- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostA La Carte (2/9)
- Next Post »A La Carte (2/10)
The Christian Lover II: Dispatches from the Digital Age
- 02/09/09
- 12
A couple of weeks ago I reviewed The Christian Lover by Michael Haykin, a collection of historical love letters sent from one Christian lover to another. Despite feeling like a bit of a voyeur, spying on private communications, I enjoyed reading these letters, and highly recommended the book. But it got me thinking about my relationship with my wife and whether she and I will leave behind any such tangible evidence of our love for one another. We have a few letters from our courtship days, little love notes that we'd sooner die than have anyone else read, but notes that we can't bring ourselves to throw away. I remember my mother once saying that she and my father once exchanged such letters and we were free to read them...once she and dad were dead. But these letters I sent to Aileen were from our pre-digital days. This was before we both had email accounts. Sure I still write her cards on occasion and seek to share my heart with her on pen and paper, but more often than not, if she and I are far apart, I turn to email.
I wonder what we may be losing in a digital world. Are love letters of this kind becoming relics of an age gone by? Will tomorrow's young lovers leave behind any "hard copy" evidence of their love? Or will it all be in bits and bytes, emails, text messages and chats? When my hard drive crashes or my cell phone gets lost, am I losing all this evidence of my love for my wife and hers for me?
Is there something inherent in putting ink to paper that makes it more valuable than perhaps communicating by putting finger to keyboard and sending off an email. I began to wonder, what might this book look like in twenty or thirty years as a generation of digital natives grows older? What might we read in The Christian Lover II: Dispatches from the Digital Age?
Well, here is a chapter sharing the letters of John and Kate MacDonald, who were missionaries to China. They are both eighteen now, and these love letters will be exchanged in just a couple of years. This is an excerpt from The Christian Lover II, to be published in 2029:
*****
Following the traditions of the time, John asked permission from Katie's father Frank before asking Katie to marry him. He did so by text message.
John to Frank:
"I can ask Katie to marry me? I luv her"
Frank to John:
"k"
Records of text messages shows what an important occasion this was in the lives of these two lovers. Just five days later, the morning after she had accepted his invitation, John sent this to Katie:
"kate, had a great time on sat. can't wait to see ya again soon. byeeeee! ps sorry the ring was 2 big."
Kate's response showed how much their relationship was built upon humor and how much joy she found in him.
"lolz! love ya lots. luv teh ring!!!!"
*****
OK, it's a bit tongue-in-cheek, I admit. But I do wonder. In all likelihood, such communication would have been quickly erased, lost forever when the cell phone ran out of memory. After all, who keeps endless archives of text messages? In this case maybe it isn't a bad thing to see it lost. But what about those heartfelt, lengthy, deep emails a husband sends to his wife when he is traveling? They may get filed away in a "Keep" folder, but for how long? How will they be rediscovered 100 or 200 years later? What happens when the hard drive gets corrupted and the file destroyed?
Just the other day I was talking to a friend and asking if, in days past, a person had ever gone to his desk, taken out a pen and writing paper, written "LOL" on that paper, sealed it up, put a stamp on it, and run it out to a mailbox. Probably not. Yet every day I seem to receive an email or two that has no more content than that. And maybe I send one occasionally myself. Is there something inherently light, "unweighty," about digital communication?
Roy Rosenzweig of the Center for History and New Media at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va has this to say: "The disappearance of letters as a source for historians is a huge loss; letters have traditionally been vital to some kinds of historical work -- especially political and intellectual history." I think love letters have been vital for children to learn about their parents and grandchildren to learn about their ancestors. And I wonder if we will be leaving anything behind for the generations that will follow us. We will leave plenty of digital evidence of our existence. But will we leave that heart-to-heart, husband-to-wife evidence that has educated and comforted those who wished to know about their mothers and fathers, their grandmothers and grandfathers?
What a loss it will be if a lack of evidence means that there can never be The Christian Lover II.

I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a husband to Aileen and a father to three young children. I write books and blogs for fun while doing web design and consulting for a living. I worship and serve at 
Comments (12)
Great... right before Valentine's Day. Thanks a lot, Tim. Was this on purpose? The twin taunters, Guilt and Anxiety, are now in full voice tuning up for my annual emasculation. Only if Jesus had written a love letter that I could... oh, wait a minute.
My wife and I communicate by email while I'm at work. I keep probably 95% of the emails that she sends me and the ones that I send her. For our tenth wedding anniversary, I compiled about 4 years worth of emails between us (some romantic, some talking about the children, some just plain funny) and interspersed pictures of us and our kids on the pages. I took the CD over to Kinko's, had them print it in color and bind it into a little book, and gave it to my wife. She loved it.
