- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostFootball Talk
- Next Post »Biblical Worldview
Book Review - Rick Warren's The Purpose Driven Life
- 01/12/04
- 140
Rick Warren's The Purpose Driven Life is a runaway bestseller, having already sold over ten million copies, making it one of the best-selling Christian books of all time. Thousands of churches have committed to leading their congregations through the Forty Days of Purpose program. I decided to spend forty days journaling my way through this book to try to determine what they hype is all about.
The Purpose Driven Life proclaims itself to be "more than a book; it is a guide to a 40-day spiritual journey that will enable you to discover the answer to life's most important question: What on earth am I here for?" We see that the author is setting his sights high; he is going to attempt to answer the greatest question we can face - that of our meaning and purpose. He promises that at the end of the journey "you will know God's purpose for your life and will understand the big picture - how all the pieces of your life fit together." The results of this will be amazing. "Having this perspective will reduce your stress, simplify your decisions, increase your satisfaction, and, most important, prepare you for eternity." It is a courageous man who would write a book that claims it will do all of that. Of course these lofty standards help us realize why this book has attracted such great attention!
The format of the book is simple. The book is divided into six parts: an introduction followed by a section for each of the five purposes Rick Warren has discovered. Each day's reading is only a few pages long and is followed by a verse of the Bible to memorize, a point to ponder and a question to consider. The book is packed with over 1200 quotations from the Bible.
There are many positive aspects to this book. The author obviously loves the church and views the local church as a beautiful institution. He speaks of the value and necessity of Christian community that can only be gained through the local church. He is firm on this point, stating that there is no such thing as a lone Christian. He has many good things to say about worship and how so many people view worship as being about themselves rather than being an outpouring of praise and obedience towards God. He speaks of the value of identifying and utilizing our spiritual gifts.
I believe Rick Warren is a godly man who truly wants to reach the world for Christ. In interviews I have read I can see that he certainly has an understanding of the Reformed tradition and has affirmed his belief in the “five solas” of the Reformation. When with Reformed people he certainly can talk the talk, so to speak. Though I do not doubt his faith or his intentions, I find that the book itself deviates from Reformed doctrine on many points.
There are literally hundreds of reviews of this book that focus on the positive attributes of the book. Many of them are written very well and there is little I can add to them. For that reason I am going to focus on some of the concerns I have with this book.
Problems in the Introduction
As I pointed out, this book makes great promises. Though there is nothing wrong with setting high standards, what is the measure of these standards? It seems that all of these standards are based on experience. There is nothing here about having a closer walk with God. As a matter of fact, there is little promised that would not be found in a secular book about finding purpose. Experience will be the ultimate measure of whether this book has succeeded. It does not promise to change the heart or mind.
One of the primary goals of the Christian life is to learn more about God and how He wants us to live. We are then to become more and more conformed to His will. This book has little to say about this process we know as sanctification.
The book is based on a false premise that there is supernatural value to a 40-day study. The author says that "whenever God wanted to prepare someone for his purposes he took 40 days." This is simply not true. Though the 40 day time period is used quite often in Scripture, we should not be superstitious about it. There are many examples of God taking different amounts of time to prepare people. Having to force the book to a length of forty days leads to a lot of repetition, especially in the last four or five chapters.
Thesis
Page 25 seems to summarize the thesis of the book. It says "We discover that meaning and purpose only when we make God the reference point of our lives." This seems to say that if the reader finds God he will also find himself and his purpose. This is not the gospel!
Multiple translations
Rick Warren quotes the Bible over 1,200 times in the text of The Purpose Driven Life. To do so, he uses fifteen different translations and paraphrases. Appendix 3 contains his rationale for this and he provides two reasons for the number of translations. The first is that in any single translation "nuances and shades of meaning can be missed, so it is always helpful to compare translations." The second is "the fact that we often miss the full impact of familiar Bible verses, not because of poor translating, but simply because they have become so familiar." (author's emphases) He believes this will "help you see God's truth in new, fresh ways." (author's emphasis)
The author's logic is faulty as the two reasons he provides contradict each other. If a translation introduces something in a new and fresh way it will necessarily introduce new nuances and shades of meaning. The way to remove nuances and shades of meaning is to use as literal a translation as possible so that the words are God's alone and are not interpreted by the translator. The author can then exposit the text, clarifying what might require clarification. This is nothing more than the traditional means of teaching what the Bible says.
As for verses losing their full impact, this may happen to some Christians, but rather than use poor Scripture translations, the author should help the reader focus on the fact that as a Christian he should love the Bible. As with David, God's Law is to be our delight day and night and not something we grow tired of.
There is a serious impact to Warren's use of so many translations. It shows his view of the inspiration and sufficiency of Scripture. It seems that he does not believe that the Bible as God wrote it is sufficient for people today. He must believe that a very loose paraphrase like The Message can impact people in a way that the real translations cannot. He shows that he is not a faithful expositor of the Bible.
Audience
The author aims this book at two distinct audiences - believers and unbelievers. He shows that he is, initially at least, writing for unbelievers by inviting them to pray a short prayer, asking them to say "Jesus, I believe in you and I receive you." He then welcomes them to the family of God. I fear, though, that he uses too many Christian terms and phrases to really connect with unbelievers. Similarly, if he is hoping to reach new Christians, I think the same holds true - the "Christianese" terms and many of the Biblical references may alienate them. On the other hand, if he is hoping to reach mature Christians, much of the book will be too simplistic for them.
We know from the Bible that there is a vast difference between believers and unbelievers. Those who have come to a saving knowledge of Christ have had their very natures changed. They have become adopted children of God and have become heirs to His promises. They have special privileges and they have knowledge and faith that unbelievers do not. This is not to say that a book can or should not be written that attempts to reach both audiences. What it does mean is that an author must be sure to distinguish between audiences, being careful not to mislead either audience.
Warren often fails to differentiate between audiences. For example, in the second chapter he quotes Ephesians 1:4 which reads "just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we would be holy and blameless before Him." The context of this verse shows that the author is referring to only Christians, yet Warren makes no distinction.
