Over the past few years, Aileen and I have continually returned to the question of why so many young people these days seem unwilling or unable to grow up. It is a question that has confused us, especially as we look to many of the young people we know. There was a time when young people seemed eager to grow up, to mature, and to head out into the world to make their mark on it. Or that is how we remember it (we were, after all, married at 21 and parents by 23). But those people now seem to be the exception more than the rule. More and more, it seems, young people (and increasingly older young people) are choosing to stay home, to stay in colleges, to earn a second or third or fourth degree. They are, it seems, refusing to grow up.
To help our thinking on this issue, I’ve been reading The Death of the Grown-up, a fascinating book by Diana West and one that seeks to answer the question of “Where have all the grown-ups gone?” The book’s subtitle is “How America’s Arrested Development is Bringing Down Western Civilization.” I suppose that says it all. West has studied this phenomenon and has determined that it is one that is going to have serious repercussions. The lines between child and adult are growing increasingly blurry. I hope to write a review of the book next week.
One section of the book that has caught my attention deals with the notion of “shame.” Shame is a bit of a tricky concept, I think, as it seems to me to be both negative and positive. The Bible makes it clear that, in their innocence, before they invited sin into the world, Adam and Eve were “naked and unashamed.” Written after the fact and written at a time when people could hardly conceive of nakedness as being anything but shameful, these words are clearly meant to make people think and to consider a world without shame. Shame, after all, in at least one of its forms, is product of guilt. Shame comes about as we realize our guilt or our inadequacy. Shame comes as we compare ourselves to a better standard or even as we compare ourselves to another standard (which is, more often than not, other people). So while it is a product of sin and a necessity only in an imperfect world, it is also a gift, of sorts. Shame is an aspect of God’s common grace that keeps us from expressing ourselves in ways that would otherwise result in serious consequences.
But shame is becoming increasingly foreign in our culture. We hear of the way teens act these days—with 13 year old girls propositioning their male friends and dispensing sexual favors on the school bus; with men and boys alike proudly discussing just how much pornography they consume; with the sexual preferences of movie stars being discussed in the evening news; with commercials for sexual enhancers constantly playing on television. Where has shame gone?
West traces the decline of shame to the death of the notion of obscenity, especially in the world of art. “By the time the courts, in effect, declared obscenity was dead, they had killed something vital to a healthy society: the faculty of judgment that attempts to distinguish between what is obscene and what is not obscene—the avowedly ‘grown-up’ sensibility of an outmoded authority figure who had long relied on a proven hierarchy of taste and knowledge until it was quite suddenly leveled. From this leveling came another casualty: society’s capacity, society’s willingness, to make even basic distinctions between trash and art.”
This has led to all manner of offensive, vulgar art being paraded in front of us, even if that art is just plain bad. The question is not, as it should be, “is it good art?” Rather, people simply cry “censorship” and allow anything to be displayed, no matter how vulgar, no matter how devoid of artistic merit. We can no longer distinguish between trash and art. Exempting art from censorship laws, effectively concluding that there is no such thing as obscenity, has had consequences.
“Once the law balked at recognizing obscenity, the populace began to doubt the very basis for shame. With no legal, institutional support for consensus, little wonder the bottom fell out from under morality.” As obscenity became a thing of the past, so too did it’s necessary consequence: shame. Shame is increasingly missing from our culture. We do things, watch things, enjoy things, participate in things that at any other time and in any other place would be considered shameful. Politicians show little remorse, little shame, when their dirty sexual deeds are exposed. Parents cavort with children, acting like children. “Shamelessness sheds light on why it is that American matrons are more likely to host sex-toy parties than Tupperware parties; why the Major Leagues showcase Viagra ads at home plate; why a presidential fund-raiser for GOP candidates includes a well-endowing—that is, contributing—porn star and pornographer; and why at grocery store checkouts shoppers can check out “hot sex tips” along with a loaf of bread. We have all learned—or at least we have all been taught—that the mental blush is superceded by the genital tingle.”
The paradox is something Christians know well. “Less restraint doesn’t necessarily deliver greater freedom.” It should be not surprising that the “land of the free” is also the land with more laws than just about any other nation in the world. With rules comes freedom—not with a lack of restraint. Humans being what we are, we rely on rules to keep us acting within the bounds of morality and within the bounds of shame. When these rules are tossed out and when shame disappears, so too does our willingness to restrain ourselves. With no concept of obscenity there is no shame; with no shame, anything goes. “In a shameless culture…self restraint is continually undermined.”
