Twin Lakes (V)

This afternoon we enjoyed a panel discussion in which Ligon Duncan spoke with several African American pastors. He asked about how they were saved, how they came to embrace the doctrines of grace, and how they feel the church can best address issues of race. He also spoke briefly on the phone with Mark Dever (asking Mark about his upcoming writing projects) and then with D.A. Carson (whom he also asked about his upcoming writing project). In the afternoon we had a few hours of free time which I used to make a long and circuitous tour of this incredible facility. I even found myself at a shooting range with a bunch of pastors blasting away at some targets with at .45 (two to the chest, one to the head seemed to be the order of the day). We walked for at least an hour and still had to stop short of seeing everything.

After dinner we reconvened for another worship service, this one led by Jay Harvey and with a sermon by Thabiti Anyabwile.

Thabiti spoke from Ephesians 2:11-22 on the topic of "The End of Alienation, Hostility, and Homelessness." He began by discussing how important and confusing this issue is, and how racial identity continues to be a major struggle for individuals and for our culture even in the twenty-first century. Many unbelievers are attempting to sort out the issues, but even the best and brightest minds continually contradict each other. The vision held out to us by God through His apostle in Ephesians 2 is glorious and provides the biblical solutions.

The three problems connected with race and identity that are addressed and answered in this passage are Alienation, Hostility and Homelessness.

The answer to our alienation is nearness to God. Verses one through ten of this chapter see Paul addressing individuals but in verses 11-22 he zooms out and looks at the people of God. He addresses these Gentiles with whom there is sharp ethnic division from the Jews. Because they were not Jewish they had been foreigners to the covenant and were without hope and without God. This is how people show up at our churches, in a desperate, desolate condition. They are estranged from God, from His people and from any kind of hope. Through Christ they are now brought near to Christ and are Christians. They are a new spiritual ethnic group. This changes everything! Alienation ends when we find nearness to God.

The answer to our hostility is reconciliation and peace through Jesus Christ. Jesus Himself is our peace. Peace is a person and He is the only peace available to Jew or Gentile. To achieve this peace, Jesus made groups that were once hostile to be unified, He destroyed the wall or barrier of hostility, He abolished the law and its regulations, and He came and preached this message of peace (which is a way of summarizing His earthly ministry). Jesus' purpose in creating this peace was to create one new man, a man characterized by reconciliation with God and with fellow Christians. We see the power of what Christ achieves in the cross when He offers Himself in our place. We see the end of alienation and the end of hostility. He does not make it possible or make it available in the future, but something He does and accomplishes. Why stress this? Because in most Christian churches we live beneath our inheritance on this issue. The power for reconciliation is found in the power of the cross. The danger for us is that we can live in a way that we show the world, which is so confused by racial reconciliation, that we haven't figured it out either. When we do this we lie about Jesus and what He has accomplished for us.

The answer to our homelessness is a new, permanent dwelling with God. Because of our hostility we are a people that are not at home with God or with each other. We are a household built on the foundation of the apostles and the prophets and with Jesus as the chief cornerstone. He anchors this building, keeping it level and sturdy. All of history is about God building for Himself a holy temple, a dwelling place. It is a new building made of living stones which each of us is (or, as Thabiti said, "we be that!"). We are the temple, the place where God resides.

God ends the alienation, hostility and homelessness. So what? How does this impact a pastor's ministry? What difference does a passage like this make in living out our faith? There are several applications:

First, Ephesians 2 lets us know that Christianity is more corporate than we may be accustomed to thinking. It is about more than our personal relationship with God. The doctrine of the church may be a secondary doctrine but it is not a primary reality. We cannot afford to have an anemic understanding of how we cultivate togetherness in the church.

Second, this passage promises greater unity than we may imagine or experience. The cross holds out for us more promise, power and deliverance than we may have ever imagined. We need to preach the cross in such a way that it applies to the way people think about identity.

Third, this passage begs us to be an aggressively inclusive people. Christians, of all people, who have been strangers in this world and who have been alien, are to be the people with the widest arms, the people seeking to embrace the most. This may be in evangelism or in hospitality or in any other way either inside or outside the church. Failure to do so is a failure to rightly grasp the gospel with our own lives.