The Gospel
The author does not at any time provide a clear explanation of the gospel message. On page 58 he says, "Real life begins by committing yourself completely to Jesus Christ" but never comes closer than that. He never writes about such crucial doctrines as man's sinfulness and need for a Savior or the work of Jesus. He never mentions the importance Christ's life, the cross or the empty tomb. Yet on page 58 we find him leading the prayer of "Jesus, I believe in you and I receive you" and then saying "Welcome to the family of God!" How can a person become a Christian without any understanding of his own sinfulness or of Christ's sacrifice on our behalf?
The author paints God's relationship with humans as being nothing but love. On page 294 he says “God has never made a person he didn’t love.” Yet we know that God expressed hatred towards Esau and Pharaoh. It seems that the author would have no explanation for such displays of hatred.
Warren's gospel seems to be one of purpose. He teaches that man's greatest problem is purposelessness and this book will remedy that situation by helping the reader discover his purpose. Needless to say, this is not the gospel as taught by the Bible. The Bible teaches that man's greatest problem is that he is a sinner and is alienated from God. Purposelessness is insignificant compared to the possibility of an eternity in hell.
Life Application
The aim studying the Bible is application. We are to study the Bible so we can apply what we learn to our lives, with the ultimate aim of conforming ourselves to the image of Christ. Application, though, depends on proper teaching and sound knowledge. It stands to reason that a person cannot apply to his life something he does not understand. Teaching stands as the foundation that application is built upon.
Since Warren does not explain the gospel and the real means of salvation, how can people truly apply what he teaches? If everything is application, what do they really believe in?
Purpose
The Purpose Driven Life is premised on the teaching that only Christians can live with purpose. It follows, then, that unbelievers have no real purpose to their lives. Yet the Bible teaches that they do! Proverbs 16:4 says "The Lord has made everything for its own purpose, even the wicked for the day of evil." Unbelievers do have a purpose, though it is not the same as the purpose God has for those who believe in Him. Interestingly, in chapter seven the author quotes this passage but omits the second half of the verse.
Bible Use
We have already seen how the author has used multiple translations as well as his justification for doing so. Of even greater concern is his carelessness in his use of the Bible. He continually removes Scripture passages from their proper context in order to make them suit his purposes. He carelessly applies promises to the reader that clearly do not apply. He also distorts or changes the meanings of certain passages to make them say what he wants them to say.
First we will examine promises Warren says apply to all Christians. One clear example of this is Jeremiah 29:11 which he uses multiple times in the book. On page 31 we read "Wonderful changes are going to happen in your life as you begin to live it on purpose. God says "I know what I am planning for you…'I have good plans for you, not plans to hurt you. I will give you hope and a good future'." When read in context we see that this verse is not written to apply to all Christians. It is a promise given specifically to the Israelite exiles. By Warren's logic Jeremiah 44:27 should also apply to all Christians. It reads, "I am watching over them for harm and not for good, and all the men of Judah who are in the land of Egypt will meet their end by the word and by famine until they are completely gone." A pastor once told me "that verse wouldn't sell as many plaques at the Christian book stores."
A second example is Isaiah 44:2. This is used in the heading of the second chapter and is rendered "I am your Creator. You were in my care even before you were born." The author chooses to quote only the first part of the verse. The second part, we see, goes directly against what he wants to say. It reads "Do not fear, O Jacob My servant; And you Jeshurun whom I have chosen." When viewed in the proper context we see that this verse applies only to a specific group (which is, once again, the Israelites).
There are some passages where Warren uses the Bible extremely carelessly. The clearest example of this is in chapter 10 where he discusses the blessing of surrendering to God. As support he quotes Job 22:21 as saying "Stop quarreling with God. If you agree with him, you will have peace at last, and things will go well for you." When we look at the larger context of this passage we see that these are the words of Eliphaz, one of Job's infamous friends. We see that Eliphaz is giving Job poor advice which God later condemns. Warren knows better than this!
Thomas Jefferson once said "The moment a person forms a theory his imagination sees in every object only the traits which favor that theory." The author seems to fall into a trap where he sees teachings about purpose in parts of the Bible that simply are not about purpose. For example, on page 30 he talks about the hopelessness of a life lived without purpose. In discussing this under the heading of "the benefits of purpose-driven living" he quotes the book of Job where Job says "My life drags by - day after hopeless day." Of course familiarity with the book of Job will show that to say Job was bemoaning lack of purpose is ridiculous. A man who has had everything he owned and everyone he loved taken from him and is covered in sores is not likely to be upset by a lack of purpose in his life. In the same chapter the author quotes Genesis 4:12 which says of Cain "You will be a restless wanderer on the earth." Again, this is made to sound like it has something to do with purpose. And again, this is a ridiculous assertion.
There are at least fifty similar examples where the author uses Scripture outside of its context or assigns a foreign meaning. When Scripture is not used in the way God intends, this sort of inconsistency is inevitable.
Sources cited
The author quotes a number of sources other than the Bible. Many of these are quoted as if they are authorities on an area of the Christian life. Among many others, he quotes Mother Teresa, St John of the Cross, Brother Lawrence and Henri Nouwen. None of these people should be considered trusted sources of Christian advice and wisdom.
Conclusions
There are several conclusions we can draw. This book does contain some valuable teachings. Unfortunately it also contains a large amount of false teachings. Most alarming is the author's blatant disregard for the proper use of Scripture. He continually uses Bible passages out of context and assigns them false meanings. He seems to view Scripture as a tool to be used and abused as he sees fit rather than seeing it as God's holy, perfect, unchangeable standard that must be used carefully.
As for the premise of living a life driven by purpose, I remain uncertain as to whether this is really what the Bible teaches. It is interesting to examine the word "driven" in the Bible. We see that the word generally has negative connotations in Scripture. It most often denotes an active force pushing and controlling a passive subject. For example, a ship is driven by the wind and the enemies of the Israelites were driven out of the land. On the other hand the word "led" most often speaks of a believer choosing to follow God's ways through knowing Him better. For instance the Israelites were led by a pillar of cloud which they chose to follow and Jesus taught us to ask "do not lead us into temptation." So perhaps we are not to be driven by purpose but should instead be led by God.
