, though. If a person has the ability to feed themselves, they must be provided with food. I wouldn’t say it is essential that a person be tube fed. One might consider that extraordinary measures depending on the circumstances.

Phi 1:21-23 For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain. (22) If I am to live in the flesh, that means fruitful labor for me. Yet which I shall choose I cannot tell. (23) I am hard pressed between the two. My desire is to depart and be with Christ, for that is far better.


4. Bill Isley
February 22, 2007
7:56 PM

As a physician for 30 years and one who is in a prolonged fight with widespread cancer, I would say that the big problem is that most physicians have not come to grips with their own mortality, much less that of their patients.

Bill Isley


5. char
February 22, 2007
9:13 PM

Yes doctors sometimes make the stupidest decisions regarding end of life care. I think that is partly due to the fact that they are not the ones caring for the patients every day, so it becomes easy to ignore the person while treating their problems. However the issue of how invested one gets in their patients has been something all people in the health care fields have to deal with.

Working in health care does require compassion-but tempered with a great deal of realism and practicality. In the long term care facilities, increasingly we are getting the “old old” (85+) who require total or close to total care and we find that we have keep emotionalism at a minimum. This seems uncaring to some, but it is necessary to be able to care for the residents needs as they are right now. It doesn’t mean that we have to be unfeeling, but that we’re always looking for the balance between their dignity and ours. That will be an issue as long as there is health care I guess.

Also I’d say it has been feelings-oriented arguments that have led to euthanasia movements and the like. Seeing the pain people are in every day can lead to feeling “sorry for them” and the best thing for them is death. Proponents of such things are often inherently compassionate. I think we must view end of life issues and their implications logically as well as compassionately. More logically when it comes to legalities…


6. Kate Maver
February 23, 2007
11:06 AM

Just want to clarify one point in this blog entry. “Christians have much to wrestle with when it comes to end-of-life or palliative care.” I am not sure that the blogger meant us to take these two terms as synonymous. They most definitely are not. Palliative care means “comfort care,” and while we certainly want that at the point of death, people who are still seeking curative treatment also deserve comfort! Palliative care consultations can be useful for people from the point of diagnosis with a serious condition. Diabetics who are living active lives, people with chronic pain conditions. those with multiple sclerosis or other debilitating illnesses may not be at end-of-life, but they can certainly benefit from palliative care. In addition, those who have survived cancer may struggle with side effects of their treatment years after the cancer has remitted. Palliative care is useful in managing their side effects, too. Palliative care practitioners take account the whole person, mind, body and spirit, and the circumstances in which they are living in an effort to manage pain, symptoms, and side effects (whether physical, emotional or relational). Now that palliative care is an official subspecialty of internal medicine, we need to help people understand exactly what it is and is not. While palliative care is a part of good end-of-life care, it is NOT synonymous with “end-of-life” care. Kate Maver, Midwest Palliative & Hospice CareCenter, Glenview, IL.


7. Ann Addison
February 23, 2007
5:16 PM

Tim said We must not be people who fear death, but instead we must be people who trust in God’s sovereignty.

If anyone is interested, I wrote a short article called God-Centered Thinking Corrects Our Perspective of Life and Death. I also put together some links to some John Piper messages that continue to be course correcting for my life. My blog is http://mousenaround.wordpress.com/


8. Tim Challies
February 23, 2007
7:10 PM

“Just want to clarify one point in this blog entry. “Christians have much to wrestle with when it comes to end-of-life or palliative care.” I am not sure that the blogger meant us to take these two terms as synonymous. They most definitely are not.”

I did mean to use them near-synonymously. In my experience they are used that way. In Canada, at least, when a person is beyond cure, he is taken to the palliative care ward of a hospital and inevitably dies there. I know that palliative really means “beyond cure” or something to that effect, but at least in the ways I’ve seen it used, it is synonymous with end-of-life care.


9. Char
February 23, 2007
10:13 PM

To a degree, Kate is right. Not all end of life care is necessarily deemed palliative. However I don’t think it is misleading to use them interchangeably as a person must be at the “end of life” to be considered palliative. In Canada this is often a specific designation for those with a terminal illness for whom certain preventative or life-lengthening measures are no longer used, and are being cared for through death.