Fourth, we need a new anthropology, a new understanding of man. We need to speak to the likeness of all people, regardless of race, but we need more. Distinctly Christian anthropology has to go on to talk about our new identity of Christ in dialog with notions of culture. We need a Christological anthropology. It also needs to be ecclesiological as well.

To summarize briefly, through the cross of Christ we can hold out to the world what it looks like to no longer be alienated, hostile or homeless.

Tonight's winning quote came courtesy of Thabiti: "I'm in Mississippi in front of a largely white audience...in the woods!"

I'll be back tomorrow with one more update and possibly some reflections. And then I'll be heading home!

Comments (14)

1
Anonymous's picture

As we all known, whatever white or black or yellow, whatever your identity is hign or low, everyone is equal. I met some friends on EbonyFriends.com and they agreed to my opinion.

2
Anonymous's picture

Thanks again Tim for your helpful coverage of this fellowship.And thanks also to your wife and family for sacrificing their time with you in order that you might benefit all of us following this conference, and all the others you dilligently cover throughout the year.

Did you discover whether there will be any audio recordings made available in the near future?

3
Anonymous's picture

Shooting range? Where you practice symbolically killing people (two to the chest, one to the head)?? That just sticks out as contrary to, well, the whole Christian message of your blog.

4
Anonymous's picture

Thanks.

5
Anonymous's picture

Tonight's winning quote came courtesy of Thabiti: "I'm in Mississippi in front of a largely white audience...in the woods!"

Love it!!!!

6
Anonymous's picture

Mississippi..woods

Was there some context for this? I thought it was funny but some might not.

Josh"...the word of God is not bound."--2 Timothy 2:9

7
Anonymous's picture

The context of the quote was the middle of an application in which Thabiti was telling us that we will find ourselves in uncomfortable or awkward situations.

For those who are from Mississippi, you may appreciate the addition that someone made during the roar of laughter: in Rankin county.

As for the question about recordings, there are recordings (we have been invited to sign up for them in the back of the main hall), but I don't know if there is a way currently to order them from outside. I am quite certain, however, that the folks at First Pres will be delighted and able to provide them.

That said, please let me reinforce the commendations of Brian Habig's and Thabiti Anyabwile's messages. These are timely messages that I think we all already know, but there's something to hearing and obeying the preached Word that makes us do what we knew we ought to but for some reason haven't done.

8
Anonymous's picture

Funny you should mention race. I wrote a post about this very thing in my blog after receiving postal mail including sunday school curricula designed exclusively for African American churches. Being of multiple ethnicities, being a military child, being born abroad, I've had all of my ethnic sensitivities eroded. But when the grace of God found me, I saw even more clearly that we are all of one race, brothers and sisters through Adam and Eve, and how making distinctions based upon skin colour is as silly as making distinctions based upon eye colour. And making distinctions based upon country of origin is as silly as making distinctions based upon the state you were born in here in the U.S. This "Christian" retailer showed a weakness we still have, and that is to bring to the surface distinctions that our Father does not see, and that as fallen creatures do not concern us. I think we perpetuate it when we acknowledge it. This could be a very naive view, I understand. But shouldn't the fact that we are all under God's wrath without submission to His Son be the message, and nothing else? We do not make distinctions between hair color in churches, nor do we hold conferences addressing the issue, because we don't make it an issue. I really wonder what would happen if we suddenly ignored skin colour, too... just a thought.

9
Anonymous's picture

"I saw even more clearly that we are all of one race, brothers and sisters through Adam and Eve, and how making distinctions based upon skin colour is as silly as making distinctions based upon eye colour."

I agree. But there's the truth that God made us all ethnically and culturally different. We look different, and we act different, and we have different tastes.I wish it weren't so, but it tis.

Even the humanist tries to show that we should all be brothers and sisters and love one another.

I have some dear black Christian friends, but we are certainly very different in mnay ways, not just skin color. Actually in the summer, I usually have a nice tan, and yet I still am not considered black.I have some Hispanic friends. But it's going to be a struggle for a lot of us, until we get to glory.