I can recommend this book only to discerning readers. There is certainly some value in the book, but in my opinion the bad outweighs the good. I would certainly not use this as an introduction to Christianity or as a means of reaching unbelievers.
I am interested in seeing whether this book stands the test of time or if it is only another fad. The Christian world loves to find the "next big thing" (ie The Prayer of Jabez) but very few stand the test of time. I expect this book will have very little long-term impact in the Christian world.

I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a husband to Aileen and a father to three young children. I worship and serve as a pastor at
Releasing on April 1, The Next
Comments (140)
More on O Sacred Head Now Wounded: the complete translated secular lyrics that originally went with the tune: http://www.sfbach.org/repertoire/meingmuth.html
I don’t see anything about the beer stein; I had heard that on Peter Shickele’s radio show, Shickele Mix. Regardless, the tune obviously originated as, in its day, a “pop” love song.
“I think you are overlooking the Great Commission”
Oh, not at all. I totally agree that we as believers are to go into the world and preach the gospel. That is precisely the point…we are commanded to go into the world. The PD church methodology reverses that command and asks the world to come unto it. It seeks to attract the world by trying to eliminate what it would see as hinderances to why people avoid church. But getting people to church to hear the gospel is not what the great commission is all about, nor what Paul so diligently teaches throughout his epistles regarding the role of the church.
As for the “hinderances”, I have no issues with churches utilizing contemporary worship or choosing other style ‘preferences’ that may deviate from traditional stylistic forms. My issue is with their choice to deviate from declaring the whole counsel of God in teaching the Word, in preference to shallow teaching to attract the crowd.
It presupposes that their methodology and not God’s word through illumination of the Holy Spirit draws men to Jesus. Such arrogance flies in the face of Paul’s admonition in 2 Corinthians 2:4-5, “And my message and my preaching were not in persuasive words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power,that your faith should not rest on the wisdom of men, but on the power of God”.(NAS)
Most churches today have ceased to proclaim the whole counsel of God by teaching the word. Instead, they have opted for positive topical messages to attract the crowd. Of course, the PD church along with other CGM institutions proclaim that indepth teaching takes place in the context of the small group. In referencing their own materials, the church structure is designed to slowly draw people into mature Christianity (around the baseball diamond, or into the core of the circle).
Aside from having no biblical basis, this strategy is often not what it proclaims itself to be. Having endured a PD church for several years, and been involved with small groups that utilize Warren’s study guides, I can say that the teaching in that context remains shallow. Warren proclaims that we are to adopt contemporary means without compromising our message. But compromise he does in acts of commission by misusing scripture to promote his methodology, and acts of ommission by failing to teach the whole counsel of God.
Time will fail me if I attempt to introduce many other misguided and unbiblical features of the PD church such as their system and training in membership, church unity, campaigns, commercialism, books, materials, and other systems disigned to circumvent the truth that it is Jesus who builds the church and Jesus through the Holy Spirit who draws men unto Himself. The whole of this complex system does not resemble the simplicity of the operation of the church as outlined in the New Testament. It assumes the burden of being under law, that if ‘such and such’ is done, then ‘such and such’ will happen.
It does not surprise me that the church is so willing to enter into compromise. We have grown accustomed to following prey to the methods and marketing of men in regards to the church and our spirituality. This won’t stop with either the Purpose Driven church or Purpose Driven Life. No doubt, the sequel is being planned. No doubt, another writer envious of Warren’s success is planning his own strategy for the Christian and the church.
It is sad and it is devastating. The reliance on methodology presumes that the Bible is insufficient, and that somehow our culture demands something more than the mere word of God. It concludes that for the church to be successful, it must adopt the complex systems of corporate America. It fails to acknowledge that only Jesus builds the church. It looks at Peter’s discourse in Acts 2 when 3,000 were saved, and analyzes his methods and strategy. It fails to take into account the faithfulness of simply proclaiming His word, and then watching the Holy Spirit draw people to Christ.
Thank you, ScottyMac, that was beautifully said. Like you, I see that when the Bible isn’t fully taught from the pulpit, then small group materials are also not carefully evaluated and can be all over the board. I can’t see any way that this does not reflect too low a view of the authority and supremacy of Scripture from the leadership of the church.
ScottyMac, thanks for a thoughtful post. I don’t necessarily disagree with you about some of the specific methods of “purpose driven” or “seeker sensitive” churches, and in particular I agree with your emphasis the need for robust expository teaching. But, I still think there’s a missiological nugget here that’s worth saving.
In particular, I strongly disagree with your assessment of church planting as not “going into the world” but instead reversing the Great Commission and asking the world to come to the church. Church planting is a widely and historically used missiological tool. Your critique could applied to the tiny house churches started by pioneer missionaries in Muslim countries as easily as it applies to “postmodern” churches in U.S. cities. I think that goes too far.
And just one other aside — for all the rhetoric here about fidelity to scripture, the reference to an “admonition” in 2 Corinthians 2:4-5 is particularly misplaced. It’s actually 1 Corinthians 2:4-5, it’s not an “admonition” but rather a description of Paul’s conduct among the Corinthians, and in the context of 1 Cor. 1:10 through the remainder of chapter 2 and into chapter 3, it’s clear that the passage relates to disputes in the Corinthian church arising from claims by some other preachers (e.g., Apollos and Cephas) of superiority over Paul. The passage, then, is about unity and humility within the church fellowship. It has nothing to do with methodology.
To: Matt Costella, Jim Bednar and all the Pharisees who have had their say:
Isn’t criticism easy?What are YOU doing to “evangelize the 21st century culture”?How does your venom help anyone to live a more Christlike life?
