- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostA La Carte (1/24)
- Next Post »Don't Call It a Comeback
A Man, a Soldier, a Christian
- 01/24/11
- 29
Not too long ago I had the opportunity to prepare a few short biographical addresses on various Christians. For one of these addresses I spoke on John & Betty Stam. For another one I spoke of the life of Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson. I’m sure many of you are familiar with his life, but let me tell the story again…
We'll start the story near the end, on July 21, 1861. It was on this day that nearly 61,000 men fought in what was the first major battle of the American Civil War. Over the previous years the United States had fractured and split with many southern states seceding from the union to form the Confederate States of America. America had become two nations, the Federals or the Union in the north and the Confederates or the Rebels in the south. And these nations were at war, state fighting state, sometimes even brother fighting brother. It split a country, it split churches, it split families. On July 21 these two nations met on the plains outside a small Virginia town called Manassas.
On that afternoon a battle raged. Already thousands of men had fallen. The Federal forces pushed hard against the Confederate army until it looked as if the line might break and the battle would be lost. One of the Southern Generals, General Bee, had already seen his forces fight a long and devastating battle. He had seen many of his men die or leave the battle terribly wounded. Though he tried to rally the men who remained, they were tired and terrified and he just couldn't convince them to follow him. He spurred his horse and rode over to Thomas Jackson who commanded the brigade next to his. Pulling to a stop near the general he called out “General, they are beating us back!” Jackson's reply was short and calm, “Then we will give them the bayonet.” Jackson's confidence inspired Bee. Galloping back to his troops he called to them “Look! There is Jackson, standing like a stone wall. Rally behind the Virginians!” Inspired by Jackson's stand, Bee led his troops in a charge and was killed in the effort.
But the Confederates won the battle that day, though between the two armies nearly 5,000 men were killed, wounded or taken prisoner. On that day a legend was born, the legend of General "Stonewall" Jackson. The man who had stood fearlessly like a stone wall in the middle of the battle would quickly become one of the most famous generals in American history and establish himself as one of the greatest military minds of all-time. But there was far more to Jackson than his military ability. He was also a man who loved God and sought to honor him in every part of his life.
Let's go back to the beginning of this story.
Thomas Jackson, or Tom as he was called, was born on January 21, 1824 in Clarksburg, Virginia, one of four children. Two years after he was born, Jackson's sister Elizabeth, who was six years old, died of typhoid fever and, just days later, his father died as well. Suddenly his mother, Julia, was a 28-year old widow with three young children to care for. This must have been terrifying for her, to be alone at 28 with three little children. She worked hard and survived on her own for four years, but then married a new husband. I guess she had gotten a bit desperate because this was a man who really had no love for his step-children. With the new father came many financial difficulties and shortly after the wedding the family was forced to send the children away. Tom's older brother was sent to one home, Tom and his younger sister Laura to another. He would be forever shaped by memories of his mother weeping and screaming with her arms outstretched as Thomas was led away from his family. Three months later Thomas rushed back to be with his mother who was very, very sick. She had just given birth to a baby and was not able to recover. Within days she died too.
And just like that, at the age of 7, Thomas Jackson was an orphan who had witnessed the deaths of his sister, his mother and his father. He had been sent away from home and forced to live with an uncle who, though he cared for him, did not represent a father figure and who extended no affection. Only a few years later Thomas would also lose his brother to tuberculosis. His younger years are almost pure tragedy.
Through these years Thomas lived with his uncle in a little place called Jackson's Mills, in Virginia (or today in West Virginia). He was a quiet boy, a pensive one, who loved to read and loved to think. His uncle built him a small raft and he would often paddle across the river in front of his home. There, in the woods near the river bank, he built himself a small lean-to, a place of solitude and refuge. It was a place he could go to be by himself--to just be himself. He would go there to read or just to think. It was his favorite place in all the world, there on the other side of the river.
