I had a rather long and interesting (but good!) lunch today. A little while ago I read on Thabiti Anyabwile’s blog that he never actually orders at restaurants anymore, but instead asks the server to just get something he or she thinks Thabiti would like. I ate today at an Italian place and really didn’t know what to order. So I just told the server to surprise me (but not with anything containing fish). It was only later that I learned this was only her third day on the job. But no matter, she ordered me something quite tasty and spaghetti-like, though I didn’t learn what it was. There were twenty or thirty of us eating together in that restaurant so it took some time for the food to be ready. When it showed up I slurped down my food (which is one of the advantages of eating Italian—it’s highly slurpable), I raced back to the convention center and then settled back in here for the session led by R.C. Sproul (though first we sang “I Will Glory in My Redeemer”). And I’m glad I made it back as it was easily one of the most powerful sermons I’ve ever heard.
Sproul discussed what it means that Jesus was cursed by God. Though Sproul has studied the subject for over fifty years, he still feels like he is barely scratching the surface of the meaning and significance of the cross of Christ. The cross is explained through many images and many metaphors to show that it is multi-faceted. It is woven by several distinct, brightly-hued threads that together form the beautiful work of art. The New Testament uses the language of substitution, of vicarious, of satisfaction of justice, of the metaphor of the kinsmen redeemer who pays the bridal price to purchase the bride. We see the motif that speaks of ransom, the motif of victory over Satan and the powers of darkness. But there is one image, one aspect, that has receded in our day into total obscurity and it is the curse inflicted by God on His own Son.
When we think today of curse, we think of voodoo or the occult—spells, hexes, pins jabbed into dolls. Curse implies some kind of superstition. But in biblical categories there is nothing superstitious about it. The idea is deeply rooted in biblical history and we need only go to the opening chapters of Genesis to see God’s anathema, His curse, on the serpent and on the earth itself. When God gives the law He attaches to it both negative and positive sanctions. The positive is articulated in terms of the concept of blessedness. The negative is articulated in terms of a curse.
The purpose of this talk was to explore the meaning and significance of the idea of God’s divine curse. When the prophets of the Old Testament spoke the words that God had placed in their mouths, the favorite method the prophets used to express the word of God was the method called the oracle. The prophets knew of two kinds of oracle—the oracle of weal and the oracle of woe. The oracle of weal would be known by the word blessed while the oracle of doom would be known by the word woe. In contrast, in North America today we believe in a God who is capable of infinitely blessing people but utterly incapable of bringing judgment upon them.
To understand what it meant to a Jew to be cursed is to look at the famous Hebrew benediction in the Old Testament. “May the Lord bless you and keep you…” There is no better example of “synonymous parallelism” than here where the same thing is said in three different ways: bless/keep, face to shine/be gracious, life up the light of His countenance/give you His peace. So how did the Jew understand blessing? To be blessed by God is to be bathed in the glory that emanates from His face. This is what Moses begged for on the mountain and when Moses saw even just the glimpse of the back parts of God, his face shone. The Jew’s ultimate hope was just to see God’s face. The Jew begged for such blessing that he might see God’s face.
The antithesis of this blessing can be seen in vivid contrast to the benediction. It would be the supreme malediction and would go something like this: “May the Lord curse you and abandon you. May the Lord keep you in darkness and give you only judgment without grace. May the Lord turn His back upon you and remove His peace from you forever.”
On the Day of Atonement there are several animals involved in the ritual. The High Priest, before he enters the Holy of Holies, involves two animals, one of which is killed and the other which survives. The one is killed and its blood is sprinkled on the mercy seat. But there is no power in this blood except that it points forward to the blood of the Lamb. What is symbolized is an act of propitiation—a vertical transaction. The other animal is not killed but becomes the object of imputation where the priest now lays his hands on its back, symbolically indicating the transfer or imputation of the guilt of the people to the goat. At the end of the ceremony, he lays his hands on the goat and drives that goat into the wilderness. He is driven outside the camp. To be driven outside the camp, outside the community, was to be driven to the place where God’s blessings did not reach. He was sent into the outer darkness; into the curse. This is expiation. In the cross not only is the Father’s justice satisfied by the atoning work of the Son, but in carrying our sins the Son removes them as far as the east is from the west. He does this by being cursed. Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law not just by being cursed for us, but by becoming a curse for us. He who is the incarnation of the glory of God now becomes the very incarnation of the divine curse.
God is too holy to even look at sin. His eyes are averted from His Son. The light of His countenance is turned off; all blessedness is removed from His Son whom He loves. And in its place is the full measure of the divine curse. All the imagery that portrays the historical event of the cross is the imagery of the curse. Jesus needed to be delivered into the hands of the gentiles so He could be crucified outside the camp so the full measure of the curse and the darkness could be visited upon Him. God adds to these details others—God turns out the light of the sun so as God turns His face, even the sun won’t shine on Calvary. Bearing the full measure of the curse Christ screams “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” Jesus did not merely feel forsaken; He was forsaken. He was utterly, totally and completely forsaken by the Father.
There is none of this to be found in the pseudo-gospels of our day. When we hear that Jesus loves us all unconditionally, it is a travesty. What pagan when he hears this does not hear that he has no need of repentance? He can continue in sin without fear knowing that all has been taken care of. There is a profound sense that God does love people even in their corruption, but they are still under his anathema. Even in this hall today there are many who are under the curse of God; who have not yet fled to the cross; who are still counting on this idea of the unconditional love of God.
