Book Review - The Tipping Point
Malcolm Gladwell needs a haircut. This was one of the first things I noticed about The Tipping Point: the photo of Gladwell and his Yancey-like hair. It’s hard to take a guy with hair like that too seriously, but I’m glad that I did, as The Tipping Point is a fascinating book. The Tipping Point is a phrase used to describe that “magic moment when an idea, trend or social behavior crosses a threshold, tips, and spreads like wildfire.” While this book studies particular trends and fads, it is primarily a study of human behavior and what it is in people that makes them accept and champion particular causes or products. My interest in this book was twofold: I had a personal interest as the book had been recommended to me and I had seen it many times on the bestseller shelf. I was also interested in seeing how many of Gladwell’s ideas were similar to or the same as what is advocated by Church Growth experts.
Gladwell draws liberally from the concept of epidemics and viral marketing, showing that in many ways ideas spread like epidemics: they are contagious; little causes can have big effects; and change happens not gradually but at one dramatic moment. These principles are as accurate a description of the way measles moves through a grade-school classroom as they are of the way that Hush Puppies became a fashion phenomenon. The book is structured around three rules of epidemics, each of which receives a lengthy treatment in this 280-page book.
The first principle is The Law of the Few which states, quite simply, that “the success of any kind of social epidemic is heavily dependent on the involvement of people with a particular and rare set of social gifts.” These three types of people he calls Connectors, Mavens and Salesmen. Connectors are those people with an extraordinary ability to make friends and acquaintances. These persons, heavily connected to others through social contact, stand as the connection between diverse groups of people. Much of their value lies in the fact that they do not only know a large number of people, but that they know many different types of people. The closer an idea comes to a Connector, or even to multiple Connectors, the more power and opportunity it has, and in turn the greater the chance that this idea will tip. Mavens are, quite simply, people who accumulate knowledge and are also known as “price vigilantes” or “market mavens.” These people are obsessed with knowing and understanding a particular product or market. They do not only accumulate knowledge about getting deals, but are also driven to help others get a deal. “To be a Maven is to be a teacher. But it is also, even more emphatically, to be a student. Mavens are really information brokers, sharing and trading what they know.” The final group are the Salesmen, who have “the skills to persuade us when we are unconvinced of what we are hearing, and they are as critical to the tipping of word-of-mouth epidemics as the other two groups.” If you put your mind to it, you will probably be able to think of examples in your own experience that would include each of these three divisions. The Law of the Few, then, says that there are exceptional people out there who are capable of beginning epidemics, if only they can be found.
The second principle is The Stickness Factor. In a fascinating chapter that compares and contrasts Sesame Street with Blue’s Clues, Gladwell attempts to explain why some ideas stick and others do not. He ultimately concludes that “there is a simple way to package information that, under the right circumstances, can make it irresistable. All you have to do is find it.” It seems that the line between acceptance and hostility towards a particular product or trend is often very narrow. In other words, an idea that catches on may only be moderately different than one that does not.
The third principle is The Power of Context. This rule is premised on the understanding that epidemics are sensitive to the conditions and circumstances of the times and places in which they occur. Once again, this is as true of a disease as it is of a cultural phenomenon. We are very sensitive to context, but the changes that are capable of tipping an epidemic are probably not what we might guess. Our external environment plays an exceedingly important role in how we behave and who we are. Very subtle changes can have a profound effect.
The book concludes with a pair of case studies and, in the paperback edition I read, an afterword from the author where he discusses the impact the book has had since its initial release several years ago.
I was not surprised to see that Church Growth has, in many ways, arrived at similar conclusions to The Tipping Point. One of Gladwell’s quotes particularly caught my attention: “There is a simple way to package information that, under the right circumstances, can make it irresistable. All you have to do is find it.” Now note the following quote by Church Growth superhero Rick Warren: “It is my deep conviction that anybody can be won to Christ if you discover the felt needs to his or her heart. That key to each person’s heart is unique so it is sometimes difficult to discover. It may take some time to identify it.” Church Growth, like the marketing efforts of the business world, is premised on the belief that a person can be manipulated to believe or accept anything if only the marketer finds the right button to push. Yet this concept is foreign to the Bible which teaches us that only those can believe in whom the Holy Spirit has begun a prior work. Church Growth ignores the spiritual dimension to conversion. It is simple enough to convince a person to attend a church and call himself a Christian. But no one can force the hand of God and it is ultimately only He who can change a heart.