Ruth
I agree with much of the criticism of PDL, though some of the talk of Warren taking over your church seems a little alarmist. Nevertheless, I don’t see why anyone would want to use a resource that has so many frequent mis-uses of Scripture. At one point in the video series for home groups Warren says, “God is going to build your character by putting you through everything Jesus went through.” Yes, that’s what he says in week 4. After I hear something like that, I wonder why bother sorting through this mishmash in order to pluck out the occasional routine truth. Mature Christians don’t need it, and young ones cannot be expected to have the discernment to sort it out.As someone else said above, the only really good thing about it is that it makes you hunger all the more for the pure Word.
I’m glad we found some common ground to agree, Dopderbeck. Maybe there is more than you think. I must be missing your reference to church planting, because I don’t see where I mentioned that. My whole point was aimed at the modern CGM churches that are compromising the teaching of scripture and creating a type of church that attempts to attract the unbeliever to them. That is all…I’m not suggesting that missions or church planting are wrong. To me, those are legitimate expressions of the Great Commission to go and make disciples.
Again, my argument is addressed primarily to the CGM and PD churches that fail to preach the word in an attempt to emphasize the positive attributes of coming to God, saying nothing of sin, repentance, grace, or other key doctrines of the faith. To obscure the difficult parts of scripture to keep people comfortable and build a church seems a bit deceptive. Perhaps we agree on this.
We remain in disagreement on I Corinthians, as I believe a close examination of the first two chapters says much about the weakness of man’s methodology. Paul is establshing the superiority of God’s wisdom and power with respect to salvation, contrasted with the inferiority of man’s wisdom. Just because Paul was directly addressing a division within the Corinthian church does not undermine the fact that he is revealing his heart in ministry. We can attribute practically every passage in scripture to a particular event in time and space, germane to the recipients of the letter. Yet, we as Christian establish our doctrine from these letters.
It seems entirely possible from I Corinthians 2 that one’s faith can rest upon the wisdom of men and not on the power of God. With the emphasis of methodology, motivational messages, and persuasive teaching within the 21st century church, it seems entirely possible that we are witnessing a faith that is resting upon the wisdom of men. With even some of Warren’s proponents admitting that he misuses scripture to establish his PD methodology, it is difficult for me to conclude otherwise.
The following quotes are located on the cover of Purpose Driven Life:
“In the traditions of Oswald Chambers, Rick Warren offers distilled wisdom on the essence of what life is all about”.
“…Rick Warren’s new, groundbreaking manifesto will set millions of people free to live the lives God intended.”
“If you only read one book on what life is all about — make it this one!”
“…Rick Warren has written a masterpiece of wise counsel for you.”
Seems like Warren’s wisdom is being a bit elevated here. Thanks, but its not what I care to pursue.
Good discussion here - I have been through the PD paradigm, even working on staff at a church that recently won a “PD Church Health Award.” And I can tell you that the church is anything but healthy - yes, large numbers are showing up on Sundays and are involved in a mountain of programs, but it really is not even a church. Is the Word faithfully preached? No not really - it’s more of the self-actualizing “pseudo-Christian” teaching that slices and dices the Bible. Are the sacraments faithfully administered? No - baptisms rarely take place and the Lord’s Supper is done in an irreverent manner with no fencing of the table. Church discipline? Forget about it. So how is an organization that fails to meet the historical marks of the true church (as the Reformers set out) to be deemed “healthy”?
I don’t doubt that Warren loves God - but my fear is that he is an excellent example of how an unbiblical theology can have horrible consequences if given a large platform. Yes there are huge numbers affected by the PD movement, but sheer volume is not a mark of orthodoxy - just look at Charles Finney and the huge success he found with his poor theology! It seems that Warren (like most evangelicals) has been too easily influenced by Finney’s revivalism and has resorted to the “whatever it take to hook ‘em” mentality.
I think Ellen’s comments are very important. We are wary of “conspiracy theories” but when you really think deeply and Biblically about it, you realize that schemes and conspiracies are Satan’s thing. The Old Testament prophets were accused of being “nutty” when they pronounced God’s word…warnings that seemed to fly in the face of the way things appeared to be.
I have just been reading some of the comments above and even on other sites and it has really brought to my attention that this little book has caused so much division and hurt amongst fellow Christians. Immediately it highlighted one verse of Scripture in Romans 16:17 “Now I beseech you, brethen, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them” (KJV)
Now, we know that certian Christian leaders always use this verse to intimidate discerning believers who make any sort of judgement toward teachers who preach another Gospel by claiming that we are the ones causing the division. But the above verse always suggest to me that it is the individual who brings in these certain doctrines or philosophies (Purpose Drive Life) who cause the division and that we should have nothing to do with them.
An old commenatry from RL Whiteside quoted “Do not shut your eyes to what they are doing, nor make excurses for them, nor for any others who cause divisions and occassions if stumbling contrary to the gospel, but turn away from them. This means that the brethen should have no fellowship with them”
Q. Is Rick Warren causing this division I see before my eyes or are the discerning believers causing the division?
Klenck’s articles were among the first I read when I began to investigate the PD movement. He has many good things to say. It is difficult to evaluate all the issues he raises, though I cannot deny that his arguments sound plausible. As I continued my research, I felt led to focus more on the biblical contrasts to Warren’s PD church, as opposed to the potential underlying sinister philosophical issues that Klenck raised.
Perhaps I decided that I’m not smart enough to figure that part of it out, or perhaps just unwilling to dig into the research. Whatever the reason, I remain most burdened by the digression of the modern church from biblical foundation into the ever-changing sea of methodology. Satan will always be ready to utilize anyone who is willing to produce a new deception upon the church, unwittingly or not. I don’t necessarily regard all such people as intentionally trying to deceive the church per se. Perhaps ego, financial gain, or just a strong desire to share their own pragmatic experiences are to blame.
We should all guard our hearts against deception, knowing that any heart that strays from the truth and sufficiency of God’s word is capable of introducing strange doctrine.
Excellent. Just read through this and I find your overview astounding. Good job, sir. Honest and viewing the entire book through the Measure of the Bible.
Excellent!