“By the twenty-first century, shame and embarrassment have zero association with sexuality—or so we are endlessly, numbingly instructed—and, correspondingly, an infantile lack of behavioral restraint may be observed in everything from freak dancing, to ‘super-size’ eating, to McMansion-building. Without the concept of obscenity, without reason for shame, the ‘self’ in self-control sees no greater, larger, socially significant point in holding back.”
What has happened to shame? Well, it appears that shame has been put to death. “Culturally speaking, obscenity is all but legally obsolete, and shame is a kind of secular sin—a symptom of ‘hang-ups,’ of repression, of inhibition, of liberty lost.”
The only thing our society tells us to be ashamed of, it seems, is shame itself.




Comments (11) »
1. Tim
December 12, 2007
12:03 PM
Hey Tim,
What a timely blog. Thank you for this great reminder to always be on the look out, even more watchful than normal, of the world creeping in and choking out the Word of God.
I was on my wifes blog and this verse was very timely regarding this issue:
11When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put childish ways behind me. 12Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.
I Cor. 13:11-12
Also I just got through listening to the free audio book on the life of Brainerd. What a comparison to make, he died at 29 years old but was so impassioned about the Kingdom of God that his life is a living testament to what God can do with a life full of shame for not glorifying God more.
Take care,
Tim
2. Woz
December 12, 2007
1:02 PM
Three books worth checking out: “Consumed: How Markets Corrupt Children, Infantilize Adults, and Swallow Citizens Whole” by Ben Barber; “Amusing Ourselves to Death” by Neil Postman; and “Brave New World” by Aldous Huxley.
None are Christian authors, but all three give us a lot to think about…especially in how much we let ourselves be influenced by the world.
I love John Piper’s comment in “Don’t Waste Your Life.” He says that “the world is not impressed when Christians get rich and say thanks to God. They are impressed when God is so satisfying that we give our riches away for Christ’s sake and count it gain.”
Part of the reason even Christians have lost our sense of shame is because we’ve bought into this world’s mantra that we should “get all we can, can all we get, and sit on the can”. I see how Christians have allowed themselves to be over-influenced: for example, I know many Christian young women that would list Sex and the City as one of their favorite TV shows (they would say it’s innocent fun, and not harmful, I would disagree). The show glamorizes a lifestyle of affluence and impropriety, in a way that makes the two mutually-inclusive. And it’s a fun fantasy for younger women to imagine a social life in a big city, complete with cocktail parties, meeting new people, shopping, etc. But this is where the danger is.
We may not think this, but I believe that our rapid consumerism leads us to ignore shame. The marketers tell us the things we “need” in order to have pleasure; we make moral concessions in order to fuel our pleasures; we become infantile in our way of thinking (“mommy, I want this nooowwwww…”); we make entertainment our highest priority; we then lose focus on God. And so, we begin to justify our self-pleasing way of life, and the pleasurable, shameful thing pushes God from the picture…and we indulge.
Having things, or having pleasure are not bad in and of themselves. It’s just a matter of what is your source of pleasure, and how much you let it influence your life. The world tells us to indulge, the Bible tells us to give to others out of your abundance. Don’t be ashamed that we don’t fit the world’s mold, because otherwise, that will be the *only* shame you have…
3. Bill Petruzzo
December 12, 2007
1:03 PM
Really thought provoking words. Thanks.
I’ll have to check out the book.
4. carol czech
December 12, 2007
1:19 PM
This reminds me of a (futile) conversation I had with a (postmodern) youth pastor about trying to protect the innocence of the students under our care. He couldn’t seem to wrap his mind around the concept. His reasoning was that the opposite of “innocence” is “guilt” and unless they are doing something to cause the kids to sin, it should not be off limits. I think this shows an ignorance of the meaning of “innocence” (or at least a very narrow definition).
One definition, according to Random House Dictionary is “having or showing the simplicity or naiveté of an unworldly person; guileless; ingenuous.” It’s not simply an absence of sinful behavior, but a total mindset. And, I think, a very biblical one at that: “For your obedience is known to all, so that I rejoice over you, but I want you to be wise as to what is good and innocent as to what is evil” (Romans 16:19 ESV).