In these years he found a best friend in Joe Lightburn. Joe was just a little younger than Tom and a lot like him--enthralled by books and drawn to playing war games. Joe was also a Christian and later in life he would become a Baptist pastor. Joe did something very important--he introduced Tom to the Bible and spent many hours discussing the Christian faith with his friend. It was here that Tom first heard the gospel. Joe's family often had Tom come with them to their church and it was in this time that he began to close each day with a time of prayer, in this time that he became interested in religion. Tom and Joe remained close friends until the Civil War began and they each became generals, one for the North, one for the South.
It was in this context that Jackson developed a trait that would mark the rest of his life--determination. And this is the first lesson I've drawn from Jackson--the importance of determination, of being very serious about life. He determined that he could be whatever he would resolve to be. He was determined to rise above his circumstances and to make something of himself. Yet this would be difficult for a poor orphan boy. He was drawn to military life, and he applied and was eventually accepted at the United States Military Academy at West Point--at that time the country's foremost engineering school. His limited education had left him far behind his classmates, but through four years of all-out, determined effort, he not only passed but began to excel, eventually placing 17th out of 59 graduates. His classmates believed that if he had one more year of studies, he would have been first. Very little came easy to Jackson. Throughout his life he had to work very, very hard to succeed and to excel. And yet by God's grace and by sheer determination, he did so, getting better and better at just about everything he put his mind to.
Now here he is, at age 22, an officer in the United States army. He was largely alone in the world, though he and his younger sister Laura remained close and wrote to one another very often. In this year, 1846, America went to war with Mexico and Jackson was given a command. In a pitched battle, he emerged the hero and his name became known in military circles--his military career was off to a good start. But that wasn't the most important thing about Mexico. His commanding officer at this time was a committed Christian. He recognized a kind of budding faith in Jackson, or an interest in spiritual matters, and encouraged him to begin a systematic study of the Bible. Jackson, with his usual deliberateness, did just that. For a time he found himself drawn to the Roman Catholic Church, the dominant church in Mexico, but after meeting with the Archbishop of Mexico, and after studying his Bible, came to believe that Catholicism was not consistent with Scripture.
And it was here, I think, that Jackson became truly committed to the faith. He studied his Bible with great dedication, he prayed regularly and it was here that he decided on a rule he would never violate: he would not write or read or mail a letter on Sunday. Instead, he would seek to keep Sunday set apart as the Lord's Day. Later on, even as he fought wars, he would seek to avoid all fighting and all work on Sunday. As soon as he returned home from Mexico, he got baptized to publicly profess his faith.
When the war ended in 1851, Jackson returned home from Mexico and, realizing that he had few opportunities for advancement in the army, applied for a position as a teacher at Virginia Military Institute in Lexington. He was accepted and lived in Lexington for ten years. These Lexington years were the most joyous and most painful of his life. In a sense these were the only years of his adult life. So if we are going to talk about Jackson in a context other than his being a general, it is here that we'll see who he really was.
First he was a teacher and probably the worst teacher in the history of the school. He was the kind of teacher who could do little more than memorize the facts and then regurgitate those facts to his students. If they had questions he would just recite the facts again from memory. If they asked again, he would often punish them. Yet Jackson remained a teacher for ten years, teaching natural and experimental philosophy (which today would include things like physics, astronomy, optics and other sciences). His students and colleagues developed a real love for him and a real respect. No one was more loyal and no one more serious.
Very shortly after he moved to the town, Jackson became a member of Lexington Presbyterian church which was pastored by William White, a man who would become a very important spiritual influence on him. This was the first time he had ever been a member of a local church. A friend from this time said "The striking characteristic of his mind [became] his profound reverence for divine ... authority. I never knew any one whose reverence for [God] was so all pervading, who felt so completely his entire dependence upon God." Another friend said that Jackson's faith was "as simple as a child's in taking the word of God as his guide, and unhesitatingly accepting all therein revealed." He decided that he wanted his Christian life to be marked by a love for God and a sense of God's love for him in return. He resolved never to "violate the known will of God." Think about that. He determined that he would never do anything that went against what God commanded and, with his usual determination, sought to do just that. Jackson was a guy who had a temper and this was something he fought against. Yet during the Civil War there are only a handful of known instances of him ever losing his temper. Even amidst all of the stress and strain of war, he did his absolute utmost to maintain his godly character and to fight against sin. Very few of his friends could identify any serious sin in his life. Little wonder that he was soon chosen to be a deacon.
