- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostA La Carte (3/2)
- Next Post »Saturday Ramblings
The Extraordinary Value of Women (II)
- 03/02/07
- 14
Yesterday I wrote about the Extraordinary Value of Women and did so in response to an email I received from a reader of this site. If you did not catch the first article, you can find it here. Yesterday I laid a bit of groundwork and today I want to address this reader's specific comments. She wrote: "No matter how I push my body to its limits, and no matter how much endurance I have to exhibit, God will always consider me a 'weaker vessel.' Galatians 3:21 seems to indicate that men and women are of equal value, but it's very difficult to distinguish between a lower ROLE and a lower VALUE. It's an uphill battle for me. God told me to embrace what I cannot change." I will provide the caveat that I am generally far better at talking to men than women about difficult issues like this one. I seem to have a remarkable ability to make women cry. So I will try to be as sensitive as possible, but don't say I haven't warned you!
First, I want to look at the concept of "the weaker vessel," a term that is drawn from 1 Peter 3:7 which reads "Likewise, husbands, live with your wives in an understanding way, showing honor to the woman as the weaker vessel, since they are heirs with you of the grace of life, so that your prayers may not be hindered." I understand that this may be a difficult concept for some women to swallow for no one wants to be known as weak (though the Bible certainly values weakness over strength, doesn't it?). The truth is, though, that both men and women are weak. We both depend upon God's saving grace and sustaining grace. When compared to the infinite power of God, neither man nor woman is in any way strong. So do not look at this verse as if it is saying "men are superior to women because of their strength."
Ancient society and religion commonly regarded women as weaker than men morally, intellectually and spiritually. As in Islam today, the testimony of a woman was meaningless compared to that of a man. It was a grave insult to insinuate that a man was in any way like a woman. Women were regarded as second class citizens. The Bible, though, says something different. The Bible promotes equal worth and equal value between men and women. 1 Peter 3:7 says nothing about a woman being weaker in any ultimate sense. Rather, it simply comments on the general rule that women are physically weaker than men. This is to say that the average man is stronger than the average woman. This verse says that men are to provide for their wives and to protect them. They are to do this in a way that is sacrificial and submits to their wives needs and desires. Without protection, women would soon fall prey to men (and, indeed, this is true throughout history and throughout almost every other religion). This is a verse promoting chivalry--a general honor and respect given to women by men.
I love what the Baker Commentary says about this verse. "Therefore, as the stronger of the two marriage partners, the husband ought to shoulder the heavier burdens, protect his wife, and provide for her according to her needs. Although the husband claims authority, he nevertheless honors, sustains, and loves his wife. We detect an apparent contradiction: the physically weaker wife submits to her husband's authority, yet she receives his honor and respect. We conclude that the wife who understands her submissive role according to the scriptural norms finds complete fulfillment in her husband." The loving husband, knowing that his wife is weaker, shoulders the heavy burdens and does all he can to protect, honor and sustain her. He gives sacrificially of his strength in order to show his love for her. Matthew Henry says the husband's roles involves "giving due respect to her, and maintaining her authority, protecting her person, supporting her credit, delighting in her conversation, affording her a handsome maintenance, and placing a due trust and confidence in her."
So I don't know that God will always consider you a weaker vessel. The truth is that you will always be a weaker vessel. You will always be female and you will always be physically weaker. This is the way God made you. And even more so, that is the way God made the human race. It is just not a comment on your worth or value, but on the way God shaped you. And having made you this way, God has graciously provided your husband to protect and honor you.
Of course it would be wrong for a man to read this and to boast in his strength. His physical strength is given so that he can use it to serve his wife and to provide for his family. And yet even this strength is so weak compared to the power of God. Even the strongest man must rely on God.
I also wanted to briefly discuss the concepts of role and value. I understand that it can be very difficult to distinguish between the two or to understand how differing roles can maintain equal worth or value. I suppose there are all kinds of intellectual arguments we could make, but I find it best and easier simply to point to God Himself. The Trinity, God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit is the ultimate example of differing roles but equal value. God is three persons; each person is fully God and yet there is but one God. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit together form the godhead. They are equal in their divinity but different in role. They have different primary functions. And yet neither one is of greater worth or value than the others. No one could rightly say that the Father has greater value than the Son or the Spirit. No one could rightly say that the Spirit has lower worth than the Father or the Son, and this despite the fact that the Spirit's ministry always points away from Himself and to the Son and the Father. Though He exists primarily to point to the other members of the godhead, He is not a lesser being or of lower value. His role does not reflect His value.
Submission in marriage is a beautiful picture of the relationships within the Trinity. While the husband and wife have different roles, they have equal value and worth. If this is true of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, it can and should be true of us. There is nothing in Scripture that hints at women being lower than men in value.
The reader wrote "God told me to embrace what I cannot change." And this is true. God desires that you embrace what He has said is true. Perhaps your trouble is that you are attempting to embrace an incomplete or incorrect understanding of the issues. I pray that these articles, weak as they are, will have given you some things to think about that you may think rightly about God and think rightly about how He has made you. I pray that you can embrace what is true rather than struggling with what is not. God gave men and women differing roles in order to protect us and to bless us. He did not intend for them to be difficult or burdensome. They are given to us that we might live as He intends for us to live.