Please… don’t throw stones at me for my personal opinion. I only got as far as day 17, struggling each day with the words from Rick’s book. Since many of the verses were used in a manner that was untrue, again, my opinion, I did not have “peace” about what was being said. I offer no explanation beyond that of the struggle. I found myself having to look up each passage, especially those quoted from The Message bible. This made a study of the book a horrible experience. I prayed extensively during that time and, unable to find a reprieve for my weakness in being able to accept Rick Warren’s mis-use of Scripture, I finally told God that I could not continue… it did not make sense to struggle each day with this book, and I was able to regain my peace. I wrote an email to my group leader and told him that I would be unable to continue and briefly stated my reasons… a lack of peace.
Don’t take me wrong, I see some tremendous “good” that is resulting from others who are following the 40-Day plan. And, although the review speaks well of this, and even states Rick to be a godly man, I sometimes wonder about a more sinister ploy of the evil one… what would he say about misusing Scripture and misquoting it? You can read all about his methods in Genesis.
But stop! I am not suggesting, even in the slightest… I’m only wondering… and quite humbly mind you.
But the good is undeniable. People are coming to the church. Now it’s time to share the Gospel with them and maybe, by God’s marvelous grace, some of them may come to accept the true Christ and be saved!
You seem to be a great group of people out there in cyberland. Please forgive me for even hinting…. But also please consider the possibility of the hint… then go ahead beat on me, if you want.
Thanks for this forum to express myself.
As a “christian” leader called by God Rick Warren is responsible for leading by the word of God.What is going on???????????I wanted to post some info discovered on RickWarren and others. The problems with his teachings go deeper then PDL.
It is the schedule for the National Pastors Convention 2004. http://www.nationalpastorsconvention.com/sched/sandiego/full.php.
Notice everyday starts with Labyrinthhttp://www.letusreason.org/Nam30.htm.
Session 1 Brennan Manning (christian mystic)Rickwarren quotes in PDL and promotes his books..Contemplative (centering prayer) daily.
Thursday March 11 Stretching & Yoga and Rick Warren Speaker.This is a huge web of deception.Series 2 Gary Thomas also Warren promotesMarch 12 and 13 YogaAs I continue to share the truth of God’s word I am thankful to Him that there are others He has shown this falsehood to.
This conference is sponsored by Zondervan, Leadership and Youth Specialties.clickclick( pictures from convention
Visit the Youth Specialties Web site! INFO FOUND ON THIS WEBSITEclick
Labyrinth - designed for young and old alike, thelabyrinth provides a mixture of rituals and visuals, of contemplative words and contemporary ambient music, of symbols and media to help guide the spiritual traveller.
Accepting the Embrace of God: The Ancient Art ofLectio Divina - information, examples and thoughts onthe prayer technique known as lectio divina, a slow, contemplative praying of the Scriptures which enables the Bible, the Word of God, to become a means of union with God.
Rick Warren co-authored a book with Dan Kimball
Emerging Church, Theby Dan Kimball, Rick Warren, Brian D. McLaren
Rick Warren says, This book is a wonderful detailed example of what a Purpose-Driven church can look like in a postmodern world. My friend, Dan Kimball, writes passionately from his heart, with a deep desire to reach emerging generations and culture. While my book the Purpose-Driven Church, explained what the church is called to do, Dan’s book explains how to do it with the cultural-creatives who think and feel in postmodern terms. You need to pay attention to him because times are changing.http://www.pastors.com/RWMT/?ID=109
Dan Kimball explains his experience on the Labyrinth at the convention.http://www.vintagefaith.com/the_emerging_church.html
The Emerging Church: Vintage Christianity for NewGenerations
A”maze”ing PrayerThe labyrinth offers ancient meditation for today’shurried souls.
Dan Kimball
Coming in from the brilliant San Diego sunshine, mywife and I entered a darkened hall lit only by candlesand a dimmed chandelier. The room was silent. As oureyes adjusted, we saw several people kneeled inprayer. The setting, spirit, and solemn stillness ofthe hall told us that we had found somethingmeditative there, something spiritual.
Today’s evangelicals are accustomed towell-choreographed worship services with every minutecarefully filled with music, video, and preaching.Postmodern generations are hungering for somethingmore”an unhurried, mystery-filled, meditativeexperience that doesn’t have to fit into a preplannedtime schedule.The prayer labyrinth offers a feast to fill thathunger.
Meeting God in the middleThe labyrinth is a maze-like path similar to thosedesigned into the floors of European cathedrals duringthe Middle Ages. Christians of that time would walkthe labyrinth to aid their contemplative prayer andreflection. The labyrinths fell into disuse, and mostwere eventually forgotten or destroyed.
At the National Pastors Conference in San Diego,however, we found the labyrinth was back and given anupdate. The path was formed by black lines on a35-foot square piece of canvas laid on the floor. Weeach were given a CD player with headphones to guideour journey through the 11 stations on the path. As webegan the inward journey”toward the center of thecanvas”a gentle female voice with a British accentread a portion of John 1. She told us not to rushthrough the labyrinth, but to slow down, breathedeeply, and fully focus on God.
At the first stop, we looked at a television screencovered with complex, moving electronic wave forms. Wewere instructed to pray about and eliminate the noisewithin that interferes with God’s voice. At anotherstation we dropped small stones into water, each stonerepresenting a worry we were giving over to God. Laterwe drew on paper symbols of our hurts, prayed abouteach of them, and put them in a trash can.
After thirty minutes we found ourselves at thelabyrinth’s center, where, seated on cushions, we wereoffered the elements of Communion. The narrator readmore Scripture and reminded us how near Jesus Christis to us. There was a Bible if we desired to linger,reading and praying.
The journey outward focused on how we can be used byGod in other people’s lives. At one station we madeimpressions of our hands and feet in a box of sand,reminding us that we leave impressions on the peoplewe touch.My wife and I spent an hour in the labyrinth and foundourselves calmed and refreshed, our perspectiveuniquely restored.
