"The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment is a truly important work-one that should be required reading not only for church leaders, but for all sober-minded laypeople as well."

John MacArthur (From the Foreword)

"If you were more discerning you’d probably buy this book. If you do read this book, you will be! This book on discernment is simple, clear, well-written and well-illustrated...

Mark Dever

Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the book, about the blog or about the author.

03/23/06
Comments (30)

Book Review - Love Your God With All Your Mind

loveyourgod.gifI have never read beyond the first sentence of Mark Noll’s book The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind. The first sentence was so perfect, so cutting, so convicting, that I felt the rest of the book could only be a let-down. “The scandal of the Evangelical mind,” he writes,”is that there is not much of an evangelical mind.” It is the perfect opening to a book. I do wonder how the book ends, so at some point I will have to read it.

In the meantime, though, I decided to read a book by a man who, I’m sure, would agree with Noll’s thesis. Love Your God With All Your Mind, by J.P. Moreland, is subtitled “The Role of Reason in the Life of the Soul.” “Judged by the Scriptures, church history, and common sense, it is clear that something has gone desperately wrong with our modern understanding of the value of reason and intellectual development for individual discipleship and corporate church life.” I could not agree more. The Christian mind has largely disappeared from North American Christianity. There are five characteristics that capture the essence of the impact of anti-intellectualism on today’s evangelicalism: a misunderstanding of faith’s relationship to reason, the seperation of the secular and the sacred, weakened world missions, the spawning of an irrelevant gospel, and a loss of boldness in confronting the idea structures in our culture with effective Christian witness. These are serious problems and ones the church must begin to address if we are to have any voice in our culture.

The antidote to this anti-intellectual thrust within Evangelicalism is clear: “If we are going to be wise, spiritual people prepared to meet the crises of our age, we must be a studying, learning community that values the life of the mind.” Moreland seeks to show that our lives are transformed not by our emotions, but that life and emotion are both transformed as we renew our minds. And this is where he takes the reader through ten dense but challenging chapters. He encourages the Christian not only to develop a thoroughly, distinctly Christian mind, but to then use the intellect to further God’s kingdom through evangelism, apologetics, worship and vocation.

On the whole he does so convincingly. A trap that Moreland seems to fall into, though, and one I have found to be common among intellectuals, is that he regards the intellect as somehow more pure or less-effected by the fall than our emotions. As Gary Gilley writes in his short review of this book, “Moreland places too much faith in reason and logic for my taste. While I understand and appreciate the value of these things, it must be remembered that reasoning is not any more infallible than emotion. Logic, too, has been affected by the Fall. Only the Scriptures can be trusted completely, and while I am certain the author would agree with this statement I do not believe his book developed the idea very well.”

The final chapter of the book proposes several solutions for recapturing the intellectual life of the church. Many of these are intruiging, even if they are not entirely practical. Still, believers would do well to ponder these as stimulation for the mind if not necessarily biblical commands.

I read Love Your God With All Your Mind at the urging of a friend who told me that this is a book every Christian needs to read every few years. High praise, indeed. I agree wholeheartedly with Moreland’s concern and agree with much of his proposed solution. I’m not sure that I am likely to read this book again, but I do hope to invest more effort in finding ways to stimulate my mind and in encouraging other believers to flee the anti-intellectualism that is rampant within the church today. And so I give this book a somewhat tentative recommendation. It speaks of a vital subject, but perhaps not in the most convincing way.

Book Review - Love Your God With All Your Mind

Comments (30) »


1. jmark
March 23, 2006
10:23 AM

I agree wholehearedly with the review - Great book, but moreland gives not enough credence to the influence of sin in human thinking.

I wrote a review of one of the chapters a while back for a reading group I was part of - must post it.


