- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostA La Carte (4/9)
- Next Post »Twin Lakes (I)
Book Review - The Bishop of Rwanda
- 04/09/07
- 9
The country of Rwanda has seen some of the worst violence and bloodshed the world has witnessed this side of the Holocaust. If ever a nation has been in need of God’s grace and favor, this is it. In 1994 the nation was devastated by a genocidal civil war that pitted the Hutus against the Tutsis. In just 100 days during April to July of that year, over one million people were killed, the vast majority of them Tutsis. There were countless massacres with thousands of people dying ever day during that period of time.
When the killing finally ended, the nation was destroyed. The economy was shattered, the nation’s infrastructure nearly ruined and the population decimated. And, of course, the people were traumatized, having seen former friends turn on each other, husbands kill wives and even the clergy willfully participating in the murder of thousands.
John Rucyahana is a native of Rwanda and, though he was not in the country while the violence happened, he was appointed Bishop of Rwanda shortly after it ended and has been involved in the aftermath. More than anything he has attempted to champion reconciliation between those who were alienated from each other during the conflict. The Bishop of Rwanda tells his story and at the same time tells the story of the Rwandan Genocide, the events that led to it, and the initial attempts at recovering from it.
The foreword to the book was written by none other than Rick Warren who is using Rwanda as a testing ground for his PEACE plan. In what I found to be a shockingly self-serving foreword, Warren seems to say that the value of this book is in showing how bad Rwanda’s problems were so that people will soon see just how powerful his PEACE plan is. He says “The PEACE plan is a plan by the Rwandan and for Rwandans” but this is simply not the case. “When the rest of the world realizes what the church and the people of Rwanda are becoming in the 21st century,” Warren writes, “they’ll also want to know the foundation upon which it was built. I’m certain this book will be one of the classic texts that people turn to.”
The text of the book is filled with the horrifying story of the genocide. To tell the story properly Rucyahana has to provide ghastly details, though thankfully he is as discreet as possible in doing so. The story told in the book’s opening pages is the most graphic of all and is enough to turn the stomach and bring tears to the eyes. Yet it was the shocking, sick reality for millions of people. Rucyahana tells the story from within a Christian worldview. He believes that the best way to promote peace and a good future within his nation is to convert people to Jesus. And, of course, I couldn’t agree more. Sadly I’m not sure that he preaches the full gospel. While he speaks often in the book about everyone’s need for a Savior, I did not find a full, strong, biblical gospel message within its pages. His ecumenical beliefs, where he seems to teach that he and the Roman Catholic Church preach the same gospel, would make it seem clear that he must be taking something less than the gospel of faith alone on the basis of grace alone because of the work of Christ alone.
I was surprised to see that the book was not particularly well-written, especially considering that the co-author, James Riordan, has authored twenty-five other books and has won several awards for his work. It was almost childish at times. For example, “Several government people who helped plan the genocide actually claimed to be churchgoing Catholics or Protestants, but they could not have done what they did and had any real belief in Jesus Christ. They were more like members of religious clubs than real Christians. They may have belonged to churches, but their beliefs were more like those of Satanists.” There are often short sentences and examples of almost childish self-expression. Perhaps it simply reflects the fact that English is not Rucyahana’s native language.
I was pleased to see that Rucyahana did not shy away from discussing the involvement of supposed Christians in the genocide. I have heard, over the years, that the Roman Catholic Church was particularly heavily involved in the lead-up to the genocide and even in carrying it out. This book discusses some of those details and suggests that this was, indeed, the case. However, Rucyahana soon reveals his ecumenical leanings and is quick to portray this as a failure of Christianity rather than a particular fault of the Roman Catholic Church. Now, in the aftermath, he is working hand-in-hand with Catholic clergy in his efforts to make the Christianity known throughout the nation.
All-in-all, this is hardly great literature and, despite Warren’s claims, is not likely to be a book with a long shelf life. However, it is still valuable in telling the story of the Rwandan tragedy from within a Christian perspective and from the point-of-view of an insider. I do hope and pray that God uses Rucyahana and other believers to bring hope and healing to this nation and to others throughout the African continent.

I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a husband to Aileen and a father to three young children. I worship and serve as a pastor at
Releasing on April 1, The Next
Comments (9)
I hope that this book is the start of many others that tells the story of what is going on and needs to happen to cause change in Rwanda.
It’s not clear in this review, but Bishop John is ANGLICAN, not Roman Catholic.
All it takes is once, listening to a Paul Washer sermon to bring light to a situation like this. Rick Warren’s peace plan is just another piece of the social gospel that lacks any real meat. This battle in Rwanda truly is one of principalities and powers. Bringing western polish like Warren’s is a slap in the face.
Robertstreetfishing.blogspot.com
Interesting that you take note of the writing style and it’s deficiencies. My new wife is a big Christian fiction reader and I have had some of the same complaints with those books as you have with this book, and when you mentioned the style it reminded me of these books my wife reads. The language is very basic and the sentances are extremely simple—almost like you’d expect from the “young-adult” section. The childish kind of self-expression is there, where the reader is informed (in detail) of every single emotion and thought inside of every characters head. Then the sentimentalism rises into single word sentances that are supposed to make the reader gush, like “Somewhere.” and “Forever.”I was wondering if this has been your experience with a lot of romantic Christian fiction targeted mainly to women?
