The conference is now already more than half finished. We have only three general sessions and two panel sessions remaining. We will still hear from John Piper, C.J. Mahaney and John MacArthur.
I just shared a nice dinner with Josh Harris at that same restaurant I went to at lunch that most other people have not yet discovered. This is not to say that he and I shared a plate of food, but that he and I (and my buddy Paul) sat in an establishment that dispenses food and eventually at least some of us ate the food served by that establishment. I enjoyed meeting Josh, with whom I had only had a relationship via email and web sites (and, of course, I’ve read one or two of his books). He is clearly a humble, godly, teachable guy. Having sat with him and talked to him, even if only for a while, I can see that C.J. was obviously correct in his assessment of Josh and that he has left the church he began in very good hands.
This evening we will hear John Piper speak on “Why Expositional Preaching is Particularly Glorifying to God.” First, though, C.J. introduced the books we received tonight. They include a paperback copy of the ESV, God Is The Gospel by John Piper and Counted Righteous in Christ, also by John Piper.
Tonight’s message will be, to the best of Piper’s ability, a portrayal of the glory of God. It will be composed of four sections. He longs for this conference to summon into being a particular kind of preacher.
Section 1 - Reflections on the kind of preaching he prays God will raise up in these days - preaching that is aware of the glory of God
He quoted Whitefield at length as he reflected on his longing for men to preach the Word. Here is what Whitefield wanted of those who would become preachers of the Word: They were to be mighty in the scriputures; aglow with the truths of the doctrines of grace; dead to self; willing to labor and suffer; indifferent to the accolades of man; broken to sin; dominated by a sense of the greatness and majesty and the holiness of God. He believed that preaching was heralding the Word of God from that kind of heart. Preaching is not talk, teaching, discussion, but the heralding of a message permeated by a sense of God’s holiness and majesty. It can be any topic, but that topic must be taken into the blazing center of the holiness of God in the Word of God. In the last century, the man who embodied this best was Martyn Lloyd-Jones.
Where will the weight of God’s glory be felt if not in the preaching of the Word? If not from the man in the pulpit, where? God planned for His Son to be crucified and for hell to be terrible so we would have the clearest witnesses possible to what is at stake when the pastor preaches. What makes preaching seriousness is that the mantle of preaching is soaked in the blood of Jesus and singed in the fire of hell.
What is tragic is that many evangelical voices today diminish the horror the cross and the horror of hell. The cross is stripped of its power to bear punishment that is coming. Oh, that God would raise a generation that would see that the world is not overrun with a sense of God’s seriousness! Earnestness is rare these days. Today, the joy of millions of Christians is paper-thin. By the millions, people, including pastors, are amusing themselves to death with what our culture calls entertainment while leaders of world religion write letters to the West condemning it and all Christian influence. Yet even in this age, people are telling pastors to lighten up, to get funny, to be amusing. To this John Piper wants to say, “where is the Spirit of Jesus?” How are people denying themselves and taking up Christ’s cross? How are they losing their lives for Him? How are they rencouncing possessions and hating family for the sake of being His disciple? How are they leaving their dead and following Him?
Section 2 - What you believe about the glory of God?
What you believe about the necessity and nature of preaching is governed by your sense of the glory of God and how you believe people awaken to it. From the beginning to end of the Bible, nothing is more ultimate in the mind and heart of God than the glory of God, the beauty of God, the radiance of his perfections. That is the ultimate allegience and commitment in the mind and heart of God. Everywhere you look, without exception, every place God makes explicit the ultimate reason for what He is doing what He is doing is for His glory. We are predestined for His glory, created for His glory, elected for His glory, saved from Egypt for His glory, rescued from the exile for His glory, He sent Christ so the gentiles would praise Him for His glory, we are to eat and drink and do everything to His glory, Christ will return so the redeemed will marvel at His glory. The mission of the church, therefore, is to declare His glory to the nations.
Nothing affects preaching more deeply than to be struck almost speechless (almost!) by the passion of God for the glory of God. What is clear from the range of biblical revelation is that God’s ultimate allegiance is to know Himself perfectly and love Himself infinitely and then to share that with His people.