Jackson bought a family Bible at this time and two passages became favorites, perhaps obvious favorites for a man who suffered so much--Revelation 21:4 which speaks of God wiping away the years of those who weep and Romans 8:28--"We know that all things work together for good to them that love God."
One story I love from this time, these years of growth, is Jackson's attempt to pray publicly. He was afraid to pray in public but understood that it was his duty to do so. He said to his pastor, "If you think it is my duty, call on me whenever you think proper. My personal comfort is not to be consulted in the matter." Two weeks later he was called upon to pray and did a terrible job of it, finding himself completely tongue-tied and embarrassed and saying a lot of nothing. He did so badly that the pastor wasn't going to ask him again. But Jackson asked his pastor to continue to ask him to pray and even by his second attempt he did better. Soon he became very good at it and became one of the leaders at the prayer meetings. After that he always enjoyed public prayer. He was also very afraid of public speaking. So what did he do? He joined a debate society and forced himself to learn to excel in this as well.
It was through this church that he helped found a Sunday school for blacks--both slave and free. He called it his "colored Sunday school." At this time it was against the laws of Virginia to teach slaves, especially to teach them to read. But he did so anyway. (he once did this as a kid and the slave forged a pass and ran away) He knew that he answered to a higher authority. He wanted everyone to be able to read and understand the Bible and was eager to teach blacks to read so they could meet God through the Scriptures. And so he helped them learn to read and he helped them learn the Bible. At times there were over 100 people attending this Sunday school and it was one of the great joys of his life. Even during the war he would write his pastor to ask how the school was doing and how the students were growing. A couple of churches still exist today that were started by people who were saved through this ministry.
At this point I should say a word about Thomas Jackson and slavery. I will do that when I pick this up tomorrow. In the meantime, let’s not get completely carried away with the question of whether or not Jackson was a Christian based solely on his view of slavery (which is exactly what happened when reviewed a biography of Jackson).

I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a husband to Aileen and a father to three young children. I worship and serve as a pastor at
Releasing on April 1, The Next
Comments (29)
My all-time hero….
Is it right to have heroes? Well, right or wrong - he’s mine!
Thanks for this Tim. it’s quite a different story than I learned in public schools and college. All I remember learning there was learning the north was right, south wrong, and the war was all about slavery.
Do you you have a top 3 or 5 favorite list for books on Jackson?
Thanks for this Tim. it’s quite a different story than I learned in public schools and college. All I remember learning there was learning the north was right, south wrong, and the war was all about slavery.
Do you you have a top 3 or 5 favorite list for books on Jackson?
Thanks, Tim.I think Jackson is one of the most misunderstood figures in US history. In many ways he is made into a silly figure, much like Calvin. The Robertson biography goes a long way to correct that impression.
Stonewall Jackson’s character is one that I greatly admire. I love his biography by his contemporary Dabney. And, that account of his request to his pastor to call on him to pray is one of my favorite parts of the book. How often are we willing to say that we will learn to do the things God wants of us no matter how uncomfortable it is?
I have the book of some of the letters he wrote to his wife (Anna). Beautiful, and worth reading if a person has grown up hearing negatives of this wonderful man.
Wow, great story so far. I might have to glean from it a bit for my book in the chapter on determination. Thanks for highlighting such an interesting man of God.
z.
I have read about and appreciated Jackson’s life and faith for many years now. When our daughter attended Virginia Tech we found numerous opportunities to visit his home and church at VMI, the battlefields where he fought and the place where he died from his wounds. I was particularly disappointed to hear a representative from the National Park Service so badly interpret his life. I’m thankful his faulty witness was not my only exposure to Jackson’s life! Thank you for this post!