I think that there is an inextricable link between lack of innocence and lack of shame. Satan tempted Eve with the possibility of her innocent eyes being opened and “knowing good and evil.” After this came the shame.
Our society makes it nearly impossible to protect the innocence of our kids. Our family loves sports and having teen boys in the house, it makes it very challenging to watch sports on TV - between the smutty commercials and the soft-core porn halftime shows. I caught my 13 year old singing the Viva-viagra song yesterday!! ACH!!! (note: what a creepy bunch of guys in that commercial - I feel sorry for their wives after these guys have been getting all whipped into a frenzy at a viagra song-fest/party or whatever that was…ewww!!)
BTW did anyone catch the halftime show during the Dallas/Jets game on Thanksgiving? It featured Kelly Clarkson and the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders in all their half-dressed hoochie-ness - nothing you wouldn’t expect for an NFL halftime show. But they were promoting the SALVATION ARMY!!! There were HUGE SA signs on either side of the stage - apparently Clarkson is a spokesperson for the organization and they were raising money for the cause. I was shocked that they would allow their name to be used with such a sleezy dance show!
P.S. Our family will also be at the Reality Check conference.
5. Ryan
December 12, 2007
1:45 PM
I think Paul weighs in on this discussion in Romans 1 (especially 24-32). The loss of shame seems one more symptom of God giving a culture over to their depraved mind- it affects art, sex, entertainment, and the way childhood and adulthood are viewed. Praise God He has given us a solution that goes beyond reforming art!
Thanks for the blog, Tim. Always great reading!
6. Chris Brauns
December 12, 2007
2:21 PM
I am reminded of Jeremiah twice repeated indictment,
Are they ashamed of their loathsome conduct?
No, they have no shame at all;
they do not even know how to blush.
So they will fall among the fallen;
they will be brought down when I punish them,”
says the LORD. (Jer 6:15; 8:12).
As you probably recall, David Wells, Losing Our Virtue has an insightful chapter (The Bonfire of the Self) that deals with shame and guilt in a post-modern world: “The exact nature of guilt and shame, and their distinctions one from another, are hard to pin down. However, the difference I will be working with isthat guilt is normally the emotional response to our violation of a moral norm, and shame is our disappointment with ourselves that we are not other than what we are (Wells, page 130).”
7. Billy Birch
December 12, 2007
2:25 PM
Tim,
This is my second time to your blog and my first time commenting. This post is as relevant as tomorrow’s paper. Well done and spot on. The most alarming apsect of what you have stated is the influence of shamelessness in the Church—and the lack of (holy) influence of the Church on the world of unbelievers.
Your post has also caused me to check myself spiritually to see if these traits have crept in unawares in my own heart.
Thank you,
Billy
8. Richard
December 12, 2007
2:42 PM
Tim,
This is an excellent overview of the book. I am reading this book and have been fascinated with the content and her research. I can recommend this book as a must read for everyone.
9. Matthew Hosier
December 12, 2007
2:47 PM
There can be no sense of shame without belief in a God to whom everyone is accountable. Western society is now two steps removed from this belief - modernism did away with God while holding to ‘Christian’ morality; postmodernism asked the question, “Why be moral at all?” and found no answer because it has no reference to God. Nietzsche prophesied this:
“When one gives up Christian belief one thereby deprives oneself of the right to Christian morality. For the latter is absolutely not self-evident: one must make this point clear again and again, in spite of the English shallowpates. Christianity is a system, a consistently thought out and complete view of things. If one breaks out of the fundamental idea, the belief in God, one thereby breaks the whole thing to pieces: one has nothing of any consequence left in one’s hands.”
There is nothing self-evident about Christian morality to our generation - we have become Nietzsche-esque (probably even more so here in the UK than for you in the US). If we are to change behaviour we need to start again from the ground up, and rebuild those foundations that have been demolished.
10. Craig
December 12, 2007
10:47 PM
Okay, that’s weird, Tim. I’m reading the same book and read the very chapter that talks about shame just last night.
It could be a sign, but I don’t know of what.
11. Keith
December 13, 2007
9:29 AM
In Britain there is a program called Shameless. I have never seen it but it is extremely popular. The reason I havent seen it is because I will not have a tv in the house.
I appreciate all your comments. Woz, you are right on the button
Thanks