- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostHeartbeat of Miami
- Next Post »The Tyranny of Technology
Review - Letter to a Christian Nation
- 07/22/07
- 5
I found Letter to a Christian Nation a difficult book to read. It is, after all, a book whose purpose is to criticize one of the things I hold most dear—the church of Jesus Christ. While certainly deliberate and measured as these things go, it is still something of a rant against religion in general, Christianity in particular, and, at its narrowest focus, those who call themselves by the name of Christ (and hence, the one they call themselves after).
With the publication of The End of Faith in 2004 Sam Harris became one of the more prominent American atheists and he is often grouped together with his British counterparts Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens. Though no less militant than these Brits, he has a measure of American charm that makes him appear a little less hostile and perhaps a little more credible. Not too many people, having seen Hitchens or Dawkins in action, would like to sit down and converse with them. Harris, though, is more affable; more personable. He is also a capable writer and a clear communicator. And where the latest volumes from the other men have been criticized for long-windedness, Harris’ book is a mere 91 pages. The book is original and interesting more for its format than for its arguments. In terms of content, it offers little that is new in the genre. It is the same arguments Christians have faced and refuted time and time again.
The book is really a letter. This letter is a response to arguments Christians use to defend their beliefs and an attempt to “demolish the intellectual and moral pretensions of Christianity in its most committed forms.” It’s a letter to a Christian nation calling it to secularize, to wake up and understand the danger posted by Christianity and other religions.. Religion, it seems, is the enemy of reason. Reason is, of course, the hope of humanity. But Harris’ disgust towards Christianity seems not to allow him to maintain his focus. This letter to a nation is really a letter to religious people who may or may not be Christian; certainly the “Christian” as Harris uses it would apply to the majority of the U.S. population whether or not they show the marks of a Christian as defined by the Bible.
And so Harris moves quickly but deliberately from point to point, touching briefly on many of the common arguments used against Christianity and against religion. It is one of thousands of religions each of which claims to hold the truth; the Bible is a grossly immoral and imperfect book; the Bible is unnecessary as a foundation to our morality; that people of all stripes to good deeds and more good deeds than Christians; that God, if He is real, would be horrifically unjust and powerless were He to allow or inflict all the suffering we see in the world; that religion is an opponent to science rather than being able to coexist with science; and so on. These are all arguments we have heard before (as recently as last year’s release of The God Who Wasn’t There it seems to me.). As I said, there is nothing really new in this book’s content. Its appeal and success owes, in my view, primarily to the author and his style combined with the utter accessibility of the volume. And, of course, atheism is a hot topic these days, perhaps particularly among young people.
Because this is simply a review, I will not take the time to answer Harris’ charges. Truthfully, because there are so many, it would take a similarly-sized volume to answer them successfully. And, in fact, Douglas Wilson has done just this in his newly-released Letter from a Christian Citizen, a book that will be reviewed right here in the very near future. For now, suffice it to say that Letter to a Christian Nation is valuable in providing a concise summary of the common arguments against Christianity. They are all here and are explained well. As mentioned at the outset, I did not find it easy to read simply because it cuts deep to have someone attack something (and Someone) I love so much. Yet I’m glad I took the time to read it. It leaves no doubt where Harris stands and where the points of conflict are between Christian and the modern atheist.

I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a husband to Aileen and a father to three young children. I worship and serve as a pastor at
Releasing on April 1, The Next
Comments (5)
You have more tolerance than I. From the numerous reviews (yours included) and quotes I’ve seen from Harris’ book, the best use of it appears to be to line bird cages and kitty litter boxes.
In terms of the idolatry of reason… The question must be asked, “Whose reason?” Mine, yours, Ghandi’s, Hitler’s, etc???Is there a bible for those who worship reason? What do they draw from? If reason is the hope of the world, who defines what it is?
God himself in the Bible challenges the “scoffer”,”fool”, {God’s words} “atheist” to put Him -God “to the test” it is up to the atheist to be honest enough with himself to know if he is willing or not to try God and not pick out His children to fight with.He is only “fooling” himself.
Psa 14:1 To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David. The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
Psa 34:8 O taste and see that the LORD is good: blessed is the man that trusteth in him.
There’s nothing new under the sun wrt opposition to the gospel - why even a pharisee of pharisees looked on at the deaths of the first Christians with delight. But like Saul of Tarsus anyone including Mr Sam Harris can call on the name of Jesus to find salvation, if and whenever the Spirit of the sovereign God moves according to His good purposes. At university the Christians in my year suffered terribly under the mocks and taunts of one of our non Christian professors - until one day the Lord opened this man’s heart - and now he is a bastion of truth for the gospel. There is salvation to be found in only one name and the gospel must continue to be preached - even to those who seemingly are far from the kingdom of God.
I like the title of Doug Wilson’s response: Letter from a Christian Citizen. It should be a good read. I like his response as a Christian ‘citizen’. What concerns me though is this notion that is commonly held that somehow a nation is Christian. The USA is not, nor ever will be a Christian nation. England is not, nor ever will be a Christian nation. Australia is not, nor ever will be a Christian nation. Yes by God’s grace the church has impacted a nation for good: the nation’s laws, work ethics, social justice, environmental stewardship, science, technology etc etc. By God’s grace common to all man, He has blessed and continues to bless nations who have no Christian church.
However the nation can never be the bride of Christ - that belongs to the Church - all of those who looked forward by faith to Messiah (ie Israel) or back in the fullness of revelation in Jesus.
The first three comments are written with the kind of narrow-mindedness and ignorance that is so rightly denounced by not only Sam Harris, but, in fact, by great Christian scholars like James Sire and J.P. Moreland. These are the kind of comments which not only affirm certain negative Christian stereotypes, but which make me almost want to wholly disassociate myself from the Christian fold.
Sam Harris’ book is thought-provoking, eye-opening, and well-written. It is a glimpse into the secular mindset, and well worth the read. Although Harris arrives at conclusions drastically and dramatically different from my own, I appreciated this work. Christians who criticize this book without reading the book and can offer nothing more than the first three comments would do well to read this excerpt from Harris’ book:
“Since the publication of my first book, ‘The End of Faith,’ thousands of people have written to tell me that I am wrong not to believe in God. The most hostile of these communications have come from Christians. This is ironic, as Christians generally imagine that no faith imparts the virtues of love and forgiveness more effectively than their own. The truth is that many who claim to be transformed by Christ’s love are deeply, even murderously, intolerant of criticism….How do I know this? The most disturbed of my correspondents always cite chapter and verse.”