Hmmm . . Am I the ONLY one to be conflicted about Jackson? He resolved never to “violate the known will of God,” yet he took part in the killings of his fellow citizens through warfare and condoned/protected a system which exploited his fellow man in the slavery of the South. We should be careful in the way in which we admire our heroes who are saints as well as sinners—as we all are .
I am a student in history at Virginia Tech, where Dr. James Robertson teaches his Civil War course. My class was unfortunate to not get to hear his lectures on Lee and Jackson due to Dr. Robertson taking a fall last year, but the class was by far one of the best I have ever taken. I gave my grandfather a signed copy of Jackson’s bio for Christmas last year and he has not stopped thanking me and telling me about it. I am sad to inform you that this semester is Dr. Robertson’s last teaching that class and he will be missed.
Richard,
I waited all day to see if someone else would address this before I mentioned it, and I am glad you did.
I too am dismayed why Jackson is so admired by professing Christians. I can understand that he may have had many admirable qualities, but I don’t understand how as a Christian, who is to follow the teachings and commandments of Christ and model his life after that of His Lord, can have hatred (which is the same as murder) toward his enemy and be willing to go forth and kill, murder and injure his fellow men…and get others to go along with it and get them to do the same. That is not the mark of a lover of Christ. That is not a good Christian witness and testimony.
Jesus told us to “love our enemies and do go to those who persecute us.” He told us “not to resist evil.” Elsewhere in the New Testament we are commanded “not to repay evil with evil.”
Jesus said “My kingdom is not of this world, if it were my servants would fight.” A Christian is a servant of Christ. If our Kings kingdom is not of this world, then neither is ours…we are sojourners just passing through. So why in the world should a Christian defend and fight for an earthly kingdom run and governed by pagans that has no eternal value?
Jackson, and others like him, put his patriotic duty ahead of his Christian duty. The early church was totally opposed to war and believers being in the military. How far we have come from a more genuine Christianity.
This is not a quip, but a genuine question: Should Great Britain, then, not have fought to protect this country (I’m in the UK) and her allies during WWII? Would you say it’s ever right to fight?And also, does every soldier *hate* the individual soldiers on the opposing side at a time of war? Or are they able to fight for what they love, but not fall into hatred?
I see nothing in the New Testament or any testimony from the early church that allows for a Christian to fight for a country/nation. “What fellowship does Christ have with Belial?”
….or to protect one’s family, island, country?Seriously? I’ve always known there were those who believed in not fighting - ever - but, until now, I’ve never ‘met’ one!
Again, this is genuine: should the men of Great Britain have allowed Hitler to come in and not have fought to protect the country?
Chris, the Amish and Mennonites hold your view of warfare. Evangelical and Catholic Christians do not. Christians are not called to withdraw from all government affairs. There is a place for “just war”. Find and download the sermons on just war by D.A. Caron.
Richard and Chris, Romans 13 gives the sword to the government for a reason. Jackson was fighting, as a government general, to protect the citizen’s rights. Jesus said if someone slaps you on the check, turn and give him the other. But what if someone slaps your wife and all your children? What if a foreign country kills thousands of your own countrymen?
We must take the Bible as a whole when developing our theology, and not only focus on certain verses. It also anachronistic to read our modern feelings back into past issues, not putting them into context.
I don’t think Tim is trying to validate the merits of slavery here. One of the main points seems to be that Stonewall Jackson was a much more complex man than the public education caricature made of him in my HS history classes.
He had glaring weaknesses for sure, but admiring the strengths does not make you blind to the horrors of slavery.
Is there such a thing as “just war”? I’m not saying the Civil War tragedy fits that category I am saying what GK Chesterton said: There may be times when the true soldier must fight not because he hates what is in front of him but because he loves what is behind him. Otherwise, it’s impossible to be Christian and be in the military. Is that national intepretation what Jesus was meaning when he addressed persecution and personal attacks of your personal enemy?
http://chiefofleast.com/
Michael, Anne,
I am not a pacifist—unlike, perhaps, Chris, though he can speak for himself on that matter. However, in view of the Civil War and the institutions the South was ostensibly “protecting,” including that of slavery, I do NOT think it was somehow morally praiseworthy and following the “known will of God” as Jackson would put it, to fight and encourage the killing of fellow American citizens. I realize we should not let our modern sensibilities blind us—at the same time, we should be aware that there are moral issues here which are serious ones which could have been blind spots for those we look upon as heroes. We need a little balance here.
