- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostA La Carte (7/7)
- Next Post »Are You a Friend of the Blog?
Life
- 07/07/10
- 10
I’ve got a bit of a thing for nature documentaries and maybe it’s because I’m not exactly the traveling type. I don’t ever anticipate being able to visit South America or Africa, to walk through the jungles and savannahs and to see so many of the wonders of God’s creation (at least on this side of eternity). Nature films, though, provide a glimpse of some of those things I guess I won’t ever see except through the lens of a camera.
You are familiar, I’m sure, with Planet Earth, the 2007 BBC documentary that was and perhaps still is the greatest nature series ever filmed. That same team is responsible for Planet Earth’s successor, titled simply Life. The series, filmed over four years, looks at “the lengths living beings go to to stay alive.” This makes the series less epic in scope than its predecessor, but no less ambitious and certainly no less enthralling.
Life does a great job of mixing well-known animals with those that are more obscure. In one show you’ll watch cheetahs and elephants and in another you’ll encounter a bizarre pebble toad that lives in just one small corner of the earth. You’ll come almost literally face-to-face with these creatures and so many others. The producers were able to capture shots that are as close-up, as intimate as any you’ve seen. Like Planet Earth before it, the camera work is absolutely stunning. In short “making-of” featurettes after each of the episodes you’ll see the lengths they went to in order to capture these shots, sometimes working for days to film just a few seconds of footage. The series also features a musical score that takes itself lightly enough that it can add an element of fun or drama where appropriate.
We watched most of this series as a family and enjoyed doing so. Now, depending on how much you’ve talked to your children about life and depending on whether or not you live on or near a farm, you may find yourself having to answer a few questions (like “Daddy, what does fertilize mean?”) since the animals are often filmed in the very throes of passion. And when the animals are not creating life, they are often destroying it, meaning that you will see a few gruesome deaths along the way. However, such is life (and, therefore, such is Life).
Watching the series as a family also gave us opportunities to discuss the inevitable references to evolution. Narrator David Attenborough throws around millions of years like a millionaire throws around nickels. In one particularly comical moment we see flamingos on the screen while Attenborough describes the birds’ reptilian ancestors. Even a child can look at a newt and then look at a flamingo and do the math. The series is not constant in references to evolution but you will encounter it several times along the way.
Overall, Life is yet another fantastic series and one that will take you face-to-face with some of God’s most remarkable creatures. The Bible tells us that it is the fool who says in his heart that there is no God. And this means that it is only the fool who could watch Life and not catch glimpses of the Creator. Watch it and praise God for his artistry.
Do note that there are two versions of the series available to you—the original by the BBC and the Discovery Channel adaptation. Be sure you find the original since David Attenborough is in every respect a superior narrator to Oprah Winfrey. Attenborough’s eccentric inflections are part of the fun. Also, if you have access to the appropriate hardware, it’s worth upgrading to the Blu Ray version so you can watch it all in high definition.
Here, in case you’re not yet convinced, is the trailer:

I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a husband to Aileen and a father to three young children. I worship and serve as a pastor at
Releasing on April 1, The Next
Comments (10)
I was really interested in this, then found out it was narrated by Oprah, then wasn’t interested, then found out BBC had another version. Now I’m really interested. :D
Wow — very amazing. I’ll make sure to check it out. Thanks, Tim!
Modern science, the more they dig in to God’s world, finds a rich array of creation. What an amazing planet.DavidRed Letter BelieversSalt and Light
I felt the same as Ginger re: Oprah. Good that there is another version. The trailer is amazing in itself.
Just bought this a few weeks ago. Absolutely awesome!
Unfortunately, we ordered this series on ebay when it came out, without realizing it was Oprah. Had we known the original was David Attenborough, we would have bought that one instead! (Anyone want to buy a never-used LIFE series with Oprah?)
Hi Rick,
I f your view on Oprah is because of her public stand against the God of the Bible, you may be interested to know Attenborough has also agressively ridiculed faith in the Creator publicly.Most documentaries like this are filled with evolutionary propaganda unfortunately, but of course we can still marvel at the wonder of God’s creation.
Evolutionary references ridiculous? Only to someone who hasn’t really studied the evidence for evolution.
What actually is ridiculous is that the Bible says Noah herded two of each of these animals onto a boat. How is that not ridiculous?
“What actually is ridiculous is that the Bible says Noah herded two of each of these animals onto a boat.”
I’ve read Genesis several times, but I don’t remember that. Perhaps you can provide an exact quote and reference. (Hint: Genesis 7. But I’m sure you know that, seeing how you advocate studying the other side before spouting off about it.)
This is far from the first time I have heard a Christian critic of evolution snort at the way scientists “toss off millions of years” or “bazillions” with eye-rolling gestures.
Actually, scientists use these numbers because they actually believe them. They are not trying to bamboozle anyone. Furthermore, they don’t vary wildly, as the critics seem to imply. There will be one figure for the approximate emergence of one creature, another number for another creature, etc.
Christians ought to be known for well-reasoned critiques, and this common one is far from that. Challies has a reputation for good thinking and this writing is a blemish on that.