For me, email has increased our written communication, and I love to go back and read some of those old emails. The key is to keep them and print them out at some point.
Very, very important and serious thoughts, Tim. I've thought about these same things. I never write letters anymore. The ones I have from earlier in life are treasured. I don't know exactly what the answer is but it's something to take seriously and give real attention to.
Tim,
This is a topic very near, and dear to my heart. I suppose I might be, even though male, a great lover of romance. I cheerfully spoil the daylights out of my wife at every opportunity.
In the love letter department, I purchased a beautiful lacquered box for my wife two Christmas' ago. It was, I told her, a place to collect all the love letters that I intend to write, and have written to her over the years.
My objective is to provide a steady supply of my love for her, in written format, for her to ponder & cherish. Furthermore, should the Lord call me home, before her, I greatly desire to leave behind a trail of my growing love for her, to encourage her not only in my love, but more importantly, of Christ's love for her.
I also desire that my children, and their children's children have this great love gift as a model for them in their love towards their spouses.
At the end of the day, marriage is the most wonderful example of Christ's love for the church, and I greatly desire to spend eternity with my wife/sister-in-Christ in praise and service of our mutual King.
Thank you for pointing this out. In a way, one can say that nothing beats "real" letters. They show emotions, ideas, and humanity more than their electronic counterparts. A huge loss, indeed.
I think we're assuming that emails will all get permanently lost. Not so.
Tech is moving in a direction where we can archive everything. Just look at gmail.
But then there's this: the speed at which we can write an email probably means we are communicating more. To a historian, this should sound like good news.
Now, we have to be very aware that were not just communicating tripe over email. We have to send thoughtful emails.
Yet, not everyone in the Victorian age sent letters. Just those who wrote. And lots of those letters got burned.
So, not sure why a historian like Rozenzweig mourns the loss of letters. I know his comment is out of context, but he sort of sounds like the horse carriage driver lamenting over the auto.
He just needs to figure out how to get his hands on the important emails.
Good stuff, Tim.
My wife regularly teases me about the lack of letters I send her. The fact that we are rarely apart for any significant length of time doesn't seem to register.That said, she was bowled over when I sent her a youtube video of Cole Porter's song You are the top.Letter's are good but I can't write as well as Cole Porter sings.
I think technology has somewhat hindered our generation but I love the fact that I could write my lady a text that she will get immediately while I'm at work instead of waiting to give her a letter later. My texts are typically longer than a few words, though.
As I've said on my blog, overall the new technologies are beneficial both personally and spiritually.
Funny this reminded me of something that happened to me about 10 years ago in an old Church.I was one of the deacons in the Church and was sharing how on occasion I serve my wife breakfast in bed.One of the deacons jokingly said to me. "Make sure you see who is coming when you are crossing all cross walks, because if it is me I am going to run you over." lol
I love letters, I love getting them I love sending them...the year my american teachers (Mr. H, US history, Mr. Nunn Journalism and Mr. Fischer US Lit) were leaving the school cause their time there was done, I wrote them a letter each and they gave me each a letter back, I still have them in a box where I keep all the letters I've gotten from friends and even some I never sent but still wanted to keep. I will never replace letter writing with email unless it is absolutely necessary, I do think something is lost in an email. In fact just today I got a letter from a friend! and there is definitely more life in a letter than email, I don't know maybe it's just me.As for text messages, I agree with Brandon, they are practically but heck so are phone calls! I prefer phone calls :D
This is a good reminder Tim. I used to write my wife often. We've only been married 10 months but already I've declined in my love notes to her. Most of them are now sent via text messaging during the day. I once wrote her a "Mr. Darcy" letter, single-spaced, no paragraphs, 5-pages, pouring my heart to her and fighting for my right to get her back (she had broken off our engagement). It cut through everything she had put up to block me. I had poor communication with her at the time (still working on it), but writing her in this way, opened the door to her heart and won her back. I communicate best when writing, so this is all the more important for me to persevere.
Emails and texts are just simply the string that connects the real gift to each other: letters, poems, and hand-written love notes. No technology can ever compare to that personal touch. In fact, I'm now energized to write my wife that poem I always don't quite get to. Thanks again Tim.
Isn't funny how some of us are so sentimental that a hand written letter would touch us more than a digital one? Did the hand written one take more time to write? Did it take more thought? Was more of your heart poured out in it?I don't think the form is so important. I should communicate love to my wife in many different ways and I so appreciate comments like Joey's to stir my imagination and provide new ways to express my love in written form.Great stuff Tim!By the way, don't just write letters to your spouse your kids cherish them also.