Some of you should have read all the way to the end. Had you done so, you would have read:
“At this point I should say a word about Thomas Jackson and slavery. I will do that when I pick this up tomorrow. In the meantime, let’s not get completely carried away with the question of whether or not Jackson was a Christian based solely on his view of slavery …”
David,
I read this before I posted. I’m not saying that Jackson was not a Christian—no more than Robert Lee or Jefferson Davis. What I am saying is we need to be careful before we engage in some of this hero worship of someone who was both a sinner and saint—a justified sinner, in other words.
Richard / Chris,
I think if you take a closer reading of the Bible, you will notice that when Jesus encountered the Roman Centurion (who was a leader in the enemy, occupying army), our Lord did not mention anything about quitting his job as a soldier. No, instead He commented about His faith.
Likewise, throughout my years of serving in the military, I took comfort knowing that I was serving our Lord as a Christian USAF fighter pilot.
Although it is by a humanistic philosopher, there is a great quote about war: “War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.”
I believe General Jackson embodied this.
In His service,”Cricket”
F15 Cricket,
I served in the active duty Air Force as well. I have worked as a civilian with the Army now for over twenty-five years. The military vocation is an honorable one. Surely, though, we need to be questioning the causes for which we are fighting—and killing our fellow man. I think we can at least question that the cause for which General Jackson was serving—and on whose behalf he was killing—was a God glorifying one. It was ultimately one which exploited others in an unjust institution—one which earlier Christians such as William Wilberforce had worked to abolish in the United Kingdom.
Richard and Chris,First, we all have our blind spots. Yes, slavery as it was in antebellum America was wrong and inhumane. However, that does not imply that Christians who fell into that deception do not have anything to teach us about a life lived in devotion to Christ. On a similar note to Jackson, should we also discredit all of Jonathan Edwards life and ministry for his defense of colonial slavery (for a good, short review of the history and circumstances for Edwards in this area see Piper and Taylor’s “A God Entranced Vision of All Things” on the DG website)? But keeping with Jackson, he and his countrymen, and we must remember that in those days one’s “country” was one’s state, therefore, for Jackson to fight against Virginia would have been unheard of, believed they were defending their homes and Virginia in particular. Virginia was actually one of the last southern states to secede, and their decision had very little to do with slavery. I am not suggesting that Jackson and his countrymen were right in siding with, in part, the defense of slavery. I am suggesting that we should not overlook, but forgive our brothers and sisters of their sin and blind spots, learn from their mistakes and examine ourselves for blind spots and sin. No doubt, should the Lord tarry, the coming generations of the Church will look at us in the same way we are looking at Jackson.
Second, if you look at Luke 3:14 notice what John the Baptist does not say: soldiers should leave the army. These soldiers were coming to him for a baptism of repentance and they ask what they should do and John’s answer has nothing to do with leaving their post.
I also echo Anne in asking should the Allies have rolled over and not fought against the Axis? Chamberlain(?), the PM before Churchill tried to appease Hitler, declaring victory in avoiding war with Germany before finding out that he totally misjudged Hitler’s motives and the machine that was Nazi Germany. War is never good, but it is sometimes right and just to fight and Christians who are called to be part of those right and just wars are to be praised for their service (this last statement is not suggesting that Jackson is in this group of just war heroes, that should be left to interpretation).
Thank you so much for this great article. I have wanted to buy this biography since you reviewed it awhile ago, but finally decided to buy it today.
Stonewall was indeed a determined man and I can only imagine what it would have been like to learn from him and serve under his leadership.