We made our own prayer pathAfter the convention we knew we couldn’t keep thisexperience to ourselves. A few months later wefeatured a labyrinth as part of Graceland’s annual artevent at Santa Cruz Bible Church.
Graceland artists recreated the labyrinth with a kitwe purchased (The Prayer Path, Group Publishing),transforming one of the church’s multipurpose roomsinto a medieval prayer sanctuary. The team hung art onthe walls, draped fabric, and lit candles all aroundthe room to create a visual sense of sacred space.Over two nights we saw more than 100 people go throughthe labyrinth. It was a joy to see so many people ontheir knees communing with God through theexperiential prayer elements.
Meditative prayer like that we experienced in thelabyrinth resonates with hearts of emerginggenerations. If we had the room, we would set up apermanent labyrinth to promote deeper prayer. Untilthen, however, Graceland will continue to incorporateexperiential prayer and encourage our people to stop,quiet themselves, and pray.
Dan Kimball pastors Graceland, the ministry andworship services for the emerging culture at SantaCruz Bible Church in Santa Cruz, California.Copyright 2001 by the author or Christianity Today,Inc./Leadership journal..Fall 2001, Vol. 23, No. 4, Page 38
http://web.ukonline.co.uk/paradigm/index.htm (Link from youth specialties) Beware
In Christ Service,Melissa HarveyBrenning Manning http://www.reachingcatholics.org/beware.html Gary Thomas http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/gthursby/0000/9paths.htm
Leo Van Veelen from Australia I have read the book and I have find that the book will gain you a very balaced life the bible dose say seek first the kingdom of god and all these things will be added unto you.That is what Rick Warren is saying in has book the Purpose Driven life I enjoyed the challengs in the book and if you dear give Jesus all your life and dont go back to the old life.
Leo Van Veelen from Australia I have read the book and I have find that the book will gain you a very balaced life the bible dose say seek first the kingdom of god and all these things will be added unto you.That is what Rick Warren is saying in has book the Purpose Driven life I enjoyed the challengs in the book and if you dear give Jesus all your life and dont go back to the old life.
Dear Tim,
I would suggest reading something about Mother Teresa and St. John of the Cross before making any blanket statements that they are not trusted Christian sources. Search www.catholic.com for some good examples of reading material.
In fact, I would also study the 8th commandment “Thou shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor” before calling anyone a “non-trusted” Christian source.
Sincerely in Christ,
Paul
your comment is so short-sighted and it is NOT helpful at all! Hope you will learn to evaluate the content from where he is coming from! NOT in your own view point. yOU CANNOT COMMENT LIKE THIS LINE UPON LINE. yOU HAVE TO SEE THE BIGGER PICTURE AND IT’S REAL INTENTION!
For Susan,Do you have an email addy?
I have left my former church and have made upmy mind I cannot look back but look ahead..it has been a heart breaking experience butGod has been good and I know He has been the oneguiding me all the way….I just feel badly forthe ones who are left in the church…and ampraying God will reveal to them what they haveto do…
Sorry for not being in touch for a long time..but there has been so much going on..
God bless…Charity
Dear Susan,
I am very grateful for your Susan at February 3, 2004 11:36 PM opposing the teachings of Rick Warren. I thought you would be interested in my Purpose Driven Chart vs. Scripture which you can access at:
http://www.abrahamic-faith.com/False-Teachers.html
I also thought you might like to know that I will be releasing a book which is a documentary exposing the false teachings, false translations, and false teachers Rick Warren promotes in his book. It will be published by Southwest Radio Church and should be available in print in a matter of weeks. However, in the meantime, I wanted to send you a complimentary review copy as a file attachment. If you would like a copy just email at rock.salt@verizon.net as I note your email is not posted on this website.
Kindest regards in Christ,
James SundquistPresidentRock Salt Publishing
PDL was the worst book I have ever read and I think it will cause long term problems in the church. The more I read of it, the more I was agitated. My God is a good God, not one waiting to strike you with something bad. This book is a bad influence on the body of Christ.
I have read all of the above comments. The church where we have been members for two years just recently completed 40 days. A friend passed on some info about the deception involved in the PDL. My husband became convicted of some of the errors contained in the book, did research, and met with the pastor concerning his research. He also discussed with the pastor the way he was teaching things that contradicted long held beliefs and doctrines of our denomination, secrecy in the church as it related to deciding to use 40 days, and secrecy of the church’s financial records. He gave the pastor copies of his research. This included the following: http://www.moriel.org/discernment/purpose_driven_church.htm
http://www.despatch.cth.com.au/Books_D/Rick_Warren.htm
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/04/4-purpose-resisters.htm
The pastor was receptive to receiving them and was very cordial—seeming genuinely concerned that he might have used a flawed program. Imagine our surprise three weeks later (in a Sunday morning sermon preached prior to our youth minister going through a skit like performance about building and then calling the finance chairman up to present a building program that fewer than 10 people being aware of—secrecy again)the pastor announced that we were a PDC. (We have since purchased the book and recognize all the markings and also got an explanation as to why the pastor had changed his ways of doing things over the past few years. This included style of music, little communication with deacons, committees making decisions without going to the church body, and financial records kept secret.) Shortly there after the pastor called and asked my husband for a meeting. When he went into the pastor’s office (without him being aware that others would be involved) immediately behind him came the youth minister, associate pastor, and a deacon. He was questioned about giving out some info that was critical of PDC and PDl. He had given one deacon an article that recounted a person’s visit to Saddleback and another person some of web site listings of other articles relating PDC and PDL. My husband related his concerns letting them know that he could think for himself and told them that he would not “drink the cool-aid” (a reference to a Jim Jones.) Before the confrontation was over the pastor told him that by giving out the materials,he was sowing discord among the brethern and he should “stop it or leave the church”. After thinking about it briefly, my husband told them he would leave the church. He had previously made the determination that he would not stay in an apostate church so my husband’s telling them he would leave was not all that difficult. But as everyone can see this appears to be an example of the way a Rick Warren trained follower would deal with a resister. Also, going on at the church is the proposed building project that was mentioned earlier. The building and finance committees came to the church with inadequate plans with the chairman insisting that he had contacted all ministries involved to assess the needs. This proved to not be the truth unless he simply contacted the pastor who is a member of every committee. The older “pillars of the church” insisted on better planning with use of an architect while the younger members were gungho to go forward at the committee recommendation. The pastor seemed to aware of the serious division which was obovious to all would lead to a split in the church. He made little effort to ease the situation or to ask for a delay in the voting which is scheduled for next Sunday morning. This disregard and disrespect permitted by the pastor almost leads one to believe that this will be the pastor’s chance to get rid of the outnumbered “pillars”. They will not be staying in a church where their expertise is ignored and are only wanted for their funds. This is another way of getting rid of resisters—pitting one group against another.
