"The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment is a truly important work-one that should be required reading not only for church leaders, but for all sober-minded laypeople as well."

John MacArthur (From the Foreword)

"If you were more discerning you’d probably buy this book. If you do read this book, you will be! This book on discernment is simple, clear, well-written and well-illustrated...

Mark Dever

Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the book, about the blog or about the author.

05/10/07
Comments (5)

Thursday Ramblings

I returned safely home from the Cleveland area yesterday evening. It is quite a long drive but one that is still faster, I would imagine, than flying since it allows me to avoid waiting in airports, the inevitable airline delays, and all the other trappings of air travel. As always, it is very good to be home. I’ll be here for another two weeks and will then head for Louisville for the New Attitude conference, though this one will be unique in that Aileen and Michaela will be traveling with me. That will mark the end of a busy spring conference schedule!

Because I have a billion emails to catch up with and many clients waiting for my attention, I can do little more than ramble today. So please bear with me. If you are one of the many people who sent me an email about homeschooling, do know that I am making my way through, attempting to read each one and to reply to it thoughtfully.

I really enjoyed The Basics Conference and would definitely recommend it to any pastor. It was another one of those conferences that just seeks to bless and serve and spoil pastors. It seemed that not a detail was overlooked. I enjoyed the fact that it featured lower-profile speakers. This may not seem like a benefit but in a sense it is. When one or more of the really big-name speakers is at a conference (guys like John Piper or John MacArthur) the atmosphere somehow changes. Or that’s how it seems to me. Baucham and Lobb and Thomas are all good speakers and gave good and challenging messages.

There is one aspect of these conferences that I find so moving. At the conference we met a couple who had volunteered to serve doing whatever needed to be done—serving coffee, serving food, cleaning tables, and so on. The husband is a lawyer who represents very high-profile clients and is surely a wealthy and important guy. And yet here he was, traveling across the continent to wait tables and to serve pastors. Where but in the church does one see this? Who but God can help a person like this seek after heavenly treasure when he could so easily be enamored with his earthly treasure. And I see this at almost every conference I attend. I always find it moving.

Changing topics, you may have noticed that I have not yet commented on the Francis Beckwith situation. This is primarily because I have little to say. To be honest, the fact that Beckwith has crossed the Tiber, so to speak, means very little to you or to me or to most Protestants. Sure he was the President of the Evangelical Theological Society, but most of us never even encounter ETS and it never intersects with our lives. So it seems to me that his return to Catholicism has been given a lot of airtime but really has very little significance to the average Christian. There is just one thing I’ll say about it. It seems to me that it is never the simple Bible teachers who convert to Catholicism. People who simply study the Bible and teach it as the Word of God very rarely find Rome attractive. But those who dive into philosophy seem to be more likely to feel themselves drawn to the intellectualism of Rome. They lose sight of the beautiful simplicity of free grace and are drawn to the “grace” of Catholicism, which is really no grace at all. This is not to say that Protestantism is inherently anti-intellectual, but that we depend on Scripture rather than the philosophical constructs of man. It is sad that Beckwith felt the call to return to Rome. I hope he is granted grace to see the error of his ways.

Finally, I am going to re-post a book review in a few moments (I first posted the review some 13 months ago). Don Piper’s 90 Minutes in Heaven continues to appear on the New York Times list of bestsellers and I’d like to post the review again, hoping to intercept Christians who are thinking of reading it. It’s a book that is clearly very popular, but one that offers a view of heaven that is seriously unbiblical.

That’s it for me today. I’ve got work to do and emails to write. I’ll try to have something more interesting to say tomorrow.

Thursday Ramblings

Comments (5) »


1. Nauvoo Pastor
May 10, 2007
11:06 AM

Tim,

I want to thank you for the postings on the Basics Conference. They were a tremendous blessing to me as a preacher and pastor. Because of my circumstances I am not able to attend conferences, so having someone there who is willing to report on them in the way that you do, gives me a chance to participate in them by proxy, so to speak.

I found the post very uplifting and encouraging.

So again, thanks and God bless.


2. Patty Knox
May 10, 2007
1:03 PM

Tim, as a former Catholic, I would like to add my thoughts to the Francis Beckwith situation. Catholicism is a most insidious religion, one that leaves many of its former followers with residual guilt and fears of “What if I’m wrong?” regarding being brought up to believe the basic tenet, ‘The Catholic Church is the ONE TRUE CHURCH.’ This is instilled all through childhood into those of us who suffered our way through 8 (elementary & middle/junior high) to 12 (high school) years of Catholic gradeschool. The very real threat of hellfire for eternity is the price we are told we will pay for leaving Mother Church. Not only that, but although I have converted to being a Protestant for more than twenty years, my mother STILL tugs on my heartstrings and pleads with her eyes when she tells me that she is still praying for my soul, because all good Catholics know that I am heading straight for hell because I am NOT Catholic. Such is the Roman control factor. For good measure, she adds in with great subtlety by quoting the commandment, ‘Honor thy father and thy mother’ that I am in violation by virtue of the fact that I abandoned the religion with which she raised me. And so, it is possible that Beckwith is not captivated with the intellectualism of Catholicism (Protestant thought, to my mind, is intellectually superior), but rather the emotional, the guilt. Also, do not underestimate, either, the power of the ritual, the pageantry, the ‘we were here first’ argument (the same argument which gave us “Peter was the first Pope of the Catholic Church” and we all know that a pope’s chief virtue is infallibility…). Catholicism had a monopoly on Christianity until Martin Luther expressed a few thoughts on a certain church door. The thanks he got was excommunication; not what he had hoped. Ever after, Catholics have prided themselves for being on the winning team. And many former Catholics in their later years and/or on their deathbed have caved in, ‘hedging their bets’ as it were. Or their parents, on their own deathbed, have elicited a last wish to the same effect, and their lapsed Catholic adult child will make them a final promise to return to Mother Church before it is too late to save his/her soul. Ah, the power of Catholic guilt! No Jewish mother could ever wield guilt so effectively. Our best defense is the Word of God, which intellectually trounces many Catholic theological points, rituals, practices, and endless recitations of rote prayers. May the grace of true spiritual discernment revisit Beckwith now, even as he copes with the reassuring comfort of childhood familiarity, a false comfort. It chills me to the bone to think of reverting to the Catholic church.


3. Alberto
May 11, 2007
5:45 PM

Tim,

Maybe Beckwith’s conversion doesn’t mean much to Protestants, but I think it does for many here in Southern California and those who greatly admired him. I never admired him personally and have not read his work. Just knowing he is a close friend of some professors at Biola says it all.


4. Arthur Sido
May 11, 2007
9:52 PM

This whole issue seems to be far more important to Romanists than to Protestants. You would be hard pressed to find too many laypeople or even many pastors who could identify Beckwith.


5. Greg Rittenhouse
May 12, 2007
1:06 AM

I too was at Basics 2007 and was tremendously blessed by the hospitality of the saints of Parkside, as well as the solid teaching of the three brothers I heard. I thank you for posting what you do on the Blog, it’s a blessing to those unable to have attended. As far as Beckwith, it’s a shame to see a man deceived by whatever drew him back into the Mother of Harlots. I grew up in romanism and when the Holy Spirit called me, I left, never to return again. After having studied her heresies for years, I cannot imagine any saved student of God’s Word even remotely thinking about going back. Transubstantiation is not only a doctrine of demons, it is the the most blasphemous insult to our Savior that the depraved mind could conjur up. Return to Rome? The chances of that are less likely than the pope becoming a Baptist!