- RSS FeedSubscribe
- « Previous PostJohn 3:16 Conference: Message on John 3:16 by Dr. Jerry Vines
- Next Post »Dominican Republic - Ordinary Superheroes
John 3:16 Conference: Message on Total Depravity from Dr. Paige Patterson
- 11/06/08
- 11
Guest blog by Andrew Lindsey
Congregation singing: “O How Marvelous, O How Wonderful”
The most hated doctrine is not the doctrine of election, but the doctrine of the exclusivity of Christ. The second most hated doctrine is that of human depravity.
“Everyone knows that I am not a Calvinist, I am not Reformed.”
Thank God that our Calvinist brothers are trying to preach the Word of the Lord; many non-Calvinists are entertaining their hearers rather than preaching the Word of God.
I commend my Calvinist friends for being mostly the ones who are the Bible teachers.
Romans 1:18-32; 3:9-26
You will not hear these verses read in most post-modern churches; you will even more seldom here them preached upon.
1. What does depravity mean?
a. “There is not a single human being on the face of the earth who is righteous before God” prior to regeneration. (Romans 3:10)
b. Those in a state of total depravity do not perceive God, and when they perceive things about Him, those things are distorted (Romans 3:11a.)
c. There is no one who seeks God; even good deed are done in a state of depravity (Romans 3:11b.)
d. We have become spiritually unprofitable (Romans 3:12a,)
e, No one can do anything good as counting toward a right standing before good; any good deed is tainted with the results of our sinfulness (Romans 3:13)
f. There is no ultimate peace in the sinner’s heart (Romans 3:14-17)
g. There is no real fear of God, though there may sometimes be fear of death or other things that mimic fear of God (Romans 3:18)
2. How does depravity come about? (Romans 5:15-18)
a. We all fell in Adam; in Adam all died.
b. Reference to the narrative in Genesis 3; Dr. Patterson did the best job I’ve ever heard of illustrating the stupidity and inadequacy of using fig leaves to cover the shame of sin. Dr. Patterson also brought out the significance of Adam and Eve covering their reproductive organs, and how this action points to the fact that the offspring of Adam and Eve would in sin as well.
c. Are we born guilty before God? “I do not think that can be demonstrated from Scripture.” We are born with a sin-sickness. Scripture is consistent that we are considered guilty only for our own sin.
Transition: What about Ephesians 2?
3. What can a dead man do?
a. “Dead” is a metaphor
b. Reference to Abraham being considered ‘as good as dead,’ and the ‘deadness of Sarah’s womb’ from Romans 4:19 to prove that faith can overcome deadness.
c. Illustration of a sailor damaged by an explosion, and cast into the sea. An admiral sees the sailor knocked into the sea and sends a helicopter to save the sailor. The sailor can barely hear, but faintly hears the whir of the helicopter blades, and he signals the helicopter, which saves him. Dr. Patterson says that we are like the sailor in the sea, God is like the admiral, and the whirring of the helicopter blades is the preaching of the gospel. We can barely hear the gospel due to our depraved condition, but if we respond to what we hear, we will be saved. Dr. Patterson acknowledged that this analogy, like all others, breaks down at a certain point, but was clear in asserting that everyone can respond to the gospel.
Dr. Patterson consistently referred to his position as “Total depravity.”
Dr. Patterson concluded with having everyone bow our heads, close our eyes, and raise our hands if we had never before truly called upon Christ for salvation, and now want to be saved. No one responded to this, but Dr. Patterson felt it was important to give everyone a chance to respond to the gospel.

I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a husband to Aileen and a father to three young children. I worship and serve as a pastor at 


Releasing on April 1, The Next
Comments (11)
I am still scratching my head over the helicopter analogy.
Andrew,
Thanks for your commitment to do this. I was wondering if you could give us some idea of head count. I was at the Living Waters Deeper Conference at FBCW two weeks ago for Paul Washer and there were around 2,500 folks registered. How does this conference compare?
I think your comment on Dr. Patterson highlights my issue with Arminianism. You can have your theological debates all day long and that’s fine. But when it translates into an emotional altar call with 24 verses of “Just As I Am” so that someone is led by emotion rather than the Holy Spirit to make a decision for Christ, and then rely on that “magical prayer” and its sincerity for the rest of their life, that’s when it bothers me. If you haven’t heard Paul Washer’s sermon from Deeper, go to his ministry website at Heartcry Missionary Society and listen to “Regeneration vs Decisionism”. It brings a clear indictment on this practice that is so prevalent in the SBC.
Looking forward to further reports.
One one hand, I am sure thankful to God for Paige Patterson, his ministry, and a lot of what he said in this message (per your report).
On the other hand, wow, he is so close, and yet so far…
Jeff: I was told that there were about 800 present.
Jerry,
That and the relationship between Romans 4:19 and Ephesians 2. [?]
-Andrew
My family and I went to a very small SBC church when I was in high school (years ago!). I remember that there were Sundays it was our family and the pastor’s family and that was it. The pastor would STILL issue an altar call and we’d sing for 10 minutes looking at each other wondering which of the 9 of us wasn’t yet saved. I never got that, and I still don’t.
I respect Dr. Patterson greatly. He, more than any other human, may be responsible for the resurgence of rigorous attention to Scripture within the SBC. And his opening comments of commendation toward Calvinists I thought were kind and, hopefully, challenging to the crowd before him.
But the helicopter analogy? It seems that is what we always have to do when defending this particular brand of SBC theology … resort to illustrations and anecdotes (the way Hunt did with the story of his conversion, and Vines did with the analogies of faith). Illustrations and anecdotes are fine, provided they illustrate what the text says. But what does the text actually say about being dead in trespasses and sins, and its relationship to whether or not every human being can, anytime he perks up his ears, hear and respond to God’s call?
It seems that Patterson - usually so textually based - has passed over such relevant passages as:
Mark 4.12Romans 11.8John 12.39-40
These passages do not solve the whole problem, or untangle all the knots. But we have to at least deal with them if we are going to claim that everyone is capable of faith.
sdechert,
My dad was raised in a Southern Baptist church and has told stories about how he and his friends took turns responding to the altar call so they could all go home. You would think that someone would catch on to that sort of thing!
If Dr. Patterson is right about depravity, the Paul’s analogy in Romans 5 breaks up. If all men receive death from Adam only by participation in sin, then all men receive life in Christ only by participation in works of the law. If we only receive the possibility of death from Adam, then we only receive the possibility of life from Christ. That is wholly incompatible with the free grace of God.
In light of Dr. Patterson’s statements concerning the doctrine of total depravity can someone explain how he consciencly signed the Abstract of Principles (doctrinal statement) of Southeastern Seminary while president of SE?
http://www.sebts.edu/prospective_students/what_we_believe/index.cfm
VI. The Fall of Man.God originally created man in His own image, and free from sin; but, through the temptation of Satan, he transgressed the command of God, and fell from his original holiness and righteousness; whereby his posterity inherit a nature corrupt and wholly opposed to God and His law, are under condemnation, and as soon as they are capable of moral action, become actual transgressors.
Thanks,Steve
Kurt, good examples of scriptures showing that indeed there are some who can’t believe, contrary to what Patterson claimed.John, quite true - if, “just as” Christ’s righteousness is imputed to the elect, Adam’s sin was imputed to the world, it would appear that we are guilty, even before we sin.Steve, a weak moment, perhaps? Interesting that many “official” SBC church statements are well-crafted and scriptural, but if pressed for what they mean, some would have to claim ignorance or admit that they disagree.