The Politically Incorrect Guide To Islam and the Crusades
“May Allah rip out his spine from his back and split his brains in two, and then put them both back, and then do it over and over again. Amen.” Such is the kind of “endorsement” garnered by The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam and the Crusades. In this case, the endorsement was written by the Islamic web site, RevivingIslam.com. The author of this book, Robert Spencer, is the director of Jihad Watch and an Adjunct Fellow with the Free Congress Foundation. He has written several other books on the topic of Islam and, as per the brief biography within this title, “lives in a Secure, Undisclosed Location.” That is no doubt a wise precaution for a man who writes books and articles warning against the dangers of Islam.
The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam and the Crusades is one of several titles in the P.I.G. series and is no doubt one of the least politically correct titles to carve a niche in the New York Times Bestseller list. This title seeks to show to the reader that almost everything he knows about Islam and the Crusades is wrong. Why? “Because most textbooks and popular history books are written by left-wing academics and Islam apologists who justify their contemporary political agendas with contrived historical ‘facts.’ But fear not: Robert Spencer refutes popular myths and reveals facts that you won’t be taught in school and will never hear on the evening news. He supplies a revealing list of ‘Books You’re Not Supposed To Read’ (as far as the PC left is concerned) and takes you on a fast-paced, politically incorrect tour of Islamic teaching and Crusades history that will give you all the information you need to understand the true nature of the global conflict America faces today” (from the back cover).
The book is comprised of three sections of uneven length. In the first, Spencer provides an overview of the Islamic religion. He introduces Muhammah and the Qur’an, and shows from Muslim holy texts and from historical evidence that Islam is a religion of war, intolerance and oppression. He also discusses many of the politically correct myths surrounding Islam. This all leads towards the conclusion that Islam is a religion that exists because of the sword and is spread by the sword. What was true of the religion over a millenium ago continues to be true today.
In the second section, Spencer discusses the Crusades, examines why they were called and debunks many of the myths surrounding them. He shows that they were, by and large, defensive actions and were not the holy wars of rape and conquest that the history texts make them out to be. He proves that Christianity and Islam are not equivalent religious traditions and deals with the myth, perpetuated even among Christians, that one of the major issues facing the world today is religious fundamentalism of all kinds.
The book concludes with several chapters discussing the current world situation as it pertains to Islam and jihad. He discusses “Islamophobia” and shows how the definition of the term, as with so many politically correct terms, allows almost a blanket prohibition of all meaningful examination and discussion of the religion and its effects on our culture. After looking at some of the recent national and international news stories that involve Islam, he provides several suggestions to the United States government. He calls for a “general recognition that we are already in a war between two vastly different ideas of how to govern states and order societies, and that in this struggle the West has nothing to apologize for and a great deal to defend. Indeed, the struggle against sharia is nothing less than a struggle for universal human rights, a concept that originated in the West and is denied by Islam. Everyone in the fractured and fractious West—Christians, Jews, and other religious believers, atheist humanists—ought to be able to agree that this is a concept worth defending, even if they disagree about its particulars” (page 224). He points out that what the United States is fighting today is not a war on terror, for terror is merely a tactic, not an opponent. The United States needs to focus on the actual enemy, not merely a tactic they happen to use with great effectiveness.
Spencer’s final reflection is worth pondering. “It’s time to say, ‘enough,’ and teach our children to take pride in their own heritage. To know that they have a culture and a history of which they can and should be grateful; that they are not the children and grandchildren of oppressors and villains; and that their homes and families are worth defending against those who want to take them away, and are willing to kill to do so. Call it a Crusade” (page 231).
Written in a fairly informal style and filled with asides and sidebars, much like the For Dummies series, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam and the Crusades is quite a good book and one that nearly anyone can read and understand. Judging by various statements throughout the book it would seem that the author is Roman Catholic and his bias seems to show through a few times. Still, he backs up almost all he writes with solid facts and avoids weak, reactionist arguments. This book is a solid introduction to the danger Islam poses to the West and it is well worth the read.





Comments (12) »
1. James H
April 1, 2006
10:12 PM
P.I.G.?
