"The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment is a truly important work-one that should be required reading not only for church leaders, but for all sober-minded laypeople as well."

John MacArthur (From the Foreword)

"If you were more discerning you’d probably buy this book. If you do read this book, you will be! This book on discernment is simple, clear, well-written and well-illustrated...

Mark Dever

Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the book, about the blog or about the author.

07/23/06
Comments (12)

Hood

hood.jpgHaving read fifty or sixty nonfiction books already this year, I began to crave some lighter, easier reading. And, in a case of great timing, an Advance Reader Copy of Stephen Lawhead’s Hood arrived in the mail just a few days ago. Lawhead, known for writing fantasy and historical fiction, has set his sights on the greatest of the English heroes, Robin Hood. But rather than simply retelling the oft-told story, he has re imagined Robin Hood and has attempted to arrive at the source for this great story. This is a “completely re-imagined epic of the man known as Robin Hood—told in a far more earthy, eerie and elemental way than ever before.” In a lengthy appendix to the book, the author explains his belief that the story of Robin Hood may well have originated in Wales and provides ample proof that this just may be the case.

And so it is that the story of Hood is set not in Sherwood Forest, as we might expect, but in the dense, primeval forests of Wales. The son of a minor Welsh king, Bran ap Brychan finds his world torn apart when his father and his father’s army are massacred, leaving the young prince to ascend the throne. But, fearing for his life, Bran is forced to flee. He eventually wanders into the forest and establishes himself as king of those who have fled before him into the safety of the woods. He is a disturbed and flawed hero, but one who begins to grow into his legend as a hero who fought on behalf of the poor, displaced and persecuted. The usual cast of characters, Marian, Little John and Friar Tuck are all worked into the story, though once again, not in the way we’ve come to expect. The villains, also different from what we’ve seen in book and film, are well-crafted and not so evil that they are unbelievable.

This novel, which is due for publication in September of this year, is very well-written and tells a very intriguing story. It is difficult to do justice to as well-known and enjoyable story as Robin Hood, but Lawhead does so successfully. To tell the truth, I can’t think of the last time I enjoyed a novel as much as this one (though I’ll have to admit that this may speak more to the quality and quantity of fiction I read than the quality of this particular book!). Still, I found Hood to be a fun, exciting take on a great story. And what’s more, this is only the first novel in a series of three, so there will be much more to enjoy in the future.

While I am glad to recommend Hood I feel it necessary to point out that the book should probably be considered PG. There is a very small amount of rough language (words such as “bastard” and a handful of French equivalents), a few hints toward sexual activity, though certainly nothing graphic or voyeuristic, and a fair bit of violence, though nothing too graphic. And, of course, Robin Hood could not be told without at least a few people being impaled with arrows. Still, this is probably not a version of Robin Hood one would want to read with the family. But again, I enjoyed it tremendously and am already eagerly anticipating the sequels.

Hood

Comments (12) »


1. Aspiring Theologian
July 23, 2006
2:46 PM

When I looked at the title, I thought it was “Hook”, so I thought of Peter Pan, lol.

Looks like a good read! I’ll have to check it out when it comes out. I love historical fiction.

God bless,

A. Shepherd
The Aspiring Theologian


2. Brendt
July 23, 2006
3:53 PM

Thanks for the review, Tim. September can’t get here fast enough.

…already eagerly anticipating the sequels

Oh joy!! While I have enjoyed his stand-alone books, I love series — especially his!! Have you read the Pendragon cycle?


3. Tim Challies
July 23, 2006
9:50 PM

“Have you read the Pendragon cycle?”

I have not. This is the first I’ve read of his. His St. Patrick book looks interesting. What others do you recommend I try?


4. Brendt
July 23, 2006
11:45 PM

I have Patrick but haven’t read it yet.

The Pendragon cycle is my favorite. The magic ascribed to Merlin in the Arthurian legend is largely written as a close observance to little-known natural things that he was taught as a child. There is some supernatural content at times, but the “good guys” are always getting it from the right place, often as a direct result of prayer. If you want straight Arthur, the series will start out slow as the first book is about Merlin’s parents, and the second book is about Merlin (though Arthur does appear in that book, if I recall correctly). Book 3 was all about Arthur and could have closed the series, were it not for its popularity. Books 4 and 5 basically cover some of the same time as 3 did, but new material. And book 6 (Avalon) could really stand alone, as it actually takes place in near future Britain, with a descendant of Arthur as the protagonist. In some ways, I enjoyed this book the most, as it revives the Arthurian legend in the modern day setting.