2. Brian Thornton
March 23, 2006
10:26 AM

As Gary Gilley writes in his short review of this book, “Moreland places too much faith in reason and logic for my taste. While I understand and appreciate the value of these things, it must be remembered that reasoning is not any more infallible than emotion. Logic, too, has been affected by the Fall. Only the Scriptures can be trusted completely, and while I am certain the author would agree with this statement I do not believe his book developed the idea very well.”

Could it be that Moreland’s point is that intellect has more of a foundation, more of a solid basis from which to work, than does emotion?

Gilley writes that only the Scriptures can be trusted completely…and I would put forth that the only way to know the Scriptures is through the intellect.

I have often heard Sproul Sr state that knowledge by itself is nothing, even a bad thing…but that one cannot know the doctrines of God and be the true theologian he should be as a Christian without having the knowledge.

In other words, knowledge in and of itself is of no benefit, but a Christian does not grow without it.


3. Jeri
March 23, 2006
10:41 AM

Tim, have you read any other book that would maybe better meet this very real need in the church? And the ironic thing is, it would need to be written fairly un-intellectually! in order to get a reading from the average believer who hasn’t been exposed yet to such things. As always, thanks for all your good reviews and information.

Jeri


4. Ochuk
March 23, 2006
10:43 AM

“Logic, too, has been affected by the Fall”

I don’t know if what he means is that our GRASP of logic has been affected by the fall, but I would hope so. If he actually thinks that logic has been affected by the fall then so has God.


5. DLE
March 23, 2006
11:09 AM

I think that more than anything else Seeker-sensitivity killed off intellectualism in the Church. The rationale was that too many eggheads running around talking about Greek verb declensions would only scare off those whose intellectual pursuits never ventured past analyzing episodes of The Simpsons.

Just behind that comes consumeristic attitudes toward intellectual discourse, even among other intellectuals, picking and choosing what would be engaged when a Christian intellectual talked. I mentioned in another post a few weeks ago that I rarely heard Francis Schaeffer’s name mentioned in Reformed Baptist camps. Someone pointed out that he’d been mentioned a few times, but only with regard to what he had to say about propositional truth, never in regard to issues like environmental and justice concerns.

Both of those attitudes are criminal, but not unexpected. We’ve picked on intellectuals too much, I suspect because they make us uncomfortable, especially when their words take on a prophetic sheen that doesn’t align with our comfortable, daily existences.


6. Tim Challies
March 23, 2006
11:27 AM

“I think that more than anything else Seeker-sensitivity killed off intellectualism in the Church. The rationale was that too many eggheads running around talking about Greek verb declensions would only scare off those whose intellectual pursuits never ventured past analyzing episodes of The Simpsons.”

I absolutely agree with that. If intellectualism was in decline already, the seeker-sensitive movement put the final nails in the coffin.


7. WeekendFisher
March 23, 2006
12:39 PM

I lean towards the egghead side at times but have to say this: loving God with all your mind, in the primary sense, is not studying Greek declensions. As a secondary effect we might spend our time on that, but a more primary grasp of loving God with all of our minds is pondering the awesomeness of his love, his creation, with our minds so that heart/mind/soul/strength are in concert. The anti-intellectualism of some camps is a rejection of the pseudo-intellectualism / misguided intellectualism of those who love theories more than God.


8. KB
March 23, 2006
12:40 PM

Something that I’ve seen borne out through time and other people: both the intellect and the emotions have great value and great weaknesses. They are limited by our finite minds and the fall.

Intellect is treated as superior in circles that want to combat anti-intellectualism. While it certainly has decided benefits, logic is fallible and all thought is susceptible to false premises or incomplete understandings we are not aware of having.


9. Tim Challies
March 23, 2006
1:06 PM

“Tim, have you read any other book that would maybe better meet this very real need in the church? And the ironic thing is, it would need to be written fairly un-intellectually! in order to get a reading from the average believer who hasn’t been exposed yet to such things. As always, thanks for all your good reviews and information.”