In many ways, The Tipping Point could be a Church Growth textbook. Nothing Gladwell writes is founded upon Scriptural principles of course, but this just emphasizes that the same is true, by and large, of the Church Growth Movement. Interestingly enough, Gladwell has also noted the connection and has written an article dealing with none other than Rick Warren.
I found much within this book that challenged the way I look at the world. I was able to see just how predictible we are as human beings, for marketing can only work where people act in a particular way! I was fascinated by the concepts of Connector, Maven and Salesmen and wonder what lesson, if any, the church can learn from this these extraordinary people. And I learned a lot about the power and importance of groups. Many of the changes that lead an epidemic to tip are based on groups, as groups play a crucial role in social epidemics. But, Gladwell teaches, groups can only rise to a certain level before they begin to lose effectiveness. It seems to be a global truth that groups begin to lose their power when they rise above 150 members. Anyone who has been in a church should be able to relate that a change came to the body as it grew above this number. If this is hardwired human behavior (one Gladwell attributes to evolution but which, if true, Christians would see as being placed in us by God), there may be a lesson that we can learn from this.
The Tipping Point was fascinating from cover-to-cover. It makes sense of some phenomena that really seem to make very little sense (after all, Hush Puppies are not the most attractive or practical shoes in the world!). It makes complex theories clear and shows just how simple it is to make human beings do things that may surprise even them.




Comments (37) »
1. Sam
March 7, 2006
10:34 AM
“It seems to be a global truth that groups begin to lose their power when they rise above 150 members.”
Well, almost global. As a member of Covenant Life Church in Gaithersburg, MD, I can testify that, by the grace of God, power has not been lost as the church membership has increased to 3000 but has only been growing. God continues to use our church in amazing ways. This of course is not because of any actions of our pastors, but because God has given us the grace to hold tightly to the Gospel and not become one of those “seeker-friendly” churches mentioned in this article. Although the tendency may be to slip into the Church Group syndrome, it is not necessary.
2. Tim Challies
March 7, 2006
10:43 AM
“It seems to be a global truth that groups begin to lose their power when they rise above 150 members.”
I should be have been more careful with explaining that one. Still, I’d suggest that even a church like Covenant Life probably had to make some changes to how it did things when the numbers climbed above the 150 - 200 mark.
3. Chris GIammona
March 7, 2006
10:46 AM
Tim
Since you enjoyed the tipping point, you should read his other book - “Blink”.
4. Tim Challies
March 7, 2006
10:57 AM
“Blink” is on my list of books to buy. It looks like an interesting one, though from the description it seems that it may be one that is a little more difficult to reconcile with a Christian worldview (though I could be wrong).
5. Brian Jones
March 7, 2006
11:21 AM
Good review; Gladwell is a very skilled writer, who is able to use anecdotal examples to make broader points in an interesting way.
Blink is excellent as well, and no more difficult to reconcile with a Christian worldview than The Tipping Point. I see these books as describing facts embedded in creation that God has not chosen to disclose through direct revelation. By discovering them through research and thoughful reflection, we fulfill God’s command to “subdue the earth” (Gen. 1:28).
Gladwell has also recently entered the blogosphere at http://gladwell.typepad.com/gladwellcom/
Another book in a similar vein, though perhaps a bit more challenging to a Christian worldview is Freakonomics by Levitt & Dubner.
6. Tim Challies
March 7, 2006
11:28 AM
Freakonomics is another one I’d like to read at some point. From a quick perusal of the book cover in the bookstore it seems that it would be quite anti-Christian in a few places.
7. Jane
March 7, 2006
11:35 AM
After being in churches of all sizes, I think it is possible that a church is not supposed to be more than 150 people. Accountability, true community, and a limit of power is a good thing for Christians.
8. Jeremy Mayhew
March 7, 2006
11:38 AM
I’m a member of Covenant Life, and I can testify to the grace of God there as well. I also see a good measure of truth in the 150 folks rule (although the number seems a bit arbitrary). I can’t tell you how many times I’ve said “Covenant Life is a big church but it feels small.” There’s something about that smallness—knowing and being known— that is crucial, and it is accomplished at Covenant Life Church via almost 100% participation in small groups.