I really liked Byzantium a lot, too. “Sprawling” is probably a good word for it. It almost could be a series itself, weighing in at almost 900 pages and shifting story lines several times (though seemlessly). One word of caution — after language that was only as strong as what you described in Hood (if even that strong), Lawhead does drop the s-word once near the end, though somewhat in context, as the protagonist reaches the climax of his anger at another character (that had been going on for hundreds of pages). And if I recall correctly, he repents later of this attitude as he realizes that the anger was only hurting him.

Going back a ways, the Empyrion series (2 books, often sold as one now) was pretty good. It was a science fiction analogy. No C.S. Lewis, but I enjoyed it. This was early in Lawhead’s career, so some may think it to be of lesser quality. And they may be right, but IMHO, Lawhead started out good and just got better.

I’ve heard good things about the Song of Albion trilogy and The Celtic Crusades, but haven’t read much of them, yet.

Well, that’s probably more than you wanted to know. ;-)


5. Custard
July 24, 2006
3:33 AM

What’s wrong with the word “bastard”? In context, it was the correct technical term for someone born outside wedlock, both before and politer than “illegitimate”, and was common English for hundreds of years, also meaning “hybrid”.


6. Tim Challies
July 24, 2006
6:14 AM

Custard - I don’t think that the word is wrong in and of itself, but when used in a pejorative way it can be insulting. Within this book it is used as an insult, not a description.


7. Annette
July 24, 2006
6:21 AM

Thanks for the overview. I have (i think) all of Lawhead’s books….look forward to adding this one to my shelves as well. :)


8. Philippa
July 24, 2006
7:17 AM

The new Robin Hood dramatisation arrives on BBC1 this autumn.

I really hope the Beeb do it full justice and erase the memory of Kevin Costner from my mind. (The best thing in that film is Alan Rickman’s gloriously over-the-top Sheriff of Nottingham).

I’ve yet to be be bitten by the Lawhead bug. I think I should give this one a go. :)


9. B. Minich
July 24, 2006
4:50 PM

My brother read a lot of those books when he was 12-14 - the Pendragon cycle was a favorite of his, and he kept trying to get me to read it. I haven’t yet, but I did read the Song of Albion series, and thought it was quite good. It starts as your basic “guys get sucked into another world” saga, but it is well done, and the antagonist comes from an interesting place. I meant to read Pendragon (don’t tell him I said that ;) ) too, just never got around to it.


10. B. Minich
July 24, 2006
5:01 PM

Ooops, I just rememberd something.

Lawhead’s giving Celtic types of names to English legends is unsurprising, really. ;) He did that in the Pendragon Cycle too (from the bits and pieces I saw - you never see the name “Arthur”, anyway), although I’m not sure if they were Welsh or Scottish. Heck, all of Britian was Celtic at one point in the past, so Arthur may have been based out of there.

Avalon was a fun read too (I DID read that one).


11. marc
July 24, 2006
7:40 PM

I read his Arthur stuff when I was younger and thought it pretty bland. Of course by the time I read Lawhead I had already read Tolkien, Stephen Donaldson and Terry Brooks so by way of comparison it wasn’t that great.

I found Parke Godwin’s two books on Robin Hood “Sherwood” and “Robin and the King” to be quite excellent.


12. Jon Dykstra
July 31, 2006
4:44 PM

Stephen Lawhead’s earlier books seemed to progress from a vaguely Christian worldview (Empyrion series, The Dragon King Saga) to one much more clearly Christian (the Pendragon series, Song of Albion series), but then in the last couple or three books veered off again, mixing Christianity with reincarnation (Avalon), and the worship of relics (the Celtic crusades). A great writer, but not one that can be recommended without at least a few theological reservations. Though, to be fair, this mixing of Christianity with objectionable elements is common in Christian fantasy writing - C.S. Lewis mixed Christianity with witches, and Tolkien too brought in spells and charms to his vaguely Christian world. So I am a tad confused as to what to think. For now I remain a Lawhead fan who isn’t a fan of two or three of his odder books.