Lord Willing
I am part of a Reformed mailing list that every now and then discusses something of interest. The list used to be quite busy, but recently there has been very little discussion, and much of what has been discussed has been quite boring (ie who would like to purchase old issues of a denomination-specific magazine). However, a couple of days ago someone asked an intriguing question. He asked what impact a belief in Calvinism or Arminianism has on daily living. So how would the daily life of a staunch Arminian vary from that of a Calvinist?
While there has been some conversation about this matter, it seems that most people have not come up with anything convincing.
My contribution to the discussion was that most Reformed people I know live with what I call a �DV-mentality.� D.V. is the shortened form of the Latin words Deo Volente which translate to �Lord Willing.� I used to attend an extremely conservative church and anytime a person spoke about the future, he would append �Lord willing� to the sentence. �We will meet again, Lord willing, next Thursday.� �Tim and Aileen will, Lord willing, be married next Saturday.� When written in a church bulletin or magazine, usually the initials D.V. would replace �Lord willing.� So a marriage announcement might read �Tim and Aileen have indicated their desire to be married. If no objections are brought forward, the ceremony will take place next Saturday, D.V.�
While the insistence on adding a �Lord willing� to any discussion of the future became nearly superstitious, I do believe it was indicative of a fundamentally Calvinist belief � that of God�s sovereignty. While Arminians claim to believe that God is sovereign, their theology denies the fullness of this belief. So I do believe that most Calvinists have a greater view of God�s sovereignty and this does impact their lives as they live with a view to God�s total control over life. They know that their plans and their dreams are all subject to God�s will, which He generally keeps hidden from us until it happens. They tend to assume less about the future and depend more on God for what will come to pass.
A second suggestion was that Calvinists tend to have more children than Arminians. This has certainly proven true in my experience, but it is important to note that most Calvinists I know are part of a culture or tradition that encourages large families. Also, the most Arminian of Arminians, Roman Catholics, also have large families. Both Catholics and many Reformed Christians believe that birth control is wrong. In the case of Calvinists this stems from a view of God�s sovereignty, for if God wants me to have a large family, who am I to deny His will? If God really wants me to have a child, I will have one despite birth control. Either way, who am I to attempt to supercede control over my family, which in reality is God�s family?
The final suggestion is that Calvinists have a higher view of church matters. I have certainly found it to be true that Calvinists generally spend more time in church, in Bible study and in devotions than Arminians. While evening services are becoming increasingly rare in Arminian churches, they are still standard fare in Calvinist churches. The same holds true, albeit to a lesser extent, with Bible studies and adult Sunday school classes. This would almost seem to indicate that staunch Calvinists take their faith more seriously than staunch Arminians, and that is not something I truly believe at this time.
That is the full extent of the discussion to this point. I would be interested in knowing your thoughts on this. Does Calvinist or Arminian theology really impact our lives, or is it merely a �head-matter?� Drop in to the forums and let me know what you think.




Comments (5) »
1. Ed Hale
August 29, 2006
1:18 PM
I would take exception to the observation that the most arminian of arminians are the Roman Catholic Church. Arminius was an ardent protestant and a conspicuous 2nd Generation leader of the Reformation. He and his students would bristle at the idea that Roman Catholics were “Arminians”
2nd, the most arminians of the Arminians today are Wesleyan Methodists, who put all of their Reformed brethren to shame when it comes to personal devotion time and mutual edification through association (read: bible studies, evening services etc..)
Your use of the word “Arminian” is inappropriate. Like many Reformed, you use it to describe anyone who is not a conspicuous Calvinist. Many who use the term in this way believe that anyone who does not embrace the Doctrines of Grace / Calvinism is an Arminian.
as far as the question about how an Arminian / Calvinistic outlook affects the daily living of an adherent, it has been my experience that when two or more Calvinists get together, they are far more likely to lament over their Arminian friend who has yet to embrace the Doctrines of Grace than they are to lament over their non-christian friend who has yet to accept Jesus. The Arminians will shrug their shoulders when their non-Christian friend becomes a Calvinist. They will not lament it (until he returns to them and tries to “reform” them) but will rejoice that he will be with them in heaven. Meanwhile, they will continue to promulgate the Good news to their lost neighbors even as their Calvinist brethren follow them down the street to tell them and their converts how they got their theology all wrong…
Just an observation…
2. Mark Tubbs
August 29, 2006
1:41 PM
All too true, Ed. All too true. As an ‘accidental Calvinist’ (I use the term with regard to my search for biblical practice in the Church, not with regard to God’s effectual call on my life) I am far too prone to engage in the behavior you outline above. Not the tagalong Calvinist perhaps, but certainly the lamenting Calvinist. You make your points with humor and grace, and it is appreciated.
On the other hand, most of the maladjusted Christians I know are unwitting Arminians. They are the folks that moan and gripe under the gentlest of God’s chastisements, and have very little reverence for the body of Christ. But that’s just my experience; it’s probably not the norm.
Tim, you only had to wait a little under two years for a response to this post!
3. GWilly
August 29, 2006
3:07 PM
Tim, Mark’s comment raises two questions of interest to me.
1)What is the longest that one of your blogs has lived so far—ie the longest amount of time from the posting until a last comment has been submitted?
2)Which of your blogs has generated the most comments?
3) an add on. Would an RSS feed enable me to see all current blogs and comments at one time? I’m amazed at how some folks seem to be contributing to several discussions at the same time, and can respond very quickly to another’s comments.
4. James
August 29, 2006
3:20 PM
I think I feel a resounding call brewing for some challies.com blog trivia!
5. Jeri
August 30, 2006
10:15 AM
Mark,
As others of Tim’s older readers could tell you, this post originally had comments which didn’t make it through one of the makeovers Tim has done to his blog! Sometimes I’ve been glad they didn’t…:) Jeri