9. DLE
March 7, 2006
11:41 AM
Churches can overcome the Rule of 150 by ensuring they have a good small group network run by leaders with firm biblical grounding.
Much of the modern Church operates off the Law of the Few, but I don’t think that’s a bad thing. The Church needs those with great relational skills, strong minds, and a zeal for reaching the lost—even if all three traits don’t always line up in one individual.
There is no doubt that there is a “viral marketing” flavor to the Church. Again, this is not necessarily a bad thing! George Whitefield, the great evangelist, used viral marketing ideas to generate buzz about his ministry. At one meeting in Boston, more people showed up to hear him speak than there were residents in Boston proper! And what is more viral than a believer telling an unbeliever about what Jesus did?
We need a balanced perspective on this. If indeed God wired us this way, then it’s there for a godly reason. To ignore that is to miss out on the best.
10. Jeremy Mayhew
March 7, 2006
11:41 AM
Oooh. Just opened my copy of Blink. You are right. That boy has some hair!
11. wfseube
March 7, 2006
1:04 PM
DLE wrote: Churches can overcome the Rule of 150 by ensuring they have a good small group network run by leaders with firm biblical grounding.
I agree, and that just proves Gladwell’s point. I’ll bet you a doughnut that Covenant Life Church has a small group program to overcome the 3000 size issue.
Even in my church of 250, we’ve gone to small groups to overcome that size.
——
bill
12. mikbry24
March 7, 2006
1:46 PM
Tim wrote:
“Blink” is on my list of books to buy.
Hey, wait a minute….since when do you buy books?
13. Tim Challies
March 7, 2006
1:57 PM
“Hey, wait a minute….since when do you buy books?”
Not very often. But I don’t know that these secular publishers have any interest in me. :)
14. Joe
March 7, 2006
4:07 PM
The key is the small group within the mega-group. One of our near mega-churches in town has found the key to that truth and is both large and healthy. Few accomplish both.
15. DLE
March 7, 2006
4:35 PM
Even with small groups in place, studies have shown that rarely does a church get more than 30% of the congregation into small groups. That’s been a pretty firm number for the last 25 years and I see no evidence that it’s increasing.
Still, if the 20/80 rule (20% are active in the life/mission of the church and 80% are hangers-on) applies, you’re doing well to get 30% in.
Gladwell talked about companies that broke up their working groups so that none exceeded the 150 number. He noted that companies that did so were more nimble, more creative, and responded better to clients and customers. Lots of application to the Church, obviously.
16. Tim Challies
March 7, 2006
4:38 PM
“Gladwell talked about companies that broke up their working groups so that none exceeded the 150 number. He noted that companies that did so were more nimble, more creative, and responded better to clients and customers. Lots of application to the Church, obviously.”
Absolutely. As I was reading the book I was wishing that there were a couple of people on the plane I could talk to about the concepts. It’s a testament to the book that I was able to review it a week later and that I still remembered most of the content!
He was careful to show that not all situations call for groups of less than 150 people. But I do think there could well be applications for the church in this number.
17. DLE
March 7, 2006
9:15 PM
Tim,
Why not use your blog to bring up the points you want to discuss? I’d be happy to join in on that one; I’m sure others would be, too.
18. Brian Thornton
March 7, 2006
9:18 PM
I know it may not be practical, but, practicality aside…would it be better for the church with 3000 members to break up into smaller churches of 150-200 members? In other words, if this is what it takes to truly feel a part of the church (getting involved in a small group), then what is the benefit of continuing to meet as a larger body (I’m not necessarily against the larger churches, just wondering out loud what real benefit is served by such a large congregation if it has to break itself down into smaller groups to be effective)?
19. wfseube
March 7, 2006
9:20 PM
DLE wrote: Even with small groups in place, studies have shown that rarely does a church get more than 30% of the congregation into small groups. That’s been a pretty firm number for the last 25 years and I see no evidence that it’s increasing.