I’m no intellectual, so I’d love to find that type of book. But I can’t think of anything off-hand. I can say that those who don’t care to have a good, tough read, probably won’t enjoy Moreland’s book. There’s a whole, long chapter dealing just with logic! I guess Nancy Pearcey’s Total Truth is a little more accessible, but doesn’t cover quite the same topic.

I’ll let you know if I come across anything.

“Intellectualism For Dummies.” ;-)


10. Drexen Magz
March 23, 2006
1:23 PM

Hear! Hear! Oftentimes when I mention “doctrine”, I am given a look that can only be described as that of someone being offered horrible-tasting medicine. The common refrain of men in a men’s group that I am a part of is that they are all about “application”.

We recently tried to go through a study of “Total Truth” by Nancy Pearcey. It was less than successful. The book required deep thought and, obviously, reading.

One comment that I thought was on target was that men especially have a tough time with studies like this because they, as a group, read less now than ever before.

What can be done to present intellectually-demanding studies in a more appealing manner…sort of the “spoonful of sugar” to help the medicine go down?


11. Steve Camp
March 23, 2006
1:42 PM

Mark Noll is not that convicting nor convincing (I read the book). There are gifted minds in evangelicalism today (Mohler, Dever, White, Renihan, Sproul, Ferguson, Carson, etc.) but he may not be one of them (as you know, he has defected to Notre Dame…)

However, that being said your recommendation to this book by Moreland is both affirming and discerning. Scriptural truth clearly expounded is much needed to today in addressing the beliefs and values of the culture. But God forbid that we naively entrust that duty to the academics. They have run havoc with the Word today—and in many cases are gutting the heart and soul of biblical Christianity with every stroke of their shallow, unbiblical, intellectualized pens. The charge to “guard the truth” was not given to scholarship, but to faithful men qualified to serve in the local church.

Even one of the five characteristics that ‘capture the essence of the impact of anti-intellectualism on today’s evangelicalism’ “the seperation of the secular and the sacred” is not accurate (that is postmodern language). There has always been the sacred/secular dichotomy throughout all of redemptive history.

We must see that Open Theism, NPP, etc. were not born in the crucible of the local church; but in the halls of the elitist religious intellectuals of today that are not accountable to the local church known as… seminaries. They have much to answer for. PTL, there is a gradual movement away from the university model of training pastors for ministry, back to the biblical model of training pastors for ministry within the local church once again. Seminaries, in fact, act like theological mavericks: they are not answerable to local church leadership for what they teach; they are not accountable to local church leadership for the doctrines they propagate; and they are hold no formal responsibility for the lives of the men they are unleashing upon thousands of well intentioned churches. That is why 2 Ttimothy is written by a pastor to a young pastor and not to educators.

Anyway, on a lighter note: I do appreciate all you are doing for the kingdom in these book recommendations. Your blog is slowly becoming the official “evangelical book club” blog. Kind of like an “Oprah Book Club” :-) (sorry couldn’t resist.) Tim’s Tomes Club maybe?

Grace and peace to you,
Campi
2 Tim. 3:16-17


12. r10b
March 23, 2006
1:51 PM

Drexen Magz asks…
What can be done to present intellectually-demanding studies in a more appealing manner…sort of the “spoonful of sugar” to help the medicine go down?

I don’t think it could or should be made more appealing lest we develop “stupid-sensitive” classes and study groups.

Some people are drawn to more cerebral things and others aren’t. Why force square pegs onto round holes? Better to accept smaller groups of people drawn naturally (or supernaturally) to such study and let it grow by the power of it’s own results, if there are any. After all, maybe contemplating the Trinity or Election for 8 weeks is not as valuable as we doctrine wonks think it is.


13. John Rabe
March 23, 2006
2:11 PM

I would agree with Ochuk’s observation on Gilley’s review. If Gilley means that our ability to apply logic has been damaged by the fall, then I wholeheartedly agree with him. However, if he means (as so many evangelicals do today) that logic itself is somehow flawed and thus unworthy of our attention, then we have a problem. I would argue it’s an attribute of God Himself, whose Son is the divine Logos.