Pastor,
You recently asked what was “happening with us.” I told you about His blessing, but not about the rest.
A number of months ago a church (historically stalwart in the faith) we were visiting, suddenly mandated that Sunday classes were to be suspended for approximately forty days. During that time everyone was to participate in the study of a popular “purpose driven” paperback. Rather than delve into the hope and joy and beauty of His Word, our challenge was to affirm a book by a “mere” man, and a rather pudgy one at that.
A few months ago a church (historically stalwart in the faith) we were visiting, suddenly mandated that Sunday classes were to be suspended for approximately forty days. During that time everyone was to participate in the study of a popular “purpose driven” paperback. Rather than learning of Him together from His Word, our challenge was to affirm a book by a “mere” man.
These two churches, each having heard the “Siren call,” marched in lockstep with a thousand other churches as the self proclaimed “Pied Piper of purpose” lead them away. “Purposefully” doing the “spiritually correct” thing each had opted for an unholy aberration of His Word and the inevitable accompaniment of confusion. They didn’t understand that there are two mutually exclusive ways of “doing church,” His Way or man’s way. The pastor of Saddleback, Inc. has convinced multitudes that his “way” is more contemporary, more savvy, more pragmatic, more loving, and of course, more popular than the other Way. The author of “purpose” has persuaded many that he has discovered mysteries that even “the Author and Finisher of our faith” has neglected to reveal. These two churches have apparently forgotten Judges, the book of spiritual confusion that sadly concludes: “every man did that which was right in his own eyes.”
Thankfully, there are those in our church who will forever reject that “Siren call.” They have the maturity to realize that something is wrong when His Word alone is never enough. And they are able to discern between the “Spirit of truth” and the “spirit of error” that manifests itself even in the flawed titles of Rick Warren’s work. They know that our “lives” MUST be “Spirit lead” not “purpose driven.” They know that our “church” MUST be “Spirit lead” not “purpose driven.”
Chris
Hostile Takeover: A generally reviled tactic in the business world of taking control of a company for personal advantage and divesting its assets without regard for that companies management, board of directors, shareholders, or workers.
Unfortunately, the Hostile Takeover has a counterpart in the evangelical world. Consider how Rick Warren has disenfranchised those who have labored a lifetime in their local assemblies.
“Be willing to let people leave the church. And I told you earlier the fact that people are gonna leave the church no matter what you do. But when you define the vision, you’re choosing who leaves. You say, “But Rick, yes, they’re the pillars of the church.” Now, you know what pillars are. Pillars are people who hold things up … And in your church, you may have to have some blessed subtractions before you have any real additions.”
Rick, through his books, conferences and simulcasts, is encouraging churches around the world to trash the gospel “once delivered” for his “new improved version” or as he calls it “vision.” And for those who oppose this gospel alien to His Word, he has a solution: make the place where we once worshipped our risen Lord so abominable that the Spirit within us will demand we leave.
A Rick Warren Takeover: What used to be a reviled tactic in the evangelical world of taking control of a local assembly for personal advantage and divesting its assets without regard for that church’s Lord, board of elders, shareholders in His Holiness, or fellow workers in the Truth.
Why is it that the world knows a “hostile takeover” when they see it, but those who call themselves “Christian” do not?
“…for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” Luke 16:8
I first became aware of this book/fad/movement of R. Warren’s several months ago. During prayer one evening I received a Word on this movement —“Come out, come out of her my child or you will be consumed by the great Harlot. My Word alone is sufficient for all your needs.” This has been discussed twice with our pastor and others but it appears that the PDL program will proceed with all of its trappings including signed covenants of accountability. When it happens we will be seeking another church home.
Hmmmmmm,anyone who wants an interesting study should look into the beliefs and teachings of men like Dallas Willard ,stephen Foster,Carl Jung,William Vaswig,Anges Sanford,etc,on of their central beliefs seems to be “Dominionism”
I so appreciate this whole discussion. I just stumbled upon this website because I am so upset about the PDL. In my area there are no churches who aren’t doing the PDL except the OPC (orthodox Presbyterian) and Catholic churches. I attend a PCA church 45 minutes from my home because the local PCA church is seeker sensitive (insert vomiting emoticon here). We are not yet doing the PDL but I fear it is only a matter of time. A friend of mine has been attending this s-s church and called me today very upset because from the pulpit the pastor declared “we are embarking on a 40 day spiritual adventure”. She knew what that meant and a member of the congragation came running up to her and her family to make sure they would come to one of the PDL small groups. She has no interest.
I find the strangest thing about this book and it’s followers is that they refer to this book the way a believer should refer to their Bible. I called a friend the other day to talk over a passage of Numbers that so excited me. Another friend called me to tell me that she couldn’t start her day without doing the PDL devotional for that day. It has a strange hold on people and that should make us very wary.
the porpuse driven lifeis really a good book for everyone here.
Dear Friend:
I did a Google search after watching yet another large Baptist church have a televised service announcing their impending journey into the Forty Days of Purpose thing. Choir robed, suited and tied, seemingly properly decorous senior citizens saying, “We are not hip enough, but we are now going to get with it.” It was kind of like watching Bert Parks trying to sing a Beatles song on the Miss America pageant. It was his last year by the way.
