- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostA La Carte (03/16)
- Next Post »A La Carte (03/17)
The Study of History
- 03/16/06
- 14
While I currently work as a web designer, and despite receiving training in another area of the computer field (network administration, for those who may be interested), my most significant training was in history. It was history that I studied while in college and it is, in many ways, still my first love. In the eight or ten years since I completed college I have continued to read in history, and in particular, in church history. Over the past few days I have been working my way through the first volume of The Baker History of the Church. It is a little bit intimidating to find myself only a few chapters into a five-volume set and this has caused me to step back and consider the importance of the study of history.
This morning, as I read about the first-century church, I was struck by the blessedness of living in our generation. As I study the very early Christians I begin to see again just what a legacy we have as Christ followers. The faith as we know it today was not simply handed to us, but was developed over hundreds and thousands of years. The Scriptures have been studied again and again and again, and the general pattern has been incremental steps forward and often larger steps backward. Sometimes God sees fit to allow the church to take a giant step forward, as in the days of the Reformation, but more often the church has slowly and deliberately developed doctrine that accords to Scripture. Today we have unprecedented access to the Scripture and to resources dealing with the Bible. For this we ought to be profoundly grateful.
Here, then, are some of the reasons that I believe we need to engage in the study of history:
God Tells Us To: The Bible continually exhorts believers to search out and remember the past. The Old Testament in particular is filled with references to God commanding the Israelites to remember His deeds of the past. He instituted ceremony after ceremony, festival after festival, that caused His people to look to what He had done in the past. Veiled in many of these ceremonies and festivals was a glimpse of what would happen in the future. And so, when we look to the past, we may also glimpse just a little bit of what God promises us in the future.
"For inquire, please, of bygone ages,
and consider what the fathers have searched out.
For we are but of yesterday and know nothing,
for our days on earth are a shadow.
Will they not teach you and tell you
and utter words out of their understanding?"
(Job 8:8-10)
To Understand The Present Climate: Because so much of the history and theology of the church is defined in terms related to error and great difficulty, we should study the past to understand the present. The study of history, when done right, is always a humbling experience. It allows us to understand and sympathize with the plight of those who came before us. It helps us understand the blessings we enjoy today that were not always enjoyed by our brothers and sisters in days past. It also prevents us from developing a view of the faith that is irrationally focused on our day and ignores the long, storied history of the church.
To Understand the Future: History is not just a study of the past in an attempt to understand the present, but is also an attempt to understand the future. When we see the patterns of days gone by, we can begin to formulate ideas about where current trends will lead. By understanding the past we begin to understand the future.
To Understand Providence: As Christians we are often guilty of dwelling in the present and looking eagerly to the future while forgetting all about the past. But to do this is to lose sight of the valuable teaching of the past. In past days God revealed Himself in mighty ways, continually providing for His people through trial and persecution. When we study the past, we can see many of the ways in which God's providence has been already displayed. This can serve as a valuable teaching tool as we prepare to face trials or persecution in our day. It can and should spur us to greater love and appreciation of God and give us greater confidence in His promises. As He has been faithful to men and women of days gone by, He will be faithful to us and to our children. This assurance gives us great stability in our faith.
To Understand Error: In many ways the history of the church is a history of action and reaction. Much of Christian theology has been developed and strengthened in reaction to error and heresy. When we visit the past we can see how error has arisen in the church and we can see which errors have already arisen and have been decided by a consensus of the church. This can be valuable as we face the inevitable error in our own day. Many Christians engage anew in battles over doctrine for which they could receive a great deal of guidance from great theologians of days past. By studying what has happened, we can avoid future errors and even the patterns that precede error.
To Understand People: We all enjoy considering who we would choose to sit for a meal with, were we able to select from all the people who are living or have lived in the past. The reality, of course, is that we cannot speak with our heroes who have lived before us. Yet by studying history we can come to know and understand them. We can come to see the parts of their lives that brought glory to God and the parts that brought Him dishonor. We can see what led to their rise to prominence within the church and perhaps the character flaws that led to their downfall. We can learn much not just from history, but from specific people who lived in a period of history.
To Understand Endurance: Since Christ left the earth, Christians have lived in anticipation of His return. Those who lived in the first century expected that this event would be imminent. And yet, two millenia later, we continue to wait. As we look to history we arm ourselves with the knowledge that Christ's return may still be far off. As we see how men and women have persevered throughout the history of the church, we are strengthened with endurance, knowing that we, too, shall be witnesses to Christ's return when the Father sees fit.

I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a husband to Aileen and a father to three young children. I write books and blogs for fun while doing web design and consulting for a living. I worship and serve at 
Comments (14)
All this time has passed and no comments yet? Does this mean no one else out there finds church history interesting? Sigh...
Tim, I've eyed this set as a possible purchase, but as you say, it's five volumes, and pretty pricey. You didn't indicate in your post whether or not you liked what you've read so far in the first volume. I skimmed through first volume in Borders one night, and the text seemed unwieldy (not particularly well written).
