An Introduction To Calvinism & Arminianism (Part 5)

This is part five of our series studying the differences between Calvinism and Arminianism. Please note that this is only a brief overview of a vast topic. A thorough discussion of this topic can (and often has) filled many books. At the conclusion of the series I will provide a list of helpful resources should you wish to pursue this study further.

The terms Arminianism and Calvinism are, of course, absent from the Bible. For that reason I tend to avoid defining myself as either one. I would rather be defined as a follower of Christ than a follower of the teachings of Calvin or Arminius. However, having said that, I do believe that one of their teachings is correct and the other is not.

It should come as no surprise that I adhere to Calvinist theology. I believe that Calvinism is little more than a correct interpretation of the Bible. It is not a radical theology; it is correct, Biblical theology! From what the Bible teaches and from what I have seen of human nature, I simply cannot believe that man can play any part in his salvation. A former pastor of mine used to say it like this: “Imagine you are in a river, the water is flowing quickly and you are sinking. You struggle, fight and thrash about but are unable to save yourself. As you are going down for the last time, you manage to extend your hand just a bit. As you extend your hand, someone grabs it and pulls you from the torent. That is Arminian theology. Calvinism says that you are a corpse - a dead, rotting corpse unable to even extend your pinky finger. But God brings that corpse to life.” The Irvins recently posted about light and asked how much light is enough to make a blind man see. The point is the same – a blind man can see no light just as a dead man cannot extend his hand. Until God brings us to life we are dead. Soli Deo Gloria.

My final word on the topic is this. To be a Christian I need only believe that Christ paid the penalty for my sins and to ask Him for forgiveness. Both Calvinists and Arminians agree on this. Therefore, whether I am Calvinist or Arminian in theology, I can and must have fellowship with those who adhere to the other viewpoint. Christian fellowship must extend to the whole body of true believers, regardless of theology.

If you are interested in studying this topic further, I would suggest the following resources:

John Piper, John MacArthur, James Boice and R.C. Sproul are all prolific authors who have written books about Calvinism or from a Calvinist perspective. Calvin’s Institutes are widely available in print or online.

I do not know of many resources which defend Arminianism since the great majority of Christians are Arminian. Dave Hunt has recently published a book which argues against Calvinism, but from what I have read it is deeply flawed (Hunt admits he has not even read Calvin’s Institutes, for example). If you can provide me with some more resources, please feel free to email me or post a comment below.

Comments (10)

1
Anonymous's picture

Robert Shank's two books

Elect in the SonLife in the Son

Are apologetical treatments contra Calvinism.

As somebody who is Reformed I believe that Shank fails as miserably as Hunt but they are his attempt to show the superiority of Arminianism.

Bret

2
Anonymous's picture

I highly recommend the two books listed below for their very effective argument against Arminianism & freewill theology.

1. No Place for Sovereignty, by R.K.McGregor Wright2. The Potter's Freedom, by James White

I will be writing reviews of these books, and others, which will appear on the site: http://reformedwritings.comcast.net

3
Anonymous's picture

Tim, your material continues to be edifying and educational. Thanks and Keep it up!

4
Anonymous's picture

Tim,

Read the whole thing. Its good writing on the arminian v. calvinism thing, but what about a third way? Most calvinists seem to think that all non-calvinists are arminians, and I don't think that's particularly correct. Most non-Calvinists would have serious issues with the Arminian position.

5
Anonymous's picture

Greetings Friends!

You wrote: "I have read it is deeply flawed (Hunt admits he has not even read Calvin’s Institutes, for example). If you can provide me with some more resources, please feel free to email me or post a comment below."

For the record, I have tapes of Dave Hunt in which he clearly states that he has thoroughly read Calvin's Institutes and Luther's Bondage of the Will. Have you? :)

I have heard this charge multiple times and I am puzzled why folks persist in light of Dave's public statements to the contrary.

I have not read Institutes in its entirety, but as an exCatholic, I am deeply troubled by what I have read.

Thanks for the ear!

6
Anonymous's picture

I think I made it clear that I was basing my comments on hearsay. I did not say I had read his book - just that I had heard it was deeply flawed. I *believe* I read that at James White's site, but I don't recall at this time.

What is it that you are deeply troubled by?

7
Anonymous's picture

Sorry if this is old I just found it. I wanted to give everyone Dave Hunt saying that he hasn't read Calvin nor the Reformers. Here is the link: http://www.straitgate.com/davehunt/index.htm and listen to the first and second hours of the Marty Minto show. The shows took place in the summer of 2000 shortly after Hunt claimed to have know more about calvinism than most calvinists.

Mark

8
Anonymous's picture

God's Strategy in Human History by Roger Forster and Paul Marston is a pretty good look at a more Arminian position. Pretty thorough and some interesting points. (Chazaq: Strengthen/Fortify or Harden or... seems to be interpreted rather inconsistently toward a reformed position... and other good stuff)

Worth a read. Anyway, while I hold to a more Arminian position it is not 100%. (I don't believe one can lose their Salvation) However, my rejection of Reformed doctrine is not on a knee-jerk "don't like the sound of it" type reaction.

If all men have fallen, than if God chose to save only one person, He is free to do so and still beyond just. I really feel that both sides have some scriptures to harmonize, and that the Arminian side harmonizes more easily with proper hermeneutical tools.

I also would like to mention what Tim mentioned up front in his first section, that regardless of how it happened (choice or no) those of us who are saved, are saved and are part of one body.

9
Anonymous's picture

Thank you! What a great site you have and what a gift you have in explaining in clear and succint ways differences between denominations and beliefs. I've been doing some research on Calvinism and Arminiasm and some site just get soooo bogged down in info. Thanks for keeping this up a level and understandable by the 'regular' person. Now...how about a study on pre-trib, mid-trib and post trib! :) Blessings

10
Anonymous's picture

Interesting topic, one that I'm not sure will ever be answered while any human form of life is left on earth. But what I do believe is what you've confirmed; our salvation does not rest on this issue!

I believe that both of these men have very good points, and the only One who knows the truth is God, all other opinions are meer speculation from man's stand point.

Think about this: God wants man to make a consious decision to follow Him, from their hearts, so if we have no choice or say so in the matter, how can man possibly make a consious decision to follow Christ and truly mean it?

I've read R.C. Sproul's book "Chosen By God" and I found it very interesting and in ways biblically supportive. So where do I stand? I stand as a Bondservant of Christ, prepared to live for Him in 100% obedience, trusting in His Word!

Thank you for your efforts and diligent work, it's awesome to see a person dedicated to studying the Word of God; there are very few of us in this world; percentage wise.

God Bless!

JohnPhilippians 2:5