- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostA La Carte (6/10)
- Next Post »A La Carte (6/11)
Book Review - Lone Survivor
- 06/10/08
- 8
“I tried to get a hold of myself. But again in my mind I heard that terrible, terrible scream, the same one that awakens me, bullying its way into my solitary dreams, night after night, the confirmation of guilt. The endless guilt of the survivor. ‘Help me, Marcus! Please help me!’ It was a desperate appeal in the mountains of a foreign land. It was a scream cried out in the echoing high canyons of one of the loneliest places on earth. It was the nearly unrecognizable cry of a mortally wounded creature. And it was a plea I could not answer. I can’t forget it. Because it was made by one of the finest people I ever met, a man who happened to be my best friend.”
In 2005, Marcus Luttrell was part of a four-man mission in the mountains of Afghanistan. A member of the elite Navy SEALs, he was tasked with killing a Taliban leader who had close ties with Osama bin Laden. This small team was hidden outside a village, surveying the area and looking for their target, when a small group of goat herders stumbled upon them. The soldiers quickly detained the two men and the teenage boy and debated what they should do. The most obvious solution and the one that would be most conducive to their mission would be to immediately execute their prisoners. But when the four soldiers put it to a vote, it was determined that they should let these people go. Morality won over personal preservation. But was it morality or fear? “Was I afraid of these guys? No. Was I afraid of their possible buddies in the Taliban? No. Was I afraid of the liberal media back in the U.S.A.? Yes. And I suddenly flashed on the prospect of many, many years in a U.S. civilian jail alongside murderers and rapists.” The former prisoners quickly and inevitably reported to the Taliban leaders and the SEALs were soon fighting for their lives. Before long three of the men were dead and the fourth, Luttrell, was running for his life (though not before the Americans killed somewhere around 100 enemy soldiers. Don’t mess with the SEALs!). It was a terrible slaughter, made worse when a helicopter carrying a rescue force was shot down, killing sixteen more Americans.
Lone Survivor tells the story of this mission through the eyes of Luttrell, the only man who lived to tell the tale. The book was released to great acclaim and has become a fixture on the bestseller lists. While the book is in many ways a typical war story (a description of SEAL training camp, tales of combat, lots and lots of bad language and tales of remarkable heroism) it goes beyond the story to share at least a couple of very important statements about warfare today. And this is, I think, where the reader stands to benefit most.
One of this book’s most important statements is that the current rules of engagement soldiers are required to adhere to are irrational and are the product of politicians who are far from the action. “Any government that thinks war is somehow fair and subject to rules like a baseball game probably should not get into one. Because nothing’s fair in war, and occasionally the wrong people do get killed.” American soldiers are being forced to fight in situations where they are almost guaranteed to take casualties because of restrictive rules of engagement. These rules may make sense to politicians safely ensconced in their Washington offices, but they are utterly unfair and unsafe on the battlefield. Luttrell states clearly and emphatically that these rules are costing lives and that the United States should not be willing to fight wars that she cannot fight to win.
The other important statement is about the role of the media in modern warfare. Luttrell’s disgust for the media knows no bounds. “It’s been an insidious progression, the criticisms of the U.S. Armed Forces from politicians and from the liberal media, which knows nothing of combat, nothing of our training, and nothing of the mortal dangers we face out there on the front line.” “I promise you, every insurgent, freedom fighter, and stray gunman in Iraq who we arrested knew the ropes, knew that the way out was to announce that he had been tortured by the Americans, ill treated, or prevented from reading the Koran or eating his breakfast or watching the television. They all knew al-Jazeera, the Arab broadcasters, would pick it up, and it would be relayed to the U.S.A., where the liberal media would joyfully accuse all of us of being murderers or barbarians or something. Those terrorist organizations laugh at the U.S. media, and they know exactly how to use the system against us.” Those of us who have watched recent wars from afar can attest that this is exactly the case. The media, and particularly the liberal media, seems too often to side with the bad guys. Soldiers are fighting brutal warfare, all the while more terrified of their own nation’s press than the guys shooting at them. They hardly know who the real enemy is.
Lone Survivor is an enjoyable book, typical in many of its facets, but atypical in its deeper message. It is a book Americans would do well to read and to consider. (Do be warned, in case you missed it earlier, that Luttrell is a solider and he uses the language of a soldier.)

I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a husband to Aileen and a father to three young children. I worship and serve as a pastor at 


Releasing on April 1, The Next
Comments (8)
Sailor or SEAL…soldiers are in the Army, Marines are in the Marines…common mistake.
Sounds like a fascinating read. I have a long and deep respect for the military and the task they do to keep the west safe. I agree with his assessment that in war , you cannot play it like a baseball game. Just think if they had executed their prisoners , which I hold would have been acceptable in a war like the one we are fighting , if the media would have had a field day with it . My thinking is this , why don’t we send all those liberal media and celebrity types who so willfully dis these soldiers and the mission and who think the likes of Bin Laden can be talked to (ie: Jack Layton ) over into their territory and see what occurs . I thank God for those serving because they pay a price I have never had to pay and have told my son’s that if they ever want to sign up to serve I would be proud .