I've read about half of the first volume. So far I am quite enjoying it. I have found it well-written and I've enjoyed reading about the Bible like history rather than theology (which is to say that the author writes like one would write about any other historical event).
There are a few problems with the book. Notably, the author tends to chase after theories as to who wrote which book and even lends some credence to the idea that Paul did not write the pastoral epistles, that James did not write the book attributed to him, and so on. That is a little disappointing, but doesn't ruin the book for me.
So I suppose I'd say, "so far, so good!"
I hane not seen the Baker set, but I have Phillip Schaff's History of the Christian Church (8 volumes), and it seems very good. It is pretty widely recommended.
You are so right about the importance of reading history. I think a lot of the discontent with "traditional church" today stems from a perspective that can't see beyond our own times. There is really nothing going on today that hasn't been seen before.
This topic reminded me of something Sinclair Ferguson said during one of the Ligonier Conference Q&A sessions. The context of the question was regarding those who think of the established churches (in buildings) as being evil, but I think his comments are applicable here. Ferguson said, "Many think the gospel started a few years before they were converted! They have NO historical understanding. A little knowledge of church history preserves us."
See! Taking notes at a conference really does pay off. It aided in me recalling that statement. Cool!
I have a question for anyone who will grace me with thier opinion. I just found a new church to go to. I had began a 3 yr study on Revelation at my previous church, we are currently on the 2nd of 4 parts. It has been great. However, my current Church has Sunday school at the same time and is going over Church history which I am very interested in. I am having a hard time with whether or not I should stop going to my Revelation study with my previous church and going to Sunday school at my current church.
Any words of wisdom?
Dallas - Seems like there is a lot more we'd need to know to give you biblical advice, but generally I'd suggest committing to one church, not splitting your attention between two.
Dallas, Tim is right, you need to decide which church you belong to. Your previous church is "previous" for a reason, whatever that is. You need to be committed to your new church.
I'd have to agree with Tim's general suggestion of committing to one church, especially if this new church you have found has a biblical understanding of church membership.
If you plan on becoming a member, they probably have some sort of membership covenant in which you covenant not only your talents and resources...but also your time.
I know of some individuals who are trying to split time between two churches, and they just never seem to get planted into either body. There seems to be an ongoing disconnect.
I'm not saying that would automatically happen with you, but I think the best thing would be to commit yourself completely to only one local bride of Christ.
Ok. I left my previous church because of a few reasons, one of the main reasons was the whole 40 days of purpose praise athon. Another was my wife and I wanted to go to a church where the pastor practiced expository preaching.
I guess I am torn because I feel like I committed to going to this bible study for it's complete duration. But, I have also committed to my Church and want to do so with all my heart and am very interested in both topics.
My current church in gracious enough to understand my plight, and so is my previous church. I guess I am lucky to have this problem of which great study to go to.
What do you think?
Tim
I did history too--Reformation and Renaissance history and it was primarily through the study of history that I began reading reformed theology.
Way back (1969 actually), I had to take a course in Western Civilization. As part of the assigned reading, we read part of a chapter of Calvin's Institutes. The assignment, to my surprise began in the middle of the Chapter, which I thought very odd. I read the whole selection, and found myself looking up Bible verses and pondering the implications of what I had read (about the sovereignty of God). In class, I objected to begnning the reading in the middle of the chapter and was accused (for the first time) of being a Calvinist.
I am now, although I was not then.
The whole of church history--from Adam on, belongs to us. Like it or not, we are part of it, if we are Christians. Too many Protestant Christians concern themselves only with the details of their own denominational history. Pre-reformation history is thought to belong to the Catholics, or possibly to the Jews. Not so.
With that in mind, I would like to wish everyone a Happy Saint Patrick's Day. The real Saint Patrick was a missionary who merits our respect.
Regards,Keep up the good work
Janet MacDougall
P.S. When is the new baby due
Dallas, I have to echo the sentiments from the others and suggest you commit to your current church and not your previous one.
I was faced with a difficult situation in my church but after some godly counsel with a few leaders and brothers outside the church I decided to stay. I continue to pray for reform in my church because our identity is schizophrenic swinging between "seeker-sensitive" to creating disciples. Leaving a church is a weighty issue though quite a few people I know treat it like it was nothing.
I definitely think the church needs to do a better job at teaching some of the fallacies of the past. So often we forget lessons that were already learned the hard way.
BTW, Old Testament is awesome and people need to read it more =op.
hi i have gone through the materieal posted and i feel we are of like minds. currently iam taking a unit in church history. in my master of divinity degree and iam loving the history of the church- your materiel on the importance of history has helped me a great deal.
hello...can i ask something?history,gosh...is very difficult for me...why is it that you like it so much?it makes me think that i'm so stupid to hate it...