Blessings, Kingdoms, Smiles and Books

This is a compilation of various things that caught my eye this week. They were things that needed more explanation than I could offer in A La Carte, but not enough that they merited an article of their own.

Same Sex Blessings

It’s easy to write off the Anglican Church, and especially so up here in Canada where it seems that so few churches have really remained faithful to the gospel. So many churches, or at least the ones that get the publicity, have long since forsaken the gospel. But sometimes we receive a breath of fresh air. Such was the case when I read a three-part series called “Where Do I Stand (On the issue of Same-sex Blessings)?” Written by Mark Larratt-Smith (who, incidentally and according to my parents, used to attend a Bible study group they were part of back in their Anglican days), the article details his view on these same-sex blessings. He begins with an affirmation and defense of the Sovereignty of God and then moves to the authority of Scripture. He roots the issue firmly in God’s authority over us. “The central issue here really isn't about same-sex relationships at all, but about God's sovereignty and the creation of idols.” He gets it right as he cuts to the very heart of the issue:

In fact, what is involved is an attempt to redefine the nature of Almighty God, in order to make Him fit with our contemporary society's view on a single social issue. In this it does not seem to me to be any different from any other attempt to create a tame god who will comfortably reflect and endorse our own sense of what is appropriate. It is just another example of making one of the gods of stone or wood that the Old Testament prophets denounced. Its implicit message is that, if I don't agree with God's version of reality, I will reconstruct a god who is more congenial with my own view of the world. As I have stated above, such a god is not worth worshipping and certainly not the source of any hope to rely upon.

People who do not get right God’s sovereignty and God’s authority through His Word will never be able to get other issues right. Larratt-Smith goes right to the gospel—right to the source.

You can read the article here: Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3

The Emergent Kingdom

Just a few days ago I was pondering the whole emerging and emergent Church movement(s) and began to realize that there is one issue the emerging people have been writing about a whole lot and that most traditional Protestants do not speak of nearly as often. I was thinking of the kingdom of God. Whether you are emerging or emergent, the kingdom of God plays a pivotal role in your theology. And yet it tends to be a mere footnote for most Protestants.

The very next day I received in the mail the latest copy of Gary Gilley’s “Think on These Things” newsletter and was delighted to see that the title is “The Kingdom of Emergent Theology - Part 1.” While Gilley approaches the issue from a dispensational perspective, already he has shared some valuable insights. While he acknowledges the differences between emerging and emergent, Gilley says “Since both emerging and emergent camps have the same view of the kingdom, I will be using the term ‘emergent’ throughout this discussion to refer to both wings.”

If there is one thing the emergent conversation has closed ranks around it is that the kingdom of God is on earth now, but it will progressively resemble God's kingdom in heaven as Christians understand their true mission, which is to make this world a better place for all. The emerging movement sees itself as a wakeup call to those who would follow Jesus. It is our task to bring the kingdom of God on earth as it is in heaven by aggressively challenging injustice, fighting poverty, aiding the sick, working on ecological concerns and, in general, saving this planet and everything on it. Emergent leaders believe that people are catching on to this new vision of the kingdom, and as a result, are optimistic about the future. No doomsday tribulation period is on their radar screen nor is Jesus coming in judgment upon the wicked. The kingdom, while already here, will progressively become like heaven as we attend to the social ills and needs around us. Tomorrow looks bright and the day after that looks brighter still.

Gilley continues to tie emergent theology into postmilleniallism and offers a brief critique. “Emergent eschatology is by-and-large identical to liberal postmillennialism which flourished prior to the mid-twentieth century.” Since I am not dispensational I know that I will have some disagreements with Gilley, but still look forward to reading the rest of the article when it becomes available next month. For now I’m hoping that someone from the non-dispensational perspective can also do some work on the issue of the kingdom. I think if we narrow in on that one issue, we’ll be in a better spot to understand much of the appeal of this whole emerging movement.

You can read Gilley’s article here: The Kingdom of Emergent Theology

Was the Father Smiling?

