"The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment is a truly important work-one that should be required reading not only for church leaders, but for all sober-minded laypeople as well."

John MacArthur (From the Foreword)

"If you were more discerning you’d probably buy this book. If you do read this book, you will be! This book on discernment is simple, clear, well-written and well-illustrated...

Mark Dever

Welcome to the online home of Tim Challies, blogger, author and web designer. My first book, "The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment," is now available everywhere.

Read about the book, about the blog or about the author.

01/31/08
Comments (10)

Overcoming Sin and Temptation (Chapter 11)

This morning we continue with our reading of John Owen’s classic Overcoming Sin and Temptation. If you’d like to know more about this reading project, you can read about it right here: Reading Classics Together. We’re into the real heart of the book now and are looking at specific instructions on how to put sin to death.

In the past few chapters we have been in the book’s second section—a section that focuses on “the nature of mortification.” In the past chapters and those to come Owen approaches the subject this way:

  1. Show what it is to mortify any sin, and that both negatively and positively, that we be not mistaken in the foundation.
  2. Give general directions for such things as without which it will be utterly impossible for anyone to get any sin truly and spiritually mortified.
  3. Draw out the particulars whereby this is to be done.

He has already shown both negatively and positively what it is to mortify a sin and has given the general directions. He is now providing a list of instructions about how to actually do the business of mortifying sin.

Summary

  1. Load your conscience with the guilt of sin
    1. Begin with generals and descend to particulars
      1. Charge your conscience with that guilt which appears in it from the rectitude and holiness of the law
      2. Bring your lust to the gospel

    2. Descend to particulars

      1. Consider the infinite patience and forbearance of God toward you in particular
      2. Consider the infinitely rich grace of God whereby you have been recovered to communion with him again
      3. Consider all of God’s gracious dealings with you

  2. Constantly long and breathe after deliverance from the power of it
  3. Consider whether the distemper is rooted in your nature and increased by your constitution

    1. Particular sinful inclinations are an outbreak of original lust in your nature
    2. Without extraordinary watchfulness, your nature will prevail against your soul
    3. For the mortification of any distemper rooted in the nature of a man, there is one expedient peculiarly suited: bringing the body into subjection
      1. The outward weakening and impairing of the body should not be looked upon as a thing good in itself
      2. The means whereby this is done should not be looked on as things that in themselves can produce true mortification of any sin

Discussion

I continue to enjoy and to profit from reading this book. When faced with sin this past week I really felt my heart stirred by some of what I learned in reading the last chapter. How could I do this sin when I know how serious it is for me to ignore the work of the Spirit as He turns my heart from it? With an awareness of how serious sin is for a believer, how could I recklessly push forward and sin against God? It is always a delight to see a book impact my life. This is especially true when the book is as infused with Scripture as this one is.

I enjoyed this week’s chapter as well. I’ll admit, though, that I was quite confused by much of the first direction—load your conscience with the guilt of sin. Despite several readings I just could not get my mind around what Owen was trying to communicate. There were parts I understood: “Persuade your conscience to hearken diligently to what the law speaks, in the name of the Lord, unto you about your lust and corruption.” And I understand his direction about looking to the gospel for further conviction of sin. But I feel like I was only scratching the surface here rather than really digging in. Hopefully your comments will bring some clarity.

Thankfully, I gained more from the rest of the chapter. I enjoyed Owen’s exhortation to “get a constant longing, breathing after deliverance from the power of sin.” “Longing, breathing, and panting after deliverance is a grace in itself, that has a mighty power to conform the soul into the likeness of the thing longed after.” And I can see from my life when I began to long after deliverance from sin. There was a time when I really was not so troubled by my sin. I may have felt some guilt from it and may have dreaded its consequences, but I did not long after deliverance. But when God, in His grace, helped me to truly desire to see my sin put away, it made such a difference to my life. “Unless you long for deliverance you shall not have it.” Those words have proven true in my life.

I also appreciated Owen’s charge that we need to rise against the first actings and conceptions of sin. His illustration was a good one. When water is restrained by dikes or levees or walls or canals it follows the course we have set for it. But when those walls crumble, the water follows its own destructive course. It overflows the banks and runs to its inevitable conclusion. And sin is much the same. We need to restrain sin and to “nip it in the bud” before it comes to full bloom in our lives (I think I’m mixing metaphors now). And this it will inevitably do if we allow it. “Rise up with all your strength against it, with no less indignation than if it had been fully accomplished what it aims at.” We do this with our help, taking measures to avoid sickness or reacting immediately at the first signs of the onset of illness. Why should we not do this with our sin?