When Jesus was forsaken by God, when He bore the curse, it was as if Jesus heard the words “God damn you.” This is what it means to be under the anathema of the curse. It is far worse, far more powerful, far more profound than we can know. We cannot understand this, but we know it is true. Everyone who has not been covered by the righteousness of Christ draws every breath under the curse of God. If you believe that, you will stop adding to the gospel and start preaching it with clarity and with boldness because it is the only hope we have. And it is hope enough.



Comments (15) »
1. The Postmortem
April 17, 2008
2:08 AM
“Slurpable”
Added to the list of Challiesms April 16, 2008.
2. Rachael
April 17, 2008
2:20 AM
Thank you for this post, especially for explaining animal sacrifices.
Are there verses and resources that support the idea that God doesn’t love unconditionally?
3. Stefan
April 17, 2008
2:48 AM
That must have been a riveting sermon to hear—everything from Levitical typology to a critique of religious pluralism and a call to preach the Gospel!
John Stott paints a very similar—and equally convicting—picture of the desolation of Jesus’ suffering on the Cross in his Basic Christianity.
4. donsands
April 17, 2008
7:58 AM
“Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law not just by being cursed for us, but by becoming a curse for us.”
Amazing. Jesus, the Father’s most Beloved Son, whom He loves with an eternal perfect love, gives Him up for ungodly cursed sinners, and hands Him a cup of His wrath to drink, and to drink it every drop, and even the dregs.
This wrath is what we deserve, every last drop and dreg is ours to drink, and deservedly so.
“But God …” Eph. 2:4
Thanks for posting this. It was excellent, and Dr. Sproul is such a exceptional man of God, and teacher.
5. luke
April 17, 2008
8:18 AM
Must Christ be totally forsaken to bear the sins of the world? More crucially, how was Jesus totally forsaken if the entirety of Jesus’ citation of Psalm 22 was completed in the resurrection?
Do you think there are any problems with the interaction of the Doctrine of God (specifically his immutability) and Jesus being totally forsaken by God?
Jesus was the only ransom to be paid for men, but does that necessitate his separation from God?
Just some Qs…
6. pat
April 17, 2008
9:51 AM
It does necessitate it. Jesus was MADE sin, so that we didn’t have to suffer the consequences. God cannot have sin in his presence. The only thing God could do was separate himself from the Son. What this topic makes me do is completely worship. MY sin caused this. MY sin caused the only perfect Man to be separated from His Father. MY sin was the reason for this. Then it makes me as thankful as I can be for this remedy.
7. pat
April 17, 2008
9:54 AM
All the audio for the conference can be found here: http://www.sovereigngraceministries.org/Resources/T4G.aspx
8. luke
April 17, 2008
1:30 PM
Amen! This is true, Christ sat in my sted (sp?) as the only sacrifice for MY sins. However, can we say that He was separated from God? Im not sure if the scriptures justify this, and it might end up posing a problem when it comes to use talking about the solidity of the relationship between God and Jesus. Does God change?
Also, this question may or may not be all that important, but I like thinking about it because it helps me get closer to the scriptures.
Thanks for the link…
9. Seth
April 17, 2008
2:32 PM
This was truly one of the most amazing talks I’ve heard. We recently had a sermon in our church on the fact of the Curse at the crucifixion, but this was simply amazing!
10. donsands
April 17, 2008
2:46 PM
“However, can we say that He was separated from God?”
Jesus cried to His Father to forgive those who were nailing Him to the Cross. And as He died, He cried, “Father into Your hands I commend My spirit”.
But here at the darkest hour of all time, the deepest depth of sinful filth was being judged upon the Lamb of God, who was perfect and blameless, and yet became a curse for us cursed ones, and Jesus doesn’t say Father at this time but, “My God, My God”. God’s wrath was upon Him.
As Abraham took His son to sacrifice him to the Lord up that hill, so the Ftaher gave His only begotten Son on Calavary for us, and though God stopped Abraham’s hand from slaying his son, the Father did not stay His hand from His most Beloved Son.
This is the greatest act of mercy, which nothing can compare.
The earth became dark, and Jesus was forsaken by His Father, and yet the Father was there when Jesus cried and said “Father into Your hands I come”.
11. James
April 17, 2008
3:36 PM
Luke:
I want to be careful here since I am working off my memory. Last year at the regional Ligonier Conference I attended, one of the questions during the Q&A w/ Dr Sproul was essentially the same as yours.
What Dr Sproul made clear was God did completely foresake Jesus but the Trinity was not ruptured. How that exactly works out I don’t recall but I believe that Dr. Sproul said he did not know either.
Hope that helps.
12. Duane
April 18, 2008
12:56 AM
I agree that this was possibly the most powerful sermon I have ever heard. The atmosphere in the room as R.C. spoke was indescribable. I was moved to tears as I was once again confronted with what my Lord became for me on the cross. Powerful!
13. Sam
April 18, 2008
1:53 AM
Thank you SO much for sharing the Gospel! While I did not have the chance to attend T4G, I’m thankful for all God’s saints who are saved by God’s amazing grace to come together and worshiping Him!
There is a fairly new book called the Great Exchange by Jerry Bridges & Bob Bevington that helped me understand the atonement and the sacrificial system (in OT) in the light the Gospel. I found this book to be very helpful.
14. The Postmortem
April 18, 2008
2:42 AM
I just listened to the sermon and my heart is full of gratitude to God, working through R.C. as he shows how intensely and often Scripture portrays the crucifixion. The message is a work to God and a blessing to its hearers.
15. The Postmortem
April 18, 2008
2:43 AM
I just listened to the sermon and my heart is full of gratitude to God, working through R.C. as he shows how intensely and often Scripture portrays the crucifixion. The message is a work to God and a blessing to its hearers.