I’ve seen those stats. The church I just came from was over 70%!!! I can’t figure out why that happened, other than that the small groups ministry was very, very visible, widely promoted, and supported from all corners of the church. And, the count included all kinds of groups - men’s accountability, youth small groups, women’s bible studies, etc. Not that that invalidates things - but the “accounting” tended to be a bit different from what I was accustomed to. But the fact remains that in that church, most people were involved in groups much smaller than 150 (total congregation size was around 500).
——
bill
20. mikbry24
March 7, 2006
10:12 PM
A book I just finished, Loving Your God With All Your Mind, addressed this near the end of the book. J.P. Moreland advocates, especially in larger settings, breaking into small groups based on vocation. When is the last time you’ve heard of a church doing this? How better to be iron sharpening iron than for those with similar vocations to share their struggles, concerns and ideas for reaching those with which they work, and living an impactful Christian life! He had other practical applications as well. I highly recommend the book. I reviewed it HERE.
Mike
21. Allan
March 7, 2006
11:34 PM
Tim what was your point in bringing this book to people’s attention? Do you recommend its message?
SO WHAT, if you can sell ANYONE, ANYTHING!!??
The Holy Ghost ABSENTS HIMSELF from all human cleverness & wisdom, Paul teaches, and SOVEREIGNLY works as and when HE pleases, NOT when man pleases.
What’s going on? Your reading seems to have suddenly deteriorated.
Tell us straight how you see the Sovereignty of God work out in conversion.
22. philip
March 8, 2006
12:38 AM
Malcolm Gladwell needs a haircut. This was one of the first things I noticed about The Tipping Point: the photo of Gladwell and his Yancey-like hair. It’s hard to take a guy with hair like that too seriously, but I’m glad that I did, as The Tipping Point is a fascinating book.
Ahhh……………….. nevermind.
23. Tim Challies
March 8, 2006
7:11 AM
“What’s going on? Your reading seems to have suddenly deteriorated.”
Allan - I am trying to expand my reading a little bit so as to understand some of what is going on in our culture. I don’t consider this a bad thing. I will still focus primarily on books published within the Christian world.
“Tim what was your point in bringing this book to people’s attention? Do you recommend its message?”
I think there was a lot of wisdom in this book. It was not wisdom based on Scripture, but was still an interesting book and one that was, in many ways, helpful. Common grace, my friend. :-)
24. Brian Thornton
March 8, 2006
8:34 AM
Regarding the 150 issue…what benefit is the large congregation when it has to break itself down into smaller groups to be effective as a body. I am not asking this because I object to larger churches…I am asking because I wonder if the large mega-church - even one such as Grace Community Church - is what God prefers to happen within the visible church. Any thoughts?
Re: the similarity of Rick Warren’s philosophy wth the marketing statement of the author of this book: I remember reading this statement by Warren in the past, and it angers me more and more every time I see it again. He basically has stated that the gospel is different for everyone, and all you have to do is find the right one for each individual to get them to come to Christ.
I read a book with a similar philosophy a couple of years ago, titled You Can Double Your Class in Two Years or Less. In it, Josh Hunt teaches teachers that they can increase attendance in their classes by developing relationships with people first without ever mentioning God or Jesus…then later on, once they have come to know and like you and some of the others in your class, then they will be more inclined to accept Jesus! The idea is to get them into the group with secular activities first, then later presenting to them the gospel. Another method Hunt recommends is presenting the gospel through acts of kindness in the community. Sounds good, right? Except Hunt’s idea of the gospel is giving someone a bottle of water with a label on it that says, “this water is given to you to let you know that God loves you, NO STRINGS ATTACHED.”
I HATE it when people market the “gospel” in this way…which is NO gospel at all.
25. Tim Challies
March 8, 2006
8:52 AM
Brian - Good thoughts.
You’re quite right about Warren. What bothers me most is the assumption that it is up to us to find the key to a person’s heart at which point he will inevitably surrender to the gospel. It is a message that denies the sovereignty of God in salvation! And not only that, but it elevates us to bear an unreasonable responsibility in evangelism.
26. DLE
March 8, 2006
11:46 AM
Brian,
As someone who was a part of the church that really pioneered the whole servant evangelism idea, let me add a few points.
In North America, most people have been exposed to Jesus in one form or another. They’ve heard who Jesus is, and whether they comprehend the true Gospel or not, they’ve effectively been inoculated against the message. (The reasons for this are legion and are a whole ‘nother post in themselves. I think you know how it happens, though, so I won’t get into that here.)