And finally, a brief note. Is it just my lack of understanding a strange sentence structure, or is there a rather important not missing from this sentence: “The means whereby this is done—namely, by fasting and watching, and the like—should be looked on as things that in themselves, and by virtue of their own power, can produce true mortification of any sin.”

Next Week

Next Thursday we will continue by reading chapter twelve (the end is in sight!).

Your Turn

As always, I would like to know what you gained from this chapter. Please post your comments below or to write about this on your own blog (and then post a comment linking us to your thoughts). Do not feel that you need to say something exceedingly clever or profound. Simply share what stirred your heart or what gave you pause. You can also post any questions that came up. Let’s be certain that we are reading this book together. The comments on previous chapters have been very helpful and have aided my enjoyment of the book. I have every reason to believe that this week will prove the same.

Overcoming Sin and Temptation (Chapter 11)

Comments (10) »


1. Scott D. Andersen
January 31, 2008
11:11 AM

Tim,

From http://www.ccel.org/ccel/owen/mort.i.xiv.html

(2.) That the means whereby this is done, — namely, by fasting and watching, and the like, — be not looked on as things that in themselves, and by virtue of their own power, can produce true mortification of any sin;

So the answer is “yes” a “not” is missing based on this edition at CCEL. I think I read a “not” in this even though not there without even realizing. You are a close reader.

sda


2. Matt Monge
January 31, 2008
11:11 AM

I’ve only recently picked up on this reading series, but have been reading Owen on my lunch breaks. I agree with your sentiment on the ability his writing has to make the aggregious nature of sin more readily realized. It’s such a tremendous reminder of how serious a thing it is to sin against the Almighty, and how lightly I tend to take sin at times.


3. Thomas Sullivan
January 31, 2008
11:28 AM

Again we thank you Tim for giving us an opportunity to talk about this book. You asked, “I was quite confused by much of the first direction—load your conscience with the guilt of sin. Despite several readings I just could not get my mind around what Owen was trying to communicate.”

Obviously he is asking us to aim more to perceive how sin is viewed by God and His estimate of it rather than our own low estimate of sin. The reason why this takes work is that it is the very nature of sin in its blinding and darkening of the mind, to form wrong views of the guilt of it. To quote Jonathan Edwards, “The heart of man is full of sin and corruption, and that corruption is of an exceedingly darkening, blinding nature. Sin always carries a degree of darkness with it; and the more it prevails, the more it darkens and deludes the mind. — It is from hence that the knowing whether there be any wicked way in us is a difficult thing. The difficulty is not at all for want of light without us, not at all because the word of God is not plain, or the rules not clear; but it is because of the darkness within us. The light shines clear enough around us, but the fault is in our eyes; they are darkened and blinded by a pernicious distemper.”

“many men who live in ways which are not agreeable to the rules of God’s word, yet are not sensible of it; and it is a difficult thing to make them so; because the same lust that leads them into that evil way, blinds them in it. — Thus, if a man live a way of malice or envy, the more malice or envy prevails, the more will it blind his understanding to approve of it. The more a man hates his neighbour, the more will he be disposed to think that he has just cause to hate him, and that his neighbour is hateful, and deserves to be hated, and that it is not his duty to love him. So if a man live in any way of lasciviousness, the more his impure lust prevails, the more sweet and pleasant will it make the sin appear, and so the more will he be disposed and prejudiced to think there is no evil in it. So the more a man lives in a way of covetousness, or the more inordinately he desires the profits of the world, the more will he think himself excusable in so doing, and the more will he think that he has a necessity of those things, and cannot do without them. And if they be necessary, then he is excusable for eagerly desiring them.” {The Necessity of Self Examination - published 1788}


4. Scott D. Andersen
January 31, 2008
1:57 PM

Followup to this missing “not”, I checked my copy over lunch and the “not” is actually there. This is interesting as the online version at Taylor’s John Owen page does not have this and I’m using the same copy edited by Taylor and Kapic.


