"The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment is a truly important work-one that should be required reading not only for church leaders, but for all sober-minded laypeople as well."

John MacArthur (From the Foreword)

"If you were more discerning you’d probably buy this book. If you do read this book, you will be! This book on discernment is simple, clear, well-written and well-illustrated...

Mark Dever

Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the book, about the blog or about the author.

03/12/07
Comments (10)

Book Review - The Reformation

The Reformation: How a Monk and a Mallet Changed the WorldI love church history. I consider it absolutely tragic that so few contemporary Christians have any real sense of their heritage. They know a little bit of New Testament history, can list hundreds of today’s best and worst teachers, but know almost nothing of the 2000 years between.

The Reformation: How a Monk and a Mallet Changed the World is one of a long line of books authored by Stephen Nichols, professor at Lancaster Bible College in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Nichols is a prolific author who seems to be releasing books with impressive regularity. To this point all of his books have centered on church history. He has written several works on Jonathan Edwards, one each on Martin Luther and Gresham Machen, and one providing a guided tour of classic Christian writing. This new title “goes behind the scenes and uncovers the human side of the larger-than-life Reformers through user-friendly narrative stories on the Reformation.”

The book is built upon two ideas, both of which I agree with entirely. The first is that the Reformation matters (which indicates that all of church history matters). Nicholas provides four reasons why: first, church history provides lots of examples of Christians from all walks of life who labored to bring their faith to bear upon the world in which they lived; second, church history can be humbling as we realize that we are not a whole lot better and smarter and godlier than people in the past; third, we are humbled by the spiritual insight and spiritual depth of our predecessors in the faith; fourth, we learn what matters most to the Christian faith when we look to church history in general the the Reformation in particular. The second idea behind this book is simply that history can be fun. Though teachers of history can take the fun out of it, this does not indicate that history is just plain boring. When taught well, history is a joy and can bring about many benefits.

The Reformation: How a Monk and a Mallet Changed the World serves as a brief and popular introduction to the Reformation, and in particular, to the key figures in each of the nations involved. We first meet Martin Luther and learn about the Reformation in Germany where it began. From there we move to Ulrich Zwingli and Switzerland and then to the Anabaptists. From there we go to John Calvin, Thomas Cramner and other English Reformers, and then we meet the Puritans. The final chapter introduces many of the women of the Reformation, both those notable for being the wives of the Reformers and those who made substantive contributions on their own. A few appendices introduce Reformation-era creeds, prayers, and other writings. One section I appreciated was one dealing with the question of “Do we still need the Reformation?” Answering historians like Mark Noll who argue that the Reformation is over and that unity between Protestants and Catholics can now be achieved, Nichols affirms that the theology at the heart of the Reformation was the very gospel and that we are not at a place where we can have ecumenical unity.

All-in-all, this book serves as a wonderful, popular-level introduction to the key persons and events involved in the Reformation, surely one of history’s most pivotal times. It makes for a great springboard to deeper appreciation and thus deeper study of both people and events. It is exactly the kind of book I would put in the hands of new Christians, or simply Christians who have no appreciation of the church’s history, so they can benefit from knowing and understanding the history of the church and thus the history of their faith. I wholeheartedly recommend it.

Book Review - The Reformation

Comments (10) »


1. David Pearson
March 12, 2007
4:42 PM

Tim,

Atlanta already? Or are you blogging while driving? Perhaps picking up hot spots as you zoom through towns…


2. Josh
March 12, 2007
5:11 PM

Answering historians like Mark Noll who argue that the Reformation is over and that unity between Protestants and Catholics can now be achieved, Nichols affirms that the theology at the heart of the Reformation was the very gospel and that we are not at a place where we can have ecumenical unity.

Thanks for the review Tim. I wonder what those folks who got burnt for their belief in the Reformation would think about that unity thing?