From all eternity the always-perfect God has known and loved Himself perfectly. He has eternally seen His beauty reflected back to Him in His Son and has savored His beauty. He has no needs for He has no imperfections. He has no inclinations to evil because He has no tendencies to do wrong. He is the holiest and happiest being that is or can be conceived. Knowing and enjoying His glory is the reason He created the world. He would bring us to know and enjoy Him the way He knows and enjoys Himself. This knowledge and joy can become our knowledge and our joy (see John 17:26). God’s love is displayed in allowing us to know and enjoy Him in this way. It is God’s very nature to share the knowledge He has of Himself and the joy He has in Himself, though it cost Him His Son. God’s aim to display His glory and my delight in that glory are in perfect harmony. God is glorified by being known and so enjoyed that our lives are transformed into the kind of lives that display His infinite worth.
Jesus said two things to emphasis His role in giving us the knowledge and joy of God (see Matthew 11:27 and John 15:11). We know the Father with the knowledge of the Son. We know and enjoy the Father with the joy of the Son. Jesus has made us partakers of His own knowledge of God and His own enjoyment of God. That has got to become visible. Knowledge and joy are invisible—only God sees and know them. They will be invisible to the world until they change you. This is why Jesus said “let your light so shine that men may see your [sacrifical, radical] good deeds and give glory [not to you but] to your Father.” The challenge is so to live that men don’t glorify you for living that way.
When the glory of God is the treasure of our lives we will not lay up treasure on earth but spend them for the spread of His glory. We will not crave the praise of men. Every sin flows from a failure to treasure the glory of God above all things. Therefore, one crucial, visible way to display the truth and value of God is humble, sacrificial service of other people.
Section 3 - How do people awaken to the glory of God?
This is the goal of a pastor. He should want to so live, lead, preach, suffer that his people will rejoice at a message like this. The answer is in 2 Corinthians 3:18 - 4:6. God is the Gospel is Piper’s overflow of meditation on these verses. These verses show that people are changed the way and at the speed that God wants them to change. Far too many people abandon these verses for a new technique. They may produce change, but it may not be the change that God wants in His people. The job of the pastor is to make the glory of God seen so that people are changed.
How does this happen? See verses 3-6. In verse three we see that there are people who will never see. A pastor cannot allow failure with these people to change his method! The gospel is a gospel of the glory of Christ. We behold the glory of the Lord most clearly and most crucially in the gospel. This is so much so that Paul calls it the gospel of the glory of Christ. Here is why this is so important for preaching: the gospel is a message. It is words, sentences, proclamation. Here is the paradox: we must see glory by hearing what comes from the mouth of the preacher. You see with your ears! Your people see with their ears!
In Samuel’s day there was a famine of seeing and savoring the glory of God. God raised up Samuel. But in 1 Samuel 3:21 God revealed Himself through the Word. He appeared by the Word of the Lord.
The way you see glory today in this dispensation between the first and second coming is by hearing the gospel. Faith comes by hearing and hearing from the Word of Christ because through the Word of Christ, Christ appears. And what appears is glory—the glory of the cross. The glory of the incarnation. That is the job of the pastor.
Section 4 - How does this relate to “expository exultation” (Piper’s definition of preaching)?
If it is the purpose of God to display His glory in the world, and if come to know and enjoy it by beholding it, and if we behold it best in the gospel, and if the gospel is proclamation, then preaching is absolutely essential. It is heralding the gospel and the glory of Christ in the gospel. This is our central job.
Expository - This is necessary because the gospel comes in word. Here are five essential components of the gospel. 1) The gospel is a message about historical events—the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. 2) The gospel is a message about what those events achieved. For example, the payment for our sins, the completion of perfect obedience, the removal of the wrath of God, the installation of King Jesus, the destruction of death. These all beg for exposition. 3) The gospel is a message about the transfer of the achievements to particular persons. How this happens is the gospel. If this happens through works, there is no gospel. Only by faith are we grafted into Christ. 4) The gospel is the message about the good things that are now true about us because the achievement has been applied to us. For example, God is now only merciful to you and not wrathful (propitiation), you are now counted righteous in Christ (justification), etc. 5) The gospel is a message about the glorious God Himself as our final, eternal, all-satisfying treasure. Even gospel-loving pastors tend to stop at number four and this is why Piper wrote God is the Gospel.
