Ultramatic Adjustable...Church?
I have always felt that Ultramatic, the company that sells electronic, adjustable beds, makes some of the worst commercials on television. Incidentally, it seems they also have one of the worst corporate Web sites on the Internet. For years their commercials were targeted at seniors – they had these awful ads which were supposed to be reminiscent of the “film noir” genre so popular in the past. A man hiding behind his fedora would carry on a conversation with an elderly lady and through terrible dialogue tell her the benefits of the Ultramatic bed. Then elderly spokesman Gordie Tapp would show up and tell us about the free catalogue and TV offer. You could call and receive their full-color catalogue to learn more about their product. If you purchased from them they would send you a crummy little 20” TV to watch from the comfort of your new bed.
The selling feature of the bed is that it is adjustable, so those who have trouble sleeping can now sleep in greater comfort. It was sold as a solution to all sorts of health problems. The target group for this bed was obviously seniors. Gordie Tapp’s appeal certainly would not extend beyond that age group as he is north of 80 and I doubt many people of my generation, or even the boomer generation, know who he is!
The other day I saw, for the first time, a new commercial for the Ultramatic. I was surprised to see that the commercial featured a young woman, probably about 30 years old, slinking around the bed in negligee. After extolling the virtues of the bed, listing all of its wonderful features, she finished by mentioning a contest in which the company was giving away free beds. She raised her eyebrow, mentioned the contest and said, “who knows…you might just get lucky.” She then put on her pouty lips and looked longingly into the camera. I found myself wishing for the days of the senior citizen film noir commercials! It turns out that commercial was part of a series using three or four similarly dressed ladies. I guess the company decided to change its marketing efforts, hoping to draw in a whole new generation of Ultramatic users!
I began to think about other marketing campaigns. Pepsi once called itself “The choice of the new generation,” though it turned out that the new generation still preferred Coke. I believe Pepsi has since gone through 10 or 12 mottoes and has now simplified, saying only “it’s the cola.” Other mottos I remember are “Generation next” and “The joy of Pepsi.” As the times changed, so did Pepsi, always reinventing the look of their product to keep it fresh in the minds of the target demographic. They had some of the world’s most famous celebrities endorse their product, targeting one generation after another. McDonald’s told us it was the place to go for food, folks and fun. Who knew that clogging your arteries could be fun? It also asked “did somebody say McDonalds?” and “have you had a break today?” They introduced grown-up happy meals that included a lottery ticket and have recently added a wide selection of healthy foods just to keep up with these healthier times.
The church seems to reinvent itself every few years too. Sometimes we seem to feel the need to change the songs we sing or even just the way we sing them. Other times we want to make even deeper changes – we get rid of the sermon and instead have a message. Before long the message might just be dumbed-down to a time of sharing. Elders and deacons go the way of the dinosaur, being replaced by pastoral teams and ushers. Prayer is removed because people find it boring and doctrine is replaced by felt needs. Jesus goes from being the One who saves from sin to the One who can be our best friend and help us live a happier life.
Through all of its mottos, the content Ultramatic adjustable bed has remained the same. It still has all the same health benefits, still adjusts to any number of positions and still comes with a cheap little 20 inch TV. The contents of a can of Pepsi are the same to today’s young people as they were back when it was the choice of a new generation – a generation that has grown up by now. McDonald’s, on the other hand, has changed its product many times. The past years have seen new types of meat, new oil to cook the fries in and new menu selections. While the sign on the front of the store is the same, the food is different. It may look the same, but it is clearly different.
I wonder if the church changes its product as well as its marketing. When the church seeks to reinvent itself to a new generation of unchurched people, does it just change the packaging, or does it change the content too? Have we gone from preaching a gospel of sin, condemnation and salvation to one of mistakes, sadness and comfort? Have we turned our Lord and Savior into the great big shoulder in sky, always there for us to cry on, but never condemning us, never indicting us for our sin? Have we allowed ourselves to go from being led by the Spirit to being driven by purpose?
In theory I do not think there is anything inherently evil with changing the packaging, provided it remains respectful and accurate. But if we begin to change the message to match the marketing, that is where we run into no end of problems…




Comments (7) »
1. Jeri
April 26, 2004
5:18 PM
Tim, that’s a good analogy. Many churches have changed their menus to accomodate modern tastes, and truth, even as we speak, is being phased out…I think the fear is that the public will find it too hard to chew.
2. Kyle
April 26, 2004
6:23 PM
Nice little article there.
I think you are right on, but if you are implying that changing the songs we sing at a church is bad or something well… God says “sing a new song to the Lord” about five times in the Bible. If you mean change from “deep” worship songs to watered-down-make-ya-feel-good ‘worship’ songs, then yeah, that’s not good.
3. Brett
April 26, 2004
10:37 PM
Spot on Tim! With these new ‘change-agents’ in the church today, they will always argue that they are changing the method, but not the message. If you continually change the method (package), it is only time that the message (content) will change. Just look at a packet of chips these days. The package is now twice the size of the contents and you are now left with half contents and half air! As with the church today, we need to squeeze this air out before we are left with one big packet of uselessness.
4. Tim
April 27, 2004
1:06 PM
“I think you are right on, but if you are implying that changing the songs we sing at a church is bad or something well”
I was not implying that new songs are bad. I just meant to show how the package changes - and sometimes the content. Compare the depth of the songs that are no longer in favor with the average church with those that are and you’ll see that the content of songs is no longer nearly as important as the package. We sing some pretty pathetic songs in the name of cultural relevancy while forsaking some very powerful ones.
5. apreik
May 6, 2004
10:48 AM
I agree to a point. Remember that this works both ways though. Many people are unwilling to change even in the face of truth. Peter was so stuck to his own feeling about how he should be living, that he told God no way 3x despite calling him Lord in the same sentence. (Acts 10)
I won’t go into my Schaeffer induced, arbitrary absolutes diatribe as, well it is side tracking from the issue and I am not disagreeing with Tim’s main point. I just want to point out that there is fault in being unwilling to change and adapt in relevance to a culture.
6. larry
July 29, 2007
9:03 PM
Do any of you guys or gals know who that annoying Tony guy is in the bed ads?
7. Dara
August 1, 2007
6:21 AM
I’ve also been trying to figure out who’s that goon, Tony. Is he a sleazy, retired hockey player or washed up boxer? Sheesh, he’s so creepy, especially with his yucky sexual allusions! What a turn-off he is, and I sure wouldn’t buy a bed he’s representing. Anyone know who he is? Thank you!