This came in to my RSS reader just a few minutes to late to include in today’s A La Carte, but it was too good to pass up. Mark Altrogge posted a great little article on The Blazing Center. Here’s a brief excerpt:

When in college, every Saturday after Thanksgiving, I played in the “Turkey Bowl” (the original and true Turkey Bowl, not one of the ten thousand played across the nation which are but cheap imitations). Before this collar-bone-cracking, skull-smashing game of tackle football, the 2 best players would pick their teams. I always knew I’d be chosen last, like I had some kind of disease they might catch from me if I were on their team. By the time the picks dwindled down to me, the captain with last pick would “choose” me with as much enthusiasm as if he’d just been asked to shovel a mountain of manure.

I’m glad God didn’t choose his children with such “enthusiasm”. I can see the Father smiling as he wrote the names of his chosen ones in his book. He elected his own with joy and excitement, not in compulsion. He saved because it brought him pleasure and joy. God inscribed his children’s names on his palms with a happy flourish. Jesus said it was his Father’s pleasure to give his children the kingdom.

Read the rest here

The New Monergism Books

Last week marked the launch of a new Monergism Books. Though I did not do all of the design work for this project, I was involved in various ways behind the scenes (configuring the shopping cart, adding functionality to it, and driving the project forward).

Some of the more notable new features, other than the new design, are: improved search functionality, book recommendations, customer profiles and wishlists, product ratings and reviews and even an affiliate program (which will launch very soon). There is also a new economy flat rate shipping option that will get your books to you for only $3.99 (provided you are shipping to a U.S. address).

Reformation Theology has a more complete explanation of the new features. And, of course, you’ll want to check out the store.

Comments (13)

1
Anonymous's picture

How do you pronounce “Altrogge”?

2
Anonymous's picture

How do you pronounce “Altrogge”?

Al-TROW-gee

(the double “g” is hard as in “get”)

3
Anonymous's picture

I’m not a dispy, but Gilley’s linking of emerging/ent preaching (whoops, “conversing”) on the Kingdom of God with liberal postmillennialism makes a whole lot of sense.

4
Anonymous's picture

Carl Henry’s 1947 book “The Uneasy Conscience of Modern Fundamentalism” has a chapter on the kingdom. He talks about the now/not yet dimensions of the kingdom.

Things haven’t changed. Back then, evangelicals shied away from talking about the kingdom because the term was so heavily used by those who advocated a social gospel. Henry argues that we can’t stop talking about the kingdom, even if we disagree with those who use it most.

5
Anonymous's picture

Tim,

Thanks for your kind comment and posting a bit of my article. And for giving the correct way to pronounce my last name………..

6
Anonymous's picture

Tim, I’m curious (and forgive me if you’ve written about this extensively)—what is your preferred eschatology? I grew up dispensationalist by default in my Baptist and Pentecostal years, but when I was part of a PCA church for several years that was the period of broadening my horizons to what other options were out there. Namely, I met partial preterists and postmillenialists. I am under the general impression that these are OK positions to hold in the Reformed world; how do you feel about this. Because when I read publications like the PCA’s ByFaith, I see many resonances between emerging and Reformed articulations of the Kingdom. At the very least (for the postmillenial, even the ‘conservative’ ones) we are to do the works Jesus said were part of his good news proclamation in Mark (and in Mary’s Magnificat, and Zechariah’s prayer), works that mirror eternal kingdom realities. And we are to pray daily that earth will mirror heaven…it seems odd that we’d pray for something that we don’t expect to happen, even as a foretaste. (Tim Keller has written an excellent book about this, titled “Ministry of Mercy.” I’d post links to all of these resources here, but everytime I do my comments jump into a ‘memory hole’ of suspected spam and never see the light of day) And at the very most, the biblically-prophesied judgment has already occurred (in Preterist perspective), and the future is truly and open book with us as new creations co-laboring with God to imagine and build a new world via the Holy Spirit’s empowerment, through the church. Of course this can look like Theonomy or the mainline Social Gospel; most emerging folks I know are uncomfortable with either of these two options and wish to pave a “third way” that is faithful to Jesus and represents a harmony of God’s eternal and temporal purposes.