Woe to the preacher who does this without exultation.
Exultation - The face and tone and life and demeanor, if dull or downcast, betrays the value of the gospel. If you do not value the gospel, you perish, no matter how many right thoughts you think. When he defines preaching as expository exultation, he means two wings on a plane. When one wing falls off, the plane crashes.
His prayer is that God may be pleased to raise up, here, preachers whose exposition of Bible texts is worthy of the truth of the Bible and whose exultation over it is worthy of the glory of God revealed in the texts of the Scripture.
Piper than led in prayer and, after singing “I Will Glory in My Redeemer,” we were dismissed until the evening’s final session, a panel session.






Comments (37) »
1. Angie
April 27, 2006
9:42 PM
Tim,
Wow! Thanks for such good notes. What a wonderful conference that is glorifying to God. You have done a great job. Thanks.
2. JD
April 27, 2006
9:58 PM
Wow! Praise God!
3. JD
April 27, 2006
9:59 PM
I didn’t read the first comment, but now I realize it started with “wow” also.
Indeed.
4. donsands
April 27, 2006
10:19 PM
Magnificient. Thank you so much for taking the time to post this. All glory to Christ our Lord.
5. Robert
April 27, 2006
10:23 PM
Wow.
Can I just say………….Wow.
One note of humor for those who read Piper a lot. When Tim writes:
“Tonight’s message will be, to the best of Piper’s ability, a portrayal of the glory of God.”
Yeah, he has a little ability at that. :-)
To God Alone be the glory.
6. angie
April 27, 2006
10:38 PM
Amen, Robert.
7. Josh
April 27, 2006
10:47 PM
Praise God for the work being done there. May He bring glory to Himself by edifying the many men gathered. May local churches be strengthened, encouraged and better-equipped because of the work being done there. May our Lord be pleased to raise us up to serve Him more diligently until that day when our faith will be sight.
8. Matt C.
April 27, 2006
10:56 PM
Thanks for the summary Tim. I was unable, as usual, to write fast enough to keep up with John. It was awesome though - I will be very happy to have him back in Minnesota after his stay in England.
BTW: Where is this restaraunt of yours? Seriously. My dinner was Subway [again] tonight…
9. Phil
April 27, 2006
11:23 PM
Amazing message… It truly did convict and challenge me.
10. Tom
April 27, 2006
11:26 PM
I liked Ligon’s comment about wondering if he’d ever preached as Piper described it. I think the same as he - must be my PCA blood.
Great sessions from all presenters and great singing - almost like heaven.
11. Brad Williams
April 27, 2006
11:35 PM
I am worn out after tonight’s services. The intensity of tonight’s service was as good for my soul as anything I can imagine. As a pastor, I was so grateful for Pastor John Piper’s words. They were savory.
12. Todd Cheney
April 28, 2006
12:03 AM
Tim,
Much like your blogging at the Shepherd’s Conf., your summary is helpful for those who were not in attendance tonight.
However, I might add that tonight was one of those rare exetential moments where the presence of the Holy Spirit was thoroughly manifest during Piper’s preaching (not that this isn’t true when he is preaching at Bethlehem Bapt.). His thesis - the weightiness of preaching the Gospel - was intrinsically felt by the brothers in attendance. The brothers sitting around me were conspiciously silent after our singing. That, I believe, was the proper applicatory response we should have as we consider what God has called us to in our sphere of preaching and teaching.
I am eager with anticipation to hear MacArthur exhort us to be faithful to what Piper represented to us tonight.
Blessings,
Todd Cheney
13. James
April 28, 2006
12:26 AM
Wow..what can I say.