Tim,
Thanks for a great article. This one and part 2. Jackson has always been and interest to me and somewhat of a “hero” to me. Not in an idyllic sense but much the same way folks look up to sports personalities. He had many great qualities as you pointed out. I have no conflict between my respect for the man and my Christian faith.
-Jim
Richard,
I appreciate your service. I also appreciate your thoughtful consideration of deep issues like this. However, I must disagree with your analysis that General Jackson was serving and killing for the cause of slavery. That is revisionist history at its worst. The real issue was state’s rights, albeit through the funnel of slavery. This issue has raged from the beginning of our country and still goes on today (reference Obamacare’s mandatory federal requirement for health insurance vs. the states suing saying the federal government has overstepped its constitutional authority).
Interestingly, the Bible talks of how masters should treat their slaves (see Ephesians 6:5-9 for one), but not much mention is made that Christians should not be slave-owners or should free their slaves. While I completely agree that slavery was a moral evil and stain on America, some loving slave-owners like General Jackson were able to lead his slaves to a true faith in Christ—giving them true, eternal freedom!
I think we must ask ourselves this, as Christians living in a pagan, postmodern America: if slavery was so evil, how does today’s pagan devotion to self above everything else compare? Surely, it is as agregious a sin in the heavenly realms.
In His service,F15Cricket
Cricket,
In regards to the Centurion, while the Centurion did demonstrate great faith, you can not conclude that he was born-again Christian. Just because Jesus did not condemn the Centurion (and you don’t know that He didn’t, we only have what is recorded), does not mean that He endorses or approves of Christians taking up military arms. Everything that Jesus teaches is contrary. And the soldiers in Luke 3:14 were not Christians, nor had they heard the teachings of Christ yet. John told the soldiers not to take money by force. If they weren’t to take money by force, would it make sense that they could take land and kill people by force?
Let me ask you some questions:
1.Would you, as a Christian in the first century, have “proudly” served in the Roman army under Caligula, Claudius and Nero?
2.Would you have been a willing and faithful servant for Christ by persecuting fellow Christians by beheading them, crucifying them, burning them at the stake and throwing them to the lions?
3.Would you have been a willing and faithful servant for Christ by taking part in Roman conquests and killing the Barbarians?
4.Is the U.S., it’s leaders and military really much better than that of the Roman empire?
5.If your commander in the USAF told you in the name of national defense go and kill that man over there and you knew that man was a brother in Christ…would you follow that order?
The Civil War was full of “Christians” killing “Christians.” AND THAT IS WRONG!
While God certainly ordains rulers, the whole world is still under the power of the evil one/Satan…this includes governments, nations, kingdoms and their rulers and armies.
There is no righteous government or nation on this earth, so why should a Christian be willing to defend one? As Christians, our allegiance is not to a flag, a nation or any earthly ruler. Our allegiance is to Jesus Christ and His kingdom. “You can not serve two masters.”
Paul tells Timothy that “no soldier in active service entangles himself in the affairs of this life, so that he may please the one who enlisted him.” The military and all that goes with it (wars, killing, maiming, destruction), are an affair of everyday life and Christians should cease their partnership and endorsement of it. We should “come out and be separate.”
How is the body of Christ going to stand out from the world and be a witness when it is entrenched and entangled in the same things the pagans/the lost are?
As followers of Christ, we are commanded “to be peaceable, gentle, showing every consideration for all men.” Engaging in warfare is contrary to this command and “the call of Christ our captain.”
There are so many commands and principles in the New Testament on how we as Christians are to think, live and behave. The Sermon on the Mount is a perfect example. I don’t see how a Christian can be honoring Christ by disobeying His commands and not following His principles?
Are we as Christians to stand up for what is right and point out what is unrighteous? Absolutely! How else is a depraved world going to know? But it must be done in a Christ-like way and in a way that does not compromise the teachings, commands and principles of the New Testament.
I repeat: Jesus, the Apostles and the early church never endorsed or permitted the killing of others, serving in the military, defending a secular/pagan state, empire or country. There are more important things to be doing!