This is my take, at least. Am I wrong—or too touch-feely for the majority of you—to say “That’s where we emergers are coming from, we understand if you’re not—can’t we all just get along?” Because before 2005, you didn’t even know we exist—we were able to share our doubts, questions, and hopes more or less safely—we didn’t try to convert any of you. More than anything, we want to share the good news of Jesus, establish churches and intentional communities, and get involved in our communities and ecologies in a redemptive way. If you think you have a superior way of doing all of the above or if you have a different set of questions—wonderful! I say this with no malice whatsoever. Go out there, and be proactive doing and proclaiming it. I know that you already do. It just seems like this endless moaning about what we do and think is counter-productive. You aren’t going to change our hearts or minds, and we’ve pretty much concluded that we won’t change yours.

I can hear it now; this sounds odd coming from someone who sees himself as part of a ‘conversation’—why aren’t you welcome as a conversation partner? Well I’d say you are as individuals…we just don’t like it when you gang up on us in the name of ‘conversation,’ or shout at us from a megaphone. Typically in local gatherings called ‘cohorts,’ we have people from all kinds of denominational backgrounds. We don’t have a ton of Episcopalians or United Methodists trying to ambush the conversation and sway it—through more heat than light—one way or another. There is distributed representation, and all conversation partners agree on respect in advance as the M.O. of the whole time. Coming in with both guns-a-blazin’ seems…well, a bit disingenuous to ‘conversation.’

So I’ll put it this way: If one of you (say, you, Tim, since this is your blog and all) wants to drop in on a conversation and share your story and your convictions about God, faith, and life—please do! But you might want to lay low the first time or two so people can get to know you as a person. Similarly, I might want to drop in on a Desiring God or Together for the Gospel conference—but I’ll want to come under the cover of anonymity, not as “Mike Morrell the librarian of zoecarnate.com, the largest emerging church links directory on the Web.”

I’m not calling for a five-year moratorium on conversation. :) I am suggesting that maybe it should consume less of our time as we move forward on different-but-parallel tracks living out the Gospel as best we know how.

7
Anonymous's picture

Tim,

I am delighted to see that people are starting to acknowledge the pervasive subject of the Kingdom of God in ‘Emergent’ literature. It is such an important subject! I hope that Protestants will tackle the subject at a less scholarly, more accessible level (so that people will have another book to turn to other than Mclaren’s Secret Message). Do I see an idea for a new Challies book?

8
Anonymous's picture

While emerg___ camps agree about the Kingdom, and seem to share a liberal postmillenial eschatology, I perceive a division in the means employed in achieving that end. While some advocate manipulation of the political mechanism, others will rightly identify the Politics of Jesus as prohibiting the use of force in achieving the spread of the gospel or the Christian ethic.

9
Anonymous's picture

Augustine, Calvin, most other reformers, and the Roman Catholic church are all amellenialists (eastern orthodoxy might be too? dunno). Broadly said, its that Christs 1000 reign is symbolic for his reign in heaven. Its the way to go!

10
Anonymous's picture

Just so you know, I’ve interacted with this post a little more here.

11
Anonymous's picture

Wellllll…since the link doesn’t show up for real, you can click on my name in this post.

12
Anonymous's picture

Mark your statement was an answer to prayer. I’m using it at the end of my sermon this weekend, a meditation on 1 Peter 2:9, thinking finally about the fact that, in Christ, our life is a singular testimony to the excellencies of God.Your statement is such a welcome exclamation to this. Thanks for the fine words, and that’s why I wanted to know how to pronounce your name properly…

13
Anonymous's picture

Yes there are still some conservative, evangelical, reformed theology-loving people who attend Anglican churches out here. In fact, there is a pocket of us at St Alban church in Ottawa (www.stalban.ca) and we expect to face more persecution from within the “church” for our desire to adhere to Biblical authority. Perhaps many Anglicans would not have strayed so far from the Faith had they only stuck with their own book of common prayer.Philip