I am (and always have been) heart sick over the Laodicean church culture in America. Rather than a repentance from our ever-increasing self pampering, we codify and celebrate it as the next move of the Holy Spirit. Coming soon will be a nursing home best seller, “The Purpose Driven Bowel Movement.” Yet, through it all there will remain God’s true church in which His Word is enough, in which worship is driven by a desire to please God, and in which a pursuit of excellence in music will not give way to the “garage band,” man-centered noise we are hearing. I believe sooner rather than later God is going to strip the church of everything but Himself. It is then that we shall see mega-church become micro-church and understand the truth that “many are called, but few are chosen.”
Please read Warren Smith’s new book entitled DECEIVED ON PURPOSE (Conscience Press). You can find more information on it online. I consider it a must read for all of us concerned about “Purpose Driven” anything.
Our pastor has just started PDL in our church and is very excited about it, along with everyone else. I, however, am very leary of this campaign. After hearing the “kick-off” sermon to open up the PDL, I came home and read the 1st chapter, and realized that our pastor basically preached to us chapter one of PDL. I was shocked when I read read some of the translations Warren used to make his case for our need to have purpose. One example and I’ll go: Rom. 8: 6 from the Message says “Obsession with self in these matters is a DEAD END.” This tremendously reduces the seriousness of this verse. The Greek word is “thanatos,” which means “death,” not “dead end.” This downplays the word “death,” making it sound like the consequence being carnally minded is just a miserable life w/o purpose, rather the wrath of God. Warren may mean well, but that doesn’t mean he’s right.
For entire churches to be duped into following a paper-back book, shows incredible christian immaturity. First it was Rick Joyner’s Final Quest, which was a load of new age babble, now it’s The Purpose Driven life. Rick Warren is very clear when he states, his book doesn’t replace the bible. When we do make GOD our anchor in every part of our lifes, freedom comes, as he states. I have been struggling in many areas of my life, and it was only when i made a concious decision to allow GOD in, did change begin to happen. Once a person has made that concious decision to follow GOD, then he/she can ask for forigiveness of theirs sin and ask Yashua to come into their lives, otherwise we are taking out a life insurance policy to save us from hell! I think the book is probably geared to wards helping a person come to that decision, once they the book should be discarded. If mature christians are reading this book, then i wonder if they are really mature at all. But for whole churches to embrace the Purpose Driven Life, is very wrong!!! I found the book re-ordered my mind to realise that Yaweh is in everything and is everything, our very next breath!!
This is the last comment. If only I had found this sight on September 28, 2004, maybe I could have swayed my church from following the Saddlebag lemmings over the cliff.
yes i do realized that there are misuse or miquotes from the bible, it is true. one will find that out. i have read the book it is so nice but then the scriptures were not specifically stated as to what specific verse, and when i tried to find it, it is not the exact quotation. but anyway the book is so nice to read, it is very refreshing…
i really love the book, and i hope i can have enough money so i can give it to some of my friends abroad, or over here in the Philippines. Rick, keep up the good work.
but pls b careful in quoting scriptures, because, readers are a bit wiser now than our ancestors, who dont read even if d can or for whatever reason, but now it’s different, most esp. christian converts are so meticulous about biblical verses.
anyway God bless and keep up the good work u have started….
The latest comments by Rick Warren about fundamentalism should cause any Bible-believing Christian to stop short and check which way the wind is blowing. Recently, in the Philadelphia Inquirer he is quoted “Warren predicts that fundamentalism, of all varieties, will be ‘one of the big enemies of the 21st century.” This is why people who question the methods of his PDC movement are edged out by intimidation, sorrow, or force.
The following is a reference to two initial links which may be of assistance to your readers. I apologise if these have already been included in the comments posted above.
* Bible Bulletin Board - www.biblebb.comThis is an electronic ministry of the Word of God, preaching Jesus Christ, His love, death, resurrection, and salvation. We address the key issues of life: Death, Life, Love, Marriage, Men and Women, Divorces, Remarriage and articles of a very practical nature, from preachers of the past. Many articles on God the Father, Jesus, the Holy Spirit, Heaven, and Hell. Holding forth the Bible as the source of truth for mankind.* Bible Bulletin Board ” includes an article on The Purpose Driven Life - www.biblebb.com/files/pdl.htm - A Review By Nathan Busenitz Copyright 2003, Pulpit - Shepherds’ Fellowship. All Rights Reserved. (For more information about Shepherds’ Fellowship and how to join go to: www.gracechurch.org/sfellowship) Extract - The Purpose Driven Life claims to be “a guide to a 40-day spiritual journey that will enable you to discover the answer to lifes most important question: What on earth am I here for?” (p. 9). A closer investigation of The Purpose Driven Life reveals several areas of weakness ” areas in which the book proves to serve up more fluff than feast
I want to have ur copy about Purpose driven life everyday by Rick warren to renewd me about how the world goes
Thank you very much ..
in Christ,
Ef
PDL has a lot of good points, but I think how you react to it has a whole lot to do with your personality.I know we all need to help others more and think less of ourselves. PDL, however, has made me feel like I shouldn’t want a new house, like I have no right to feel happiness, and like I shouldn’t even be taking care of the material things I have. And I guess if you do ENJOY anything you’ve aquired, that’s wrong and it should only be for the good of others. Also, the book makes it sound as if God and the devil are somewhat working together to teach us all lessons (obviously their intentions are different). Anyway, like I said, it probably depends on your personality as to how this book is preceived. I all ready have quite a servants heart and it made me feel like I don’t deserve anything. I really liked Norman Vincient Pearl’s old book, “The Power of Positive Thinking” much better, and he still calls you to help others without beating you down so much. I may also read Joel Osteens book.Blessings,Jaye
I have a Big problem with Rick Warren, especially now that he has unveiled his P.E.A.C.E Plan.
Remarkably the 5 Giants Rick describes are exactly the 10 Goals of the Un’s Millennium Development Goalshttp://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/index.html
The Problem is the UN is the most likely candidate to implement the one world religion described as existing in the end times.