The Basics Conference (II)

After a great dinner, and a few worship songs courtesy of Keith and Kristyn Getty, John Piper took to the pulpit to explore the theme of preaching the doctrine of justification from the Scriptures in an undiminished way. For ten years he has been very exercised about this doctrine and he began by offering five reasons why this has been the doctrine that has most consumed him over the past ten years. Here they are:

First, for eight of those years he was preaching through the book of Romans. When you preach through Romans, you bump into the doctrine of justification again and again. He lived in Romans for eight years and really had no choice but to reflect heavily on this doctrine.

Second, he is surrounded at Bethlehem by apprentices and young men who read more than he does, who are smarter than he is, and who ask many hard questions about cutting edge issues they are reading about and he is not. He has found it necessary to respond to their questions.

Third, this doctrine is increasingly embattled in our day. It is being confused and reduced and contradicted in many ways (and here he offered five of them): a) the lines between Protestant and Catholic doctrine are being blurred; b) the doctrine of the imputation of Christ’s righteousness is being flat-out denied by evangelicals; c) the New Perspective on Paul (and N.T. Wright in particular) has redrawn the map so that confusion is very widespread about what justification is, how it relates to judgment in the future, and so on; d) faith itself and the fruits of faith are being merged so that the historic “by faith alone” is losing its meaning; e) the term “righteousness of God” is being given meanings that historically it never had and which are throwing people off.

4. He relates to this truth in terms of the imputation to us of the righteousness that Christ perfectly lived out very personally. “I love this doctrine! I live off this doctrine.” This doctrine is desperately, daily saving. Some might say that this is a blinding passion but perhaps it might instead be an eye-opening passion. The Bible is as often (more often?) misinterpreted by those who come to it skeptically as those who come to it with craving.

5. The heart of the glory of God in Christ reaches its climax at the cross. The gospel is the gospel of the glory of Christ. He is driven by this to preach with passion the doctrine of justification.

He then offered three ways the glory of Christ is diminished in these challenges. And having done that, he spent some time discussing each one of them. I will give only the points and leave it to you to listen in for his explanation (and again, I’ll let you know when the audio files are available):

First, one of Christ’s great achievements is being denied—that his righteous perfection is counted as mine.

Second, if you lose Christ’s righteousness being counted to us, something in the human soul does not get dealt with. There is some need within us that cannot be dealt with outside of the imputation of Christ’s righteousness.

Third, the aim of our charge is love, says Paul. Love is the great outcome of the Christian doctrine. What happens if you begin to blur the line between the ground of it and “it” itself? The very thing that you try to increase in importance (love) will die because you’ve tried to make it the foundation instead of something that is supported by the foundation.

We’ll now enjoy a short concert by the Getty’s and after that look forward to another great day tomorrow. If you’d be so kind, I’d love it if you’d remember me in your prayers as I lead a breakout session tomorrow at 1:00 PM.

I’ll be back in the morning!

Comments (12)

1
Anonymous's picture

Great emphasis of John Piper on desiring to do all for the glory of the Lord—good challenge. The criticism of the “social gospel” and mainline churches was perhaps outdated, though. Reading more of Jesus (as much as Paul) should make us “social gospelers” I think. The contemporary challenge to imputed righteousness might have been explained a bit more. He mentioned N.T. Wright, for instance, so a quote or something more may have helped us understand what the challenge is. But he is John Piper—so he is good.

2
Anonymous's picture

Did the conference discuss the meaning of “credited as righteousness”? Especially Ps 106:30-31 where the identical phrase (in Greek and Hebrew) is used as it appears in Gen 15:6, except in this case of Ps 106 it is talking about Phinehas’ works.

3
Anonymous's picture

Tim, what was Piper’s response to the Driscoll/MacArthur issue?

4
Anonymous's picture

Would these be the top six most controversial questions about the doctrine of Justification? (Have I missed any?) 1. How is the “righteousness of God” defined?2. Imputation, does it exist and if so is it ontological or merely forensic?3. What place is there in Justification for the obedience of Jesus?4. Is faith distinct from the fruits or evidence of faith?5. Is the final judgement one of salvation or works?6. How important is the doctrine of soteriology in the grand scheme of things?

5
Anonymous's picture

I think imputation runs a similar risk of diminishing the glory of Christ if we miss out on the reality of the Holy Spirit and the sanctifying, mysterious fellowship that we experience with Christ through the infusion of grace.

It’s not either/or. It’s both/and. And that, to my way of thinking, is even more glorious and more wonderful.

6
Anonymous's picture

I just have to share my amusement at Tim’s tweets about the folks sitting next to him at the conference. The guy watching the video screen, the guy eating a tuna sandwich at breakfast…Obviously Tim isn’t introducing himself, lest they read about themselves on the blogosphere!

7
Anonymous's picture

” a few worship songs courtesy of Keith and Kristyn Getty”

Boy, I’ll bet that was nice.

Lord bless Tim’s teaching, and those who hear, let them be built up in the faith. Amen.

8
Anonymous's picture

As I was eating my spicy california roll leftovers for breakfast I had to laugh about the guy eating his tuna sandwich for breakfast too.

Ah, c’mon Tim. Fish isn’t just for dinner these days.:-)

Cheers,

Scott

9
Anonymous's picture

Great summary I was just thinking about the “new perspective” and reading on it, and how confusing it seemed and how they down play the atonement as part of the whole of paul’s teachings and not of primary importance they even specifically mentioned Piper and Ferguson.

10
Anonymous's picture

The conference audio and video is available now at this website. Just an FYIhttp://www.parksidechurch.com/site/c.iqLRIUOCKtF/b.5127829/k.97AD/Basics_Conference.htm

11
Anonymous's picture

Confused, reduced and contradicted? That might be overstating it. Just a little.

12
Anonymous's picture

I love John Piper. He is never out to fight just for the sake of it and really does desire to glorify God in all things he does (even when he criticizes others). I wonder, though, how much flexibility we should allow on the doctrine of justification. What I mean is this:

1) Should we define the ‘righteousness of God’ as a ‘treasury of merit’ that we receive as a gift, an action of God or the character of God?

2) Should we see imputation as something that happens before our union with Christ or are we seen as ‘righteous’ precisely because of our union with the messiah?

3) When we speak of receiving the righteousness of Christ does the bible really differ between an active and passive obedience?

The reason I ask these things is because I heartily affirm imputation but I don’t define ‘righteousness of God” as a gift of merit, I think the bible teaches that we are declared to be righteous ‘in him’, and I don’t think the Bible cuts a line through Christ’s active or passive obedience.