As has been pointed out by many good scholars, the modern evangelical heart/mind dichotomy is a recent invention. Scripture sees them as the same thing, and uses the terms interchangably. Many today will dismiss doctrine and propositions by defering to a “heart-love” for a “person.” I certainly agree Christianity is that, but our relationship with God comes through His revelation of Himself in Scripture. And to understand Scripture, we have to use our minds, including reason, logic, Greek declensions, and all that entails. (I think Brian Thornton says it well above.)

As one of the things affected in the fall, our ability to reason through logic is one of the things Christ is redeeming. Yes, reason is marred by the Fall, and cannot be the object of our ultimate trust. But as Moreland is pointing out, we cannot fully love God without it. It’s not a secondary thing to have as a supplement to a “relationship with Christ.” He primarily appeals to us and reveals himself to us through our minds.


14. Brian Thornton
March 23, 2006
2:21 PM

Herein lies one of the saddest realities of contemporary Christianity…we have to try and come up with ways to make theology more appealing so that today’s “Christian” will be willing to digest it.

Is it just me, or does that make absolutely no sense? Granted, not every child of God is at the same point spiritually, but shouldn’t it still be true that every adopted son and daughter pants for God’s Word as the deer pants for water? Or does, “be diligent to present yourself approved of God as workman who does not need to be ashamed, accurately handling the word of truth”, only apply to the formal clergy?

In America at least, we need a purging - a cleansing, if you will - of the visible church. Not something where individuals are pointed out and labeled tare or wheat and then kicked out or permitted to remain, but a move back to biblical church models that include the true evangel…this will do much to purge the visible church of those who have no business being there (because they will have no desire to remain), which should result in more pure honest study of theology and all things biblical, rather than having to go to great lengths to make things easy by making them less intellectual.

Sorry for the rant.


15. Andrew Wheatley
March 23, 2006
3:19 PM

DLE:

Do Greek verbs have declensions? I thought only Greek nouns did.


16. billmelone
March 23, 2006
3:35 PM

Drexen Magz asks…
What can be done to present intellectually-demanding studies in a more appealing manner…sort of the “spoonful of sugar” to help the medicine go down?

CJ Mahaney is a great example of how to do the intellect and heart. His model for making doctrine appealing in the right way is basically working with basic themes—the cross, humility and preach about them practically (its always convicted me to hear him talk about how cut to the heart he is over his sin) and be almost ridiculously careful to make sure that he’s not living a double life, knowing that it honors God. I don’t know him personally but I’ve seen enough of him and the pastors that serve with him to know how it is (and lots of other pastors do the same i’m sure). Its just a matter of living a life that loves reading the Bible and ends up displaying more joy than people who never talk about anything but joy and love in a weak way.
And preaching the Bible as it is—the story/biblical theology is more conducive to start deeper learning than systematic theology is.
Christianity is a love for seemingly lost causes (seen most clearly in Christ) and we have to let the lost causes know our love (and see our love for God), which is more than just a spoonful of sugar.


17. mikbry24
March 23, 2006
4:36 PM

What can be done to present intellectually-demanding studies in a more appealing manner…sort of the “spoonful of sugar” to help the medicine go down?

I think this question raises its own point. Why does it have to be so “appealing?” Wouldn’t it be better to not dumb something down, but to arrive at it with some hard work and mental exercise? I think this echoes Moreland’s claim that something has been lost. We don’t read, we don’t want to take part in anything that may seem mentally tasking. I have to ask myself why this is? The modern evangelical church is missing its mind! And is losing the desire to use it! I pray that God will give us the desire back….

Mike


18. Peter G.
March 23, 2006
4:41 PM

Tim, I’m about half way through Noll’s Scandal right now and you really owe it to yourself to get past that first sentence—good as it is—because it’s a great book.