5. Kwame Nyarko
January 31, 2008
4:32 PM

I agree with Scott. The ‘not’ is there in the copy edited by Taylor and Kapic. Thanks Tim for your diligence and thank you Thomas for your quote concerning Owen’s first point in the chapter. After reading the first point, I personally felt, I needed a lot of time to read more and examine myself by the help of the Spirit, to see sin as the law in its “holiness, spirituality, fiery severity, inwardness, absoluteness” portrays it. As Romans 7:11-13 says “For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me. Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good. Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful” I was very reluctant moving onto the next point in the chapter because I do not tremble and cry at the thought of my sins. I need the grace of the Spirit to see Sin as God sees it. I pray for the enablement by the Spirit to have a complete Godly understanding of sin and an utter desire to kill all of our sins at all times. kan


6. Carol
January 31, 2008
4:38 PM

Thanks, all for comments!

Tim - I read and re-read that section on loading up our conscience, too. Initially, it didn’t seem as though “loading my concience with the guilt of sin” would be very effective in removing it. Initially it seemed almost as though this might foster condemnation and provide little relief for an already troubled soul bound up in the lust of the day. (That’s how it can be with me, at least).

Then, I continued to think harder and read more closely (esp. the series of entreaties on p.105): 1. Owen wrote: “Bring your lust to the gospel”
Lust: i.e., strong desire, besetting sin, natural inclination, distemper, sinful response, idol) 2. Then he writes, “not for relief, but for further conviction of its guilt… i.e., We may be craving relief, but what we need is the Gospel.
3. He follows this up with, “look on him whom you have pierced…” Thus, we end, not in guilt, but on gaving at Him, the one we have pierced.

For me, to get to the Gospel, I need, not just on the day of salvation, but every day, to recognize the seriousness of my sin, the hateful wretchedness of it, and load up my conscience with guilt. I should feel guilty. But Owen explains that we don’t feel guilty enough. That’s yet another reason I keep coming back to Owen - he lays my soul bare in an uncomfortable way that helps me - helps me to grow in the Gospel mainly, and I pray also helps me hate sin and love the Cross more every day, every lust, every lust-filled day, so every day might be a little better (not for me, but for the Lord).

Owen helps me understand that especially when I am drawn to any particular lust, loading up with the guilt of it will help my conscience - and help me change. Only then, when I load up with the guilt of it, can see the Gospel more clearly. Only then I can move from mere selfish emotionalism (or seeking relief) to the Cross, and then, by grace to change. Only then will may gaze change from myself (and my lust) to look on Him (who had no lust) and thereby be transformed.

I loved Owen’s grand series of questions and his exhortation to entertain our conscience with them on p. 105. He begins with an entreaty to consider what we have done in light of the Gospel: “What have I done? What love, what mercy, what blood, what grace have I despised and trampled on! Is this the return I make to the Father for his love, to the Son for his blood, to the Holy Ghost for his grace….etc.” and it ends with this Shall I daily grieve that Spirit whereby I am sealed to the day of redemption?” …(p. 305)

Loading our conscience with the guilt of sin is not an isolated act, not just so that we can wallow, or dig too deep into our personal sin pit; no, it doesn’t end there - it needs to be carried to the Cross. Owen show us WHY we ought to load up, and then fires questions to us to help us consider the implications of our lust, and also the implications of why we need to load up our consciences with the guilt of sin to get the cross.

We load up because:

1) We tend to feel we need relief in the midst of lust. Even in the midst of any daily lust (note that Owen often uses the word “daily” in his list of questions and discussion of it) we tend to feel as though we need love, or comfort, or sympathy, or understanding. We think we need relief when what we really need is to load up our conscience with the guilt of it.

2) What we really need in the midst of lust is the Gospel. All sin is against God - sin sent Jesus (God’s precious and treasured only son) to the Cross.

Salvation isn’t just for the day we first believed. Salvation is for every day because we need to keep believing. God already demonstrated his love. He already demonstrated mercy. He already demonstrated grace. He demonstrated all that in the Gospel. Should I believe any less the guilt of my sin today as the day I first believed - no, rather, I should believe it more today, and more tomorrow, so the Gospel looms larger over my lusts, larger over my conscience, larger over each day.