Tim,
I appreciate you reviewing this book, and bringing it to my attention. As a member of the Anglican Mission in America, who has met Rucyahana, I am very interested in reading it.
I wonder about the criticism of his English. Are you sure English is not his first language? It seems far more likely to me (in my experience) that common African usage of English is just much different than ours. Like British vs. American English, only more so.
I was, however, deeply troubled by the anti-Catholicism dripping from your review. I know, I know, I’ve come to the wrong blog. But at least let me appeal to you - granted you believe Roman Catholicism to be a false church, does that justify unfairness to them? Could it be that your antipathy is leading you to judge “by appearances” - seeing what you want to see?
Do you know for a fact Tim, that Catholics were more involved in the genocide than the Anglicans? Do you know better than Rucyahana, a bishop of that country? And what would you do if you heard a subsequent report that actually the Catholic behavior was better than had previously been reported? Would you not cling to the first report, and defend it, out of sheer instinct?
I know I will never convince you that the Catholic Church is a Christian church and our allies in the transmission of the gospel. But at least consider trying to judge fairly the behavior of Catholic people.
P.S.- I realize this post is confrontational, and I am psudonymous - hence I am shooting from cover to an open target. If it’s any consolation, I won’t criticize you from my blog, only here where you have full control over whether this comment gets published.
Hi! I thought you and your readers might be interested in some post-Easter news about Pope Benedict XVI…The Pope’s car is being auctioned off to raise money for Habitat for Humanity:www.buyacarvideos.com/popecar.htmThe bidding is already more than $200,000! Personally, I think this is a really fun and creative way to raisemoney. The auction goes until April 14th if you and your readers want to check it out.
Tim…Forgive me for the long comment, but you jogged a wonderful memory that has shaped my Christian life and pastoral ministry… In 2000, I spent a month in Rwanda on mission, only 6 years after the genocide
When we arrived, there was still a great deal of tension in the air, and resentment, anger and revenge still reverberated angrily in the hearts of many. Yet amid all of the turmoil, there were indescribably beautiful glimpses of God working among the people, glimpses of hope, and forgiveness.
One such glimpse came one day when we were sitting in a service one Sunday, and one of our Rwandan friends who partnered us while we were there was giving her testimony. It was in Kinyarwandan so I didn’t understand what she was saying. Yet, as she spoke, tears streamed down her face, her voice broke. I was at the other end of a bench where others from the mission team were listening to the translation. I got up and moved over to sit at the translator’s feet. I sat with my back to her, and I sat facing the girl giving her testimony. She had been raped by a Hutu man who stormed her house, raped her and her mother in front of her father and brothers, then killed all of them, bar her, with a blunt machete.
Then came the bit of the story that will stay with me all my days. As she spoke she broke down, tears streamed. Yet in what was almost like a resurrection of strength in her she stood upright, raised her hands and amid the sounds and words I did not understand, one word seemed to surface more frequently than any others, and I recognised it… “Yesu” - Jesus.
I still remember looking at this 30-year-old woman, with vision blurred by tears, and hearing these words spoken softly by the translator. One day, this young woman got up from her chair, walked out of her door, up her path, out of her broken gate, turned right, walked no more than 10 paces till she came to another gate. She opened the gate, walked up to the door of her neighbours house and knocked on it. When the door was opened, she was face to face with the man who raped her and killed her family… He was her next door neighbour.
And this is what she said. “I just wanted you to know that for raping me, bringing shame to me, for killing my family and devastating me, I forgive you.” As she turned to walk away, the man called out “why”. She turned to him and said, “because my lord Jesus has forgiven me and has called me to forgive those who sin against me.”
As I pictured that whole scenario in my mind I thought to myself, I may never see a closer demonstration of an imitation of Christ as long as I live. You see, we are never as close to imitating Christ than when we are forgiving others for sinning against us. And for this woman, forgiving didn’t change her past. But it helped her deal with and it gave her a life-line for the future. And what’s more, her attacker became a believer too.
Liam,
That is a really powerful story - thank you for sharing it. What a demonstration of God’s grace in action!
It reminds me of the story of Corrie ten Boom, who upon meeting one of the prison guards who had been responsible for some of the atrocities that she and her family had experienced, was nevertheless able to forgive him, solely because she remembered that her Lord had forgiven her.
Amazing grace! We truly have a mighty God!
I have heard, over the years, that the Roman Catholic Church was particularly heavily involved in the lead-up to the genocide and even in carrying it out. This book discusses some of those details and suggests that this was, indeed, the case.
I’d be very interested in anything you have to verify this, Tim. Similar accusations are still floating around about the Holocaust, despite having been pretty effectively disproven. Slaughters and civil wars aren’t the sort of thing the Church usually participates in, although there will always be Jack-Chick types who come up with wild stories to the contrary. If the schisms of the 16th century taught us anything, it’s that getting too caught up in secular politics is a bad idea for the Church.