For many of these people, their exposure to Christians left them wondering why Christians don’t live out the message they supposedly believe. That only furthers the inoculation.
This is not the kind of situation we found in Acts, though. Then, the message was new and no one had heard it. But that is not the case today. In some ways, we Christians find ourselves in a “mopping up” campaign. We’re approaching people who already have their defenses up against the Gospel. Those people want to see our reality, not just hear the words.
Servant evangelism CAN be effective in breaching that defense. I’ve heard the stories of people who were converted as a result of that first step of a servant evangelism campaign, and personally known those people.
But you are absolutely correct in that handing out a free bottle of water does not take the place of a solid Gospel presentation. Unfortunately, that does happen. I protest against that, too. But an act of true kindness coupled with the truth of God is a powerful combination. Jesus Himself used miracles and kindness as a way of ushering people into the Kingdom.
27. jane
March 8, 2006
1:02 PM
DLE said, “If indeed God wired us this way, then it’s there for a godly reason. To ignore that is to miss out on the best.” Could it not be that is our own sinful nature which makes us seek to be served? I am still trying to understand why people think a mega-church is a good thing and how a small group could possibly be compared to a small community church.
28. Brian Thornton
March 8, 2006
3:49 PM
DLE,
I Think you and I are on the same page with regards to the free bottle of water example. Social acts of mercy are good…but they should NEVER replace the gospel, no matter how innoculated people are against it.
Servant evangelism must contain not only the service to the person, but also the true evangel.
29. Allan
March 8, 2006
3:54 PM
Tim you said;
‘I think there was a lot of wisdom in this book. It was not wisdom based on Scripture, but….’
I think you should read 1 Cor. 1:17-29 again!
If you ARE saying that merely human insights into what natural psychological factors motivate fallen men to make their decisions (strangely termed by you ‘common grace’), have any value, relevance and place in Christian ministry, then in my view you have totally subverted your reformed (and biblical) view of what man is, (corrupt and culpable) and what he can do (nothing) in the matter of conversion.
Am I misunderstanding you or something? Or are the Arminians now cheering?
30. Tim Challies
March 8, 2006
4:28 PM
“If you ARE saying that merely human insights into what natural psychological factors motivate fallen men to make their decisions (strangely termed by you ‘common grace’), have any value, relevance and place in Christian ministry,”
I don’t recall saying it exactly like that. Gladwell says that a great deal of research has shown that humans function best in groups of 150 or less. If this is a global truth, that is something the church may wish to take notice of. It does not mean that we NEED to apply it (since, after all, Scripture is silent on it), but it may be information that is useful for the church. I don’t see why this makes me an Arminian.
31. Allan
March 9, 2006
4:17 AM
Arminians say ANYONE can make the best decision of all, with the little bit of help that will be available whenever they decide they want to make it.
Pelagians say ANYONE can make the best decision of all and WILL, just as soon as they see the benefit it offers.
The Bible says NO-ONE can make the best decision of all, because they are stone cold DEAD in sin, and thus never WILL, unless they are made ALIVE by the uncaused sovereign act of God.
To which of these three kinds, would ‘The Tipping Point’ assign non-Christian man?
32. Davey
March 9, 2006
8:15 AM
The Tipping point isn’t addressing any of this, Allan. It’s merely observing how things seem to work and happen in life from a secular point of view. I read the book a long time ago and my comclusion was that Gladwell was the master of the “rearview mirror” in that I thought he could make astute observations about things that had already happened. No magic there.
This book is a secular book addressing observable phenomenon. It’s interesting.
Tim isn’t applying it to God’s work in salvation. Please chill.
33. Tim Challies
March 9, 2006
9:10 AM
“Tim isn’t applying it to God’s work in salvation.”
Exactly. An unbeliever is as capable of observation as a believer.
Davey is quite right about Gladwell - he is astute at bringing together studies and information that is already widely available, and using these various bits of information to weave together an argument.