Josh “…the word of God is not bound.” —2 Timothy 2:9


3. Joel
March 12, 2007
5:54 PM

You mean like Servetus, Josh? (Sorry, I couldn’t resist.) :)

I think I may have to see if I can get hold of this one. I do believe that the reformation was necessary in most areas EXCEPT the theological. Luther was spot-on about simony, and if it had ended there, we wouldn’t have to be having this sort of discussions. However, since it didn’t end there, I douubt very much we’ll be able to seriously hope for ecumenical unity this side of Heaven.


4. Tim Challies
March 12, 2007
8:10 PM

“Atlanta already? Or are you blogging while driving? Perhaps picking up hot spots as you zoom through towns…”

I’m away down south in Dixie…


5. Armen
March 12, 2007
10:22 PM

May I make a suggestion Tim?

Rather than just give a review and one or two quotes on a book, maybe you could underline the most profound statements in the book and quote them? Not everyone has the resources, ability, or time to benefit from books so quoting the most profound passages allows them to benefit inspite of not reading it.

This is what I am doing at the minute as I read through ‘Lectures to my Students’ by Spurgeon. It is a lot longer and probably contains more ‘quotable’ statements than most books, so I have to blog a chapter at a time, but it is very beneficial I believe.


6. SteveE
March 12, 2007
11:47 PM

I would have to say that the agreement of a line of scholars that have built upon one another is not necessarily a good, nor accurate way of supporting that their conclusions are correct.

If, from the begining, there is/was a basic flaw in their idea, then the problem becomes more profound as time, and scholars, attempt to refine their ideas. The biggest difficulty with this, is that they have a belief in, and trust of, the individual/s that formed the idea. Which engenders a blind spot in their thinking that leads them to view scripture through the eyes of the men they trust, rather than seeking what God is attempting to say/teach.

This is a fundamental flaw in much teaching, no matter what venue you teach/learn from…be it Reformed or Arminius. I have never found either side to be particularly willing to see these flaws, nor attempt to correct them. They simply build upon the previous flaws, for no other reason than that they seek no further than what they were taught and seek to prove it via scripture….instead of allowing God to speak.


7. John K
March 13, 2007
1:46 AM

“…unity between Protestants and Catholics can now be achieved…”

Unity in the sense that there is unity in the Body of Christ and that there are members of the Body among both Catholics and Protestants? Perhaps

Unity in the sense that we can work side by side in areas of commonality? Perhaps.

But unity in the “political” sense of joining the two churches here on earth? Won’t happen. Can’t happen. Too many compromises necessary. We protestants could never accept the many errors we see in Catholocism, and I’m sure any strong Catholic would feel the same about us.


8. Cheryl
March 13, 2007
3:00 AM

This sounds like a wonderful book, Tim! I so totally agree with you and the author on the importance of knowing and understanding the history of that in which we stand now. I think much of what is being “re-fought” in orthodox Christianity today may not need to be, if the majority of our churches had in the last generation or so, valued the teaching of Church history. We cannot understand or value where we are, if we do not know from where we’ve come.


9. Bibliomaniac
March 13, 2007
11:11 AM

Tim: Anytime you find a good book on church history that is written in a popular style, be sure to mention it!

You lament the fact so few are familiar with church history, and I wholeheartedly agree. A small part of the problem is that those who write and publish books on church history frequently fail to make the presentation interesting to a lay person.

Thanks for mentioning this book.


10. Joel
March 13, 2007
5:35 PM

We protestants could never accept the many errors we see in Catholocism, and I’m sure any strong Catholic would feel the same about us.

In the sense you mean, John, I quite agree. However, we also believe that there already exists some unity by virtue of our common baptism. In another sense, we believe that you are already part of the Catholic Church, albeit a part that’s not in communion with the main body. (I know that sounds sort of patronizing, but it’s not meant to be.)

However, the Reformation was long enough ago that any unity would require one of us to change drastically to conform to the other, and I can’t see that happening. If we changed our doctrines to be compatible with yours, we’d become just another Protestant denomination, and if you (collectively) changed yours to match us, you’d just be joining the Catholic Church anyway. Too much water under the bridge. (Not to mention that trying to get doctrinal unity even among Protestants would be like herding cats.)