On this, the final day of the reFocus Conference here at Moody Bible Institute, we heard first from Henry Blackaby who is the Founder and President Emeritus of Blackaby Ministries International in Atlanta, GA.
More on that in a moment. In the day’s middle session Crawford Loritts brought a sermon on the necessity of the ministry of the Holy Spirit in the life and ministry of a pastor. Basing his sermon in Galatians 5:16-25, Pastor Loritts, with real urgency, called upon the men to turn from the plans, programs, and perspectives which have captured the minds and hearts of so much of the evangelical church, and to “walk by the Spirit”. He used an excursion to Ephesians 5:18 to drive home the point that being filled with the Spirit was not a suggestion, but a command, which needs to be controlling and continuous. While his sermon was solid in exposition—meaty with teaching on the connotations of the Greek words in his text, Loritts’ delivery was kind, authoritative, and impassioned, provoking both exuberant ” A-men’s and hushed stillness, from a group of men not naturally given to this!
The conference wraps up this evening with an address from John MacArthur. Unfortunately, my flight schedule was such that I was not able to stay for this. I am rather disappointed, but it just plain can’t be helped!
And now back to Blackaby.
He began his time with a call to understand worship as being more than music. He especially wants pastors to emphasize reading Scripture in worship and also to reclaim the pastoral prayer in which the pastor, with the rest of the congregation, gathers up a person in prayer before the Father. These two traditional aspects of the worship service have been lost in many churches and I was glad to hear his call to reclaim them.
The purpose of Blackaby’s message today, I believe, was a call to pastors to listen to God to see if he would be raising them up to use them to call this nation to repentance. He said things such as this: “If you are not clearly, unmistakably hearing from God, it is your heart that is the problem. When you test your heart, honestly and carefully, see if you are hearing regularly, constantly from God.” He looked to Luke 12:54-56 and Ezekiel 22:30-31 to challenge the men here to see America as a nation that is under judgment. He said that God is looking for men here to stand for the land. America is under the remedial judgment of God and the Lord is watching to see if the leaders of God’s people recognize the activity of God especially as he moves in judgment. Every time, biblically, God was about to judge a people, he raised up a prophet and let the prophet know what was on his heart. What was on God’s heart was always either life or death with no in-between. It is important that those of us who have been called and appointed by God to hear a word from God that he intends his people to know, that we hear and quickly go to the people of God and let them know what is on the heart of God so they can adjust their lives back to God. God is looking for men to be spiritual watchmen on the walls of the nation, to be prophetic intercessors to the nation.
This was the purpose of the message. However, the dominant portion of the message (in terms of time) was Blackaby relating stories of the success of his book Experiencing God and all the lives it has changed. I believe he did this to show how God uses faithfulness on the part of pastors (like himself) to impact the world.
So let me stop here for a moment. This is what I am struggling with when it comes to this particular conference. On Tuesday the three keynote speakers were Voddie Baucham, Flip Flippen and John Piper. The message proclaimed by Baucham and Piper was radically different, opposite even, to the message shared by Flippen. Today we begin our day with Henry Blackaby and end the day with John MacArthur. And again, these men would be polar opposites when it comes to an issue as critical as authority, of sola scriptura. This is not to say that Blackaby had nothing valuable, nothing biblical, to say. Rather, it is simply to say that there seems to be a disconnect here and we have speakers coming from radically different theological perspectives; and I’m not sure how to reconcile this. Is this just a question of appreciating each of these speakers for what they do well? Is it a question of seeking to provide speakers here that will appeal to people from different traditions? Or do some people just not even see that there appears to be a huge contradiction here? I am confused about this. I just don’t quite know what to think about it.
At any rate, reFocus has wrapped up for this year. Talking to pastors as I did often over the past few days, I can see that this has been a time of real rest and refreshment for them. I trust they will head back to “real life” now recharged and hopefully refocused.





Comments (12) »
1. Scott
May 21, 2009
9:08 PM
Thanks for the reports and the insight, Tim.
Tim said; “I am confused about this. I just don’t quite know what to think about it.”
Like you I’m confused also. I hope you or someone else will shed some light on this issue very soon.
Thanks,
Scott
2. Tom Hardy
May 21, 2009
9:18 PM
Tim
I can see why you were confused by the contrasting theological positions held by the speakers at this event. Sounds to me like ecumenicalism is rearing its (ugly?) head again.
I am actually surprised that a person such as John MacArthur would speak at the same event as Blackaby. If I didn’t know better it would seem that MacArthur is condoning ecumenicalism. But from what I know about MacArthur that is very unlikely.
3. JT
May 21, 2009
11:30 PM
I don’t think I would label it as ecumenism. In relation to Blackably, he seems like a solid guy who loves the gospel from what I’ve read from him. Is there anything that would cause separation theologically? It doesn’t seem likely.
Flippen on the other hand is interesting and I think Moody having him is part of the ever growing confusion in the Christian Psychology arena.