Just a couple thoughts buzzin' around in my head, for what they're worth.

10
Anonymous's picture

Marcian, i disagree that God does not see our human distinctions. Of course He does...He made them! And Scripture seems to acknowledge them (see Acts 2:9-11, 6:1, 8:27; Gal. 2:11-16), especially when addressing problems in the church. Moreover, Scripture seems to acknowledge that these distinctions among humans will continue on into eternity (Rev. 7:9). The gospel does not obliterate our differences, but rather, relativizes them. Where the world has idolized and absolutized human differences, the gospel puts them in proper perspective, but without denying their existence. And it is to God's glory that He has made the many, ONE in Christ. i fear that many in the church who want to ignore race are either naive or simply taking the easy way out. Donsands, i don't mean to pick on you, but i think your desire that humans were not different is not a good one. Why desire something contary to what you believe God Himself has done? i am hard-pressed to believe that this *desire* that all be the same does not result in *behaviors* that seek to make everyone the same. This often expresses itself in a cultural arrogance and demand for conformity by the dominant group, that leaves the sub-dominant groups marginalized and diminished. But it is through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ that we are saved...

11
Anonymous's picture

The context of the quote was the middle of an application in which Thabiti was telling us that we will find ourselves in uncomfortable or awkward situations.

Thanks James. I don't live in Mississippi but I do live in the South so I got a chuckle out of that one too.

Josh"...the word of God is not bound."--2 Timothy 2:9

12
Anonymous's picture

"This often expresses itself in a cultural arrogance and demand for conformity by the dominant group, that leaves the sub-dominant groups marginalized and diminished"

I agree wholeheartedly. I wasn't very clear in my comment.

I appreciate all the cultural diversity.

I have a good missionary friend in Nepal, who is married to a Nepali, Jaya. Their culture is very different then ours, and yet we have the same Lord, and we have all the common ground in the truth and grace of God.

I have a hard time expressing my thoughts sometimes.

13
Anonymous's picture

Thanks, Christopher, for your thoughts. You have made me reconsider mine.

14
Anonymous's picture

American Colors: The Spin on Skin The United States is uniquely ignorant in its obsession with race. All societies have institutionalised prejudice in one form or another; older societies have gone through many cycles of creating and dismantling hierarchies as various coalitions wrestled with the economic and social spoils available.The idea here is to consider the American case as an anthropological absurdity rather than a comparative assessment of its moral status vis-a-vis related prejudice.The first thing that struck me as absurd about American popular and institutional notions on race is its conscious connectivity with skin color. In reading through anthropological texts, the orthodoxy suggests that genetic differentiation intra-species was superficial (in terms of nose bridge structure/hair texture/skin color) and that the quasi-science of race nevertheless was defined in some non-superficial matrix : Austric, Caucasian, Mongoloid, etc., based on climatic and other adaptive contexts.In the US, the census and many employment documents show a pervasive sense of politically/socially defined race categories exclusively and ignorantly based on skin color! So racial categories are white/black/yellow, etc. The sense of self/other is eurocentrically derived...so, the polite phraseology for blacks is african-american, whereas for whites, it is not european-american. So people from the Indian subcontinent who may be Caucasian or Mongoloid are called Asians (race category!). Thankfully I have not seen a category of "brown/yellow" in census documents; perhaps a young society cannot think in a less simplistic dimension than black/white in formulating prejudice hierarchies.There is a definition of freedom and equality that seems inconsistent with the above, but is savagely upheld as being true despite the commonality of superficial race discourse across American society. A typical American is quite content to comment negatively on European or Asian (old society) class and caste hierarchies as laughably sophisticated prejudice in opposition to his/her own sense of freedom/equality in American society. The next moment, that same naive citizen will speak in the most ignorant manner about race categories in terms of skin color. This is ingrained at all levels in language, media, government, and in personal lives. A society founded on the massacre of native populations, and the systematic enslavement of other human beings must naturally be racist, but what is amazing about American racism is its focus on skin color as a defining characteristic of race, in defiance of all scientific and anthropological evidence.