Thanks for the review. I lean towards listening more to the military than politicians.
But there is wrong behavior on both sides. The military has tortured, and mistreated prisoners, and even civilians in the past, and I’m sure the same happens today.
Torture for tortures sake is wrong. And some types of torture should never be condone. But some of the milder ways of causing these murderers to give valuable information, I’m all for. If it saves lives, then it’s worth it.
These who they are interrogated will be murderers, and people who would slice the throats of every American, Isralie, and frre person in this world.They could simply be shot, or even hung by the neck until dead, but don’t waterboard them.I don’t get it.
After saying all that, I do think we need to be very, very cautious with torture. Torture is quite eveil, and we better hate it, and hate having to use it.
This is a difficult subject, and makes the emotions raw.
I read this book about 2 weeks ago myself.
It was a great read, but I honestly feel torn when I put myself in their shoes. While difficult, they made the right moral decision to let the shepherds go.
I agree that the insight Luttrell gives of the media’s relation to the war is the best aspect of the book.
I picked this book up the week before last Christmas. It was not an easy read. Don’t get me worng, it is a page turner. The fact that the reader joins Marcus on the journey of reliving the most horrific eevnts anyone could go through makes it tough. I am in awe at the level of determination and the sense of duty and honor these men put into their jobs. It is something we should all strive for. I recommend this book as well because it speaks of the realities of war. There are often no clear rules and many people get caught up in situations that are tragic.
In Al Mohler’s book, Culture Shift, there is an interesting chapter that touches on the subject of torture and the war on terror.
With all due respect, I cannot agree with some of the commentary on the book. Namely, I do not see how these two comments:
“Morality won over personal preservation.”“…they made the right moral decision to let the shepherds go.”
can be squared away with these two passages from the article:”But was it morality or fear? … “Was I afraid of the liberal media back in the U.S.A.? Yes. And I suddenly flashed on the prospect of many, many years in a U.S. civilian jail alongside murderers and rapists.”
“…though not before the Americans killed somewhere around 100 enemy soldiers. Don’t mess with the SEALs!). It was a terrible slaughter, made worse when a helicopter carrying a rescue force was shot down, killing sixteen more Americans.”
The first passage directly contradicts the first comment. And as for the second comment, I cannot imagine how 100 enemy soldiers and 19 American soldiers dead is better than three filthy goatherders dead. Worse yet is the tone of the commentary sympathizing with the soldiers’ decision to spare the shepherds yet reveling in the gore of SEALs mowing down scores of enemies - a “terrible slaughter” indeed. Every one of these people is a human life.
Yes, some will argue that the shepherds were innocent civilians, and I concede that that is true. But are they really that different from the enemy soldiers? They were all probably from the same region and of the same ethnicity, and the shepherds would likely take up an AK-47 and kill “infidels” just as soon as the soldiers would. Furthermore, the shepherds performed a military role by transmitting military information that led to the soldiers’ deaths - not exactly “innocent” if I may say so.
I concede that this is a “sticky” and complicated issue, and I believe Paul (the commenter) made a good point when he said of war, “There are often no clear rules and many people get caught up in situations that are tragic.”
That being said, I agree heartily with the main content of the article, that U.S. forces are often unduly restricted by R.O.E.s made by aloof politicians and that the liberal media is extremely detrimental to the war effort. We cannot possibly win when our worst enemy is ourself.
Thanks for the review, Tim. I’ll have to put this book on my list.
I’m US military vet and I served in the global war on terror (Iraq). I’m certainly no lover of war. And regarding torture, killing civilians on the battlefield, undue use of force and related issues I agree in principle with those who say we must not become a monster to kill a monster. How we go about destroying the terrorists is just as important as the fact that we must find them and kill them.
With that said, I agree wholeheartedly with the sentiment that the mainstream, liberal news media in the US and worldwide is a great danger to our armed forces. I go further and say that the ideologies and worldviews present in the media and many politicians are more dangerous than any terrorist group or other murderous force could be.
As long as our military is allowed to do its job, we can face any external threat. Foreign terrorists or armies may attack us and even cripple us, but history has so far proven that they will not beat us. But the threat posed by these liberals in positions of influence and power is beyond crippling because it comes from within. These are Americans who, like the venomous Vietnam protesters, would rather see Americans dead than our enemies.
Why so many Americans allow these people to retain their positions in mass media and government is beyond me. They are certainly entitled to their beliefs and opinions. But if our nation continues to allow them to lead in matters of public opinion and policy, they will destroy us. The great American experiment will be undone by blind, foolish Americans. The world will lose a bright, shining example of a culture where freedom, liberty, and prosperity thrived. And the rest of us will be to blame for letting it happen.
We’re watching this happen. It is real. I’m not sure how imminent the demise of America is, but we are close enough for me to imagine the end coming in my lifetime or in the generation to follow me.
Praise God that we have an eternal hope in Christ Jesus which is not rooted in nations or ideologies of men. There will be an end to wars. There will be no more terrorism or torture or even death.
In these days we simply must stay focused on Him and His glorious Word. “Let the evildoer still do evil, and the filthy still be filthy, and the righteous still do right, and the holy still be holy.”
“Amen. Come, Lord Jesus!”