Why should the Devil get all the good scientists? It sometimes seems that way, doesn’t it? We hear of scientists like Stephen Hawking and Richard Dawkins and others who are acclaimed as being at the top of their field and almost inevitably it seems that they are atheists or otherwise committed to explaining the world in terms of Darwinian evolution. Occasionally we find a great dissenting mind, but then we discover that that person is committed to beliefs that seem opposed to the plain account of Scripture. So we have Francis Collins who writes The Language of God but who in the book says that, though God exists, life and creation can be explained in terms of natural laws and processes that do not depend on the Divine hand of God. It is both tiresome and frustrating.
But here at last comes Edgar Andrews whose list of academic credentials include more letters than all the names in my family: BSc, PhD, DSc, FInstP, FIMMM, CEng, CPhys (which, according to a site I consulted, is together an anagram for disbenching tscpf fpsps chym- cmd ‘m). No, I don’t know what any of those degrees mean, but they sure sound impressive. He is Emeritus Professor of Materials at the University of London and an international expert on the science of large molecules (not small ones, mind you, only the large ones). His credentials include things that sound like they must set him apart; things such as this: In September 1972 he was one of four specially invited speakers at the dedication symposium of the Michigan Molecular Institute, two of the others being Nobel Laureates Paul Flory and Melvin Calvin.
Put it all together and you find that Andrews is one smart dude. He’s smarter than you and me and the rest of us put together. And in his new book Who Made God? he launches a full front assault on the new atheists. He does this not through a point-by-point refutation of their books, but by an insightful look at science and the existence of God. An excellent writer who mixes a subtle British sense of humor with a powerful intellect and a deep understanding of science, he very quickly picks apart the arguments we have for so long been hearing from the likes of Richard Dawkins and Stephen Hawking and even Francis Collins. Yet he still crafts a book that is readable and, best of all, understandable. Even the chapter dealing with string theory is comprehensible—no small feat for a smart guy writing about what lies at the very frontier of science.
The topics Andrews covers range from the existence of God to the nature of hypotheses to the abilities of mutations to create. Through it all, he shows how the claims of atheism and naturalism fall short—how they rely on bad science, how they require bad logic or unfair hypotheses and how they are beneath the very minds that create them. He draws the reader to inevitable conclusion that there is a Creator who is pre-existent and who is living and active in the world today. By the end he draws the gaze of the created to the majesty of the Creator and calls the reader to see God for who he is.
A powerful book and one that is exceptionally well-written, Who Made God? is just the book I’ve been waiting for. It aptly refutes the claims of the new atheists but does so without giving away the farm in the meantime. And I couldn’t ask for much more than that.



Comments (17) »
1. Matt Wolfgang
November 17, 2009
8:43 AM
Tim,
Thanks for the helpful review. I’d seen some press for this book, but was waiting for a review to get some more info! This is now going on my Christmas list.
I especially look forward to this as I’m a virologist (a really sassy way to say that I study viruses) and I’m always interested in understanding more how the Lord has created my work and science in general. Evolutionary theory basically engulfs my field. Hopefully this may help me think through on different points how to interact with my coworkers and friends for the Lord’s glory.
Thank you again for taking the time to review this one!
-Matt
2. Ben Mordecai
November 17, 2009
8:57 AM
And so the book queue gets longer
3. Lance
November 17, 2009
9:37 AM
Thanks Tim. One more book to add to the stack on the bedside table…. :)
Lance
4. Paul C
November 17, 2009
10:13 AM
Tim would you recommend this book (or perhaps another) to someone who is struggling to come to terms with the reality of God? I have someone in mind who has asked a lot of questions, but is still not seeing the light.
5. Julie Park
November 17, 2009
10:21 AM
I am SO glad to see this review!! I was seriously going to send you a copy because this book is brilliant! I’ve been reading it and finding it to be an incredibly intelligent and readable - even entertaining! I’m left in awe of the complex and beautifully organized design of the Creator. Love how he systematically takes down atheist arguments by demonstrating the absurdity of it all. I’ve already bought copies for my friends. In fact, CVBBS.com has it on sale for $10 right now.
6. Josiah
November 17, 2009
10:41 AM
Thanks for the review of this book, it looks interesting. The following statement caught my attention, though:
“So we have Francis Collins who writes The Language of God but who in the book says that, though God exists, life and creation can be explained in terms of natural laws and processes that do not depend on the Divine hand of God.”
I’m not sure that this statement is very fair to Dr. Collins, who I’m not sure I agree with when it comes to his views on evolution. But I think from hearing him speak that he believes that the natural laws are created, set up, and superintended by the Divine Hand of God. The main question here, then, is what is our view of General Revelation—is it a valid category? If it is, then we can see through science God’s handiwork, and if the evidence seems to point toward evolution, then that’s where we should go. Of course, then we have the ticklish manner of how to interpret Genesis 1-2—but there have been evangelical interpreters (Meredith Kline, for instance) who see Genesis 1-2 as a “framework” that explains God’s work in creation and doesn’t literally describe how it happened.
I’m not saying Collins is necessarily right—but I think that his stance doesn’t discount Providence, as you seem to suggest.
7. Beth
November 17, 2009
11:55 AM
Thank you for the review. I will be putting the book on my Christmas list.
Your description of Francis Collins is a suprise to me. I haven’t read his book, but I’ve read various interviews with him and I was under the impression that he believes that God was involved with our origins in a very direct way (which is why I was doing a touchdown dance when I heard he was appointed director of the NIH).