Ought we to return His great love with more sin? No, we load up, and rightfully so, because then we get not just to temporary relief, or a quick fix to “feel better” No. We get beyond relief to the Cross, to the Gospel, to the Lord Jesus Christ.

Here, then, is the mystery - we load up on the guilt of sin not for some temporary relief, but when we load our conscience up with the weight of it - it’s staggering. It’s too great a load. It’s too great a load for our conscience to bear. In fact, if it’s fully loaded, we can’t get relief, and we’re beyond needing relief. This positions the burdened believer for His Savior, for the Cross. Then, there is true and real and lasting and eternal relief.

What a paradox, and what amazing grace! Wow! What a Savior!


7. Kevin K Woo
January 31, 2008
6:04 PM

Hi folks,

When I first read:

“That the means whereby this is done, — namely, by fasting and watching, and the like, — be not looked on as things that in themselves, and by virtue of their own power, can produce true mortification of any sin;”

I did a double-take and thought a “not” was missing also. Upon reading again, I realised this sentence could be read in a couple of different ways due to it’s length. My grammar isn’t great so when I look at commas, I was taught to see them as space for breathing rather than for separation of clauses and ideas. Here’s another way the sentence can be read:

“That the means whereby this is done, — namely, by fasting and watching, and the like, — be not looked on as things that in themselves (and [therefore] by virtue of their own power [assuming they actually had any power of their own], can produce true mortification of any sin)”

This sentence is then understood as making a hypothetical point assuming fasting and watching possessed an intrinsic power of it’s own. I hope this helps y’all a bit!

Kev


8. Thomas Sullivan
February 1, 2008
2:43 AM

RE: And finally, a brief note. Is it just my lack of understanding a strange sentence structure, or is there a rather important not missing from this sentence -

Tom: > I have only be reading from the William H Goold edition (Owen’s works volume 6) - I forgot others here are reading from a paperback edition. - the error is in the paperback edition only. If you have the CD ROM edition of Owen’s works, you can search and find other passages in which he says the same thing - or near to it.

In his treatise “Of Temptation” he wrote,

“The most vigorous actings, by prayer, fasting, and other such means, against that particular lust, corruption, temptation, wherewith you are exercised and have to do. This will not avail you if, in the meantime, there be neglects on other accounts.”

If any here want to go on and study other works of Owen, I just listened to a course of Owen - 8 lectures taught by Derek Thomas - which are here http://spurgeon.wordpress.com/2007/06/29/john-owen-derek-thomas

The last two lectures are on sanctification and are worth hearing.


9. Ben G
February 2, 2008
9:21 PM

Hi all, thanks for the comments!

I found this to be a great “nuts and bolts” chapter for the means of the mortification of sin. Owen gets us to examine our hearts, and actually DO something about our sin by “loading our consciences” with the guilt of sin. I, like Tim, have found this to be the case in my life, that I can abide sin without feeling the weight of it. Then, by the grace of God (but usually all of the sudden) WHAMMO! I’m hit with the guilt. My fight against sin is (could be?) much more effective if I can be more often reminded of the seriousness of it - both the generals and the specifics. I need to “load the conscience” up with the weight of sin, so that am able to hate it!

Another part that caught me was this one: “Know that he that dares to dally with occasions of sin will dare to sin.” There are circumstances (and sometimes people!) that bring us closer to sin’s doorstep. If we are serious about killing the sin, we need to avoid the circumstances, and manage our time with those people that lead us to temptation.

May God continue to convict us of our sin so that we can by the Spirit mortify it!


10. Justin Keller
February 5, 2008
4:16 PM

Owen’s prose can be dense, but this is the nutshell version of what I have taken away from the last two chapters so far: I need to hate sin. What Owen is trying to do is give me biblically rooted tools to do just that. I need to feel the weight of sin. If only I scratched the surface the guilt that I incur, the degree of wrath I earn, the grief and pain that I inflict… In other words, if only I began to see sin the way our triune Creator-Redeemer sees sin, if only I could make a start down that path, then I might despise it as I ought. And therefore I might not only not glibly and freely choose to sin, I might actually begin to flee it.

The reality is that I love sin too much and righteousness too little. And all too often my thoughts, attitudes, and actions reflect that reality.

And as a result, the cross is not nearly as precious too me as it ought to be.