19. Brian Kay
March 23, 2006
9:15 PM

I’m seconding Peter G.’s encouragement to anyone to read Mark Noll’s book. My wife and I are going through it together for a little intellectual-spiritual tune-up. And, contra one of the above comments, Noll doesn’t doubt that evangelicals have great working theologians, as least as I read it. He just thinks that there are few intellectual leaders who can show how theology goes on to inform other areas of human study. The “scandal”, in part, is that we don’t produce many non-theologian academics who are able to say how theology has informed their approach to science, the study and practice of art, etc. We might have a smart scientist who is a Christian, but likely that scientist has his faith in a separate box than his intellectual persuits in his discipline. Evangelicalism, as a whole, won’t encourage him to think like a Christian while he’s in the laboratory (whatever that might exactly mean).


20. philip
March 23, 2006
9:59 PM

Brian quoted;
‘Herein lies one of the saddest realities of contemporary Christianity…we have to try and come up with ways to make theology more appealing so that today’s “Christian” will be willing to digest it.’

I don’t know where you got that one from Brian but how about this little pearl that I came across when
somebody actually recommended the following site;

www.Churchformen.com
‘Believers, avoid “Christianese” the language spoken by church insiders. Terms like “Spirit filled” “Washed in the blood” and “Sanctified” confuse and frustrate outsiders. The less “churchy” your speech the more men will understand and participate in church discussions. Men want what’s real, not what’s religious.’

I might add;
‘My Dear Wormwood, after the alter call and sinners prayer, continue to avoid ‘Churchy Speech’ for it is desirable to keep the candidate from ever partaking in solid food!’

Mikebry24 states;
’ I think this echoes Moreland’s claim that something has been lost. We don’t read, we don’t want to take part in anything that may seem mentally tasking. I have to ask myself why this is?’
Answer. Because it is the easier, softer, milk-fed PDL/ECM way.
philip


21. Brian Thornton
March 23, 2006
10:17 PM

‘Herein lies one of the saddest realities of contemporary Christianity…we have to try and come up with ways to make theology more appealing so that today’s “Christian” will be willing to digest it.’

Philip,
Thanks for your comments. I don’t how to humbly say this, but that quote was my own. Although, now that I think about it, I remember reading something from Spurgeon where he addressed basically the same kind of problem…his warning to the church for doing certain things or changing things or adding certain things to appeal to the masses.

As I was writing this I did a quick search and found it. It is from Feeding Sheep or Amusing Goats.

In it, Spurgeon says, “The devil has seldom done a cleverer thing than hinting to the church that part of their mission is to provide entertainment for the people, with a view to winning them.”

I think we can go a step further with his comments and say the same thing about the church thinking part of their mission is to dumb down the truth with a view to making it more understandable to people, even its own.


22. r10b
March 23, 2006
10:43 PM

Many churches are like schools from which no one ever graduates.


23. matthew
March 24, 2006
12:12 AM

Tim-

I struggle with intellectual elitism , and I really appreciate your recent review of CJM’s book on Humility. I really like his contributions to the Together for the Gospel Blog.

I think other people share this struggle, and we risk a prideful, intellectual triumphalism that regards our brothers and sisters in Christ with contempt. Some of that is a reaction to improper condemnation from non-theology-wonks (thanks R10B). I think we should turn our analytical and exegetical minds to 1 Cor. 1:18-31.


24. jmark
March 24, 2006
6:00 AM

I’ve posted those comments on Moreland’s book over at my place that I mentiopned in comment #1


25. wfseube
March 24, 2006
7:24 AM

r10b wrote: Many churches are like schools from which no one ever graduates.

That’s because they’re Christian kindergartens where the students never progress to the 1st grade. They feed a constant diet of milk and never dish out any solid food. But they do have great guitar.

——
bill


26. Joe
March 24, 2006
7:28 AM

Sounds like a book worth reading, and I think I will do so.