I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a husband to Aileen and a father to three young children. I write books and blogs for fun while doing web design and consulting for a living. I worship and serve at 
Comments (14)
Tim,
Excellent articles!
I just wanted to point out that struggle over the roles of man and wife came about after the Fall. Gen. 3:16; "...Yet your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you" A study of this verse (and others linked to it) and the excellent resource "Rediscovering Biblical Manhood & Womanhood" edited by John Piper and Wayne Grudem would be beneficial for anyone to better understand the distinct roles and equal value we have.
Hayden,
I have also heard some say that the 'desire' mentioned in the verse you cited does not refer to attraction, but to the desire for the man's authority. In other words, God is saying to woman, "You will desire to usurp your husband's authority, but he will be the one to hold the position as head of the family."
Any thoughts on that?
Brian....I believe that interpretation is an excellent one. I first read it in Dr. Allen P. Ross' commentary on Genesis. Apart from it likely being an accurate interpretation, most women can testify to it's validity working out in our lives.
Regarding the issue of women and their station/status, this came up during our Precepts study on Leviticus. The verses that declared women unclean for a longer period of time after the birth of a female child as opposed to a male and the "valuation of persons" in Lev. 27.
The articles here have been "sensitive" and loving. But I mostly try to fall back on the Biblical principle of can the thing made argue with it's creator as to why he made it that way. "No" is the logical response and I'll live with that.
'1 Peter 3:7 which reads "Likewise, husbands, live with your wives in an understanding way, showing honor to the woman as the weaker vessel, since they are heirs with you of the grace of life, so that your prayers may not be hindered."'
This is a very sobering verse for me as a husband. If I fail to honor, and love my wife as I am called to by God He simply will not listen to me. This verse scared me to death when I read it in our pre-marital class. This verse should give wives hope to know that God has provided their husband to love them in such a way.
Thanks, Tim. I love reading stuff like this...the Gospel is so beautiful when it comes to roles, isn't it?
I love this - "Submission in marriage is a beautiful picture of the relationships within the Trinity. While the husband and wife have different roles, they have equal value and worth."
I have also heard some men speaking of the "weaker vessel" that woman are generally also weaker emotionally. Although I understand the arguments for it and see how it may be true, I'm not sure if it's taught from this text.
There are always exceptions to the rules though, whether it's physical or otherwise.
I have heard it said that the phrase "weaker vessel" should be seen to refer to women as delicate and fragile, but in the sense of fine china. You don't bring out your grandmother's china for the Super Bowl party, and you don't harass your wife like she's "just one of the guys." ;)
I wonder if part of the problem doesn't come from the reader's use (not yours, Tim) of the term "a lower ROLE". Subordinate role, yes, but I'm not sure that means lower role in the way we usually use the word lower, which I'd think usually carries with it the idea of less important.
After all, even though I'd affirm that Christ's role in salvation is subordinate to the Father's (the Father plans and sends, the Son goes and does), I would never in a million years say the Son has a lower role in salvation. His work (or role) is the centerpiece of salvation even though His work is subordinate to the Father's planning and sending.
Tim, great post.
You dealt both with the "weaker" aspect and the "vessel" aspect, although you didn't mention the latter by name.
Confer 1Cor 12:22 on weakness and 2Cor 4:7 on vessel-ness onto 1Pet 3:7, and the point that you were making rings clear: both are vessels; the surpassing greatness of the power is God's. The fact that men know that we are just vessels ought to humble us into all-out-and-no-holds-barred service to the other, more delicate, and just as necessary, vessel.
If we are so self-important as to miss this, it is no wonder that our prayers shall be hindered!
Rebecca,
Kudos on highlighting the difference between subordination and diminished value.
My understanding of a verse that many find difficult is that Paul makes the exact same point in 1Tim 2:15. He is saying that women already have a role in the plan of salvation that cannot be surpassed in value.
Consider Timothy's own experience of this fantastic women's ministry (2Tim 1:5, and esp 2Tim 3:14-16, where ma and grandma are given equal--and perhaps greater--value to Paul's apostolic discipleship of him).
Of course, this is not the only ministry for women (Paul himself commands others, cf. 1Tim 5, Titus 2), but this one really takes the cake. Most women have a roll in God's saving that is equal or greater in its value to that of an apostle. By comparison, very few men are called to be elders.
No wonder the one who aspires to the office of overseer desires a good thing (1Tim 3:1). We men are just trying to catch up :-)
I have many times been edified by your blog, Rebecca, and now I have been edified by your comment as well. Thank you.
James
No crying here. :-)
Thanks, Tim!
Tim,I am a little cofused...I thought this was referring to the way Eve was tricked in the garden first and susceptible to being tricked? I see that is not at all how you take it, but do you think this is a part of it at all?? ?:/
This is a vital series Tim. There is so much confusion about this in the world.
Josh"...the word of God is not bound."--2 Timothy 2:9
It might be helpful for women to think of being the weaker vessel in terms of another biblical analogy which Paul uses when elucidating the doctrine of election in Romans. He states that God makes some vessels for noble use and others for ignoble. Presumably the one made for noble use would be of more formal or decorative use, what we might term ceramic or a finer more brittle type of china. The ignoble vessel was probably a thicker coarser type of pottery that required less finesse in its forming. The former, though more brittle, is more noble that the coarser but stronger pottery vessel.