34. Allan
March 10, 2006
1:30 AM
I was quite aware of that Davey, but couldn’t understand why Tim was wasting his own time and mind, and promoting books to us constituted from fallen human wisdom (1 Cor. 1.) when we KNOW what damage these very same kind of ‘insights’ have caused when they have been picked up by the Church, Rick Warren et al, as a wisdom worth practising in Christian ministry. I just could not see WHY Tim now was promoting such stuff as profitable to his readers. I had learnt to expect BETTER from him!
And ‘interesting’ is no guarantee of quality or benefit!
I am puzzled Tim, by the sudden seeming ‘shift’ in your latest offerings, which led me to query your intentions.
And “chill out” Davey? - sorry, no. We’re not playing tiddlywinks here. I would merely log out, and stay ‘hot’ somewhere else.
35. Davey
March 10, 2006
9:29 AM
Allan,
If my use of the phrase “please chill” offended you – I apologize. I could have left that out and found a better way to request you take a deep breath. You are certainly entitled to your opinions. The fact is though, that I was offended that you would take issue with Tim in a manner that suggested you felt he had gone over to the “dark side”.
One of the reasons I visit this site with regularity is because it is clear to me that Tim is a guy who has a passion for Christ and who is equally solid in doctrine and in faith. The icing on the cake is that he is a talented and gifted writer and reviewer. I have no doubts that most others would agree.
In regard to your comments about the damage being done to churches because of the church growth movement I heartily agree with you. In fact, I think it was an article here about the Purpose Driven Life that I stumbled across during a rough time when our old church was getting involved in all those things and was taking a decided turn for the worse. It was quite a relief to find that so many others shared my concerns.
But since that time I have come to realize that not every single thing that comes out of the church growth movement must be evil. If God can use the Catholic Church to keep scriptures together, then His power and workings can been seen in other areas as well. For example: we just started doing small groups at our new church. Are small groups wrong? If so, why? One of the problems I saw with Saddleback and others doing this was that anyone could be a small group leader – irregardless of their spiritual maturity (and in some cases I read – even the unsaved were leading these groups!!!) When we do it – mature Christians are leading it. The benefits are we’ve gotten to know other brothers and sisters in Christ much better. It’s helped our church fellowship greatly. But that does not mean that the next sinister step for our church is an abandonment of the gospel for 12 step programs and pointless skits. You just have to be careful and discerning.
I think if you follow your logic correctly, then you must never get any legal advice from an attorney unless he/she is a Christian. Or any mortgage advice unless he/she is a Christian. Or read any book whatsoever unless it is a Christian book.
If you feel Tim is abandoning the gospel, then maybe you take your own advice and go get “hot” elsewhere. The alternative, of course, is to realize that Tim has not abandoned the gospel and that we are not going to always agree with fellow Christians on every single point of doctrine or opinion. Please stick around and contribute, but perhaps you could refrain from calling a strong brother’s faith into question.
God bless.
36. Tim Challies
March 10, 2006
9:46 AM
Allan - It’s really this simple. I have decided that I will review the occasional book that appears on the NY Times Bestseller list. Why? Because these books are having a great impact on our culture and because they are being read far more than any of the other books I review. I see this as an opportunity to keep abreast of what is happening in the culture and what the guy next door to me is reading.
Many of these books are going to contain some good points. Christians do not have the market cornered on all that is true. Also, there are things that are good in certain contexts that are bad in others. For example, some of Gladwell’s points are well-made and valuable. The problem comes when they become too deeply ingrained in the church or begin to overtake the Bible’s clear teaching.
Anyways, I intend to continue to occasionally review such books, and see nothing wrong with doing so.
37. Allan
March 10, 2006
3:28 PM
Davey said;
‘but perhaps you could refrain from calling a strong brother’s faith into question.’
Aaah, - THAT most unpardonable post-modern sin!
Brother have you heard your biblical namesake’s inspired word;
“Let the righteous strike me. It shall be as excellent oil.”
Yes I WAS asking him for a firm unequivocal reaffirmation of his ‘core principles’, not just for his sake, but for the sake of the many that have come to trust him.
I believe I would be quite wrong to apologise for seeking that, and I don’t, but again ask him to please refrain from offering us the wisdom of this world, ESPECIALLY so attractively packaged like Eve’s tree, and which wisdom, our God says, is ‘earthly, sensual and devilish’. What is the NEED? -Has the in fallible WORD of GOD suddenly become INsufficient???!!!
Post Your Comment Here »