Thanks


27. Gabriel Fluhrer
March 24, 2006
8:55 AM

It’s so refreshing to see someone actually discuss the role of the Fall and its resultant effects on human reason. In a day and age where Thomas Acquinas is being rediscovered and revered by evangelicals, we must truly love God with all our mind, but that means fearing Him first. The very fact that evangelicals would be running after Thomas shows our absolute shallowness when it comes to history: Kant destroyed Thomas’s arguments in the 18th century and all of Western philosophy since then has been but a footnote and working out of Kant’s principles. Indeed, it was the exaltation of “reason” so-called that led to the nihilism of Nietzsche. So loving God with our minds presupposes that we have first understood that our minds are fallen and, apart from God’s grace, will always interpret the “facts” wrongly and come to the wrong conclusions (witness the natural man and evolution). I hope to see more evangelicals loving God by humbly searching the Scriptures and looking at how magnificently and majestically God has provided for all of our needs there. May we worship Him and not cast ourselves down before the idolatrous altar of human “reason”.


28. DLE
March 26, 2006
12:07 AM

Andrew,

You are, of course, correct. It’s Greek nouns that have declensions. I mixed two separate thoughts there and blew it.

Somewhere up above, J. Gresham Machen is saying, “Dude, I did all that work on New Testament Greek for Beginners and this is the thanks I get?”

And to think that I was once offered the opportunity to join an elite group of students of Greek when I was at Wheaton.

My alma mater may very well ask for their diploma back.


29. SteveE
March 26, 2006
6:54 PM

When I think of intellectualism in the realm of christianity I find there are two trains of thought. Both are equally true. Both necessarry. But to zero in on one would be to loose the other. Here are two quotes to consider.
“The gripping message of the bible will never be fully heard in the library. When we value scholarly precision and doctrinal purity above a personally transforming encounter with the God who reveals Himself in His Word, when we fail to see that an accademic grasp of scripture often leads to a proud appriceation of knowledge more than a humble and passionate appriceation of Christ, we develop an orthodoxy that crushes life. And we miss the Gospel that frees us to live.”

Here is the other: “It has been said by someone that ’ the proper study of mankind is man’. I will not oppose the idea, but I believe it is equally true that the proper study of God’s elect, is God; the proper study of a christian is the Godhead. The highest science, the loftiest speculation, the mightiest philosophy, which can ever engage the attention of a child of God is the name, the nature, the person, the work, the doings and the exsistence of the great God whom he calls his Father.”

The pursuit of God and a knowledge of Him is a worthy aim. But knowledge of God does not always mean you “know” Him. One is an ability to quote scripture, regurgitate information, write books, sermons, even teach people the means of salvation…but you can still never know Him. Knowing God goes beyond the dry pages and must come to fruition in the lives lived. Yet, even that, may not qualifiy as “knowing” God.

Obviously all of us are at different levels in our relationship to God, so not everyone may grasp fully what I mean by the things I have stated. This doesn’t mean you, I, we, are not where we are supposed to be. It simply means that in attempting to increase the intellectual we may need to hold a caution in our minds; that being, the scriptures were meant to be understood…even directed at, and to, the lowest intellects. God called the simple, the poor, the destitute, the uneducated…even His apostles were in this group. Just remember in our intellectual pursuits, that stronger minds, stronger knowledge requires that more be done with what God has blessed you with. Knowledge is good, but love is better.

Just something to consider.

Because of Him
SteveE


30. Ken Abbott
March 27, 2006
4:16 PM

I hope Mr. Noll at least gave a tip of his hat to Harry Blamires, whose 1960s book “The Christian Mind” begins “There is no longer a Christian mind.”


Post Your Comment Here »

It's generally preferred that you use your real name. 
This is just to perturb spammers. It won't be visible. 
You can include a link to your own blog (if you have one). 
Click here and you won't have to enter your personal information every time you comment. 

You may use HTML to style your comment.
Your comment will appear on the site immediately, so think before posting! 
This is to guard against spam. Please forgive the inconvenience. 
 
Please click once and wait patiently!