Interesting title. At long last (I feel as if I have had my head in the sand for not knowing about the series)—a title after my own heart! It is refreshing that not EVERYONE is cowering in fear under the sickle of Islam. I try to tell my children some of these sames truths that this book seems to espouse, but increasingly it seems the media has been bought to paint in rosy hues the fallacy of Muhammad as a religion of “peace.”
Peace? Sure, just lay down and surrender to Muhammad’s lies. After all, he did claim to be, like Joseph Smith later would, the “one” that is used of God to bring the people “back” from the “apostasy” of Judaism and Christianity. Muhammad even claimed that HE was the “paraclete” (the Holy Spirit or “Comforter” of John 14 and 16) sent to guide the disciples into the real truth.
Unlike Islam, Christianity picks up no fleshly sword, rather the doctrines of grace and the Gospel, the sword of the Spirit, are the weapons we use. As Paul enjoins in 2 Cor. 10, our weapons are mighty and useful for tearing down arguments and strongholds. Islam weilds the terror of one that can destroy the body, utilizing the physical weapons of this world to make converts; our God alone can destroy the soul and bless or curse for eternity.
I would hope that a book like this would include a section or two on evangelizing those in the veil of Islam. Do you know if it addressed this issue? This seems the biggest battleground.
—James H
2. Patrick O"Hannigan
April 2, 2006
10:37 AM
To answer the question posed by James H, the book does NOT include a section on evangelizing the gospel to Muslims. It’s a work of popular history.
3. Tim Challies
April 2, 2006
12:56 PM
“I would hope that a book like this would include a section or two on evangelizing those in the veil of Islam.”
This is not a Christian book, really. As Patrick said, it is a work of popular history or commentary, not an attempt to convert Muslims.
4. Scott McClare
April 2, 2006
2:01 PM
Good review, Tim. As it happens I read this book only two months ago (Yay! I beat you to it!) and I’m in basic agreement with your conclusions.
As it happens I am currently about halfway through Onward Muslim Soldiers by the same author, which focuses specifically on the Islamic pillar of jihad.
One thing that reading these books (as well as Spencer’s two blogs, Jihad Watch and Dhimmi Watch) has shown me is that I am not particularly well informed about Islam, which is disappointing considering the Muslim population of Ottawa, where I live. I’ve put the Quran on my reading list, to tackle before the end of the year.
5. Brian Thornton
April 2, 2006
3:10 PM
Do you really need to spend time to read something like the Quran in order to be able to defend the true faith with a Muslim?
Instead of trying to convert them through apologetics, what about simply presenting the true gospel to them and let the Holy Spirit do the rest?
6. Tim Challies
April 2, 2006
5:15 PM
“Do you really need to spend time to read something like the Quran in order to be able to defend the true faith with a Muslim?”
I don’t think t here is anything wrong with reading the Quran as a way to better understand Muslims. Yes, we must preach the gospel, but understanding another person’s faith can prove to them that you are truly interested in them and what they believe. It can also help you find ways in which you can point out the inconsistencies of their own faith and show how Christianity better addresses those issues.
7. Brian Thornton
April 2, 2006
6:35 PM
Tim, I understand what you are saying, but isn’t that more witnessing through apologetics instead of through the gospel?
I don’t see anything wrong with knowing something of the person and his/her religion, culture, etc., but I guess I see the time better redeemed by studying more truth than by something like reading through a worthless book like the Quran.
I think some have the mentality that we have to break through social and ethnic barriers before we can reach them with the gospel. As if they will be more accepting of the message if they think we care more about them and where they are coming from.
I guess I am one that thinks my time and my God can be better served by studying what is true and honorable and right and just, rather than studying a false religion in order to better refute it’s errors. The true gospel will refute any and all error, won’t it?
I do agree that this practice can be rightly done by some who have been called to study a false religion and break it down and show how it is false, for the benefit of others. But I don’t see how we all should spend time reading something like the Quran. Does what I just said make any sense?