Even from your notes, the weightiness of the charge comes through. Oh may all our pastors and their congregations plead with our Father in heaven to hear, see, and glorify Him in all preaching!
14. Andrew Lindsey
April 28, 2006
12:58 AM
That Piper sermon was so intense- I compare it to what it must feel like to live through a catastrophic earthquake. Everything that can be shaken was shaken, so that only that which cannot be shaken remains. I know what Ligon Duncan means when he said (to the affect of), ‘after that sermon, I’m wondering if I’ve ever really even preached before.’ I’m sure that after tonight, I’ll be more diligent to pray for my elders. As I said to my pastor after the sermon, “that deeply convicted me, and I’m not even a pastor.”
15. Jim Cress
April 28, 2006
2:16 AM
Your description of Prophet Piper’s annointed message only makes not being there at TFTG more painful. And yet deeper than my grief over not being there is the gratitude and joy over my brothers who were so blessed to actually be in the room where the Spirit and Power and Glory of God seems to have been palpable. Thank you again so much Tim for your tremendous efforts in ministering to those of us who are not there with you.
BTW, is this going to available on video (DVD)?
16. Adrian Warnock
April 28, 2006
7:14 AM
By reading this and other bloggers posts (which I am linking to over at my place!) it almost feels like I am there. A great day for the gospel!
17. Bo
April 28, 2006
8:18 AM
Hey Tim,
Is the restaurant where you have been eating called Wick’s Pizza? Their pizza is incredible!! I live in Louisville, and when you mentioned the pizza, that was the FIRST place I thought of.
18. Paytonmom
April 28, 2006
8:22 AM
Thank you so much for live blogging this event. My hubby is there with some other guys from our church.
My hubby promised to let me see all the notes. However, it has been wonderful to read your blog to help me pray that God will work mightily in all the men attending.
This morning I am struck with awe at what a Glorious God we serve and how He uses His servants. Thank you for your ministry!!
19. Steve Camp
April 28, 2006
8:32 AM
I was wanting to ask a question of those who have been there at the conference (for I was unable to attend though wanted to greatly).
Though some good thoughts have been shared by these dear men, it doesn’t seem that any of them have preached expositionally from the Word of God yet. Each of these men are fine expositors in their own right… it just seemed a bit odd—am I missing something here?
I say that not critically, but have noticed so far, contrary to the Shepherd’s Conference, that there doesn’t seem to be a focus where the messages are preachments from the Scriptures. No matter how gripping or profound their thoughts might be, there is no substitute for the Word of God being proclaimed; and the text of Scripture being exposited… amen?
In saying that, I am confident that my friend , John MacArthur, will give the text — he always preaches the Word without fail.
I am looking forward to getting the DVD’s or MP3 downloads.
Thank you for your kind insight,
Steve
2 Tim. 3:16-17
20. Brian Thornton
April 28, 2006
9:20 AM
Steve,
As one who greatly respects your work and ministry for Christ, I must sadly say that I am disappointed by your comments here. What benefit is derived by comparing this conference to another in the way that you have? Are believers doing something wrong in EVERY instance where they get together but are NOT expositing Scripture?
This conference does not constitute a gathering for local corporate worship, does it? Should we treat it as such, or make distinctions based on the activities that take place if they differ from what should be taking place in a corporate gathering of a local church, or if they differ from what we have seen at another conference?
In response to your comments on the absence of any expository preaching at this conference, I must ask the question, how and when do we determine that the activities being put forth are wrong or not beneficial, or actually detrimental to the cause of Christ? Should EVERY event at a conference like this (or Shepherd’s) be an exposition of Scripture? If not, WHY? Where should the line be drawn? Were there any events/sessions at the Shepherd’s Conference where expository preaching was NOT done? How about the panel discussions, or the different classes given during the week? If ANY of those were not expository in nature, was it wrong to let them take place? If not, why or why not?
I guess I am trying to ask a question(s) more than I am trying to say something. What are the guidelines one should use when planning a conference such as this?
With much respect for you, Steve, I must disagree with the distinctions you have made in your comments and questions about this conference.