8. E.G.
November 17, 2009
12:23 PM
@Josiah: Thanks for a much more reasonable statement on that issue.
9. Steve Burlew
November 17, 2009
2:32 PM
Hey, Tim -
Hope all is well with you there this week.
I’m sure you’ll remember my sponsored post of a few weeks ago, where I offered to send a book to anyone who had never read a Puritan but would commit to do so AND to email me when done? Well, I sent out a number of Banner of Truth’s Puritan Paperback, “The Bruised Reed” by Richard Sibbes, and recently got my first email. I thought you might be interested in reading it. Here it is …
——————————————
Hi Mr. Burlew,
Doug here. You might remember sending me a copy of The Bruised Reed over three weeks ago. Well, suffice it to say that “the Heavenly Doctor Sibbes” was an awesome read. Clear, racy in style and yet written in such a pastoral heart - if this is what the Puritans were all about, then I love them! Thank you so much for sending this book to me! One thing is certain - once a little more money becomes available, I am plugging into as many Banner books as I can get my hands on!
In Christ,
Doug
10. Jerry
November 17, 2009
3:51 PM
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think Tim is suggesting that the explanation Collins proposes (which he terms “BioLogos”) ‘does not depend on the Divine hand of God’ because it runs afoul of what Scripture requires. So, the problem with Collins is not that he believes there is a God, it’s that his explanation for the cosmos renders God unnecessary, and that’s simply not true or acceptable when held against Scripture.
At which point, we go to places like Colossians 1 to see that God was VERY invested in what he created - it was ‘through him and for him’. No matter the phraseology or semantics, any explanation which renders God unnecessary is insufficient and (most damnably) unbiblical.
11. David Woollin
November 17, 2009
3:55 PM
You may be interested to know that Professor Edgard Andrews debated with Richard Dawkins in the Huxley Memorial debate at Oxford University (England). It is on youtube.
12. Josiah
November 17, 2009
4:20 PM
Jerry—
I say “Amen and Amen” to your sentiments. God created, and God is invested in what he created. What I’m saying is that there are some theistic evolutionists that believe this as well—that say that God actually created a world where evolution is possible and then superintended evolution to produce the world as we have it now.
It is possible to take serious issue with this approach—do we have to then interpret the Bible in light of scientific data? It seems to me this is the real question, hence what I said earlier about General Revelation. If it is possible, from the text itself, to say that Genesis 1-2 can be interpreted as emphasizing the fact that God created the world and not positing a literal explanation of how God did it, then Collins’ theistic evolution becomes a possibility. If not, then it’s not a possibility. Augustine, about 1400 years before the evolution debate, put forward the possibility that Genesis 1-2 could be interpreted in this manner: http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2009/may/22.39.html. What we do with that is another matter, I suppose—he could be wrong. But it at least shows that it’s not a foreign idea to Church history to say that Genesis 1-2 are not necessarily describing literal 24 hour days.
13. Patty J
November 17, 2009
4:31 PM
Check out www.whomadegod.org. This is the official website of Professor Edgar Andrews, physicist, author and Emeritus Professor of Materials in the University of London, England. You will find here an outline of his new book, as well as articles and videos by Professor Andrews. As Julie mentioned before this book is currently on sale at www.cvbbs.com for $9.99.
14. Beth
November 17, 2009
8:15 PM
Perhaps Collins has changed his views. Here is quote from a 2004 interview, “God is a God who both created the universe, and also had a plan that included me as an individual human being.”
It can be found here: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/questionofgod/voices/collins.html
Later in the interview he is vague on how he thinks God made the universe.
15. The Scotty Stevens Show
November 23, 2009
9:48 AM
Same old story. The religious, whilst reading, their hands shaking with glee at each page-turn, will nod in excitable agreement, “Yes! Yes! You are exactly right, Edgar! There IS a God, no matter what they say! Jesus DID walk on water, part the sea, and feed two small fish and five loaves of bread to five thousand people! Who needs evidence when the Lord says it’s true!” At the same time, atheists like me will STILL be waiting for the STILL elusive evidential proof of God and co.
I will read this book, and most probably - as is always the case when I read ANYTHING by creationists (no matter how many letters after their names) - will pull my hear out at all the illogical arguments put forth FOR God, and AGAINST atheism/evolution.
All I know is this: Life is brief. Why waste time kneeling on a mat, praying to someone/something who has never been seen, for a second life in a place that has ALSO never been seen, when we have all this heavenly beauty on planet earth just waiting to be enjoyed?
To freedom,
Scotty Stevens
16. Tim Worley
November 23, 2009
11:23 AM
Scotty,
I haven’t read Andrews’ book yet, but I have to ask: Simply in the interest of good reading practice, if nothing else, might it be advisable to read Andrews’ arguments first before prejudging them as illogical? It’ll at least give your hair a short reprieve :)
All the best,
Tim
17. Dr. DEW
November 26, 2009
12:34 PM
Interesting note - I went to Barnes and Noble to order, ordered the book and a day later got a note that they cancelled my order. Now when you try to find the book on their website it doesn’t exist. If tyou try harder, and know exactly how to look, it is there but no longer available - guessing someone doesn’t want us reading the book? Can’t wait for my copy from AMAZON to show up!!
Thanks again for another helpful review Tim, I always come to you first for what to read next.