8. pgepps
April 3, 2006
3:27 AM
@Brian—
You seem to be using the term “apologetics” like it’s a bad thing. Even if you prefer not to use it as a major witnessing tool, it has its uses. It helps to shore up the confidence of the faithful, until they come to solid convictions, for instance, when they see their leaders ably expounding the differences between faith and various kinds of unbelief, and explaining the reasons for those differences.
On the merits, it sounds like I’m going to love this book. I’m pretty sick of hearing the politically-correct shibboleths about Islam, which has an unmitigated history of unenlightened oppression and mayhem to fall back on for examples in the current crises. They are, after all, being really quite faithful to Mohammed’s words, in all this mess. “Moderate” Muslims may be more convenient, but we shouldn’t kid ourselves—they’re degenerate Muslims like liberals are degenerate Christians. I’d prefer, really, a world in which we each try to really believe what we profess, but modern societies prefer against that.
And that, back to Brian, is another reason why it’s worthwhile to understand what others profess to believe—we can show them how little they do believe it, and help awaken their conscience to their real calling in Christ. And, of course, we can only do that if we have entrusted ourselves and our message to Him, and that’s going to mean dwarfing any other learning with His words, now isn’t it?
So, even where I think you’re a little wrong, you’re on the right track. Just don’t shoot down your allies who are taking a different zone of fire from yours, OK?
Cheers, PGE
9. Brian Thornton
April 3, 2006
9:26 AM
I never said it wasn’t worthwhile to understand what others believe. And I never said apologetics was a bad thing. I believe apologetics is to build up believers in their faith, just as you said. I just don’t see the benefit in taking valuable time to read something like the Quran to get a better idea of what Muslims believe. I would much prefer to spend that time reading something from say, Ravi Zacharias, who has already spent a considerable amount of time researching. I think that would be a better use of my time, that’s all I meant by my comments.
You made a reference to awakening one’s conscience who professes another religion…the ONLY thing that will do that is the Holy Spirit through the proclamation of the gospel, which is first a presentation of the law (which is what condemns the guilty), and then the presenting of the grace of God through what Christ did in dying as a substitute for sinners, which must be received through repentance and faith.
Doing that doesn’t require that I read the Quran, does it?
10. Weekend Fisher
April 3, 2006
12:55 PM
FWIW, awhile back I put together a quick guide to answering common Muslim questions/attacks against Christianity. This is just so you don’t get caught off guard with their incoming questions on your way to presenting the gospel.
11. Elle K
April 12, 2006
2:24 PM
Dear Co Workers of the Gospel of Jesus Christ,
I’m so glad that there’s lively discussion around this topic about the truth of Islam—historically and potentially-via the book that Spencer has written.
As someone who works for an evangelical organization that seeks the conversion of Muslims to Christ, Spencer has enlightened me to trends of Islam, but has not equipped me for sharing the truth of God’s Word with the Muslim mind. I urge you to distinguish the Muslim and Islam. This book by Spencer is worthwhile reading for the political awakening, as the Quraan is worthwhile for the intellectual awakening to a Muslim’s theological worldview. They are books, but God’s Word should always be our central tool in our witness to Muslims as “the people of the Book.” This is the name that the Quraan itself gives us. How God has laid His preparation for us to make known His Son!
I’ve heard one convert to Christianity say that for every hour he reviews the Quraan for convincing his Muslim friends of the gospel that he spends two hours with his Bible. A noteworthy saying.
12. Rob AMos
September 16, 2007
11:44 AM
Just reading some of this stuff, and some of the comments from some fellows. lol In past times various christians were persecuted, and tuffed it out so to speak. Above all, the Christian (after old testament) is a person of faith, tolerance, kindness and forgiveness (the big fellow) “turn the other cheek”.
I read some peoples comments in relation to God, and Christ like they are some incredible, and infalible expert. lol
Anyway, what if they don’t believe in my God or my christian religion, I don’t care, that is what freedom is. They can have their beliefs, and I will have mine. But, as for not reading what they do, or trying to see anyones point of view, I don’t see what that is about. Perhaps, as well as reading the bible, if you read a few other books, and open your mind up a bit, you might just find there is a broader interpretation to the word of god. Like, love thy neighbour.
Post Your Comment Here »