Just because I am opposed to warfare and Christians being involved in it, does not mean I disrespect those that serve. I do not hate anyone because they are in the military. And neither does it mean that I am not patriotic. If you came to my home and saw all the patriotic material (prints, documents, flags, etc.), you would quickly realize how patriotic I am.
I also recommend two books for further contemplation.1. Christianity and War by Laurence Vance2. Change of Allegiance by Dean Taylor
“And while being reviled, He did not revile in return; while suffering, He uttered no threats, but kept entrusting Himself to Him who judges righteously.” 1 Peter 2:23
Wow. I will try to keep my reply brief, but that in no way lessens the depth of my beliefs in this matter.
Interesting that you think Jesus would positively remark on the Centurion’s faith, but that you say he might not have had a saving faith. Huh? Didn’t Jesus know the centurion’s heart, and therefore that he trusted in Jesus as the Christ to be his savior?
I would reckon if I came to your house, also, I would see much of the Old Testament missing, as the conquest of Canaan by Israel was not done by diplomacy. (I’m not in any way equating God’s commanded conquering of Canaan with serving in any country’s military today, however.)
To answer your questions:1. “Proudly” is a bad adjective in this case. If the Lord wanted me to serve in the Roman army, that’s where I would’ve been. … just like the Roman centurion! And, if God appoints our leaders (as the Bible says He does), does it really matter who is in charge? I served in the USAF under Presidents Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush and Obama. I think that’s a wide variety of men, ranging from Christian to completely pagan!2. Your question is grossly simplistic. No, I would not have participated in things that are against what the Bible teaches. Same as during my recent service: if I were ordered to go drop bombs on what I KNEW to be a non-combatant village, then I would have moral grounds to disobey. BUT, I would also have to be willing to accept the consequences, just as the Roman soldiers who refused did. Couldn’t that very well be part of their Christian witness, even unto death?3. This question delves more into politics than Christianity. To ask this question is akin to asking, “Is any war morally legitimate?” I think that answer MUST be yes. If not, then we would be ruled by ruthless dictators the likes of Hitler, Stalin and Saddam Hussein still today. Thank GOD that men of faith were, and still are, willing to fight against evil men like them.4. Does it make a difference?5. Again, too simplistic a question, as I could never ‘know’ what you suggest. However, having ‘been there-done that’ and gone to war, I did wonder if those I were engaging in combat might have been Christian … and I took faith in my prayers for them, and that His will be done. Have you ever hated a Christian brother in your heart? If so, Jesus said it is murder … which is what this is all about. There IS a difference between murder (intentional, premeditated taking of an individual’s life by an individual, usually motivated by selfishness) and killing (which is the taking of human life, one example is in wartime). The commandment is against murder.
In regards to your comments by Paul to Timothy about getting entangled in the affairs of this life … your views on this are again simplistic. Do you have a job that requires you to work at it, and a boss that you have to please? Do you have to prepare food everyday to eat? Do you put clothes on every day that match? Aren’t those all affairs of everyday life? And, if you continue the passage in 2 Tim 2, Paul mentions athletes and farmers. Does that mean Christians can’t serve in those professions, as well? I think Paul means that we serve Christ as soldiers in His army, so we should not “get entangled in civilian pursuits” (ESV translation).
I firmly believe that God uses Christians in all professions that are not directly sinning (being involved in the pornography industry or an abortion doctor, for example).
Finally, I think the American churches have become too engrained into politics, and cannot separate political views from the gospel of Christ. That’s why I appreciate that my denomination does not put an American flag in the front of the church. We love our country, but we serve Christ our savior … in this country where He placed us in His sovereign will.
With that, I will end my way too long post. I thank God for Christians who serve our Lord Jesus Christ in the military, and as athletes, and as farmers, etc, etc., and even as Civil War generals on the losing side.
F15Cricket
F15Cricket:
Very well-stated.
Count me among the many who are grateful for your service and consider it an honorable occupation.
Just want to say, Yes! to what you - F15 Cricket - have said. With you all the way….