As I recall Sproul stating at the Ligonier Conference last year in repsonse to those who would get upset by the applause that was taking place after different speakers or performers were done, “This is NOT a church service, and shouldn’t be held up as such.”
Thank you, Steve - and others - for allowing me to rant. Now, Steve, go easy on me…
21. Tracie
April 28, 2006
10:17 AM
With regard to Steve’s comment (#19, above) - unless I misunderstand the term “expository teaching” (and I well may), didn’t Mark Dever do that on Wednesday night? I had the privilege of being able to personally witness just a bit of T4G by tagging along with my husband that first night. While I was standing in the hallway listening in as best I could, Mark Dever walked those in attendance through the teaching given by Paul in 1 Corinthians 4 and what that means for pastors (and well summarized in Tim’s blog). That’s the only session that I have any first-hand experience of. Thanks to anyone who cares to educate me regarding any misunderstandings I may have! I greatly appreciate the many wise and discerning posters here.
22. cozart
April 28, 2006
10:29 AM
Tim,
Do you happen to remember (if he even mentioned it) where Piper got the Whitefield quote(s)?
23. Jim Cress
April 28, 2006
10:31 AM
Regarding Steve Camp’s comments, none of the men of God who have spoken at TFTG would ever put “their thoughts” on the level with “God’s thoughts”. Just as is true in any of the seminaries we have attended, including The Master’s Seminary, courses are taught on homiletics, original languages, current issues facing the church, etc.
Every man who has spoken at TFTG is known for his unquestionable passion for God and His Glory, his appetite and ability to exegete and “preach the word”, and for an annointing to call and equip other men (and women) to live Soli Deo Gloria.
Each of these men who have spoken at TFTG would also be quick to tell anyone, (borrowing from a quote by Matsuo Basho),
“Do not seek to merely follow in the footsteps of men of old; Rather, SEEK WHAT THEY SOUGHT.”
Rejoicing in Aslan being on the move,
Jim Cress
SOULCAREMAN@AOL.COM
24. Steve Camp
April 28, 2006
10:58 AM
Tracie,
thank you for your thoughts. I would consider Mark’s message more devotional than expositional. For example, verses 1-7 of 1 Cor. 4 are not about a cross centered message, but being servants of Christ compared to the sectarianism that was taking place in chapter three that Paul was warning about. 2 Cor. 4:1-7 is a powerful text that really focuses on the cross-centered message.
I wholeheartedly agree with Mark’s words and thoughts (through Tim’s posting); its just the text he chose in 1 Cor. 4 doesn’t primarily deal with what he was asserting.
Jim,
I know that these dear brothers would never think nor place their own words above the Word of God. Please forgive me if that is what you took from my question. I have deep respect for each of these men. Knowing most of these men and that each of them place such a high premium on expository preaching and the supremacy of the Word of God, I was wondering why it seemed none of them so far had preached expositionally? (I am ordering all the messages).
Tim is very good with his notes and summations; so when those notes do not point to exposition of the Scriptures (as the Shepherd’s Conference notes did), I thought I would just ask the obvious…
I know that it is so easy for any of us to share our own lists of concerns, burdens about the faith, issues facing ministry, cultural trends, etc. But Paul’s admonition to Timothy involved none of that. It was to “Preach the Word in season and out of season.”
Thank you both for your helpful thoughts,
Steve
2 Tim. 4:1-5
25. Steve Camp
April 28, 2006
11:24 AM
Brian:
I appreciate you brother.
A few quick thoughts:
-I am not comparing Shepherd’s Conference with this one for it is virtually the same men that were at both and are basically the same thing. I am only comparing what they were saying.
-Everytime a man is assigned a topic to preach, he should preach the Word AND he should preach it expositionally church service or not. The fact that each of these brothers affirms expositional preaching with such ferver, it surprised me that it seemingly was not being done. (I say seemingly for I have not heard the actual messages).
-I am only asking the question (no other motive). I think that is still a good thing to do… ask questions which I commend you for doing as well.
