- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostA La Carte (1/14)
- Next Post »A La Carte (12/15)
Book Review - The Little Boy Down the Road
- 01/14/09
- 7
I don’t often post reviews two days in a row, but today you’ll need to bear with me.
I was somewhat surprised but rather pleased to find The Little Boy Down the Road in my mailbox one morning. It was the first I had heard of the book. I was drawn to it by its pastoral cover and its simple premise—“Short Stories and Essays on the Beauty of Family Life.” As the subtitle says, this is a collection of stories and essays that attempt to reveal the beauty of family life. It is, perhaps surprisingly, the first of Douglas Phillips’ books that I’ve read. Let me share a brief overview of its chapters.
“The Little Boy Down the Road” shares a son’s joy in the return of his father and goes on to speak of the simple joys of parenthood. “The Woman Who Chose Life” is a remarkable story of God’s providence in the gift of life while “The Art of Home School Opera” is a humorous look at the joys and importance of family eccentricities. I should note that in these early chapters I began to notice the repetition of certain words and phrases and felt like something was being said between the lines, that the author was building toward something, but was doing so using a lexicon that was unfamiliar to me. There was talk of homeschooling and patriarchy with many uses of the word multigenerational. But I digress.
Phillips is at his best when he is telling stories and allowing the stories to share the joys and beauties of family life. “The Animal Fair,” his chapter on the many animals that have been pets to his family is as humorous as it is poignant. He says rightly that “Pets tend to accumulate.” Once parents have opened the doors to one pet, others will inevitably follow. This has proven true in the Phillips family. “From rabbits to goats, tarantulas to chickens, dogs, horses, cats, fish, cows, crabs, birds, reptiles, vultures, and even baby deer—at some point or another, they have all lived with, beside, and even on top of the Phillips family.” Through the chapter he describes some of the best and some of the worst pets they’ve had, tells the awful truth about chickens, and pleads with the readers never, ever to trust a Llama (and especially so when it lowers its ears). And through the funny stories, he tells how pets have blessed his family, taught responsibility, and even forced the children to grapple with tough lessons on mortality. With its shades of James Herriot and Farley Mowat, this chapter is the book’s finest. You can download it and read it here.
“The Man’s Library” warms the heart of this avid reader and challenges me with the importance of not only building my own library, but beginning to build one for my son (and daughters) as well. “The League of Grateful Sons” shares what Phillips learned from filming a documentary with survivors of the battle of Iwo Jima and the children of some who did not survive.
As the book comes to its final chapters, it transitions from stories to essays and, sadly, becomes weaker. Here Phillips shows his hand, explaining more fully the emphases of his ministry. He espouses the importance of quiver full theology, of naming children with distinctive names (though here he is able to poke fun at himself for the unusual names he and his wife have chosen for their children), of multigenerational thinking, and so on. What were small hints in the book’s opening pages are unleashed more fully in its final chapters. This is not to say that any or all of what Phillips says here is wrong (though much of it is contentious and falls into the realm of disputable matters) but rather that the quality of writing is better when Phillips is telling stories rather than writing these essays. The book begins with a bang but ends with a bit of a fizzle.
There is a lot to learn from this man who has dedicated his career to emphasizing the importance of family but, more importantly, has dedicated his life to serving and leading the family God has given him. Your enjoyment of this book may well depend on just how much you enjoy the emphases of his ministry. Though I enjoyed reading the book (despite being convicted that my children are where they ought to be in public school, despite having only three kids, and despite never having used the word “multigenerational”), I couldn’t help but feel that the book would have been better had it been just about half as long or had the book’s second half been written in the style of the first.

I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a husband to Aileen and a father to three young children. I worship and serve as a pastor at
Releasing on April 1, The Next
Comments (7)
I don’t know how you receive your books, Tim, but it’s no surprise that you were sent this one. It seems a fairly innocuous, sweet book, and probably the marketers at Vision Forum were hoping for a great review from a well-known blogger and reviewer. They seem to be inserting themselves into the peripheral vision of evangelical Christianity more and more often (inviting Fireproof, Expelled and Crown Financial films to the San Antonio Film Festival is one example of this, as is the free pub they have been getting on Moody Radio of late). The hope seems to be that the sweet stuff on the top (love of family and home, desire for holy lives—all very good) will look so inviting that the “consumers” will neglect to look below the surface at some of the less orthodox emphases and teachings, which have been a snare for some families.
In your review you said you were “convicted that my children are where they ought to be in public school”. Was this a Holy Spirit conviction, or feeling shamed by the tone of Phillips’ writings? (Since you say your children are where they ought to be, I imagine it is the second, and I wouldn’t be surprised.)
As always, I appreciate your writing and your discernment, and it was good to hear you on Moody last week (slightly different from what I had expected, eh?). I hope you might do a review of “Quiverfull: Inside the Christian Patriarchy Movement” by Kathryn Joyce when it is published, if it isn’t against your principles to do so, in order to take a deeper look at patriarchy.
Was this a Holy Spirit conviction, or feeling shamed by the tone of Phillips’ writings?
I wrote that simply to show that, while I disagree with many of the emphases of Phillips’ ministry, I still enjoyed the first half of the book. My convictions about my children’s education came long before reading this title.
I see what you meant now, Tim—sorry for the confusion. Also see that your interviews were more than a week ago. Time flies when you’re having fun shoveling snow—hope your household stays warm in the winter blitz!
Thanks for the thoughtful review. I love short stories and might try this one out for the first half of the book. B.
Tim. I was really enjoying the chapter “The Animal Fair”, until I came on the sentence, “More importantly, they knew thatBuddy did not have an eternal soul. He was an animal,and that means that when he died, he was gone forever.” p.61As an avid pet lover, as is Mr. Phillips, I was taken back by that sentence. I have wrestled with the eternalness of animal life ever since I was l old enough to remember anything of weight. I have two dogs now that indisputably react with human - like emotion (fear, happiness, excitement, contentment, anger…), and often, more intelligence.
If I remember my seminary Hebrew correctly in the creation account both the creatures and man become (if literally translated) “living souls” (Nephesh Chie). I guess I had a pet loving professor, as he made a big point of that connection and pointed out that both were called living souls. I will lay my cards on the table. I want to see (some) of my previous pets in heaven. I don’t see the Word intimating anything otherwise.
If Isaiah 11:6-8 is more than allegory then there is ample evidence that the next life will be inhabited by a fully redeemed nature. Are certain souls of the animal kingdom elect, too? If not, why does the natural world groan for the redemption of the souls of humanity?
“I consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us. The creation waits in eager expectation for the sons of God to be revealed. For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the glorious freedom of the children of God.” Romans 8:18-21 NIV
…any thoughts?
I found myself nodding at much of what Kathy said. . .
It seems as if as the years pass, Vision Forum and Doug Phillips become more focused on creating a particular subculture and less focused on the heart of the Gospel.
It saddens me, because I’ve seen families become mired in the belief they must live, look, behave the “right” way — and so become ensnared in religiosity.
Why is it so easy for us as Christians to lose sight of Christ, our first love? Why are we so willing to trade in the reality of living out the Gospel for the pretty picture of a particular subculture?
…this insipred a little additional late night Bible study, resulting in (more room than I feel I should monopolize here:http://togetheroneservant.blogspot.com/2009/01/liberation-of-creation-animals-in.html
Oh, your water heater issue (twittered) was probably caused by an air pocket left by the previous fixer. That may have caused an element to melt (thus the bad smell). Cold showers are the pits @ 30 below! Guess you will be warming your bath on the stove.