Thanks for the posts. I know which sessions I’ll want to listen to. Voddie and Piper for sure!
JT
http://redeemingriches.wordpress.com
4. Terry Stauffer
May 22, 2009
12:10 AM
Thank you for blogging this conference, Tim.
I understand your confusion. I’ve had the same confusion in years past attending our association’s national conferences. One year we would get good biblical preaching from a fine theologian/pastor, and the next year we would get wishy-washy stuff - sort of your experience in slow motion.
I talked to one leader and he said that they were trying to keep two “camps” happy in our association.
By the way, we had Henry Blackaby one year, and I wasn’t impressed. He was way too subjective.
5. Champ Rhodes
May 22, 2009
12:22 AM
“And again, these men would be polar opposites when it comes to an issue as critical as authority, of sola scriptura.”
Would Dr. MacArthur say this? Flippen seems out of place at this conference, or any for pastors, but one must place a certain measure of trust in (fallen) leadership. Having cessationists and those who believe “God speaks today” at the same conference is a powerful way to show unity, especially since there are so many who differ on this matter in the body of Christ. Piper and MacArthur don’t even agree on this issue.
6. Heather
May 22, 2009
8:03 AM
I would say it’s one small way of helping beleivers to continue to examine and teach the Word in humility, never believing they have all the right answers.
7. Willy Wheeler
May 22, 2009
10:23 AM
I’m confused too.
Is this sort of like Bill O’Reilly’s motto of “we report, you decide?” We’ll just get several differing perspectives on the same platform, arms linked while teaching things that are not consistent between them. Are we to conclude that what you believe in the matter is really not very important, after all these are all respected men - see, they’re sharing the stage and speaking with the same authority? Sort of a ‘something for everyone’ approach.
Confusing, perhaps even discouraging. Maybe truth really isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. Maybe Jude got it wrong (not) - but what is faithfulness to Christ and brotherly love to look like in such a setting where teachers link arms without confronting error and inconsistency? Is this iron sharpening iron?
Give me the Larry King setting any day, at least then it is openly acknowledged that the differing views are inconsistent and often entirely irreconcileable - then the truth can be contended for.
8. DaddySapp
May 22, 2009
2:10 PM
I think the opposite polls Tim is talking about (TIm? you there?) is not ecuminism. There were not clerics from other faiths or what have you. The problem, at least with Blackaby vs. MacArthur, is Sola Scriptura.
Do you believe that God is leading us by experiences that we have or by his Word. If you believe in extra-bilical experience then of course you see nothing wrong with Blackaby’s notions of hearing a voice then going down rabbit trails and calling it “God’s will”. I have been through the training book with a group and only saw gnosticism including a sort of chopping down of Christ by claiming that Jesus Himself needed to ‘find out’ what God was doing and join Him in His work. Is not Jesus fully God and from eternity known the plan the Trinity had laid out?
Also, Moody himself was a pragmatist at best and a marketeer (he often referred to himself as ‘God’s salesman’) at worst and that mixed bag of theology has always been present at the Bible Institue so the Sola’s that we hold to are probably of no importance there.
Enough said. Perhaps they should read a book on Spritual Discernment by a rather well known author/blogger. I think his name is Tim? : )
God’s Blessings
9. Nord
May 22, 2009
3:37 PM
I’m not sure why some of you are surprised at MacArthur speaking at Moody. He was a member of the board there for a number of years and Moody Press publishes his commentaries. He has had an ongoing relationship with that school for a long time, and has spoken there a lot over the years. This was not Piper’s first time to speak there either.
10. Champ Rhodes
May 22, 2009
6:30 PM
Daddy Sapp,
In reference to your comment: “If you believe in extra-bilical experience then of course you see nothing wrong with Blackaby’s notions of hearing a voice then going down rabbit trails and calling it “God’s will”. ”
What was the church in Antioch doing in Acts 13:2? Would you call that a “rabbit trail and calling it God’s will”? It’s safe to say Paul had “sola scriptura” in mind, even by this time, don’t you think?
11. PRW
May 23, 2009
7:45 PM
Moody was a great conference. Flippen was out of place, that was obvious to all who were there. The other speakers were all sound Bible expositors. It is a great reminder that the Body of Christ is made up of a lot of different types of people who may have different cultural backgrounds and may not always agree on everything. Instead of making so much of the differences, rejoice in the Word of God and the common Savior that brought all these godly men together. I would recommend the naysayers who have posted attend the conference with an open heart to hear from God.
12. Tom Hardy
May 23, 2009
7:48 PM
Champ Rhodes said: “What was the church in Antioch doing in Acts 13:2? Would you call that a “rabbit trail and calling it God’s will”? It’s safe to say Paul had “sola scriptura” in mind, even by this time, don’t you think?”
I thought of commenting dirrectly to that quote, but I thought I might be misunderstanding what you are saying.
Can you elaborate on this a little more?
Are you saying that you believe Acts 13:2, contradicts sola scriptura?