-I have no doubt that MacArthur (and I haven’t even seen Tim’s notes yet) preached the Word. You can always count on John to deliver the text wherever he is ministering. He is a dying breed.
Hope that helps clarify and thank you for your questions as well.
“Going easy on my brother, :-)”
Steve
26. Ron Harvey
April 28, 2006
11:26 AM
Dude,
You have done such a great job to keep us informed. Many “kudos” for doing so. May your tribe increase!
27. James
April 28, 2006
11:35 AM
Steve does bring up an interesting point.
Would the preaching be more along the lines of topical preaching as opposed to straight exposition?
28. Jeremiah
April 28, 2006
12:31 PM
“Here is what Whitefield wanted of those who would become preachers of the Word: They were to be mighty in the scriputures; aglow with the truths of the doctrines of grace; dead to self; willing to labor and suffer; indifferent to the accolades of man; broken to sin; dominated by a sense of the greatness and majesty and the holiness of God.”
How convicting this is. Thanks Tim- this is what I needed to read today.
Jeremiah
29. JGray
April 28, 2006
3:34 PM
The goal of this was a discussion of ministry, preaching, and the gospel. The format was to have each man address different issues in a way to enlighten and encourage other pastors from their experience and insight.
This was not a church service, and thus the exposition of God’s Word was not required. It was a conference to discuss theological topics as well as practical ones, and though it could be accomplished through expository sermons, it could also be accomplished through exhortations in a topical format and through panel discussions…and it was.
30. Jason
April 28, 2006
10:16 PM
Did anyone catch the details of what Piper prays before he goes up to speak?
A - Admit I can do nothing
P - Pray for anointing help
T
A
T - Thanks
He said it fast and I missed some of it. He even gave Scriptures. He said this during the panel.
Thanks,
Jason
31. Donny
April 28, 2006
10:28 PM
Piper brought me to tears in his final prayer.
I idea of exultation in my speaking humbled me. I can easily study and explain a text (well, maybe not that easily), however, to allow that text to engage my heart so that my expression of the Gospel is obvious. Wow, my heart is hard and callous and God swung Piper like a sledge hammer.
32. Scott Lamb
April 28, 2006
11:16 PM
Jason,
The APTAT is in his book onpreaching, and also can be found at desiringgod.org
33. Carla
April 28, 2006
11:19 PM
Just an fyi - this message is now available on CD here:
Why Expositional Preaching is Particularly Glorifying to God - by John Piper
34. Dave
April 28, 2006
11:22 PM
Jason,
Here is the short version. There is a wonderful article explaining it on desiringgod.org if you search under APTAT. This has served me wonderfully for a couple years now, I keep the article in my PDA for whenever I lack faith to step out in faith.
Dave
A - Admit you can do nothing
P - Pray
T - Trust a specific promise of God from scripture
A - Act, do what you are to do
T - Thank God for the result
35. Scotty Karber
April 29, 2006
10:21 AM
I returned from the conference late last night and am just reading the comments. Regarding the non-expositional nature of the addresses it should be noted that several times attention was called to the fact that the speakers were asked to give “addresses” and not sermons. They were asked to deal with topics rather than texts. Mark Dever noted in his that with his topic he was able to address it expositionally — but the emphasis of the planners was made clear in this regard.
36. tawana
April 29, 2006
3:58 PM
Tim,
Thank you so much for this information about the conference! I was there…but a few floors above you, praying for you all and especially my husband. God was truly glorified in this conference. I certainly have gotten a flavor from what my husband shared with me and the comments you have posted. I can not wait to read all your posts…and hear the messages on CD. May God bring true revival in the hearts of the ministers who were there and strengthen them for the call on their lives.
Fix your eyes…and walk by faith!
37. stephen
April 29, 2006
4:25 PM
“In saying that, I am confident that my friend , John MacArthur, will give the text — he always preaches the Word without fail”
actually, mcarthur didnt preach from a text at all. we read through i theselonians 1 and 2 ( i think)and he said ” i dont think i need to say anymore about that”
he then went on giving anecdotes, illustrations, and autobiographical sketches which were very edifying and helpful.
-stephen